AMD Radeon Fury X 3DMark performance

[patrickjp93]

hmm still seems to be off by a bit

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7287182

17199 on firestrike extreme in SLI

Stock 980TI, or an aftermarket?

[Sunako]

stock cooler evga sc trying right now to get it to sit at 1000  but doesn't like it so far

hasn't finished a run on 3dmark unerclocking it so much yet keep getting the failures   in middle of second 

graphics test.  Without setting the clocks myself  with will sit at 1330 or so just from gpu boost 2.0

[NAP51DMustang]

that graph has been bugging me all day its not inline with the scores i have been seeing for the 980 ti's unless hies going off something other then firestrike

a personal run from just a little while ago today to see if the chart was in line with  what i'm seeing

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7286424

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7217839 this is from last week when i did single card run of every thing

upper 6000's aren't out of the question see: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5044259

 

same base clock and same processor

[Swndlr]

AMD better knock it out of the water with these new cards or....

 

[Opcode]

It should be noted that the chart in question is purely fabricated from his own speculation as he states in the main article. I would rather wait to see someone like Logan upload a video with the unit actually behind him in his machine while he fills us in on how it performs according to his huge database of numbers.

[alphaproject]

Let alone what is the Fury.... NON X going to do? Did they just not bother testing it?

[spartaman64]

what if the fury x is overclocked

if 1050mhz is the highest clock it can go amd messed up something with the architecture but it can probably go higher  

[spartaman64]

Ah fuck it. AMD is making shitty CPU's, Ati still makes good GPU's, Intel makes good CPU's and Nvidia is still losing to Ati when it comes to price/performance. The projected graphics card performance is too good for a company such as AMD. #AtiFTW

ati is part of amd ...

[spartaman64]

HMB at this point is irrelevant because the bandwidth is not making or breaking the cards and so far this proves it. AMD took a chance by leading the Tech race but ultimately failed because it's all about the GPU and not the memory.

 

Maxwell proved to be a more powerful core than Fury...which is just hilarious since it has FAR less cores. 4000+ cores vs 2800+ cores and it's losing when the 980 ti is OC'd. ROUGH!

 

This card cannot retail for more than the 980 Ti is no one is going to buy it unless you are a rabid AMD fanboi.

 

And yea.... Nvidia killed their own 980 for the 980 Ti, but they didn't quite kill off the Titan X because there has been guys on this site who clearly bought the Titan X even though they knew the 980 Ti was just around the corner because they want.... "THE BEST CARD" Even if it loses in benchmarks while staying stock vs an OC 980 Ti.... if that makes any sense.

 

The Titan X has 12 uber gigs of Vram vs a measy 6 Gb in the 980 Ti so guys still want those bragging rights. So the Titan X is not dead but yikes... why buy a 980 at all?

 

I see absolutely no reason to buy one unless they lower the 970 and 980 prices. I might buy a 980 for $450.  Even....then... I'm hesitating because the Ti is so much better.

? its faster than a 980 ti so why not? doesnt faster cards usually cost more

[alphaproject]

100 points in 3Dmark is what equivalent in money? $200? ROTFLSTOMP.

[BonSie]

It should be noted that the chart in question is purely fabricated from his own speculation as he states in the main article. I would rather wait to see someone like Logan upload a video with the unit actually behind him in his machine while he fills us in on how it performs according to his huge database of numbers.

There are actually results in the database

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5036776

[xAcid9]

There are actually results in the database

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5036776

Deleted.  :lol:

[zMeul]

who wants to bet that Fury X (or however will the Fiji top dog be called) won't beat, either in price nor performance, the R9 295X2  :lol: or it will be very very close to it

[Dabombinable]

ati is part of amd ...

No its not. Ati makes good products ie the 7***/R9 series. AMD just make a line or 2 of good CPU's than takes multiple steps back.

[Hackzzila]

Hmm, the results seem to have been taken down.

[MEC-777]

The AMD hate is strong among this community... It's becoming increasingly annoying. 

[jaggysnake57]

if the new fury is priced at $850 then its gonna get spanked buy the 980ti 

[bogus]

The AMD hate is strong among this community... It's becoming increasingly annoying. 

And if you are not on the hate train, then they consider you a fanboy - specially if you call them out for bullshit talk and trolling.

[syoumans54]

Uh oh..... Team red is getting mad.

[Briggsy]

if 1050mhz is the highest clock it can go amd messed up something with the architecture but it can probably go higher  

 

they have chosen to go the safe route. If 60%% of Fury X cards can do 1100Mhz just fine, but 40%% can only do 1050, then they have to make them all 1050 stock, and let the AIB partners do their own binning for higher clock models, or reference buyers can play the silicon lottery. I wish they would add a boost component to Powertune (maybe they have with Fury, I don't know), so that the cards that can clock higher will do so, much in the way Nvidia cards auto-bin themselves with Boost 2.0 firmware. Then again, overclocking AMD cards is more enjoyable so its not all bad.

[SOLO_AVENGER]

If this is true then this card is a joke, seriously it's been so long since Maxwell came out and this is what AMD have.

[MEC-777]

if the new fury is priced at $850 then its gonna get spanked buy the 980ti 

 

Wait until it actually comes out, then judge. We really have no idea how it will stack up against the 980Ti at this point.

 

And if you are not on the hate train, then they consider you a fanboy - specially if you call them out for bullshit talk and trolling.

 

Yep. Example right here. \/

 

Uh oh..... Team red is getting mad.

 

Assuming we're on "team red", just because we're getting tired of the AMD hate? There is such a thing as objectivity.

 

they have chosen to go the safe route. If 60%% of Fury X cards can do 1100Mhz just fine, but 40%% can only do 1050, then they have to make them all 1050 stock, and let the AIB partners do their own binning for higher clock models, or reference buyers can play the silicon lottery. I wish they would add a boost component to Powertune (maybe they have with Fury, I don't know), so that the cards that can clock higher will do so, much in the way Nvidia cards auto-bin themselves with Boost 2.0 firmware. Then again, overclocking AMD cards is more enjoyable so its not all bad.

 

And just to add to this; you can't judge a GPU by it's clock speed, just like you can't compare CPUs of different architectures by clock speed. 

[MEC-777]

If this is true then this card is a joke, seriously it's been so long since Maxwell came out and this is what AMD have.

 

We don't even know how it actually performs yet, so...

 

How do you come up with that conclusion?

 

+1

[spartaman64]

No its not. Ati makes good products ie the 7***/R9 series. AMD just make a line or 2 of good CPU's than takes multiple steps back.

amd purchased ati or else how can all the gpus go under the amd branding

[spartaman64]

they have chosen to go the safe route. If 60%% of Fury X cards can do 1100Mhz just fine, but 40%% can only do 1050, then they have to make them all 1050 stock, and let the AIB partners do their own binning for higher clock models, or reference buyers can play the silicon lottery. I wish they would add a boost component to Powertune (maybe they have with Fury, I don't know), so that the cards that can clock higher will do so, much in the way Nvidia cards auto-bin themselves with Boost 2.0 firmware. Then again, overclocking AMD cards is more enjoyable so its not all bad.

amd isnt going to clock it as fast as it can go out of the box and neither does nvidia