Jump to content

1070 VS 1080 Vs 1080 TI

Johoni

Probally the biggest question i am asking for my new build is what GPU should i get. The GTX 1070, 1080 or the amazing 1080 TI?

All of these are an amazing upgrade from my XFX r9 390 8Gb with1Ghz worth of clock speed :/ 

 

The 1070 is at a clock speed of 1.56Ghz and i could buy right now

The 1080 is at a clock speed of 1.72Ghz and i could buy after 1 months of saving up MAX

The 1080TI is at a clock speed of 1.56Ghz and i could buy after 2 months of saving up MAX

I would like to know which one is the best price for preformance

I would also like to know if the 1070 is faster than the 1080 as one of my friends said

And finally i would like ot know which one you would if you were going to game a 1440p 144Hz

 

Any questions feel free to ask :)

Thanks in advance for the responses

PC Specs:
Cpu - i7 8700k (1.25V 4.9Ghz)
Ram - 2x8Gb Crucial Ballistics 2666mhz
Motherboard - Asus Prime Z370-A
Gpu - Gtx 1080Ti Palit Super Jetstream
Psu - Corsair 850i Platinum+
HDD - 2Tb Seagate Green 7200RPM
SSD - 120Gb Kingston 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1080TI performs way the best. they go with bigger number = better peformance. for 1440p 144Hz id go with the 1080TI for sure

I spent $2500 on building my PC and all i do with it is play no games atm & watch anime at 1080p(finally) watch YT and write essays...  nothing, it just sits there collecting dust...

Builds:

The Toaster Project! Northern Bee!

 

The original LAN PC build log! (Old, dead and replaced by The Toaster Project & 5.0)

Spoiler

"Here is some advice that might have gotten lost somewhere along the way in your life. 

 

#1. Treat others as you would like to be treated.

#2. It's best to keep your mouth shut; and appear to be stupid, rather than open it and remove all doubt.

#3. There is nothing "wrong" with being wrong. Learning from a mistake can be more valuable than not making one in the first place.

 

Follow these simple rules in life, and I promise you, things magically get easier. " - MageTank 31-10-2016

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1070 performs well and is at a lower price than the 1080

 

1080 performs a little better than the 1070 and is more expensive

 

1080 Ti performs the best out of all of these and is the most expensive.

 

For 1440p @ 144Hz I'd go for a 1080 or 1080Ti

Quote or tag me( @Crunchy Dragon) if you want me to see your reply

If a post solved your problem/answered your question, please consider marking it as "solved"

Community Standards // Join Floatplane!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1070ti is almost like 1080

My Rig

CPU - Ryzen 5 1600@3.8ghz          GPU - XFX XXX RX580 8g          Cooler - Arctic Freezer 33 eSports edition green          Motherboard - Gigabyte AB350 Gaming 3          Ram -  G.Skill 2x8 Ripjaws 5 2666                   Case - Pahntecs P400s TGE Modded with Green accents          PSU - Seasonic M1211 evo 620w          SSD - Samsung 960 evo 500 GB          HDD - Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm 2tb       

 Fans - 2 be quiet SilentWings 3         OS - Windows 10 Home 64-Bit         Cables - Cable Mod Green Cable Extension

 Peripherals

Mouse - Logitech G502          Keyboard - k95 Platinum Brown          Headset - Philips SHP9500s + Vmoda Boom Pro          Monitor - LG 29UM69GB

Webcam - USB webcam for Wii Fitness game xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1080ti = most CUDA Cores, most RAM, highest speed GDDR5X

1080 = Less CUDA than 1080ti, more than 1070, Less memory

1070 = Least amount of CUDA of the three, slower GDDR5 memory.

 

All of them clock very respectfully.

[FS][US] Corsair H115i 280mm AIO-AMD $60+shipping

 

 

System specs:
Asus Prime X370 Pro - Custom EKWB CPU/GPU 2x360 1x240 soft loop - Ryzen 1700X - Corsair Vengeance RGB 2x16GB - Plextor 512 NVMe + 2TB SU800 - EVGA GTX1080ti - LianLi PC11 Dynamic
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Johoni said:

I would also like to know if the 1070 is faster than the 1080 as one of my friends said

I'd like to know what's the reasoning behind that statement because it just doesn't make sense at all. 

 

Also you can't measure different GPUs by clockspeed. A 1080 Ti at 1582MHz would still obliterate a 1070 at the same clock speed. 

 

Right now the 1070 is the best fps per $

The 1080 Ti is the most powerful single GPU graphics card on the market and the 1080 somewhat in between.

 

Note that not even a 1080 Ti can drive demanding games at 144Hz 1440p without compromises. Only esport titles could run at that kind of framerate and that resolution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, light-v said:

I'd like to know what's the reasoning behind that statement because it just doesn't make sense at all. 

 

Also you can't measure different GPUs by clockspeed. A 1080 Ti at 1582MHz would still obliterate a 1070 at the same clock speed. 

 

Right now the 1070 is the best fps per $

The 1080 Ti is the most powerful single GPU graphics card on the market and the 1080 somewhat in between.

 

Note that not even a 1080 Ti can drive demanding games at 144Hz 1440p without compromises. Only esport titles could run at that kind of framerate and that resolution. 

My mate said that his 1070 was better than any other base 1080 because of the clock speed, i thought this was wrong becuse of other factors like cuda cores and faster memory like GDDR5x (I think)

PC Specs:
Cpu - i7 8700k (1.25V 4.9Ghz)
Ram - 2x8Gb Crucial Ballistics 2666mhz
Motherboard - Asus Prime Z370-A
Gpu - Gtx 1080Ti Palit Super Jetstream
Psu - Corsair 850i Platinum+
HDD - 2Tb Seagate Green 7200RPM
SSD - 120Gb Kingston 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Johoni said:

My mate said that his 1070 was better than any other base 1080 because of the clock speed, i thought this was wrong becuse of other factors like cuda cores and faster memory like GDDR5x (I think)

Yeah ask for proof about that. Then make him realise that the 1080 boosts to 1800MHz or higher by itself already, so his argument is invalid regardless. You cannot measure the performance of a GPU from the clocks alone. 

USEFUL LINKS:

PSU Tier List F@H stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Realistically speaking NVIDIA would be quite stupid to release 1070 that can be overclocked to perform better than even the weakest 1080 ;-)

CPU: i7 6950X  |  Motherboard: Asus Rampage V ed. 10  |  RAM: 32 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum Special Edition 3200 MHz (CL14)  |  GPUs: 2x Asus GTX 1080ti SLI 

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1 TB M.2 NVME  |  PSU: In Win SIV 1065W 

Cooling: Custom LC 2 x 360mm EK Radiators | EK D5 Pump | EK 250 Reservoir | EK RVE10 Monoblock | EK GPU Blocks & Backplates | Alphacool Fittings & Connectors | Alphacool Glass Tubing

Case: In Win Tou 2.0  |  Display: Alienware AW3418DW  |  Sound: Woo Audio WA8 Eclipse + Focal Utopia Headphones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GPU Boost, base clocks on the spreadsheet is meaningless, a stock 1080 Ti will run on around 1850mhz core clock if every thing is working correctly.

 

I would get a GTX 1080 because I don't feel the GTX 1070 is sufficient for your very powerful display... 1440p144hz is no easy feat...

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

again so many keep forgetting the crucial bits of deciding.

ROPs and TMUs matter, the more the GPU has the faster, the higher its clocked, the faster too (GPUz keeps reminding you of this).

 

You cant compare shaders between generations and brands, even so shaders arent everything otherwise vega would be beating or matching the 1080 ti.

 

Pick a GPU based on your settings and budget. The 1080 TI doesnt have that much more ROPs and TMUs than the 1080 (the first titan x pascal has more of these than the 1080 ti despite the same shader count). So if you feel the few extra TMUs and ROPs isnt worth the much higher cost, then get the cheaper one.

 

The 1070 and 1080 have a lot of difference between them in shaders yet are said to perform similarly? The reason is to do with ROPs and TMUs as well.

 

More shaders - more geomatry, lighting ,shadows and effects performance

More ROPs - more post processing and AA, smoother higher resolution

more TMUs - more higher quality textures, faster AF and anything texture related

 

So vega loses to pascal because of having less ROPs and TMUs while being lower clocked. Those shaders are good for compute, stuff like blender that can software based render on the GPU taking advantage of those flops.

 

So go with whats best for your budget. If you plan to upgrade in the future when a new GPU comes out, better to take the lesser GPU if it does what you want for 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in the day (before i3, i5, i7 series) I had a pentium running at 4Ghz, And now I have a 2600k, do you think its slower since it is only 3,4 Ghz and boosting to 3.8?

 

There are SO many other dependencies ;)

Quote or mention me if not feel ignored 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For 1440p at 144hz, there's no question. The 1080 TI will get you the best experience and will be well worth the money.

New Build (The Compromise): CPU - i7 9700K @ 5.1Ghz Mobo - ASRock Z390 Taichi | RAM - 16GB G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 3200CL14 @ 3466 14-14-14-30 1T | GPU - ASUS Strix GTX 1080 TI | Cooler - Corsair h100i Pro | SSDs - 500 GB 960 EVO + 500 GB 850 EVO + 1TB MX300 | Case - Coolermaster H500 | PSUEVGA 850 P2 | Monitor - LG 32GK850G-B 144hz 1440p | OSWindows 10 Pro. 

Peripherals - Corsair K70 Lux RGB | Corsair Scimitar RGB | Audio-technica ATH M50X + Antlion Modmic 5 |

CPU/GPU history: Athlon 6000+/HD4850 > i7 2600k/GTX 580, R9 390, R9 Fury > i7 7700K/R9 Fury, 1080TI > Ryzen 1700/1080TI > i7 9700K/1080TI.

Other tech: Surface Pro 4 (i5/128GB), Lenovo Ideapad Y510P w/ Kali, OnePlus 6T (8G/128G), PS4 Slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×