Jump to content

Monitor and Graphics Card

I've recently upgraded my PC and the next part is the graphics card. I upgraded to a I7 7700k and need a graphics card to pair, possibly 4k. Also will need a good 4k monitor. Budget I'm thinging of saving up £500-£600.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

a "good 4k monitor" will cost you that entire 500-600, and so would the 4k capable video card (1080ti currently)

"Put as much effort into your question as you'd expect someone to give in an answer"- @Princess Luna

Make sure to Quote posts or tag the person with @[username] so they know you responded to them!

 RGB Build Post 2019 --- Rainbow 🦆 2020 --- Velka 5 V2.0 Build 2021

Purple Build Post ---  Blue Build Post --- Blue Build Post 2018 --- Project ITNOS

CPU i7-4790k    Motherboard Gigabyte Z97N-WIFI    RAM G.Skill Sniper DDR3 1866mhz    GPU EVGA GTX1080Ti FTW3    Case Corsair 380T   

Storage Samsung EVO 250GB, Samsung EVO 1TB, WD Black 3TB, WD Black 5TB    PSU Corsair CX750M    Cooling Cryorig H7 with NF-A12x25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Video Card: Asus Radeon RX 480 8GB Dual OC Video Card  (£186.00 @ Aria PC) 
Monitor: LG 27UD68-P 27.0" 3840x2160 60Hz Monitor  (£399.99 @ Amazon UK) 
Total: £585.99
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-04-13 19:05 BST+0100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TVwazhere said:

a "good 4k monitor" will cost you that entire 500-600, and so would the 4k capable video card (1080ti currently)

You seem to suffer from the "Ultra or bust" syndrome. Even AAA games can be run on mid-range cards on lower settings on 2160p.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matu20 said:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Video Card: Asus Radeon RX 480 8GB Dual OC Video Card  (£186.00 @ Aria PC) 
Monitor: LG 27UD68-P 27.0" 3840x2160 60Hz Monitor  (£399.99 @ Amazon UK) 
Total: £585.99
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-04-13 19:05 BST+0100

+1 to this suggestion both monitor and GPU.

OP can also save himself a bit of money by going for the 27UD58-B. He would only lose height adjustment.

6 minutes ago, TVwazhere said:

a "good 4k monitor" will cost you that entire 500-600, and so would the 4k capable video card (1080ti currently)

You're about 100 USD off with the monitor and you don't need to have a 1080 Ti to be able to play in 4K. It really just depends which games you will play

"We're all in this together, might as well be friends" Tom, Toonami.

 

mini eLiXiVy: my open source 65% mechanical PCB, a build log, PCB anatomy and discussing open source licenses: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1366493-elixivy-a-65-mechanical-keyboard-build-log-pcb-anatomy-and-how-i-open-sourced-this-project/

 

mini_cardboard: a 4% keyboard build log and how keyboards workhttps://linustechtips.com/topic/1328547-mini_cardboard-a-4-keyboard-build-log-and-how-keyboards-work/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matu20 said:

You seem to suffer from the "Ultra or bust" syndrome. Even AAA games can be run on mid-range cards on lower settings on 2160p.

I call it high standards. You might have a different name for it. :P

Just now, Minibois said:

You're about 100 USD off with the monitor and you don't need to have a 1080 Ti to be able to play in 4K. It really just depends which games you will play

True. I just always assume at least one AAA title because usually when people ask "What games will you be playing" they range from mine craft to GTAV

"Put as much effort into your question as you'd expect someone to give in an answer"- @Princess Luna

Make sure to Quote posts or tag the person with @[username] so they know you responded to them!

 RGB Build Post 2019 --- Rainbow 🦆 2020 --- Velka 5 V2.0 Build 2021

Purple Build Post ---  Blue Build Post --- Blue Build Post 2018 --- Project ITNOS

CPU i7-4790k    Motherboard Gigabyte Z97N-WIFI    RAM G.Skill Sniper DDR3 1866mhz    GPU EVGA GTX1080Ti FTW3    Case Corsair 380T   

Storage Samsung EVO 250GB, Samsung EVO 1TB, WD Black 3TB, WD Black 5TB    PSU Corsair CX750M    Cooling Cryorig H7 with NF-A12x25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TVwazhere said:

I call it high standards. You might have a different name for it. :P

True. I just always assume at least one AAA title because usually when people ask "What games will you be playing" they range from mine craft to GTAV

People still think you need the highest of end GPU's to play games at 4K, but that is just because of the ultra presets in games.

Reviewers of course test stuff at Ultra settings (and occasionally Medium) while High looks just fine and can yield much higher fps. This give the illusion that RX 480 type cards present games at powerpoint presentation level of fps, while they can actually achieve good fps on 4K High settings.

"We're all in this together, might as well be friends" Tom, Toonami.

 

mini eLiXiVy: my open source 65% mechanical PCB, a build log, PCB anatomy and discussing open source licenses: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1366493-elixivy-a-65-mechanical-keyboard-build-log-pcb-anatomy-and-how-i-open-sourced-this-project/

 

mini_cardboard: a 4% keyboard build log and how keyboards workhttps://linustechtips.com/topic/1328547-mini_cardboard-a-4-keyboard-build-log-and-how-keyboards-work/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4k monitors would cost all of that anyway

get an rx480 with a good 100hz or greater 1440p monitor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Minibois said:

.

I really like that video as well, indeed ultra settings offer very little difference in quality nowadays compared to what they did before.

 

I still think OP should get a 1440p monitor instead... 4k is very overestimated, the budget's tight any ways...

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Princess Cadence said:

I really like that video as well, indeed ultra settings offer very little difference in quality nowadays compared to what they did before.

 

I still think OP should get a 1440p monitor instead... 4k is very overestimated, the budget's tight any ways...

What would be a good 1440p monitor to go for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×