New Stanford Semiconductor Materials May Take Process Node Manufacturing to 0.6nm

[paddy-stone]

How many giglipigs is that

 

[RadiatingLight]

4 hours ago, Okjoek said:

Will it be 300 dollars?

Nobody knows yet, but I'd assume so.

[Scitesh]

21 hours ago, mr moose said:

They can switch single atoms on and off in an array, but this is different, and yes they are claiming it "should" be able to go down to 0.5nm I think I read.

Unless we can go quantum, use mesons, bosons, gluons and morons

21 hours ago, Ryan_Vickers said:

Wow, for the longest time I had heard that somewhere around 5 nm would be the limit... that's quite a leap  

 

You only need to be concerned once they start claiming we can make them less than 1 atom in size  

 

10 hours ago, RadiatingLight said:

Yes.

the 2700 won't be an 8-core.

IIRC AMD is increasing CCX size to 6 cores with ZEN+, so it will be a 12 core.

Wait 12c./24 t on mainstream even if it is $450 I am gonna buy it even if there is no ipc gain over Ryzen

Ps

Rip intel mainstream

Rip intel hedt

Rip intel server

[RadiatingLight]

22 minutes ago, Scitesh said:

Unless we can go quantum, use mesons, bosons, gluons and morons

 

Wait 12c./24 t on mainstream even if it is $450 I am gonna buy it even if there is no ipc gain over Ryzen

Ps

Rip intel mainstream

Rip intel hedt

Rip intel server

Yep.

 

RIP intel.

[Bananasplit_00]

5 hours ago, RadiatingLight said:

Yep.

 

RIP intel.

Exempt for games where Intel will probably still win lol

[Froody129]

6 hours ago, RadiatingLight said:

Yep.

 

RIP intel.

If only AMDs GPU department had gotten the memo...

[Scitesh]

7 hours ago, Froody129 said:

If only AMDs GPU department had gotten the memo...

So should I buy vega or wait for navi

[Froody129]

45 minutes ago, Scitesh said:

So should I buy vega or wait for navi

Well this my take: 

 

We know that the tech world moves fast. New hardware becomes "old" very quickly. So, if we are logical about it, we can see that if you never buy the hardware in the first place, your hardware will never be outdated! 

[Rune]

On 8/14/2017 at 1:42 AM, RadiatingLight said:

How many atoms are in a nanometer?

I was under the impression that it was 2-4.

are you saying we can make transistors that are less than 4 atoms in size?

It does say 3 atoms thick, yes.

[BachChain]

On 8/14/2017 at 1:48 AM, Ryan_Vickers said:

You only need to be concerned once they start claiming we can make them less than 1 atom in size  

Why? You just need to take a knife and cut the atoms in half.

[mr moose]

23 minutes ago, BachChain said:

Why? You just need to take a knife and cut the atoms in half.

 

They did that once,  They blew a shed up and put bubbles in beer.  Not sure how it's going to help semiconductors though.