Jump to content

This video will not age well - AMD Radeon RX 7900 Series Review

7 minutes ago, DeerDK said:

Seems like a good call. 

I might upgrade, mostly because my 3060 doesn't fit in my mITX case. Waiting to see what the 7600 xt brings to the table, though 

It will probably perform like a 6700 XT and will cost the same amount of money as the 6700 XT...

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Vishera said:

It will probably perform like a 6700 XT and will cost the same amount of money as the 6700 XT...

I'm hoping more in line of the 6800, and with better RT, but we will have to wait and see. 

Otherwise the 6700 is also a good deal now.

mITX is awesome! I regret nothing (apart from when picking parts or have to do maintainance *cough*cough*)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Vishera said:

The RTX 3080 costs $550 in my country...

It's significantly cheaper than the 7900 XT and the performance difference is just 12%.

That chart I posted only shows relative performance of ray tracing performance that has been averaged over several games, with ray tracing being an area the AMD cards have been behind the competition in. It does not tell the full story. The cards perform vastly differently depending on the game with RT due to the different ways games implement RT features. In ray tracing the 3080 beats the 7900xt in some games (cyberpunk, control) and the 7900xt performs better in others. 

You need to read the full review and look at traditional rasterisation performance, as well as things like thermals and power consumption, to get the full picture.

 

But, yeah. If the price is right then buying last generation cards - or used cards - might be the better option, depending what it is you want. If you are looking for something cheaper it might also be worthwhile waiting for the RX 7800 XT or RTX 4070 (Ti?) and seeing how much they cost and how they compare.

CPU: Intel i7 6700k  | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170x Gaming 5 | RAM: 2x16GB 3000MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX | GPU: Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080ti | PSU: Corsair RM750x (2018) | Case: BeQuiet SilentBase 800 | Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34 eSports | SSD: Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 840 500GB + Crucial MX500 2TB | Monitor: Acer Predator XB271HU + Samsung BX2450

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh, screw the USB-C port, triple DP on AIB cards please, don't want to have to use a dongle to hook up three screens or downgrade to HDMI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

depending on local pricing and how the encoding turns out to be I will get one of these, kinda need an upgrade from my r9 290's, even if people in this topic are saying it isnt a great upgrade from last gen, it is way way way better than what i currently have and i want to have an AV1 encoding card and seeing how long i keep hardware its a need to have to last to the future

RAM 32 GB of Corsair DDR4 3200Mhz            MOTHERBOARD ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
CPU Ryzen 9 5950X             GPU dual r9 290's        COOLING custom water loop using EKWB blocks
STORAGE samsung 970 EVo plus 2Tb Nvme, Samsung 850 EVO 512GB, WD Red 1TB,  Seagate 4 TB and Seagate Exos X18 18TB

Psu Corsair AX1200i
MICROPHONE RODE NT1-A          HEADPHONES Massdrop & Sennheiser HD6xx
MIXER inkel mx-1100   peripherals Corsair k-95 (the og 18G keys one)  and a Corsair scimitar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Blender performance

I have a feeling the Blender performance difference is due to OptiX specifically taking advantage of the RT cores. My 2080 Super can render literally twice as fast using OptiX than just CUDA. I am not sure if the AMD HiP integration supports the RT features of the AMD cards, so it is likely just using it's raw compute through HiP like usual. There is a good chance we will see significant performance jumps in Blender. Not matching, but probably twice as fast as its base speed. I am also a little sad that wasn't mentioned (if it is the case) because it could have been yet another "aged like fine wine" point, lol.

 

I am certain that if AMD is able to push more raw RT performance in their cards (just like how they're pushing more VRAM at a lower cost), they will be an incredibly compelling option for workstation users, which is a market that AMD has yet to capture.

Heck, we might even see cloud render farms offering a cheaper option through AMD cards, similar to how AWS is able to offer significantly cheaper VPS solutions by offering EPYC-based VMs rather than Intel Xeon Scalable VMs.

Edit: I found meeting notes from the Blender dev team:

Quote

AMD HIP-RT: AMD have hardware ray-tracing working internally, but stability and performance are still being worked on and driver support for this still needs to become part of an official release. A patch will be sent to Brecht for early design review.


Also, in the Cycles AMD HIP device feedback forum post from Brecht:

Quote

See the last meeting notes for updates on HIP-RT, an initial implementation is being reviewed by me. And the goal is of course for that to be an API other renderers use as well.
 

We decided to drop OpenCL because it was holding back Cycles development, driver issues and other limitations were making it very hard to add new features. If we were still using OpenCL we’d struggle to support these older architectures as well when there is no official AMD support for them anymore.
 

Already now when adding for example many lights sampling I’ve had to spend time doing workarounds. But at least with HIP we can ensure that the one compiler version we use works, rather than dealing with a range of OpenCL driver versions and implementations that each have their own bugs and limitations.


So based on this, it seems like AMD RT accelerated rendering is definitely going to be a thing, pending some bugs and issues.

Edit 2: They have a tracker which includes "hardware ray tracing" as a task:

https://developer.blender.org/T91571

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spotty said:

The downside to showing the results this way is you'll need to view the separate charts for the 7900xt and 7900xtx. I think the reason LTT did the chart their way was to condense both cards info on to one chart

They could've still achieved it by essentially comparing 6900 XT and 4080/4090 to the 7900 XT/XTX not the other way around. Usually when you take something as reference point, you compare other values to that reference point, not compare reference point to other values. Like, that's entire point of a "reference" point, haha.

6900 XT - -60% (compared to reference)
7900 XT - reference perf.

4090 - +50% (compared to reference)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I switch from an NVIDIA to an AMD, will Steam Link still work on my NVIDIA Shield TV Pro?  I know I'll lose NVIDIA's game stream setup, but will Steam's at least still function or does NVIDIA lock that to NVIDIA cards as well?

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600X  | Motherboard: ASROCK B450 pro4 | RAM: 2x16GB  | GPU: MSI NVIDIA RTX 2060 | Cooler: Noctua NH-U9S | SSD: Samsung 980 Evo 1T 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Way too expensive, not that fast. Easy skip. They can only get away with this pricing because Nvidia's pricing is beyond ridiculous this gen

CPU-AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D GPU- RTX 4070 SUPER FE MOBO-ASUS ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wifi RAM-32gb G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 6000cl30 STORAGE-2x1TB Seagate Firecuda 530 PCIE4 NVME PSU-Corsair RM1000x Shift COOLING-EK-AIO 360mm with 3x Lian Li P28 + 4 Lian Li TL120 (Intake) CASE-Phanteks NV5 MONITORS-ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ 1440p 170hz+Gigabyte G24F 1080p 180hz PERIPHERALS-Lamzu Maya+ 4k Dongle+LGG Saturn Pro Mousepad+Nk65 Watermelon (Tangerine Switches)+Autonomous ErgoChair+ AUDIO-RODE NTH-100+Schiit Magni Heresy+Motu M2 Interface

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LapsedMemory said:

If I switch from an NVIDIA to an AMD, will Steam Link still work on my NVIDIA Shield TV Pro?  I know I'll lose NVIDIA's game stream setup, but will Steam's at least still function or does NVIDIA lock that to NVIDIA cards as well?

steam link would use steam, and mostly any GPU? If it's through the shield itself or through nvidia's streaming service that would likely be different.

 

Also dam, quite the price difference and performance difference between 7900xt and xtx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

need a new build just for a 4090, not planning on that atm, the xtx is...ok over the 6950xt, need some AIB cards, oc testing and driver updates, and it's not worth 1k if the 4080 is 1200, probably need to drop another 100bucks in price.

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

wait 3 to 6 months and see what uptake,

on blender lvl work with amd. unless its hpc cards and software stack. not worth it.

MSI x399 sli plus  | AMD theardripper 2990wx all core 3ghz lock |Thermaltake flo ring 360 | EVGA 2080, Zotac 2080 |Gskill Ripjaws 128GB 3000 MHz | Corsair RM1200i |150tb | Asus tuff gaming mid tower| 10gb NIC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ubersonic said:

Meh, screw the USB-C port, triple DP on AIB cards please, don't want to have to use a dongle to hook up three screens or downgrade to HDMI.

It's DisplayPort, you can just daisy-chain the displays...

OWNED CONSOLES [ INTV | NES | SNES | GG | N64 | GBCPS1 | GCN | GBA/GBA SPDC | PS2 | Wii | DS Lite/DSi | Wii U | 3DS/XL/nXL | Switch ] PLANNED ( XSX | Amico ) TV: E420VL + CT-26WX15N

GAMING PC/WORKSTATION [ Aether Case: FD Focus G Mini | CPU: AMD Ryzen 3950X (16c32t @3.5GHz) | GPU: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | RAM: 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 @3600MHz | Mobo: Aorus X570 mITX | PSU: SSR-600TL

OS: Win10 Pro | SSD: WD SN750 1TB NVMe | HDD: 4TB WD Black | KB/M: Dell Multimedia USB Hub Keyboard (SK-8135) + Logitech G903 HERO | Display: ASUS VE248H + Dell E177FP | Headset: Corsair Void Pro RGB Wireless

HTPC/HOME SERVER [ Phazon Case: Antec 900 Two | CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black (4c4t @3.67GHz) | GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB | RAM: 12GB (2x4GB+2x2GB) DDR3 @1400MHz | Mobo: MSI 870A-G54 | PSU: SSR-450PL

OS: Win10 Pro | SSD: Crucial 240GB SATA | HDD: 8TB HGST Ultrastar + 750GB WD Caviar Green + 200 GB Seagate | KB/M: Microsoft Wireless Entertainment Desktop 7000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GPU prices continue to drop in my country...

The 6700 XT just dropped to $300 in the local shops here.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD have turned disappointing people into an art form.

 

Seriously, both the XT and XTX are massive disappointments.

Instead of seeing 20-30% gains over the 4080, we see next to nothing. Neck and neck, or less.

Sure its cheaper than the 4080 ..but a Jag is cheaper than a Bugatti ...its still fking expensive !

 

The prices are insane, no amount of performance can justify it. The 7900XTX and 4080 are ...XX80 tier ..not even xx80ti ..and they are at the £/$1,000 mark.

Its stupid, and those with so little self control who buy them are only hurting themselves, and the consumer tech community in general, in the long run as they signal to these manufacturers that these prices are OK.

 

CPU: Intel i7 3930k w/OC & EK Supremacy EVO Block | Motherboard: Asus P9x79 Pro  | RAM: G.Skill 4x4 1866 CL9 | PSU: Seasonic Platinum 1000w Corsair RM 750w Gold (2021)|

VDU: Panasonic 42" Plasma | GPU: Gigabyte 1080ti Gaming OC & Barrow Block (RIP)...GTX 980ti | Sound: Asus Xonar D2X - Z5500 -FiiO X3K DAP/DAC - ATH-M50S | Case: Phantek Enthoo Primo White |

Storage: Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD + WD Blue 1TB SSD | Cooling: XSPC D5 Photon 270 Res & Pump | 2x XSPC AX240 White Rads | NexXxos Monsta 80x240 Rad P/P | NF-A12x25 fans |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, SolarNova said:

AMD have turned disappointing people into an art form.

I think you missed the point Linus made of: the last generation AMD cards have gotten better with software + it is clear that the 7900XT/X are trading blows in certain games with inconsistent results, i.e: probably a software issue.

I wouldn't be surprised if 3-6 months after today, these cards will do way better (especially with third-party cards).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

A note about the graph at 12:11 - while our data was correct, the manner in which it was displayed was not. This graph should have been broken into two, with one showing Total Graphics Power and one showing Total Board Power (as seen below). Our video's power conclusions remain unchanged, but we wanted to be sure that you had all of the data for yourself. 

 

image.png

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×