4K 144Hz when?

[niofalpha]

When can we expect 4K 144Hz monitors to be out? I remember reading something saying they'll be here soon (TM) a few years ago. Just curious as to when they'll be here.

 

Bonus points if they're 21:9.

 

I swear to god if any of you say "muh crysel bal" I'm blocking you.

[Judd]

Probably 2h2018. There is no need for them since even the Titan Xp only gets 70fps at 4K when lowering settings.

[Orangeator]

You would need dual Titan Xp's to push that and it still would drop way below 144fps constantly. This just isn't feasible yet.

[McHox]

7 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

You would need dual Titan Xp's to push that and it still would drop way below 144fps constantly. This just isn't feasible yet.

ofc it is,also doesnt matter if it is constantly at 144fps or not,a panel that costly will have gsync anyways

and anything above 60fps is already a improvement 

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

1 minute ago, McHox said:

ofc it is,also doesnt matter if it is constantly at 144fps or not,a panel that costly will have gsync anyways

and anything above 60fps is already a improvement 

it does matter to have 144fps coz then ul take advantage of the 144hz, if u just get above 60 u can just stick with a 75hz monitor... the biggest change is 60 to 75hz , then 75 to 100,  after that it becomes less big of a change ( still noticeable alot however )

 

10 minutes ago, Orangeator said:

You would need dual Titan Xp's to push that and it still would drop way below 144fps constantly. This just isn't feasible yet.

dual titans wont even run it at 144fps on 4k in modern games... unless u wanna play with LOW settings which is entirely fking pointless to get a 4k monitor just to play on LOW settings or medium... better just get fullhd with max settings then   ( supersampling for example lol )

 

its prolly gonna take another 6-10years to see 144fps on max settings 4k in gpus these days

[Bcat00]

It will come when the GPU and CPU gets to that point. 

No reason to make a monitor of that spec if no hardware on the market can power it.

 

[McHox]

1 minute ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

it does matter to have 144fps coz then ul take advantage of the 144hz, if u just get above 60 u can just stick with a 75hz monitor... the biggest change is 60 to 75hz , then 75 to 100,  after that it becomes less big of a change ( still noticeable alot however )

 

dual titans wont even run it at 144fps on 4k in modern games... unless u wanna play with LOW settings which is entirely fking pointless to get a 4k monitor just to play on LOW settings or medium... better just get fullhd with max settings then   ( supersampling for example lol )

 

its prolly gonna take another 6-10years to see 144fps on max settings 4k in gpus these days

...
many games dont go near 144fps anyways,no matter the hardware you throw at it.
you just sound like someone from the youtube comment section

[iRileyx]

11 minutes ago, McHox said:

ofc it is,also doesnt matter if it is constantly at 144fps or not,a panel that costly will have gsync anyways

and anything above 60fps is already a improvement 

Yeah but a 4k panel with 144hz and gsync will also cost about(based on 1080 and 1440p panels) atleast $200 more than a 60hz panel, and not many people will pay that much extra just for the extra 10-15 fps they'll be getting, and that's assuming theyre even running the highest tech available right now.  

[CyberFern0]

23 minutes ago, niofalpha said:

When can we expect 4K 144Hz monitors to be out? I remember reading something saying they'll be here soon (TM) a few years ago. Just curious as to when they'll be here.

 

Bonus points if they're 21:9.

 

I swear to god if any of you say "muh crysel bal" I'm blocking you.

2018

[CyberFern0]

22 minutes ago, Judd said:

Probably 2h2018. There is no need for them since even the Titan Xp only gets 70fps at 4K when lowering settings.

my 1080 gets me 70 at ultra...

[McHox]

3 minutes ago, RKRiley said:

Yeah but a 4k panel with 144hz and gsync will also cost about(based on 1080 and 1440p panels) atleast $200 more than a 60hz panel, and not many people will pay that much extra just for the extra 10-15 fps they'll be getting, and that's assuming theyre even running the highest tech available right now.  

following that logic,why would anyone even bother to buy 1080p 144hz panels if not every game can reach that?

[iRileyx]

Just now, McHox said:

following that logic,why would anyone even bother to buy 1080p 144hz panels if not every game can reach that?

Cause games like CSGO, LoL, dota etc can reach that. And the majority of people who buy 1080p 144hz play those kind of games. 

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

5 minutes ago, McHox said:

...
many games dont go near 144fps anyways,no matter the hardware you throw at it.
you just sound like someone from the youtube comment section

i guess u never play any competitive games, and stick with a ps4 instead lol many games can cap 144 easily

[dizmo]

They're not even beginning panel manufacturing until next month, then Nvidia has to work their magic, so figure it'll be 2H 2018 as has already been said. Pricing will also be high, so I hope you're willing to shell out a very pretty penny.

 

33 minutes ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

it does matter to have 144fps coz then ul take advantage of the 144hz, if u just get above 60 u can just stick with a 75hz monitor... the biggest change is 60 to 75hz , then 75 to 100,  after that it becomes less big of a change ( still noticeable alot however )

 

dual titans wont even run it at 144fps on 4k in modern games... unless u wanna play with LOW settings which is entirely fking pointless to get a 4k monitor just to play on LOW settings or medium... better just get fullhd with max settings then   ( supersampling for example lol )

 

its prolly gonna take another 6-10years to see 144fps on max settings 4k in gpus these days

Except they don't make 4k monitors above 60hz....so, for those that want to go higher, there's this.

Not everyone runs lower end hardware that can't push 4k content at a high level.

The only way it'll take 10 years, is to get 4k to play on mid tier level hardware.

30 minutes ago, Bcat00 said:

It will come when the GPU and CPU gets to that point. 

No reason to make a monitor of that spec if no hardware on the market can power it.

They're coming. They'd already be out if it wasn't for panel manufacturing issues.

28 minutes ago, RKRiley said:

Yeah but a 4k panel with 144hz and gsync will also cost about(based on 1080 and 1440p panels) atleast $200 more than a 60hz panel, and not many people will pay that much extra just for the extra 10-15 fps they'll be getting, and that's assuming theyre even running the highest tech available right now.  

It'll be a lot more expensive than that, because of the features and the fact that it's a very niche market.

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

Just now, dizmo said:

Except they don't make 4k monitors above 60hz....so, for those that want to go higher, there's this.

Not everyone runs lower end hardware that can't push 4k content at a high level.

The only way it'll take 10 years, is to get 4k to play on mid tier level hardware.

 

even high end systems cant go near 4k with ultra settings ( i personally think its pointless to increase resolution to reduce game quality , ultra or no go

 

and ye 4k 144hz is gonna take a looong time still if not the FPS its gonna be a problem developing the panels

[McHox]

35 minutes ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

i guess u never play any competitive games, and stick with a ps4 instead lol many games can cap 144 easily

i've been on 144hz since summer 2014 m8.there are way too much games that struggle with that regardless of hardware

Just now, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

even high end systems cant go near 4k with ultra settings

running gta 5 at 4k with max settings/fxaa with up to ~125fps,90 on average.
4k is easy enough to handle with current hardware

[dizmo]

Just now, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

even high end systems cant go near 4k with ultra settings ( i personally think its pointless to increase resolution to reduce game quality , ultra or no go

 

and ye 4k 144hz is gonna take a looong time still if not the FPS its gonna be a problem developing the panels

Yes they can. They can't max out at 144hz, but if you throw 2 1080Ti's at a game, then yeah, you'll hit a lot farther above 60fps.

You don't need to play at Ultra settings, High is often just as good as Ultra with a much lower resource requirement.

You think it's pointless, not everyone does

 

Problem developing panels? They already have. They just have to ramp up production. So the development is already done.

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

4 minutes ago, McHox said:

i've been on 144hz since summer 2014 m8.there are way too much games that struggle with that regardless of hardware

running gta 5 at 4k with max settings/fxaa with up to ~125fps,90 on average.
4k is easy enough to handle with current hardware

^there u got it, who the fuck gets a 144hz monitor for GTA 5... LOL

[McHox]

12 minutes ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

^there u got it, who the fuck gets a 144hz monitor for GTA 5... LOL

are you really that dense

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

21 hours ago, McHox said:

are you really that dense

no, who the fk gets a 144hz monitor to play rpgs or open world games.. like seriously..

[McHox]

12 minutes ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

no, who the fk gets a 144hz monitor to play rpgs or open world games.. like seriously..

[CostcoSamples]

4k 144hz isn't that far away, and isn't pointless. So tired of this ridiculous debate over and over and over... 

[niofalpha]

3 hours ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

no, who the fk gets a 144hz monitor to play rpgs or open world games.. like seriously..

It's a nice touch. Skyrim felt better for the 10 minutes I played without installing abunch of mods. 

 

On 11/25/2017 at 12:20 PM, Judd said:

Probably 2h2018. There is no need for them since even the Titan Xp only gets 70fps at 4K when lowering settings.

For games like CSGO I can get 150 FPS using DSR on 4K on my rig. That's a game where I need high refresh rate to have a level playing field, then if I feel like playing a more graphically demanding game, I can play that at a higher Resolution.

[Revan654]

4K144 is still a long way off, No input can do 4K at 144 currently. DP 1.3/1.4 can do 4K120, DP 1.5 is still in development and will still be years before you see monitors with DP 1.5. There barely any monitors that have DP1.4. With HDMI not even the upcoming HDMI 2.1 supports 4K144, it will only go up to 120. HDMI 2.1 is still years away before it will be included in consumer electronics.

[Septimus]

On 11/25/2017 at 1:38 PM, Bcat00 said:

It will come when the GPU and CPU gets to that point. 

No reason to make a monitor of that spec if no hardware on the market can power it.

 

Or you could just make it, sell it to people who don't realize that they can't take full advantage of it (or who don't care) and make money, and then watch everybody realize they can't actually take full advantage of it, then watch them buy better components, stimulating the market, and therefore giving a reason for more technological advancement. Yay consumers!