Jump to content

gtx 780 3g vs rx 570 8g vs r9 290 4g big battl

thekingofmonks

[Poll] GPU in build for 2D/3D AutoCAD/Media/Browsing (and possibly gaming)  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Pwease just VOTE don't loiter thank you!!! grr

    • gtx 780 3g (Asus dcu2) - pros: has cuda, second best performer. cons: second least inefficient, no longer supported, has barely enough vram for beefy tasks
      1
    • rx 570 8g (biostar 6pin card with msi cooler) - pros: most efficient, still supported, has most vram. cons: IT LOOKS LIKE CRAP
      12
    • r9 290 4g (gigabyte windforce) - pros: best performer (~1650) , last driver june 2022. cons: least efficient, loudest (custom fan curve will prolly choke it)
      0


Post-scriptum:

-just think of this as a pc you're building for your son but with the lame parts that you put in your old pc years ago

-THE MSI COOLER LOOKS LIKE crap

-take into consideration the possibility of undervolting

Asus ROG G531GT : i7-9750H - GTX 1650M +700mem - MSI RX6600 Armor 8G M.2 eGPU - Samsung 16+8GB PC4-2666 - Samsung 860 EVO 500G 2.5" - 1920x1080@145Hz (172Hz) IPS panel

Family PC : i5-4570 (-125mV) - cheap dual-pipe cooler - Gigabyte Z87M-HD3 Rev1.1 - Kingston HyperX Fury 4x4GB PC3-1600 - Corsair VX450W - an old Thermaltake ATX case

Test bench 1 G3260 - i5-4690K - 6-pipe cooler - Asus Z97-AR - Panram Blue Lightsaber 2x4GB PC3-2800 - Micron CT500P1SSD8 NVMe - Intel SSD320 40G SSD

iMac 21.5" (late 2011) : i5-2400S, HD 6750M 512MB - Samsung 4x4GB PC3-1333 - WT200 512G SSD (High Sierra) - 1920x1080@60 LCD

 

Test bench 2: G3260 - H81M-C - Kingston 2x4GB PC3-1600 - Winten WT200 512G

Acer Z5610 "Theatre" C2 Quad Q9550 - G45 Express - 2x2GB PC3-1333 (Samsung) - 1920x1080@60Hz Touch LCD - great internal speakers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given you know this already

Quote
rx 570 8g (biostar 6pin card with msi cooler) - pros: most efficient, still supported, has most vram

Feels like a no-brainer to me.

 

-Moved to Graphics Cards-

Quote or tag me( @Crunchy Dragon) if you want me to see your reply

If a post solved your problem/answered your question, please consider marking it as "solved"

Community Standards // Join Floatplane!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crunchy Dragon said:

Given you know this already

Feels like a no-brainer to me.

 

-Moved to Graphics Cards-

but the other cards look cooler ;(

Asus ROG G531GT : i7-9750H - GTX 1650M +700mem - MSI RX6600 Armor 8G M.2 eGPU - Samsung 16+8GB PC4-2666 - Samsung 860 EVO 500G 2.5" - 1920x1080@145Hz (172Hz) IPS panel

Family PC : i5-4570 (-125mV) - cheap dual-pipe cooler - Gigabyte Z87M-HD3 Rev1.1 - Kingston HyperX Fury 4x4GB PC3-1600 - Corsair VX450W - an old Thermaltake ATX case

Test bench 1 G3260 - i5-4690K - 6-pipe cooler - Asus Z97-AR - Panram Blue Lightsaber 2x4GB PC3-2800 - Micron CT500P1SSD8 NVMe - Intel SSD320 40G SSD

iMac 21.5" (late 2011) : i5-2400S, HD 6750M 512MB - Samsung 4x4GB PC3-1333 - WT200 512G SSD (High Sierra) - 1920x1080@60 LCD

 

Test bench 2: G3260 - H81M-C - Kingston 2x4GB PC3-1600 - Winten WT200 512G

Acer Z5610 "Theatre" C2 Quad Q9550 - G45 Express - 2x2GB PC3-1333 (Samsung) - 1920x1080@60Hz Touch LCD - great internal speakers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thekingofmonks said:

but the other cards look cooler ;(

If that's your only issue, I'd just throw in the GTX 780 and not expect to do much beyond 1080p.

 

Or get a case without a window, then you don't need to care about how things look because nobody will ever see it anyway 😄

Quote or tag me( @Crunchy Dragon) if you want me to see your reply

If a post solved your problem/answered your question, please consider marking it as "solved"

Community Standards // Join Floatplane!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thekingofmonks said:

but the other cards look cooler ;(

They are also like A LOT worse and do not have dirver support so they might not even work in your programs.

 

However every single card listed here is the wrong choice for you. If you will do some rendering of your autocad files as you'll need cuda on a SUPPORTED gpu (so the 780 isn't applicable here).

 

Either way raw performance wise the 570 wins and it's also supported and has enough vram.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really doesn't matter which would be faster, the choice should be RX 570 simply because there's still support in the current drivers for them, and most games will continue to support the Polaris series for a long time, because variations of these chips are present in consoles.

 

It also has hardware h264 and HEVC decoding, partial/hybrid vp9 decoding,

 

32 minutes ago, thekingofmonks said:

-take into consideration the possibility of undervolting

 

can be silent with the right fans or by uploading custom bios in them (you can use a tool like SRBPolaris (just be careful which version and from where you download it, some versions are bundled with mining viruses or other crypto password stealers) to edit the bios/firmware and configure custom fan curve, you can set lower default clocks for gpu and ram if you want... )

 

290 is too old of a generation, same for GTX 780.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, you can get a custom shroud made or even make one yourself if you have the tools and the little bit of perseverance it would take. Or drop the whole thing and install a AIO on there. Many come with a shroud/fan setup for the memory slabs and the waterblock/pump is for the gpu. You could even put a aftermarket gpu air cooler on it. Theres plenty of possibilities to make it look better, what you want is the capability on a newer arch and the vram for plenty of frame buffer. They are all very close to each other in performance really, but the 570 is the best pick there. On a newer, latest, mobo/cpu/ram setup it could probably really shine since the cpu will have all the power it needs to feed it as fast as it wants to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×