Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[SimplyChunk]

My scores

[CrypticSnow]

1 hour ago, Jumper118 said:

its inefficient. if you look at the sheet the average score not including my sub zero score for a 2700X is 1900.875cb. even the average 1700, which is a previous gen, bottom bin part average is higher than your score. your £/performance is not good. even with a stock cooler that cpu should be able to boost to 4ghz.

so just to be clear. my 2700X was at 3.7 not overclocked at all. would u rather i give you one with it at 4.1 or 4.2?

[SimplyChunk]

3 minutes ago, CrypticSnow said:

so just to be clear. my 2700X was at 3.7 not overclocked at all. would u rather i give you one with it at 4.1 or 4.2?

What board do you have?

[SimplyChunk]

6 minutes ago, CrypticSnow said:

so just to be clear. my 2700X was at 3.7 not overclocked at all. would u rather i give you one with it at 4.1 or 4.2?

nvm i found your screen shot   Don't go cooking your hardware just to satiate these rabid beasts.  If you're happy with your performance leave it where it is.  If not try and find a nice little guide somewhere on overclocking your chip see if you get some more  

[Jumper118]

7 hours ago, CrypticSnow said:

so just to be clear. my 2700X was at 3.7 not overclocked at all. would u rather i give you one with it at 4.1 or 4.2?

yes, you would get much better value for money. I dont understand why you would have it locked to the base clock. it is like underclocking your cpu. at that point you might as well have saved some money and bought a first gen cpu for much less. 

[CrypticSnow]

9 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

yes, you would get much better value for money. I dont understand why you would have it locked to the base clock. it is like underclocking your cpu. at that point you might as well have saved some money and bought a first gen cpu for much less. 

Because Overclocking my CPU isn't mandatory. I'm not having performance issues with anything. it is running more than smoothly. why would i touch something that has no issues nor needs any tweaking?

[Tech Wizard]

2 minutes ago, CrypticSnow said:

Because Overclocking my CPU isn't mandatory. I'm not having performance issues with anything. it is running more than smoothly. why would i touch something that has no issues nor needs any tweaking?

My dude, this is a "competition" here on LTT forums. You're suppose to overclock your chip high, so you can get a kickass score in to the sheets. Stock speeds are boring, and will be placed low.

[Jumper118]

Just now, CrypticSnow said:

Because Overclocking my CPU isn't mandatory. I'm not having performance issues with anything. it is running more than smoothly. why would i touch something that has no issues nor needs any tweaking?

I didn't say it was mandatory. You are not having performance issue subjectively but it is objectively underperforming compared to other processors. Its probably not running as smoothly as it could. 

 

Because if you touching things, magical new worlds of performance may be unlocked that you never knew existed. 

[Jumper118]

2 minutes ago, Tech Wizard said:

My dude, this is a "competition" here on LTT forums. You're suppose to overclock your chip high, so you can get a kickass score in to the sheets. Stock speeds are boring, and will be placed low.

It isn't even that. I am just advising that he gets the maximum performance for the price he paid. Where its gaming or cinebench or anything else. 

[PhilOCE]

 

Not too bad for an old girl that costed £250 to build!

[Jumper118]

1 hour ago, PhilOCE said:

 

 

Not too bad for an old girl that costed £250 to build!

cpusz is a great addition and its free  

[purple_rider]

New school, new laptop. Here's my XPS 13 (2018)

[Tech Wizard]

@Jumper118 Is the E5-1620 unlocked like a 3820?

 

$30 1620 nearby

[Jumper118]

1 hour ago, Tech Wizard said:

@Jumper118 Is the E5-1620 unlocked like a 3820?

 

$30 1620 nearby

yes

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e5_1620/

[Aaron Springs]

Just benchmarked a used PC I found out by the dumpster here.  It is only 4 years old, but its score is hilariously low.

 

The thing is an HP All-In-One model# 19-2014 which dates from early 2014.  It came stock with Windows 8.1 and 4GB of memory.  I tossed in an 8GB memory stick I had in the pile of spare parts to bring it up to a whopping 12GB.  And I upgraded it to Windows 10 Home because, well, I hate Windows 8.1 more than Windows 10.

 

Oh, did I mention this thing has single channel memory?  The fun just never stops.

 

 

It sports an AMD E1-2500 APU with is a dual core APU that has a base clock or 800MHz and turbos up to the dizzying speed of 1.4 GHz.    Back in 2014 this APU was intended for use in low end laptops where battery life matters more than raw performance, I think.  TDP is rated at 10 watts.

 

By now you are probably thinking something along the lines of "Wow, that thing must be a total pig!"

 

And it is.

 

Its Cinebench score is 48.  That was with Open Hardware Monitor running to keep track of temps which never managed to top 56 degrees C.  I suppose I ought to rerun it with nothing else running to see just how much of a difference that makes on this thing.  I should time the run if I do.  It took quite a while to finish.   Like ... minutes.

 

I must say, this thing amuses me, though it's not likely to be used much.  Mostly I decided to get it up and running on Windows 10 because I run Linux on my main PC and I decided that having a Windows PC here might occasionally be useful.

 

 

[Aaron Springs]

Okay, a quick follow up.  I reran Cinebench on this HP All-In-One 19-2014 but without the Open Hardware Monitor running to see if that made a difference.  This time the CPU score was 47 cb,  That's less than the 48 I got with the Open Hardware Monitor running so I'm going to just chalk it up to some random variability in something I didn't control.

 

Oh, in case anybody is interested, the CPU benchmark took more than 14 minutes to run on this thing.

 

That's one pass.

 

14 minutes.

 

 

I won't bother to post a second screen shot.  I mean, what would be the point?

 

 

Anyway, enough of this for now.

 

[DildorTheDecent]

38 minutes ago, Aaron Springs said:

Okay, a quick follow up.  I reran Cinebench on this HP All-In-One 19-2014 but without the Open Hardware Monitor running to see if that made a difference.  This time the CPU score was 47 cb,  That's less than the 48 I got with the Open Hardware Monitor running so I'm going to just chalk it up to some random variability in something I didn't control.

What you need to do is run it in real time and run it offscreen as much as you can.

 

And CPU-Z too. Unless this is for fun.

[Aaron Springs]

2 hours ago, DildorTheDecent said:

What you need to do is run it in real time and run it offscreen as much as you can.

 

And CPU-Z too. Unless this is for fun.

Well, considering that the PC is a total sloth (a dual core running at 1.4 GHz in its turbo mode) that I will most likely never use for anything more than running an occasional utility that is only available in a Windows version (I run Linux on my daily driver system) the whole point of posting the benchmark results here was really just as an amusement for folks who normally see numbers an order of magnitude higher in the results people get on their serious gaming rigs.

 

My personal reason for even installing the Cinebench benchmarks on that pig of a system in the first place had more to do with checking the system's thermals under extreme CPU load than anything else,  The benchmark software is a good way to really load up the CPU to see how well the system handles the heat generated.  It did occur to me that the system was likely going to turn in some hilariously bad benchmark scores given its processor specs.

 

Mind you, I don't think its numbers are bad enough to set any records on the low end.  I'm sure there are operational PCs out there that use processors that are so bad that they would turn in even worse results, though I suspect most of them are quite a bit older.

[DildorTheDecent]

10 hours ago, Aaron Springs said:

 

Usually just saying "this is for fun" suffices.

 

You do you though.

[Jumper118]

@Ground

[Ground]

4 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

@Ground

 

I saw on Hwbot and should be able to beat you once it gets a bit colder here (or once I get around to get some dice going) - those last 3 cb might even be beatable with some more tuning, but I don't wanna degrade my daily any further on air at least  

Nice mem, Hypers? I need a third stick of BBSE, pretty sure these can beat my hypers once a bit colder...

[The Reu]

On 6/19/2018 at 6:01 PM, Jumper118 said:

thats pretty epic

I see what you did there.

[Jumper118]

12 hours ago, Ground said:

I saw on Hwbot and should be able to beat you once it gets a bit colder here (or once I get around to get some dice going) - those last 3 cb might even be beatable with some more tuning, but I don't wanna degrade my daily any further on air at least  

Nice mem, Hypers? I need a third stick of BBSE, pretty sure these can beat my hypers once a bit colder...

yes. hypers. my efficiency sucks  didnt want to spendtoo long on it on water cos i have phase working again now  you should get some dice, that would be great.

[Ground]

4 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

yes. hypers. my efficiency sucks  didnt want to spendtoo long on it on water cos i have phase working again now  you should get some dice, that would be great.

Plan is end of the month, and from what I can tell my chip is better then our x5650, but it'll only be under dice, no LN2 for me, so not sure how far I can take it yet...

 

Reran my heavily degraded E5640 (when I got it did 4.8 at 1.4V, now needs 1.6 for the same clocks):

Getting a couple more of those coming in the next days, picking up any x58 32nm xeon I can get, still on the hunt for max bclk (currently at 271.26, pretty sure I can get further under cold - this CPU did 261 under air and 277 under SS for example...)

[StoryVFX]

Hello people. Ive been messing around with overclocking my 8700k and I found out that 4.8ghz @1.260v is best for me.  I ran some cinebench tests and my best result was 1578 cb. My temps when not doing anything is around 35 Celsius and when im doing a cinebench test it got to 77 Celsius 

 

 

My rig: 

CPU: I7 8700k @4.8ghz

Ram: Gskill trident z 16gb @3200mhrz

CPU Cooler: NZXT Kraken x62 

Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z370-F

Storage: Samsun 970 Evo 250 GB m.2 & 2TB Seagate Baracuda HDD

PSU: Evga supernova g2 850w modular.

Case: NZXT H700i

GPU: Waiting for prices to go down on the 1080ti’s