Jump to content

Apple announces Mac studio desktop equipped with M1 Ultra Chip & Studio Display Monitor

RVRY

Interesting tidbit that explains why the M1 Ultra Studio is 1kg/2lbs heavier than the M1 Max Studio. 

 

They have the same 370W power supply. The additional weight is due to M1 Ultra having a larger copper thermal module, whereas M1 Max has an aluminum heatsink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, KWelz said:

It was shown powering multiple displays.  

multiple monitors, sadge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should not be this mad about m1 ultra but, for me, it's a bad day when Apple pantses intel nvidia and amd with what appears to be a price competitive option for professionals.

It's totally irrational but Apple is supposed to be overpriced vs performance but when prices are this silly, it's a tough choice now even with inflation.

 

Performance per watt and performance per $ aren't supposed to be in Apple's favour.

The best gaming PC is the PC you like to game on, how you like to game on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Paul Thexton said:

I can understand the desire/requirement for that much screen real estate, but I recently tried vertical stacking of monitors so I could use a single desk setup for my work + personal hardware and the results were … not great. Maybe there’s something about the higher monitor tilt angle I’ve not gotten quite right, anybody aware of any good information about getting that kind of setup right?

Well assuming you're talking about positioning, rather than the mechanics of it (which is "get stands/arms that support it") it really comes down to fiddiling around til you find what you like.  I have a verticle stack dual monitor on my PC (i have 3 monitors for my mac.. well it's an imac, so to additional on left and right)... I haven't really worked out the best way to use the upper monitor....i mainly set it up because I had the monitor arm, and I had an extra monitor, so I COULD do it, and figured the overkill of it made me happy.

🖥️ Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS  ** Processor: AMD Ryzen 2600 3.4 GHz ** Video Card: Nvidia GeForce 1070 TI 8GB Zotac 1070ti 🖥️
🖥️ Memory: 32GB DDR4 2400  ** Power Supply: 650 Watts Power Supply Thermaltake +80 Bronze Thermaltake PSU 🖥️

🍎 2012 iMac i7 27";  2007 MBP 2.2 GHZ; Power Mac G5 Dual 2GHZ; B&W G3; Quadra 650; Mac SE 🍎

🍎 iPad Air2; iPhone SE 2020; iPhone 5s; AppleTV 4k 🍎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Obioban said:

My guess is...

 

3) Mac Pro gets an M2 based chip. The M2 has additional mesh points, that allow them to do 2-4X M1 Ultra (so 40-80 cpu cores and 128-256 GPU cores), plus whatever generation over generation improvement they get going from M1 to M2 (which is likely 10-25%, assuming the M2 is A15 based, since that was the A14 (which the M1 is based on) to A15 improvement.

 

... unless the M2 is A16 based, since the M2 is still months out and the A16 is (probably) only 6 months away, in which case maybe a little more?

I am guessing this is more likely. The A15 from A14 wasn't that big of change. A16 will likely be more significant. 

CPU-AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D GPU- RTX 4070 SUPER FE MOBO-ASUS ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wifi RAM-32gb G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 6000cl30 STORAGE-2x1TB Seagate Firecuda 530 PCIE4 NVME PSU-Corsair RM1000x Shift COOLING-EK-AIO 360mm with 3x Lian Li P28 + 4 Lian Li TL120 (Intake) CASE-Phanteks NV5 MONITORS-ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ 1440p 170hz+Gigabyte G24F 1080p 180hz PERIPHERALS-Lamzu Maya+ 4k Dongle+LGG Saturn Pro Mousepad+Nk65 Watermelon (Tangerine Switches)+Autonomous ErgoChair+ AUDIO-RODE NTH-100+Schiit Magni Heresy+Motu M2 Interface

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GhostRoadieBL said:

I should not be this mad about m1 ultra but, for me, it's a bad day when Apple pantses intel nvidia and amd with what appears to be a price competitive option for professionals.

It's totally irrational but Apple is supposed to be overpriced vs performance but when prices are this silly, it's a tough choice now even with inflation.

 

Performance per watt and performance per $ aren't supposed to be in Apple's favour.

I wonder if this will affect Nvidias 4090 pricing. Doubtful, I know, but still. 

CPU-AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D GPU- RTX 4070 SUPER FE MOBO-ASUS ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wifi RAM-32gb G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 6000cl30 STORAGE-2x1TB Seagate Firecuda 530 PCIE4 NVME PSU-Corsair RM1000x Shift COOLING-EK-AIO 360mm with 3x Lian Li P28 + 4 Lian Li TL120 (Intake) CASE-Phanteks NV5 MONITORS-ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ 1440p 170hz+Gigabyte G24F 1080p 180hz PERIPHERALS-Lamzu Maya+ 4k Dongle+LGG Saturn Pro Mousepad+Nk65 Watermelon (Tangerine Switches)+Autonomous ErgoChair+ AUDIO-RODE NTH-100+Schiit Magni Heresy+Motu M2 Interface

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ryan829 said:

I wonder if this will affect Nvidias 4090 pricing. Doubtful, I know, but still. 

If the rumors are true (huge doubt) that 4090 is 2x 3090 performance and a ~600w tdp it won't change anything.

It's likely that the rumor of 30 and 40 series being manufactured and sold at the same time might cause a small tick down for 30 series and could line back up with M1 Ultra vs 3080 pricing for gpu only tests.

 

The best gaming PC is the PC you like to game on, how you like to game on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2022 at 6:20 PM, WereCat said:

For example, A6000 will definitely demolish the M1 Ultra in rendering performance maybe even by an order of magnitude but only as long as the scene fits into its 48GB VRAM buffer. Once the scene becomes much larger the A6000 simply has no chance. 

also consider how much that A6000 48GB costs..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is all this restricted to certain uses eg. Particular programs?

Just saying, it is Apple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MrSmiles said:

Is all this restricted to certain uses eg. Particular programs?

Just saying, it is Apple.

The Mac is extremely open, software wise. Almost no restrictions, if you turn off the safeties.

 

That said, programs will need to be compiled to take full advantage-- aka not X86 code, GPU code running through Metal, ML tasks running on the ML cores. This happens automatically if you use XCode, but if you're using, say, Electron... not going to be nearly as optimized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dracarris said:

also consider how much that A6000 48GB costs..

I literally did in the next paragraph 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Obioban said:

The Mac is extremely open, software wise. Almost no restrictions, if you turn off the safeties.

 

That said, programs will need to be compiled to take full advantage-- aka not X86 code, GPU code running through Metal, ML tasks running on the ML cores. This happens automatically if you use XCode, but if you're using, say, Electron... not going to be nearly as optimized.

There is a Tensorflow plugin

https://developer.apple.com/metal/tensorflow-plugin/

There however is not a pytorch module.

 

https://coremltools.readme.io/docs

However there is a suggestion to convert pytorch and others models to CoreML. Which is of no help if the software is written to use pytorch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2022 at 4:36 AM, Ryan829 said:

I am guessing this is more likely. The A15 from A14 wasn't that big of change. A16 will likely be more significant. 

There was quite a big change from A14 to A15 apple however mostly put this change into reducing power draw as that was more important on the phones than increasing perf. Perf increase was about 10% but at the same time power draw was reduced by over 30% in many tasks!  This is in fact a much larger change than apple typically do year on year, the entire story about A15 not bieng a big gains of A14 comes from the fact Apple did not compare them when they shipped the new phones with A15 but people who have looked at them since have been very impressed with the improvements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×