Jump to content

Is this PC any good?

Just now, r2724r16 said:

That so many people used Hyper 212s in their builds, despite the general consensus (on the LTT forum) being that Hyper 212s are bad CPU coolers.

They will always be a group of people on any forum that thinks certain components are bad and that getting that components means it's a bad build. The group over at THG, they think any single rad aio is crap and one must at least get a dual rad. My advice for you, is to ignore them.

Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 @ 3.5GHz 6C:12T / CM212 Evo / Asus X99 Deluxe / 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 3000 Trident-Z / Samsung 850 Pro 256GB / Intel 335 240GB / WD Red 2 & 3TB / Antec 850w / RTX 2070 / Win10 Pro x64

HP Envy X360 15: Intel Core i5 8250U @ 1.6GHz 4C:8T / 8GB DDR4 / Intel UHD620 + Nvidia GeForce MX150 4GB / Intel 120GB SSD / Win10 Pro x64

 

HP Envy x360 BP series Intel 8th gen

AMD ThreadRipper 2!

5820K & 6800K 3-way SLI mobo support list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Calvin McCaw said:

so turns out I don’t know as much as I thought I did ? thank you guys for all the reply’s and with regards on the builds you suggested i’m going to look into it and see which one will be best for me. sorry if my terrible knowledge annoyed any of you

 

Thanks,

Calvin

yeah... it's more complex than just watching some videos sometimes.

 

but after literally thousands of lists you get to know what to choose, so I'm always happy to help

 

quoting is appreciated btw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, r2724r16 said:

That so many people used Hyper 212s in their builds, despite the general consensus (on the LTT forum) being that Hyper 212s are bad CPU coolers.

Only the EVO is a bad cooler and that's simply because it's old fashion.

 

the X or Black have extremely improved and quieter fans with small yet welcome improvements on heatsink.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, r2724r16 said:

That so many people used Hyper 212s in their builds, despite the general consensus (on the LTT forum) being that Hyper 212s are bad CPU coolers.

 

And I was also trying to tell two users that they made a PCPP list with $1400 as the budget when the OP said his budget was £1400.

Yeah they’re different but it’s still gets the point across.

I got a ps5 and a pc pretty ballin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Calvin McCaw said:

so turns out I don’t know as much as I thought I did ? thank you guys for all the reply’s and with regards on the builds you suggested i’m going to look into it and see which one will be best for me. sorry if my terrible knowledge annoyed any of you

 

Thanks,

Calvin

Generally speaking, the i3 < i5 < i7 < i9 and the same for Ryzen 3 < 5 < 7

Use PCPartpicker to scour that local market and get the best bang for your buck.

 

Rules of thumb:

  • Intel beats AMD in single core performance, so for gaming purposes, it's a touch faster
  • If you want to overclock, you'll need an unlocked intel chip (K or X series) where all Ryzen CPUs are ready to do so.
  • AMD beats Intel in multicore performance, especially at the low end. So if you're doing streaming, video editing, animation, etc. it is generally the victor.
  • Your GPU needs depend heavily on the monitor resolution and refresh rate you want to game at, and what titles you want to play.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trevb0t said:

Generally speaking, the i3 < i5 < i7 < i9 and the same for Ryzen 3 < 5 < 7

Use PCPartpicker to scour that local market and get the best bang for your buck.

 

Rules of thumb:

  • Intel beats AMD in single core performance, so for gaming purposes, it's a touch faster
  • If you want to overclock, you'll need an unlocked intel chip (K or X series) where all Ryzen CPUs are ready to do so.
  • AMD beats Intel in multicore performance, especially at the low end. So if you're doing streaming, video editing, animation, etc. it is generally the victor.
  • Your GPU needs depend heavily on the monitor resolution and refresh rate you want to game at, and what titles you want to play.

 

Just to expand on this a little, for this generation of CPUs:

 

Gaming:

r3<r5 2400g<r5 2600=i3 8100<r5 2600x<r7 2700/x<i5 9400f<i5 9600k<i7 9700k<i9 9900k

 

Premiere Pro:

i3 8100<r3<r5 2400g<i5 9400f<r5 2600<r7 2700<r5 2600x<i7 9700K<r7 2700x< i9 9900K

 

Other Adobe:

r3<r5 2400g<i3 8100<r5 2600<r5 2600x<r7 2700/x<i5 9400f<i5 9600k<i7 9700k<i9 9900k

 

Most other productivity (modeling, rendering, streaming, folding, etc.) In this category there will be exceptions to the rule depending on the application but generally speaking:

i3<r3<i5<r5<i7<r7<i9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

Gaming:

r3<r5 2400g<r5 2600=i3 8100<r5 2600x<r7 2700/x<i5 9400f<i5 9600k<i7 9700k<i9 9900k

r3<i3<r5=i5f<i5k<r7<i7<i9 you mean?

 

a 8100 isn't even close to the 2600

Edited by LukeSavenije
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

Gaming:

r3<r5 2400g<r5 2600=i3 8100<r5 2600x<r7 2700/x<i5 9400f<i5 9600k<i7 9700k<i9 9900k

Buying a 4c/4t 7400/8100 is just awful over any 6c/12t CPU. 

 

Also 2600x is either as good or a better choice over the 9400f. The 2600 beating them both in terms of what a person should choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LukeSavenije said:

r3<i3<r5<r7<i7<i9 you mean?

 

a 8100 isn't even close to the 2600

Nope, in a vast number of games the I3 8100 trades blows with the 2600. It takes about an even number of wins as the 2600 does. And then the 9400f at stock is able to beat overclocked 2700/2700x/2600x almost across the board with a few outliers. If you'd like some linked data I have plenty as I'm sure you know hahaha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, jerubedo said:

Nope, in a vast number of games the I3 8100 trades blows with the 2600. It takes about an even number of wins as the 2600 does. And then the 9400f at stock is able to beat overclocked 2700/2700x/2600x almost across the board with a few outliers. If you'd like some linked data I have plenty as I'm sure you know hahaha. 

yeah, exept that that csgo run was either superfake or horribly tested in dx8

 

no way a 8700k gets overtaken by a 8700

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoldenLag said:

Buying a 4c/4t 7400/8100 is just awful over any 6c/12t CPU. 

 

Also 2600x is either as good or a better choice over the 9400f. The 2600 beating them both in terms of what a person should choose.

A gaming rig is going to be used for gaming, browsing, video watching, email, discord, etc. So the gaming numbers are all that really matters. Nothing productivity is happening that makes use of the extra threads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 2700 3.2 GHz 8-Core Processor  (£207.98 @ Aria PC) 
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG - H5 Universal 65 CFM CPU Cooler  (£44.99 @ AWD-IT) 
Motherboard: Asus - PRIME X370-PRO ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£80.46 @ Ebuyer) check with ebuyer if bios is updated.
Memory: Kingston - HyperX Predator RGB 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  (£101.43 @ Box Limited) 
Storage: Crucial - P1 500 GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£63.38 @ CCL Computers) 
Storage: Toshiba - P300 2 TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£48.95 @ Amazon UK) 
Video Card: Gigabyte - GeForce RTX 2080 8 GB WINDFORCE Video Card  (£636.10 @ More Computers) 
Case: Corsair - SPEC-DELTA RGB ATX Mid Tower Case  (£57.98 @ CCL Computers) 
Power Supply: Corsair - TXM Gold 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£79.00 @ AWD-IT) 
Total: £1320.27
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 10:45 BST+0100

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Heatsink: Gelid Phantom Black GPU: Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual RAM: Corsair DDR4 2x8GB 3000Mhz mobo: Asus X570-P case: Fractal Design Define C PSU: Superflower Leadex Gold 650W

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

yeah, exept that that csgo run was either superfake or horribly tested in dx8

 

no way a 8700k gets overtaken by a 8700

Yeah, as I did previously note that one test was indeed bad. These, however, paint the picture. The first one is a stock 2600 vs 9400f, the second one is an OCed 2600x vs the 9400f. None of the below charts are cherry picked, either. The original articles only have the 2600/x and 2700/x winning in like 4 games of 22 total:

 

benches.png.296d3ed82bb34abeaea4533c0c5cc4cf.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

Yeah, as I did previously note that one test was indeed bad. These, however, paint the picture. The first one is a stock 2600 vs 9400f, the second one is an OCed 2600x vs the 9400f:

you're disproving your own point here

 

2600 trades blows with a 9400f and 8400, not a 8100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, LukeSavenije said:

2600 trades blows with a 9400f and 8400

No, it gets crushed for the most part.

 

Here's the i3 vs r5 data:

 

As you can see, in just over half the games the 8100 pulls ahead. They are about functionally even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

A gaming rig is going to be used for gaming, browsing, video watching, email, discord, etc. So the gaming numbers are all that really matters. Nothing productivity is happening that makes use of the extra threads. 

chough

Every core i5 4c/4t

chough

 

You end up paying for nothing extra while suffering in the long run. Which is allready showing in games that can use a lot of threads where the 9400f and other non-ht CPUs start to suffer in their 0,1%. Aka the metric that is equivelent to stutter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

chough

Every core i5 4c/4t

chough

 

You end up paying for nothing extra while suffering in the long run. Which is allready showing in games that can use a lot of threads where the 9400f and other non-ht CPUs start to suffer in their 0,1%. Aka the metric that is equivelent to stutter

Actually that first video did test 1% and 0.1% lows and the 9400F still won on that metric, too, and by a large margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

Actually that first video did test 1% and 0.1% lows and the 9400F still won on that metric, too, and by a large margin.

had a look through. another issue with the 9400f is limited memmory support which hits it in randomly games. unlike the 9400f the 2600/x doesnt have massive 0,1 lows that isnt related to the overall performance. 

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i5-9400F 2.9 GHz 6-Core Processor  ($167.99 @ SuperBiiz) 
Motherboard: ASRock - B365M Pro4 Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard  ($83.98 @ Newegg) 
Memory: G.Skill - Aegis 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-2800 Memory  ($69.99 @ Newegg) 
Total: $321.96
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 06:32 EDT-0400

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 2600X 3.6 GHz 6-Core Processor  ($179.99 @ Amazon) 
Motherboard: ASRock - B450M PRO4 Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard  ($69.99 @ Amazon) 
Memory: GeIL - EVO SPEAR 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  ($74.99 @ Newegg Business) 
Total: $324.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 06:32 EDT-0400

 

price is more or less identical depending on the Ram frequency you end up buying and avoiding the trap of non-ht that "old" core i5 CPUs suffered is much worth it over a same or slightly higher framerate. 

 

remember you need a B365 or Z390 board to ensure BIOS compatiblity. 

 

edit: that is not mentioning the intel box cooler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

edit: that is not mentioning the intel box cooler. 

and the fact that a 1600 can be had around 50 bucks with a motherboard at microcentre stores

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoldenLag said:

Buying a 4c/4t 7400/8100 is just awful over any 6c/12t CPU. 

 

Also 2600x is either as good or a better choice over the 9400f. The 2600 beating them both in terms of what a person should choose.

I agree with that.

Especially with the heatsink in da Box...

3 hours ago, jerubedo said:

Nope, in a vast number of games the I3 8100 trades blows with the 2600. It takes about an even number of wins as the 2600 does.

But not all are to be rated equally.

125fps instead of 110fps average is just irrelevant for most people.

 

48min/57 avg. vs 49/65 vs. Ryzen 2400G or 60/74 for the 1600X or 66/81 for the 2600X in Assasin's Creed Odyssey is relevant as that is where it counts. Where it goes from somewhat playable to really well playable.

 

The high FPS shit is of no interest for most people...

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LukeSavenije said:

and the fact that a 1600 can be had around 50 bucks with a motherboard at microcentre stores

Well yeah, no one can argue that value proposition. In the case of having a Microcenter near you the 1600 is an undeniable value proposition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoldenLag said:

had a look through. another issue with the 9400f is limited memmory support which hits it in randomly games. unlike the 9400f the 2600/x doesnt have massive 0,1 lows that isnt related to the overall performance. 

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i5-9400F 2.9 GHz 6-Core Processor  ($167.99 @ SuperBiiz) 
Motherboard: ASRock - B365M Pro4 Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard  ($83.98 @ Newegg) 
Memory: G.Skill - Aegis 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-2800 Memory  ($69.99 @ Newegg) 
Total: $321.96
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 06:32 EDT-0400

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 2600X 3.6 GHz 6-Core Processor  ($179.99 @ Amazon) 
Motherboard: ASRock - B450M PRO4 Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard  ($69.99 @ Amazon) 
Memory: GeIL - EVO SPEAR 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  ($74.99 @ Newegg Business) 
Total: $324.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 06:32 EDT-0400

 

price is more or less identical depending on the Ram frequency you end up buying and avoiding the trap of non-ht that "old" core i5 CPUs suffered is much worth it over a same or slightly higher framerate. 

 

remember you need a B365 or Z390 board to ensure BIOS compatiblity. 

 

edit: that is not mentioning the intel box cooler. 

This is more the comparison I'd make:

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price
CPU Intel - Core i5-9400F 2.9 GHz 6-Core Processor $167.99 @ SuperBiiz
Motherboard Gigabyte - Z390 UD ATX LGA1151 Motherboard $114.89 @ OutletPC
Memory ADATA - XPG GAMMIX D10 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory $77.99 @ Newegg
  Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts  
  Total $360.87
  Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 13:31 EDT-0400  

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price
CPU AMD - Ryzen 5 2600X 3.6 GHz 6-Core Processor $179.99 @ Amazon
Motherboard ASRock - B450 Pro4 ATX AM4 Motherboard $79.99 @ OutletPC
Memory ADATA - XPG GAMMIX D10 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory $77.99 @ Newegg
  Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts  
  Total $337.97
  Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 13:33 EDT-0400  
     
     

That Pro4 (ATX sized) is on a great sale right now, though. It's normally $100, making the price difference usually only $3.00.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My only deal in this battle is that a locked Intel CPU is only ever going to give you what it can. Some older gen CPUs have shown great longevity, but it's the ones you can feel out in overclocking. 

If the argument was for an unlocked Intel winning each round at the same pricing, I cant argue that value. 

 

We haven't had Ryzen long enough to compare it to a 3770k in long term use (and the AMD offerings didnt show much lifespan at that point,) but I would say it's a safe bet to assume it's at least going to give Intel's unlocked chips a run for their money as a few years pass here, since most of the lower end unlocks still aren't Hyperthreaded for the pricing. 

The first gen is still trading blows for a high value, so it's been promising thus far. 

 

I think if you want some longevity (speculation here) the Ryzen is still going to prove a higher value to the unlocked chips. 

 

At current pricing, I like the 2600X for value. 

 

@jerubedo has certainly got me looking more at the price competitors lately, though. Nothing is cut and dry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

This is more the comparison I'd make:

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price
CPU Intel - Core i5-9400F 2.9 GHz 6-Core Processor $167.99 @ SuperBiiz
Motherboard Gigabyte - Z390 UD ATX LGA1151 Motherboard $114.89 @ OutletPC
Memory ADATA - XPG GAMMIX D10 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory $77.99 @ Newegg
  Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts  
  Total $360.87
  Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 13:31 EDT-0400  

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price
CPU AMD - Ryzen 5 2600X 3.6 GHz 6-Core Processor $179.99 @ Amazon
Motherboard ASRock - B450 Pro4 ATX AM4 Motherboard $79.99 @ OutletPC
Memory ADATA - XPG GAMMIX D10 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory $77.99 @ Newegg
  Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts  
  Total $337.97
  Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-04-23 13:33 EDT-0400  
     
     

That Pro4 (ATX sized) is on a great sale right now, though. It's normally $100, making the price difference usually only $3.00.

yeah i was looking at making the price as close as possible for the intel CPU while not having to update the BIOS. you save a bit on the 2800mhz Ram and B365 board. 

 

its also recommended to get a cooler with the 9400f as the stock cooler is quite loud. a arctic freezer 33/34 esports would be something nice to add. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×