Another Ryzen Thread - 1600X Leaked CPU Z - bench

[Paragon_X]

It seems that Ryzen will likely deliver. It seems that AMD will almost price match intel and offer a category above of their pricing. Also I would say be wary of the leaks as always but since we are getting so close to launch I am inclined to believe that this has a large chance of being real, since I am guessing most reviewers already have the chips at hand.
 

Quote

Below are these alleged Ryzen CPU benchmarks, alongside a benchmark of Intel's i7 6850K at stock clock speeds (3.6GHz base 3.8GHZ boost). We can see here that AMD's Ryzen CPU scores 1888 in the single threaded test and 12544 in the multi-threaded test. 

Compare this to our i7 6850K, which in the same test offered scores of 1845 on a single thread and 11147 scores all cores/threads. This is a very favourable result for AMD, though it is worth noting that we have no proof that this test wasn't done on an overclocked Ryzen CPU. 

Even so, this result does show that AMD's Ryzen CPUs do have what it takes to compete with Intel's Broadwell-E series CPUs, though it remains to be seen if this performance will hold true over a wide enough range of applications to truly challenge Intel's market dominance. 

Spoiler

 

source

[Herman Mcpootis]

so, just one random benchmark? no games? 

[Paragon_X]

2 minutes ago, herman mcpootis said:

so, just one random benchmark? no games? 

You are right, corrected the title to be clearer.

[sof006]

Benchmarks are all well and good but the real tell will be real world performance. Like rendering videos, playing games etc. Benchmarks are synthetic just there to show how good it is at number crunching. A 8 core FX chip is good at number crunching on paper but in reality its slower than most i5's at gaming.

 

I'll wait for linus etc to review the chip with games

[TigerHawk]

While I will be the first to say this is another non-gaming benchmark so don't care too much, the single threaded performance is pretty interesting. It's roughly skylake clock for clock. I'm perfectly fine with that. I have a whole new rig ready to be built, just waiting for cpu/mobo and wondering if it will be AMD or Intel. I want some full on NDA lifted benchmarks of some GAMES first though. Got my eye on the 1700X. I also do a lot of VM work with 4-5 going at once so the cores will be a huge boon for me going from an ivy bridge i5 @4ghz

[Coaxialgamer]

Well, seeing AdoredTV's recent video about the leaked passmark scores, it seems ryzen will be very good at integer and FP calculations. This might be what is being measured here. 

[Humbug]

this is probably an overclocked ryzen 6 core which is why it is beating the intel in single threaded performance...

[leadeater]

1 hour ago, huilun02 said:

Isn't the 1600X supposed to be 6c/12t as per the leaked lineup?

What about the 1700X and 1800X? Monstrosities that will end the world? 

This inconsistency means someone is bullshitting with their 'leaks'

If you have a look at the CPU-Z picture it shows that this is a 6 core CPU, that at least matches up.

[NumLock21]

The amount of some here who tries to look for something minor and complains about, is ridiculous.

 

What's no games benchmark?!

Only cpu-z?!

Where is 1700x and 1800x, this benchmark is bs!

 

maybe a mod should lock that cpu-z benchmark thread, that's sticked in the cpu section.

 

[Prysin]

2 hours ago, Paragon_X said:

It seems that Ryzen will likely deliver. It seems that AMD will almost price match intel and offer a category above of their pricing. Also I would say be wary of the leaks as always but since we are getting so close to launch I am inclined to believe that this has a large chance of being real, since I am guessing most reviewers already have the chips at hand.
 

  Hide contents

 

source

seems really good... until you realize a FX 8320 at 4.77GHz hits slightly over 9k multi and 1.2k single... I mean, it is better. but Skylake is wastly better in single core (close to 2k)

[VerticalDiscussions]

Is it just me, or it feels like AMD release date is getting further away rather than closing in .-.?

 

[Space Reptile]

3 hours ago, Paragon_X said:

 

 

wow look at this one , NO MENTION of  what the cpu is anywhere on the screen , and it also close to 5820k scores ... HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

 

3 hours ago, Paragon_X said:

 

ITS LEGIT GUYS 

 

(also 0.375v jesus , No , just nO) 

[Coaxialgamer]

2 hours ago, Prysin said:

seems really good... until you realize a FX 8320 at 4.77GHz hits slightly over 9k multi and 1.2k single... I mean, it is better. but Skylake is wastly better in single core (close to 2k)

Um no. Just no. 

 

(fx 9590 at 4.7ghz, effectively the same chip as an fx 8320) 

 

As for the 6700k :

 

Edit :nvm, seems they switched how scores work between 1.74 and 1.73 revisions of cpuz, which i wasn't aware of. 

In cpuz 1.74, that seems about right. 

[Prysin]

18 minutes ago, Coaxialgamer said:

Um no. Just no. 

 

(fx 9590 at 4.7ghz, effectively the same chip as an fx 8320) 

 

As for the 6700k :

 

Edit :nvm, seems they switched how scores work between 1.74 and 1.73 revisions of cpuz, which i wasn't aware of. 

In cpuz 1.74, that seems about right. 

i was referring to 1.78

Scores are wastly affected. My FX is totally dead now, so i cannot go retest it, i think...

[Coaxialgamer]

11 minutes ago, Prysin said:

i was referring to 1.78

Scores are wastly affected. My FX is totally dead now, so i cannot go retest it, i think...

Yeah . I actually tried downloading the version of cpuz that uses cpuid benchmark v15. 01.64 like in this leak, but even 1.78 only offers benchmark 15.01.32. Can't seem to find the exact version. Maybe it's because I'm running a 32 bit system... 

[Gibbons]

Unless Windows isn't detecting correctly, 4-core Ryzen should have more than 1MB L2 cache. The 6-core has the correct cache labels though.

[Prysin]

16 minutes ago, Coaxialgamer said:

Yeah . I actually tried downloading the version of cpuz that uses cpuid benchmark v15. 01.64 like in this leak, but even 1.78 only offers benchmark 15.01.32. Can't seem to find the exact version. Maybe it's because I'm running a 32 bit system... 

32 bit?! 

how? you gotta be running something older then this

http://i.imgur.com/fZGAqvv.jpg

[Doobeedoo]

My FX8350 stock settings scores in this test are: 1220 in single, 7890 multi. 

So if these shown leaks at those clocks is like that it looks quite a jump 

[Coaxialgamer]

5 hours ago, Prysin said:

32 bit?! 

how? you gotta be running something older then this

http://i.imgur.com/fZGAqvv.jpg

well long story , but my 3770k + z77 board died a couple weeks ago . Figured i would wait for Ryzen to launch until i make a decision , considering how close we are to release.

So i picked up an old athlon 64 x2 rig with 2gb of ddr2 from a relative ( igpu was dead ). Figured i would run as much as i could on my 290x through hardware acceleration .

Ubuntu didn't run well ( amd drivers for linux are pretty bad ) and performance was poor . Switched to windows 7 ( only version that had up to date drivers ) and i chose the 32 bit version because it uses slightly less ram than the 64 bit version .

It's actually not as bad as i thought . Sure , it takes a bit of time to load stuff and forget about anything cpu intensive , but with an ssd , it browses the web fine , and it can play older games like fallout 3 and oblivion at medium settings.

[leadeater]

8 hours ago, Space Reptile said:

(also 0.375v jesus , No , just nO) 

Well my 4930K idle core voltage is 0.5V and a by default OC R4BE motherboard, won't be much lower than this normally though.

 

I agree though, trust this about as much as covering myself in gravy and walking in to a lions den.

[Prysin]

16 hours ago, Doobeedoo said:

My FX8350 stock settings scores in this test are: 1220 in single, 7890 multi. 

So if these shown leaks at those clocks is like that it looks quite a jump 

4.77GHz and your multi is gonna hit over 9k...

[Citadelen]

On 2017-2-17 at 3:43 PM, Space Reptile said:

-snip-

I seem to remeber reading somewhere that this was running on a version that doesn't feature support for RYZEN, hence incorrect voltage readings.