wait i thought RTX 3090 is the best Gpu out there

[Orian Pax]

plz check the attached image,

wait i thought RTX 3090 is the best Gpu out there without a doubt,

then how come 6900xt has this much upper hand in this section?

why is there so much difference?

[Naijin]

7 minutes ago, Orian Pax said:

plz check the attached image,

wait i thought RTX 3090 is the best Gpu out there without a doubt,

then how come 6900xt has this much upper hand in this section?

why is there so much difference?

Don't use Userbenchmark to compare. If you want to game, look up gaming benchmarks. For content creation, look up actual content creation benchmarks.

[Rym]

Synthethic benchmarks, not real world performance difference.

[boggy77]

becasue userbenchmark is flawed and no one should ever use it.

for example, according to the screenshot above, the 6900xt is 50% better because it's released 2 months ago, as opposed to 4

[MadPistol]

UserBenchmark... when will people stop using this?

The RTX 3090 has 24GB VRAM, more VRAM bandwidth, DLSS capability, and better Ray Tracing performance. It also will beat a 6900 XT at 4K performance roughly 90% of the time, and it has enough VRAM and bandwidth to handle 8K (although this one is reaching as it's still not that fast).

It is almost guaranteed that an RTX 3090 will long outlast a 6900 XT in usability. That does not mean an RX 6900 XT is a bad card... far from it. But nobody should be choosing an RX 6900 XT over an RTX 3090 if given a choice between the 2.

[Orian Pax]

7 hours ago, Naijin said:

Don't use Userbenchmark to compare. If you want to game, look up gaming benchmarks. For content creation, look up actual content creation benchmarks.

@Naijin  "For content creation, look up actual content creation benchmarks."
where can i look up that? any place/website recommended by you?

7 hours ago, Rym said:

Synthethic benchmarks, not real world performance difference.

@Rym any better website or more authentic website than userbenchmark? (i am asking for your recommendations thank you)

1 hour ago, MadPistol said:

UserBenchmark... when will people stop using this?

The RTX 3090 has 24GB VRAM, more VRAM bandwidth, DLSS capability, and better Ray Tracing performance. It also will beat a 6900 XT at 4K performance roughly 90% of the time, and it has enough VRAM and bandwidth to handle 8K (although this one is reaching as it's still not that fast).

It is almost guaranteed that an RTX 3090 will long outlast a 6900 XT in usability. That does not mean an RX 6900 XT is a bad card... far from it. But nobody should be choosing an RX 6900 XT over an RTX 3090 if given a choice between the 2.

@MadPistol any better website or more authentic website than userbenchmark? (i am asking for your recommendations thank you)

7 hours ago, boggy77 said:

becasue userbenchmark is flawed and no one should ever use it.

for example, according to the screenshot above, the 6900xt is 50% better because it's released 2 months ago, as opposed to 4

 @boggy77 any better website or more authentic website than userbenchmark? (i am asking for your recommendations thank you)

 

[Middcore]

Look at reviews from reputable sources like HardwareUnboxed, Gamers Nexus, Tom's Hardware, Guru3D. These will almost always include detailed charts and graphs comparing performance to the closest rivals in real use cases. 

 

Userbenchmark is a trash website that games SEO to be one of the top search results for virtually any "hardware X vs hardware Y" comparison but arbitrarily weights things in their rankings to make whatever part they want to look superior, then accuses anyone who calls them on their BS of being a paid shill. (Although I will say it's a refreshing change to see Userbenchmark BS actually come out in an AMD product's favor.)

[ImAyaanKhan]

8 hours ago, Orian Pax said:

plz check the attached image,

wait i thought RTX 3090 is the best Gpu out there without a doubt,

then how come 6900xt has this much upper hand in this section?

why is there so much difference?

 

Userbenchmark is not inidicative of real world performance, always take what you see there with a grain of salt. I'd recommend watching youtube videos showing their real world performance instead

[boggy77]

26 minutes ago, Orian Pax said:

@Naijin  "For content creation, look up actual content creation benchmarks."
where can i look up that? any place/website recommended by you?

@Rym any better website or more authentic website than userbenchmark? (i am asking for your recommendations thank you)

@MadPistol any better website or more authentic website than userbenchmark? (i am asking for your recommendations thank you)

 @boggy77 any better website or more authentic website than userbenchmark? (i am asking for your recommendations thank you)

 

as others said, HardwareUnboxed, Gamers Nexus, Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, Anandtech, techpowerup are all good review websites that compare hardware for a large array of use cases. for software, puget systems also have very good benchmarks 

[Orian Pax]

29 minutes ago, boggy77 said:

 Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, Anandtech, techpowerup

finally websites to read other than youtube videos, this is what i wanted.

are there more websites?
i have frequently seen many spec mistakes done by tom, and tech powerup.

that's why i was wondering if there are any better or any alternative?

@boggy77

@ImAyaanKhan
@Middcore @MadPistol@Rym @Naijin

[boggy77]

4 minutes ago, Orian Pax said:

finally websites to read other than youtube videos, this is what i wanted.

are there more websites?
i have frequently seen many spec mistakes done by tom, and tech powerup.

that's why i was wondering if there are any better or any alternative?

@boggy77

@ImAyaanKhan
@Middcore @MadPistol@Rym @Naijin

techspot, kitguru, hexus

[-rascal-]

2 hours ago, Orian Pax said:

finally websites to read other than youtube videos, this is what i wanted.

are there more websites?
i have frequently seen many spec mistakes done by tom, and tech powerup.

that's why i was wondering if there are any better or any alternative?

@boggy77

@ImAyaanKhan
@Middcore @MadPistol@Rym @Naijin

 

Gamers Nexus has a website, but their videos are usually more in-depth version of the review article.

Some of their reviews and deep-dives are also YouTube video exclusive.

 

Their videos have time stamps embedded, so you can skip to the sections you want to check out.

 

 

You can only explain so much with text....it might get super confusing without any images / video clips, etc.

Example is the NZXT H1 case recall investigation...they were trying to re-create the CASE FIRE issue.

How do you write that out in text easily...

 

https://www.gamersnexus.net/

[Orian Pax]

10 hours ago, -rascal- said:

 

Gamers Nexus has a website, but their videos are usually more in-depth version of the review article.

Some of their reviews and deep-dives are also YouTube video exclusive.

 

Their videos have time stamps embedded, so you can skip to the sections you want to check out.

 

 

You can only explain so much with text....it might get super confusing without any images / video clips, etc.

Example is the NZXT H1 case recall investigation...they were trying to re-create the CASE FIRE issue.

How do you write that out in text easily...

 

https://www.gamersnexus.net/

yes indeed you are right but tech jesus lacks a thing which is videos like below
1)

(yes i know about buildzoid but he does such type of videos mostly on motherboards, i wonder if tech jesus & builzoid will collaborate for gpu RAMBLING like they did for motherboards)
one the scale of one to 10 just like linus my trust score for tech jesus is 9/10!

and i don't know how much should i trust this O!Technology guy/people/channel

 

Hardware Unboxed has videos which are "intersection" of both O!Technology and tech jesus but the hardware unboxed guys talk like they don't have trust in their own work.

 

like always thanks for suggestion. if u want to add more plz do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Orian Pax]

guys,what do you think about these websites?

1) https://www.ozarc.games/nvidia-rtx-3080-vs-1080-ti/
2) https://hwbench.com/vgas/geforce-rtx-3080-vs-geforce-gtx-1080-ti

3) https://www.gpucheck.com/compare/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080-vs-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti/intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz/medium

 @-rascal-

 @boggy77

 @Middcore

 @ImAyaanKhan

 @Rym@Naijin@MadPistol

 

 

[SavageNeo]

3 minutes ago, Orian Pax said:

guys,what do you think about these websites?

1) https://www.ozarc.games/nvidia-rtx-3080-vs-1080-ti/

 

 

the scores seem pretty much inline. seems like a decent website

 

4 minutes ago, Orian Pax said:

https://hwbench.com/vgas/geforce-rtx-3080-vs-geforce-gtx-1080-ti

very bad website. no info about testing specs. probably generated numbers.

 

5 minutes ago, Orian Pax said:

https://www.gpucheck.com/compare/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080-vs-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti/intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz/medium

also no testing specs. pretty bad website

[Mark Kaine]

21 hours ago, boggy77 said:

hexus

I dunno why people give credit to that site

 I read a 'review' of gigabyte 3070 Vision OC, there's basically zero info and it boils down to "yes this is indeed a video card"... worst review ever /10

apparently I mixed it up with "ilikekillnerds.com", my bad

 

21 hours ago, Orian Pax said:

i have frequently seen many spec mistakes done by tom, and tech powerup.

yes they make mistakes, but generally, it's not that important - - the results these guys get are barely ever comparable to the results *you* will get, they do not always disclose what hw was actually used, neither what settings were used in their test, "ultra" doesn't really cut it, especially when some games don't even have "ultra" settings - - that's not to mention that they often get handpicked 'review samples' from the manufacturer which will outperform the average 'customer samples" manifold... 

[boggy77]

38 minutes ago, Mark Kaine said:

I dunno why people give credit to that site, I read a 'review' of gigabyte 3070 Vision OC, there's basically zero info and it boils down to "yes this is indeed a video card"... worst review ever /10

just had a quick search, looks like a pretty good review, they cover the basics, synthetic tests, games benchmarks, noise, power, overclocking. it isn't super in-depth, but decent, i'd say

https://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/146425-gigabyte-geforce-rtx-3070-gaming-oc/

[Mark Kaine]

9 minutes ago, boggy77 said:

just had a quick search, looks like a pretty good review, they cover the basics, synthetic tests, games benchmarks, noise, power, overclocking. it isn't super in-depth, but decent, i'd say

https://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/146425-gigabyte-geforce-rtx-3070-gaming-oc/

Actually that's the Gaming OC, not Vision OC - - they're supposed to be similar / identical - - but that's precisely why I wanted to see reviews... 

 

Anyway I think I was thinking of this 'review' which is really just 'yes its a video card, with bent pins that I possibly bent myself...' kinda 'review' ... 

https://ilikekillnerds.com/2020/12/gigabyte-rtx-3070-vision-oc-8gb-graphics-card-review/

 

 

 

I coulda sworn there was one from hexus too but I can't find it, so probably my bad. 

 

However, there is a severe lack of gigabyte vision OC reviews, which is quite irritating... 

 

[Orian Pax]

2 hours ago, Mark Kaine said:

yes they make mistakes, but generally, it's not that important - - the results these guys get are barely ever comparable to the results *you* will get, they do not always disclose what hw was actually used, neither what settings were used in their test, "ultra" doesn't really cut it, especially when some games don't even have "ultra" settings - - that's not to mention that they often get handpicked 'review samples' from the manufacturer which will outperform the average 'customer samples" manifold... 

yes exactly what i wanted to say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(but i was scared that i might get attacked)

[Orian Pax]

2 hours ago, SavageNeo said:

the scores seem pretty much inline. seems like a decent website

 

very bad website. no info about testing specs. p

 

also no testing specs. pretty bad website

oh i see, thanks confirming!

2 hours ago, SavageNeo said:

probably generated numbers.

i don't much about it seems like something new for me to research about.

 

oh long time no see, nice to see you there,how are you?

also do you have any recommendations other than below websites?

 - Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, Anandtech, techpowerup,techspot, kitguru, hexus

 

[SavageNeo]

Just now, Orian Pax said:

oh i see, thanks confirming!

i don't much about it seems like something new for me to research about.

 

oh long time no see, nice to see you there,how are you?

also do you have any recommendations other than below websites?

 - Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, Anandtech, techpowerup,techspot, kitguru, hexus

 

those websites are pretty reliable. I do not really have others to recommend

[Orian Pax]

3 minutes ago, SavageNeo said:

those websites are pretty reliable. I do not really have others to recommend

Yosh!

--------------------------------------------------------------

I guess this should be enough in-depth study for this topic, thank you very much everyone!

 @-rascal-

 @boggy77

 @Middcore

 @ImAyaanKhan

 @Rym@Naijin@MadPistol

@SavageNeo