Fury x or 980ti

[El Diablo]

On 10/03/2016 at 0:08 AM, super_skank said:

I think he is referring to shader caching has now disappeared from AMD drivers for some reason, this did actually work quite well, in terms of loading games a bit faster...unsure where its gone or why it's now gone in crimson 16.2.1

even before the shader cache games loaded realy fast

[El Diablo]

On 10/03/2016 at 2:37 AM, 2dfx said:

On a side note regarding team red vs team green...you have to wonder what is going through Nvidia's head at the planning level.  Seems to me like they're slacking on the innovation side of things.  No async compute aside, Nvidia has traditionally been ahead of AMD or toe-to-toe with them from a hardware perspective.  

 

But it almost seems like they're taking an "Intel vs AMD" position where their market lead is so great that they can afford to rest on their laurels.  To me, their market lead isn't THAT great that they can be doing it.  AMD, at least on the graphics front, is working on new emerging tech and innovating in the space to have that robust, future proof edge.

 

I do NOT see Nvidia doing this.  And I think it's going to cost them...

passcall vs polaris

16nm vs 14nm

 

i think the gtx980 titanium and the titan x which was a card worthy of the name  are two good cards to finish with when a company starts to go downhill after that

 

at least they ended on a bang

 

nobody denys the 980 titanium is the beast card and the go to card when it comes to dx11

 

even though the fury x has bad frame pacing theres a reason for it, dx12+ liquid v.r solves it

 

i didnt not post charts before showing the fury x winning in fps in 95% of the games because truthfully,, i cant be fucked

 

i only posted them now because i saw them popup in the comment section on wccftech

 

its somuch crap to go thru to find the last 4months worth of games to just prove a point

 

im not one of them guys

 

either believe what i say or dont

 

its totaly up to u

 

just rember

 

im not here tryin to cause a fight

 

im a mma fighter

 

talk is cheep.........

[El Diablo]

Nvidia had 4 years to play catchup with the AMD G.C.N architecture

 

 

 

and so did intel when it came to amd shitting out 8core CPU'S

 

atleast intel caught up with amd and so have amd caught with with intel, their new stony bridge 28nm cpu's are on par  with the intel i7 skylake 14nm chips

 

amd was so ahead in the technology department they were irrelivent

 

finally their old cpu's are throwing punches with all their muscular fibers interconected with one another  and they are trading blows with intels low binned beasts

 

wtf was nvidia doing all these years?  literaly,,WHAT HAVE NVIDIA INVENTED IN THE PAST 10 YEARS?

 

 

 

[2dfx]

20 hours ago, El Diablo said:

passcall vs polaris

16nm vs 14nm

 

We all have our reasons.

 

I chose 2x Fury X's for 2 reasons - best price/performance ratio on the market, arguably.

 

And an eye to the future.

[El Diablo]

21 minutes ago, 2dfx said:

We all have our reasons.

 

I chose 2x Fury X's for 2 reasons - best price/performance ratio on the market, arguably.

 

And an eye to the future.

there is no fury x2

 

its called the radeon pro duo

 

 

[El Diablo]

 

 

[2dfx]

11 hours ago, El Diablo said:

there is no fury x2

 

its called the radeon pro duo

 

 

You read my post wrong.

 

2x Fury X as in I have 2 of them (in cf)

[Big-G]

On 13/3/2016 at 9:54 PM, 2dfx said:

You read my post wrong.

 

2x Fury X as in I have 2 of them (in cf)

Or just get a single Pro Duo

[2dfx]

On 3/15/2016 at 10:10 PM, GidonsClaw said:

Or just get a single Pro Duo

Ahh yes, the Sony Radeon Memory Stick Pro Duo