Razzy_85

@LinusTechplease sort this travesty!

@LinusTechplease sort this travesty!

@LinusTechplease sort this travesty!

I understood that reference

It's intel, probably will be a new board involved.
 

This is an excellent explanation of how these things work. 
 
I'd like to add that as long as the creator who gets the automated claim disputes it in a timely manner, there is no lost revenue during the period while it was "claimed". 
 
I've been down at IBM Think for the last couple of days and this thread is the first I'm hearing of this issue.. Aaaand it's already resolved. 
 
So, as far as I can tell, everything is working as it should...ish
 
We have noticed a significant uptick in copyright claims in the last couple of weeks, though, with some of them being in really really old content which suggests youtube has made some kind of change to ContentID and we've been trying to figure out how to address it.
 
We are generally pretty supportive of the creation of derivative works by our community and we want to make sure that they aren't being algorithmically claimed, but this change has caused other issues for us too. I woke up the other morning to a handful of claims made against Tech Quickie by LTT... Can't have that. 
 
I'm sure this will be resolved, but it's probably going to take some time for youtube to get their crap in order, as usual. 

Scan don’t even have prices atm. Hopefully by the end of the week we’ll see some reviews coming out for them. 
 
I did find a pretty rubbish GE63 Raider preview this morning. 
 
https://youtu.be/QD2cqWfX-pI

Good on AMD! 

I am , but let me put this forward for your thought.
 
You/people demonize a person who is said to have coerced another into a sexual encounter. You/people thus sympathize with the 'victim'.
 
Now think of this. A person chooses to comply with a sexual encounter, becouse they beleve their job is on the line or that their position within a job will improve, or atleast not get worse.
Therefor they value their job over their own dignity, respect, and pride, they value their job over themsleves.
Then after the fact, that person brings up the event, and the 'coercer' is then domonized in the media, in public. Perhaps the the 'victim' is then compensated (in some way, be it monetary ,positioning within a job, or socialy). Do you think that person, that 'victim' , who made a choice of job over themselves, is thinking of their own morality, their own dignity, pride... or perhaps similarly to their reason for choosing their job over themselves, are they thinking of money, of their position. ?
 
Food for thought.

They need to start building a tonne of Nuclear reactors hell of alot more quickly across europe!

They need to start building a tonne of Nuclear reactors hell of alot more quickly across europe!