Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Nena Trinity

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


This user doesn't have any awards

About Nena Trinity

  • Title
  • Birthday Dec 01, 1992

Profile Information

  • Location
    Norway / Oslo / East Side
  • Gender
  • Interests
    Computers, Guns, Military Vehicles, Processor chips & Smartphones! :3
  • Biography
    I am asian and weird! :3
  • Occupation
    Sells phones and fixing them.


  • CPU
    AMD FX-8370 Black Edition 4.4/4.7GHz (AM3+) / Intel Core i5-10600 (LGA1200) / AMD Ryzen 5 3600 3.6/4.2GHz (AM4)
  • Motherboard
    MSI 970 GAMING, Socket-AM3+ / ASUS PRIME B460 PLUS, Socket-LGA1200 / ASRock B450M Pro4, Socket-AM4
  • RAM
    DDR3-1866MHz CL8 (4x4) / DDR3-1866MHz CL9 (4x4) / DDR4-2666MHz CL16 (4x8) / DDR4-3600MHz CL18 (2x16)
  • GPU
    EVGA GTX 960 SSC (2GB) / Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 OC / MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC
  • Case
    Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Medion Micro-ATX Case (upgraded with 70mm front & 80mm rear fan)
  • Storage
    Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD x2 + Seagate 3.5" 2TB SSHD / Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD x2 + Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD
  • PSU
    EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W PSU / EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W PSU
  • Display(s)
    ASUS 24" LED VN247H / HP 19" Flat Panel L1940
  • Cooling
    Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / AMD 125w Near-silent Thermal Solution
  • Keyboard
    Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic)
  • Mouse
    Razer Abyssus 2014 / Razer Abyssus 2014
  • Sound
    ASUS 24" LED VN247H / Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150
  • Operating System
    Windows 10 Home / Windows 10 Home
  • Laptop
    Huawei & MSI

Recent Profile Visitors

10,683 profile views
  1. Testing 13-15-15-35-440-1T in memtest86 now, gonna go to bed and see the results tomorrow. ^_^
  2. In that case would either of the two be able to do sub-400 on the trfc? Or is it VERY UNLIKELY? :I
  3. Stick 2 and 4 are identical in Thaipoon Burner both does not specify other than it being a Samsung, its maybe a Samsung M-Die was it? If so is that the weaker link than the CJR? If so what would the lowest tRFC possibly go? And just to verify 1 and 3 are HyperX CJR sticks which had same OC on primary timings. Current OC profile MHz CL13-15-15-35-467-1T
  4. Before they were apart, while the HyperX 2666 sticks @3600 were in the AMD system the G.SKILL still refused to do any better than 13-15-15...
  5. Yep same PC both in the Intel system, the system has a 4x8GB setup while my Ryzen has a 2x16GB since ASRock are asshats and makes a board that refuse to run sticks in slot 1 and 3 any higher than 3066MHz! XD ((So I bought a larger capacity version of CJR since I knew they could hit 3600MHz most likely))
  6. Wait why does CPU-Z? and Thaipoon Burner say Samsung? I agree that performance and behavior seems more like a Hynix CJR or C-Die which also explain why they function so perfectly with my other CJR kit with no stability issues.
  7. At 2666MHz none of them would go any lower, the one I suspect is a CJR is only marked as Kingston DRAM by CPU-Z while the G.SKILL kit is marked Samsung, funny enough my other kit of HyperX 3699MH CL17-19-19-39 is clearly marked as SK Hynix in CPU-Z...
  8. Its 100% a Samsung, a B-Die? Well Buildzoid said in a video 3200MHz CL16 Samsungs are very often reject or garbage tier B-Die so I assume it could be.
  9. Funny enough at 1.35v both kits were at best to hit 13-15-15 and that is not very impressive...
  10. I am not gonna aim for maximum performance that is for sure, the first kit of RAM is a SK Hynix, it was able to OC up to 3600MHz CL18-19-19-39 fine from 2666MHz CL16-18-18-39 just fine on my AMD system the other kit is probably a trash bin B-die since its Samsung 3200MHz CL16-18-18-38 I wont bet much on these so considering all that the weakest link is the Hynix or B-die? I guess I gotta settle with the weaker kits reccomended minimum right? X-X
  11. So them being COMPLETELY DIFRENT, that means messing with it like in Ryzen case is a bad idea? For Ryzen the math should be 19 + 39 = 58, so for Intel how does one calculate the optimal tRFC? Or is default preferable?
  12. AMD: *Bank Cycle Time (tRC) Intel: *Row Refresh Cycle Time (tRFC) To my understanding the RIGHT setting should be tRP + tRAS = tRC as the correct setting right? But how come Intel have tRFC at 467?!! O_O What is the correct way to calculate minimum safe tRFC? Going from 467 down to 50 sounds kinda extreme?