Jump to content


Upcoming Calendar Events

Recent Topics


Photo

Battlefield 4 Alpha GPU and CPU Benchmarks!

battlefield 4 alpha gpu cpu benchmark

  • Please log in to reply
70 replies to this topic
crystal6tak
crystal6tak

    Junior Cheeseburger

  • Member
  • 593 posts

http://www.bf4blog.c...cpu-benchmarks/

Remember the game is still in alpha so there probably is several factor bringing down performance such as debug codes being ran or just pure unoptimization. However this is the best we can get for some idea of how well so far battlefield 4 is being ran.

500x1000px-LL-c436885b_bf419204x.jpeg

500x1000px-LL-b8f9a7f8_bf425604x.jpeg

500x1000px-LL-04d6fd37_bf4proz.jpeg

500x1000px-LL-e9cfce38_bf4vram.jpeg

bf4%20ms.jpg

bf4%20intel.jpg

bf4%20amd.jpg


  • MegaDave91 likes this

naca1227
naca1227

    This is definitely sandpit turtle

  • Member
  • 1,835 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

I need an upgrade, sheesh


  • rhyseyness and ElfFriend like this

OS - Windows 8.1 Motherboard - ASUS M5A99FX Pro R2.0 Processor - AMD FX 8350 Black Edition RAM - 16GB 2x8 Crucial Ballistix Sport Graphics Card - Gigabyte Windforce 2 OC GTX 660 Power Supply - Corsair CX750M CPU Cooler - NZXT Kraken X60 Wireless Adapter - ASUS PCE-N15 PCI-E Adapter Fans - x3 Masscool blue LED 120mm Fans Case - Fractal Design Define R4

Monitor - Dell S2230MX 21.5-inch Keyboard - Logitech G105 Mouse - Logitech G602 Speakers - Logitech Z130 Headsets/Headphones - Tt eSports Shock, AKG K240, California Headphones Laredo Phone - iPhone 4S


dyent10
dyent10

    Member

  • Member
  • 276 posts

its still in alpha, so i wouldnt be too concerned right now.


  • Darell3, xRAGExSounDxRIOTX and Parasyte like this

bcredeur97
bcredeur97

    Member of LTT

  • Member
  • 1,851 posts
  • LocationSomewhere in Louisiana, USA
Looks like 2GB of VRAM is a must for 1080p. CPU's don't seem like an issue for last 3 gens of intel and this gen of AMD. BUT MAN OH MAN they need to fix this for modern GPU's.


lhikary
lhikary

    Veteran

  • Banned
  • 1,014 posts
  • Locationteh internetz
posted before
noone with a working mind cares about alpha benchmarks
not even those who play the alpha which is gonna finish a day or 2
  • Minjon, ou rocks3 and iWearKiltz like this

Real programmers don't document, if it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.
I've learned that something constructive comes from every defeat.


BevanGachett
BevanGachett

    Member

  • Member
  • 183 posts

I should be fine.  :D


  • Clone Trooper 501 likes this

catbutts
catbutts

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 467 posts

User's Awards

     

Though it's still early, this should at least stop idiots from crying, "BF4/future game titles are optimized for AMD ONLY! ! !"


  • panfriedpuppies, Kuzma and TheJayHammer like this

qwertywarrior
qwertywarrior

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 8,766 posts
  • LocationIm off the Grid

looks like  the AMD optimization claim was over exaggerated

 

i still need to upgrade my gpu

i have a 1.2GB GTX570 :(


  • ElfFriend, panfriedpuppies and Kuzma like this

You should go take a shit at 11:55 and come out 10 minutes later, you will emerge in the future! (2015)

-coolkingler1


Inkz
Inkz

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 876 posts

Hope they make it more optimized, I do not want to upgrade soon with my recent 7970.


Case: Thermaltake V4 Black Edition   CPU: 4770k (FormerlyA8-3850 @3.0 GHz)    Motherboard:Maximus 6 Hero  (Asus F1A75-V PRO GPU: GTX 780 ACX (Formerly Sapphire 7970 OC) PSU: A cheap off brand one   RAM 8 Gb of 2x 4Gb Corsair XMS3 @1600 MHz and  4 Gb of some other 2x 2Gb Supertalent @ OC 1600Mhz CPU Cooler :Thermaltake Water 2.0 Preformer. HDD 2x 750 Gb WD green drives in RAID 0.      SSD: OCZ Vertex 3 120Gb       Also if I am wrong at something call me out on it so I do not spread false information and will teach me the right way.

 


Jebonia
Jebonia

    Member

  • Member
  • 389 posts
  • LocationSydney

Where is the 7950?

 

Edit: nvm



kuddlesworth9419
kuddlesworth9419

    Professional Opinionist

  • Member
  • 3,877 posts
  • Location127.0.0.1 England

It's pretty much the same engine as frostbite 2 was so I think that it just runs poorly. There will be optimization but seeing these benchmarks makes me feel like they have a lot of work to do. Having two 780's in SLi running at 74 FPS means you have a poorly optimized game. Even Metro 2033 would run higher than that.


  • Clone Trooper 501 and Kuzma like this

 (\__/)

 (='.'=)

(")_(")  EVGA 680 Classified 4GB 5820K 500GB Samsung EVO SSD 1TB WD Green 8GB of RAM Corsair 540 Air Black EVGA Supernova 750W Gold CM Storm Trigger Logitech G502 Fiio E10 Sennheiser 558's Lian Li Fan Controller Corsair H80 Unicomp Model M/13


Dudenstein
Dudenstein

    Geek Chic

  • Member
  • 2,122 posts
  • LocationCalifornia
This kinda makes me worried about my 560ti. Let's hope for optimization!

i5 2500k stock speeds | ASUS DCuII 560ti@900mhz | MSI p67A-G43 | Kingston HyperX DDR3 8GB | Antec EarthWatts 750w | Lian Li PC-K63 | 2x1TB Barracuda | Blackwidow Ultimate | Deathadder


brownninja97
brownninja97

    No waifu, No laifu

  • Member
  • 12,380 posts
  • LocationLondon

I hope those results didnt show overclocked graphics cards because then its a under 30 fps for me. Nearly forgot i3 your fired. Considering the 2120 is the most sold i3 from sandy they should have benched that instead of the 2100.


new pc 21/11/2014

Editing Rig

 Add me on steam or origin, its still brownninja97, if you wanna play a game then im down, as long as im not watching anime

Stav Kats
Stav Kats

    The guy who always has a problem

  • Member
  • 646 posts
  • LocationGreece

Something is wrong, ASUS Ares 2 can't be under the 690. It should be way higher.


  • Kuzma likes this

CPU: AMD FX-6100 Black Edition @3.9GHz GPU: XFX 7970 DD (1062/1520 MHz) MOBO: ASUS Sabertooth 990FXA(1st Revision) RAM: Corsair Vengeance 16GB @ 1333MHz Storage: Corsair Force 3 120GB(Boot) + WD Green 1TB(storage) PSU: FSP AURUM 600W(80+ Gold) CPU Cooler: stock AMD CPU Cooler Case: NZXT Tempst 410 Elite(Mid-Tower) Mouse: Logitech G602(Manufacturer Refurbished) Keyboard: Noppoo Choc Mini(Cherry MX Blue) AUDIO:Samson SR850+ASUS Xonar DGX Monitor: LG M2280DF 21.5" 1080p(TN-75Hz)


Minjon
Minjon

    The Cake

  • Member
  • 1,387 posts
  • LocationBanja Luka, Republik of Serbs, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Stop spreading this.....................ugh, it has no freaking textures.


AMD Radeon 7870 Gigabyte OC / Intel i5 3570k / ASrock Z77 Pro4 /Samsung 840 EVO 250GB / WD Blue 500GB 7200rpm / Kingston HyperX T1 2x4GB 1600mhz / SeaSonic 520w M12 / Thermaltake v4 Black

 

 


Yun4xGaming
Yun4xGaming

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 430 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

I don't think it's real. Ares 2 is 100000000% faster than the 690. Imposible im pretty sure that those are fake.and 770 beats HD7970 Ge?? naahh somethings wrong there


  • Clone Trooper 501 and Kuzma like this

Xelithium
Xelithium

    Victory or Death

  • Member
  • 656 posts
  • LocationSweden

I don't think it's real. Ares 2 is 100000000% faster than the 690. Imposible im pretty sure that those are fake.and 770 beats HD7970 Ge?? naahh somethings wrong there

Obvious fanboy is obvious.

 

Maybe the game just prefers Nvidia.


  • panfriedpuppies and david cassar like this

| GPU: GT 650M | CPU: i5-3210M | Excuse my language, sometimes I can be pretty vulgar.

 


GPUXPert
GPUXPert

    Member

  • Member
  • 414 posts

Take these results with a massive bag of salt, remember the BETA Crysis 3 benchmarks ? they were completely different from the final game build on both CPU & GPU performance.

Generally speaking performance optimization & polish takes place during the beta phase, where no new features are being implemented into the game (post-alpha).

And it is obvious that no AMD CPU optimizations have been made yet, this is what an AMD CPU optimized chart looks like (Crysis 3)

 

Very high core utilization.
crysis3%20amd.jpg

No hyper-threading support.
crysis3%20intel.jpg

So clearly the AMD/Frostbite CPU & GPU optimization process that EA & AMD have announced is still in effect & hasn't been implemented into the alpha yet.
So expect the final build of the game to have significantly different performance results.

I would presume that the current benchmark results are based on the same optimizations made with BF3 & just carried over without any of the BF4-specific optimizations added in yet.



Yun4xGaming
Yun4xGaming

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 430 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Obvious fanboy is obvious.

 

Maybe the game just prefers Nvidia.

Lol, please if you dont know what your talking about dont open your mouth like a 10 year old. i NEVER had an AMD card and it's true that the Ares 2 is faster than the 690... i own a 780 and had a 280 and 590.


  • Kuzma likes this

piplupgao
piplupgao

    I see your 13 now too, Lanoi

  • Member
  • 3,103 posts
  • Locationsomewhere over the rainbow

Who would have a 3970X with a 550ti


<p>Wires Suck :angry:
!fY0|_|(4|\|R34[)7#!5PMM37#3(0[)3:1337 70833|\|73R3[)!|\|49!\/34\|/4Y 4|\|[)93741!f3

 






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: battlefield 4, alpha, gpu, cpu, benchmark

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users