Fury x or 980ti

[Nena Trinity]

1 minute ago, Kryptyx said:

What I'm saying is that the game is not released yet and game-ready drivers are not complete. You can't judge Nvidia performance in DX12 until both are ready. There is so much misconception about Nvidia and DX12 it is ridiculous.

True they should release a Async beta driver or so...

[Pokemonking81]

Well after some thought im going with 980 ti hydro copper

 

Edited March 8, 2016 by Pokemonking81

[Pokemonking81]

Welp i'm going with a Fury X Fury because i cant use surround with a dp hub but i can use eyefinity with one (3 on the bottom 2 on top and one vertical on the left) They guy selling the fury x sold it, so i like said im going with a fury

[El Diablo]

fury x

dx12 

 

nuff said

[El Diablo]

12 minutes ago, Pokemonking81 said:

Welp i'm going with a Fury X because i cant use surround with a dp hub but i can use eyefinity with one (3 on the bottom 2 on top and one vertical on the left) 

DONT JUST LOOK AT FPS

 

Fury x has LIQUID VR

HBM.. GAMES LOAD UP SOOO FAST

VCE 3.0 (1-2 Fps loss when recording at high bitrates and upto 4K 60FPS or more i think and nvidia shadowplay comes nothing close to the quality and file sizez ,nor does intel)

TrueAudio (takes audio off the cpu and puts it on a special audio chip on the chip giving way more fps even though no benchmarkers bother to use it)

UVD

LIQUID V.R

VERY LOW TEMPS

feels very sexy ,it has a rubbery thing on it

wont make the inside of your pc hot

has WAAAAAAAAAY better 3.d support, will run basicaly any game in 3.d on any 3d capable tv

 

e.c.t

[El Diablo]

On 23/02/2016 at 7:17 AM, Minsekt said:

the 980ti is a better performer. if youre going for performance get the 980ti. if you want to safe money get the fury.

it looses fps

 

it looses fps in dx12

.........

 

BETA OR NOT

 

it looses fps

 

microsoft shut down fable game due to nvidia

 

2 big gaming studios also got shut down today 

[El Diablo]

On 23/02/2016 at 7:18 AM, Fungal said:

Fury X looks like a better deal but the 980 ti has more vram which is good for sli and idk I don't really trust craigslist

dx12 allows gpu memory pooling

[El Diablo]

On 01/03/2016 at 8:12 PM, Kryptyx said:

It's also in development.

Which speaks loud volumes of how dedicated nvidia are to dx12 titles

 

their own title fable got canceled 

 

virtually every benchmark i have seen so far shows the fury x beating the reference 980 titanium

 

oxide spoke publicly about nvidia pressuring them to disable feature sets. why? 

 

 

 

[WynLore]

In terms of sheer performance, 980 Ti.


But if you want to consider the practices, ideals, and other features between Nvidia and AMD... I'll leave that up to you to decide.

[WynLore]

Woops, botched this one (Hope one of the admins/mods would delete this specific reply. I botched quoting, my bad.

Edited March 8, 2016 by WynLore

[WynLore]

50 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

fury x

dx12 

 

nuff said

That doesn't say much...

46 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

DONT JUST LOOK AT FPS

 

Fury x has LIQUID VR

HBM.. GAMES LOAD UP SOOO FAST

VCE 3.0 (1-2 Fps loss when recording at high bitrates and upto 4K 60FPS or more i think and nvidia shadowplay comes nothing close to the quality and file sizez ,nor does intel)

TrueAudio (takes audio off the cpu and puts it on a special audio chip on the chip giving way more fps even though no benchmarkers bother to use it)

UVD

LIQUID V.R

VERY LOW TEMPS

feels very sexy ,it has a rubbery thing on it

wont make the inside of your pc hot

has WAAAAAAAAAY better 3.d support, will run basicaly any game in 3.d on any 3d capable tv

 

e.c.t

Uhm... what the hell?

38 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

it looses fps

 

it looses fps in dx12

.........

 

BETA OR NOT

 

it looses fps

 

microsoft shut down fable game due to nvidia

 

2 big gaming studios also got shut down today 

Okay, now thats stretching it. 

35 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

dx12 allows gpu memory pooling

I believe its better than we let DX12 out and let it do its thing first before we actually conclude that gpu memory pooling would, in practice, actually be effective.

30 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

Which speaks loud volumes of how dedicated nvidia are to dx12 titles

 

their own title fable got canceled 

 

virtually every benchmark i have seen so far shows the fury x beating the reference 980 titanium

 

oxide spoke publicly about nvidia pressuring them to disable feature sets. why? 

 

 

 

Can you provide evidence of the Fury X beating the 980 Ti?

[Citadelen]

You guys need to get tour heads out of your asses, the 980Ti is the better card, but is it worth $159 more, no, you'd be getting a card that is sometimes faster and sometimes slower. At that price discrepancy a Fury X should easily be the better choice.

[dirtykirty_21]

I don't know why so many people are recommending the 980Ti, where at this point in time it is a relatively old card and the T9 fury/fury x is a relatively new one. Secondly, you guys are saying that if you plan on running dx11 go with the 980Ti and if you plan on running dx12, go with the R9 Fury, try to help the builder be more future proof because most likely he is running windows 12 and would probably like to purchase a card that will last him/her a while. I myself had a huge issue with this choice as I recently built my rig and had to decide between the 980Ti and the R9 Fury, Il give my reasons for going with the R9 Fury(I bought the Asus Strix R9 Fury):

1. It is  the newer card and I could not wait for Nvidia  to release a new card

2. The R9 Fury has native support for the newer platform(DX12) whilst still running DX 11 games relatively well: Heroes of the Storm and World of warcraft both run in the 100FPS range with everything.................I mean everything maxed out.

3. Nvidia support for DX12 will be mostly driver bound..........based on everything that I have read, as the hardware itsellf does not natively handle asyncronous compute(effective management of GPU processing items), whereas the R9 Fury supports it natively.

Keep in mind that this is based on my personal experience with the card and can advise you that the drivers.............at least for the games I play are utter mess so I am running the older Catalyst 15.7 driver and everything world flawless(I really am waiting patiently for the drivers to mature)

 

Hopefully this helps you or anyone asking themselves the same threaded question in the future.

[Morgan MLGman]

While the 980Ti is faster atm, it's nowhere near being 150$+ price difference faster, so in this case, Fury X.

[ResonantPixel]

On 23/02/2016 at 7:12 AM, Pokemonking81 said:

As the title says, and i can currently get a Fury x and a XSPC wb off craiglist for 630$ (has everything with it), or i can get a Evga 980 ti acx 2.0 and a Ek block for 789$ (new and includes tax). Also im going to add another card later. Which one should i go for. 

You should get the Fury x as AMD arent a bunch of B*****ds.

[A/C]

What about those reports saying DX12 favors AMD cards much more?

[MineMineMelon]

Fury X, all the way. If you ever get another card it will scale like a boss.

[Kryptyx]

10 hours ago, El Diablo said:

Which speaks loud volumes of how dedicated nvidia are to dx12 titles

 

their own title fable got canceled 

 

virtually every benchmark i have seen so far shows the fury x beating the reference 980 titanium

 

oxide spoke publicly about nvidia pressuring them to disable feature sets. why? 

 

 

 

Fable being canceled has nothing to do with Nvidia. On top of that, Nvidia was ahead of AMD on Fable benchmarks.

Every benchmark? You mean titles still in development without game-ready drivers?

Nvidia more than likely wanted them to disable async compute because the driver to enable it is not ready.

[El Diablo]

17 hours ago, WynLore said:

In terms of sheer performance, 980 Ti.


But if you want to consider the practices, ideals, and other features between Nvidia and AMD... I'll leave that up to you to decide.

How, referance 980ti gets beat by the fury x every time

 

 

[El Diablo]

16 hours ago, WynLore said:

That doesn't say much...

Uhm... what the hell?

Okay, now thats stretching it. 

I believe its better than we let DX12 out and let it do its thing first before we actually conclude that gpu memory pooling would, in practice, actually be effective.

Can you provide evidence of the Fury X beating the 980 Ti?

go look yourself

[El Diablo]

6 hours ago, Kryptyx said:

Fable being canceled has nothing to do with Nvidia. On top of that, Nvidia was ahead of AMD on Fable benchmarks.

Every benchmark? You mean titles still in development without game-ready drivers?

Nvidia more than likely wanted them to disable async compute because the driver to enable it is not ready.

not ready for over 6 months?

[El Diablo]

8 hours ago, A/C said:

What about those reports saying DX12 favors AMD cards much more?

EXACTLY

 

AMD HAVE HAD THE DX12 FEATURE SET SINCE LIKE 2009

 

NVIDIA CANT OVERNIGHT THE DX12 FEATURES

 

look im sorry,im not attacking you guys

 

look NON REFERANCE 980 TITANIUMS are faster than a fury x

 

but in dx12  NOPE they geat beat

[El Diablo]

Do you know why amd cards faired worse in the fable benchmark

because features were disabled

 

heres the diference between amd and nvidia

 

AMD HAD ASYNC COMPUTE FOR YEARS

nvidia had time to catch up

 

they didnt

 

nvidia on the other hand delibratly pump high tessalation into strands of hair to give amd cards bad performance

 

in the latest dx12 games old old old radeon hd7000 cards are beating the GTX 970

 

and dont ask me for proof, you guys are capable of looking this stuff up yourself

 

im not here trying to fite u guys,, we are all tech heads here, we all love tech

 

 

[Kryptyx]

14 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

not ready for over 6 months?

 

13 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

EXACTLY

 

AMD HAVE HAD THE DX12 FEATURE SET SINCE LIKE 2009

 

NVIDIA CANT OVERNIGHT THE DX12 FEATURES

 

look im sorry,im not attacking you guys

 

look NON REFERANCE 980 TITANIUMS are faster than a fury x

 

but in dx12  NOPE they geat beat

You're still talking about unreleased games... If you want to do that then look at Fable's DX12 performance. Nvidia was on top.

You can't judge Nvidia cards based on 1-2 games that are still in development. Wait for the games and drivers to be released before you can judge it. Beta means nothing.

[El Diablo]

2 minutes ago, Kryptyx said:

 

You're still talking about unreleased games... If you want to do that then look at Fable's DX12 performance. Nvidia was on top.

You can't judge Nvidia cards based on 1-2 games that are still in development. Wait for the games and drivers to be released before you can judge it. Beta means nothing.

im talking about released games

 

sory wrong comment

 

blud they had 6months

 

why did they ask the feature to be turned off

 

comeon man

 

fuck nvidia

 

bro

 

fuck them