9900k 400 dollars. Thank you AMD!

[Turtle Rig]

17 minutes ago, _Syn_ said:

 

Too many choices my friend. 9900k or Ryzen 3900 or 3950x lol.  I might sit it out Im not sure, I need to see benchies on July 7th and what not.

[LukeSavenije]

9 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

15 min for 46 minutes is amazing! 

i'll tell you a couple things you probably should know by now

 

adobe is unoptimised as hell, and only really has something in place for quicksync and cuda, not for opengl, that's why amd generally performs worse.

 

and if leaked benches are true, even the 3700x would smoke a 9900k, let alone a 3950x

 

and there's no i10

[GoldenLag]

9 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

I just might bypass the Ryzen and get a i10 next year, unless Ryzen blows away the 9900k which I doubt.

Look at benchmarks for the 2950x. That is what you are getting in terms of rendering performance. 

 

Or wait 3 days.

 

13 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

My old man rendered a 46 minute video with Premiere.  It was 1080p 30fps h.264 and it did it in 15 minutes

In other words Doesnt say a lot when you cant compare......

 

Also the 2950x has quite the rendering advantage in adobe premiere.

 

16 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

What else can you ask for ? 

Something to compare to.....

[Gohardgrandpa]

So your telling me I watched you post tons of ryzen threads and you might not even buy one? 

Hmm 

[LukeSavenije]

Just now, GoldenLag said:

ook at benchmarks for the 2950x. That is what you are getting in terms of rendering performance. 

or maybe even better because of the higher boost clock

[DezGalbie]

16 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

unless Ryzen blows away the 9900k which I doubt

As long as the benchmarks coming out aren't complete fantasy, then 3rd gen Ryzen does seem to blow away the 9900K. I mean, when you look at both performance and price:performance together.

In terms of performance alone, 9900K won't be completely blown away, but it will be at least a little slower, and at a significantly higher cost.

[Turtle Rig]

9 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

i'll tell you a couple things you probably should know by now

 

adobe is unoptimised as hell, and only really has something in place for quicksync and cuda, not for opengl, that's why amd generally performs worse.

 

and if leaked benches are true, even the 3700x would smoke a 9900k, let alone a 3950x

 

and there's no i10

Good post Luke to the rescue.  You say AMD is not as good in Premiere but then you say the 3700 will smoke the 9900k.  So I'm assuming you mean these new Zen 2 chips and not the AMD of the past and what not.

[LukeSavenije]

1 minute ago, Turtle Rig said:

Good post Luke to the rescue.  You say AMD is not as good in Premiere but then you say the 3700 will smoke the 9900k.  So I'm assuming you mean these new Zen 2 chips and not the AMD of the past and what not.

I said the 3700x will GENERALLY outperform it, for adobe we're yet to see, because it currently heavily relies on quicksync to perform better, which has to do with the igpu, not the cpu

 

and amd has a disadvantage with gpu's because they can't utilize cuda, rather rely on opengl, which is badly inplemented in adobe

16 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

So I'm assuming you mean these new Zen 2 chips and not the AMD of the past and what not.

i'm saying that amd is currently going ahead of intel, and by far