RTX 2080 Ti & 2080 Benchmarks :D

[mikedrewsmy]

https://videocardz.com/77983/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-and-rtx-2080-official-performance-unveiled

 

The data we are sharing with you today comes from official Reviewers’ Guide. The numbers in this guide are only a reference for further benchmarking. It is probably an important thing to say that those numbers should not be taken very seriously. Each reviewer has a different testing methodology (different scenario, different testing equipment, a different list of games).

 

The graphs are based on values (framerate/scores) provided by NVIDIA for their recommended titles. Yes, the word recommended is rather important here too.

In GeForce RTX reviewer’s guide, NVIDIA is not using any other resolution than 4K. So all benchmarks (except VRMark Cyan Room) were performed at 3840×2160 resolution. In fact, the RTX 2080 series were ‘designed for 4K’, as the document claims.

 

NVIDIA reference system includes: X299 Rampage VI Apex, Core i9-7900X 3.3 GHz, Corsair 16GB DDR4 (no frequency specified), Windows 10 (v1803), NVIDIA 411.38 drivers.

 

Settings

DirectX 12 Games

• Battlefield 1 – Ultra Preset
• Hitman – Highest Settings
• Shadow of the Tomb Raider – Very High Preset, TAA
• Star Wars: Battlefront II – Ultra Preset

DirectX 11 Games

• Call of Duty: WWII – Render Resolution: Native, Pre-T2X Resolution: Native, Post Process AA: Filmic SMAA T2x, Texture Resolution: Extra, Normal Map Resolution: Extra, Specular Map Resolution: Extra, Sky Resolution: Normal, Shader Preload: On, Anisotropic Filtering: High, Shadows: On, Shadow Map Resolution: Extra, Shadow Depth: High, Screen Space Shadows: Always On, Screen Space Reflections: High, Cache Sun Shadow Maps: On, Depth of Field: High, Motion Blur: High Quality, Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: Hemo AO, Medium Distance Ambient Occlusion: On, Surface Scattering: On
• F1 2018 – Ultra Preset, TAA, AF: 16x
• Mass Effect: Andromeda – Ultra Preset
• Middle-earth: Shadow of War – Ultra Preset
• PlayerUknown’s Battlegrounds – Ultra Preset
• Rainbow Six Siege – Ultra Preset
• The Witcher 3 – Ultra Preset

Vulkan Games

• Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus – Mein leben Preset

DirectX 12 Synthetic Benchmarks

• 3DMark – Timespy Extreme
• VRMark – Cyan Room

[vanished]

It's safe to assume that if they're recommending which games to run and with what settings, that doing so will show the best case scenario.  I'm interested to know how some different tests turn out (and for that matter, if these numbers are reliable in the first place)

[i_build_nanosuits]

2 hours ago, Ryan_Vickers said:

I'm interested to know how some different tests turn out (and for that matter, if these numbers are reliable in the first place)

pretty sure they are and they make sense...they probably tested a trottling blower founders edition 1080ti at default settings against the RTX...which sport a new dual fan design and more cooling and likely better stock clocks...i now have the MSI Gaming X Trio 1080ti and pretty sure at 2050mhz it will give the 2080 a run for it's money...

 

RTX 2080 start at 1079$CAD+Tax and shipping for an entry level Gigabyte model (https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=427&sort=price&page=1) and today i spent 700$CAD on a stupidly high end 1080ti that was 2 month used with receipt and everything in the box like new (https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GeForce-GTX-1080-Ti-GAMING-X-TRIO.html)

 

THE RTX 2080ti in the other hand is a fkn beast...amazing upgrade from even a 1080ti...but at 1600$CAD+ does it even make sense?

https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=424&sort=price&page=1

[xg32]

i'm more excited with the prospect of running everything at med-high at 4k 120hz in almost all games (i dont plan to play anything in ultra), which is my goal for the next 3 years,  although the last question is how well can it oc, i dont expect much since the only "cheap" card was the 2 slot evga (not paying 100dollars more for a bigger air cooler)

 

If these numbers are true, it also begs the question, why the hell was nvidia being so secretive with the numbers? just to build hype?

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 hour ago, xg32 said:

the last question is how well can it oc, i dont expect much since the only "cheap" card was the 2 slot evga (not paying 100dollars more for a bigger air cooler)

 

If these numbers are true, it also begs the question, why the hell was nvidia being so secretive with the numbers? just to build hype?

from 1080ti to 2080ti you're basically moving from 60FPS to 90FPS at 4k on average for 1299$...where's the hype?

i mean, it's great but a 1080ti can be yours for 550 to 600$ if you shop wisely or buy slightly used...2/3 of the performance for less than 1/2 the cost.

[Lathlaer]

6 hours ago, Ryan_Vickers said:

It's safe to assume that if they're recommending which games to run and with what settings, that doing so will show the best case scenario.  I'm interested to know how some different tests turn out (and for that matter, if these numbers are reliable in the first place)

This might be the case but still it's a nice and legit selection of titles and no one would bat an eye if these particular games appeared in an independent benchmarking article/video. There might be 2-3 games difference but overall I don't feel like they cherry picked some obscure stuff.

[Brezzels]

I'm happy with the power of the rtx 2080. I only do not understand is their pricing. Sure in general it's a lot ant its not way better than the 1080ti, which is OK since they went a ne path. I only don't get why in Germany the reference card which is quality and asthetic wise is cheaper. I mean i take IT

 

[PrimeSonic]

7 hours ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

i mean, it's great but a 1080ti can be yours for 550 to 600$ if you shop wisely or buy slightly used...2/3 of the performance for less than 1/2 the cost.

People buying the latest and greatest cards at launch probably don't care about the price/performance ratio.

 

So while, yes, you're making a good point about price now, remember that the 1080Ti sold for $1000 or more during a good chunk of its lifespan.

It's only cheap now because we had enough of a lull from miners and the new 20series cards are out.

 

If getting a good deal is important to you, by all means, get a 1080Ti on the cheap.

But if you're a dude that wants the latest and greatest, wants the bragging rights, and can afford to pay whatever, then you'll be looking to get a 2080Ti no matter what.

[seduce_me]

Synthetics wise looks the RTX2080 looks to be equal in performance to the GTX 1080 Ti. I have a decent OC on mine and get 4984 in Time Spy Extreme. Although the CPU score might affect it (i7-8700K vs i9-7900X) 

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28545564

[Princess Luna]

12 hours ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

THE RTX 2080ti in the other hand is a fkn beast...amazing upgrade from even a 1080ti...but at 1600$CAD+ does it even make sense?

Given how 7nm GPUs are incoming next year already I'd say no.

[xg32]

10 hours ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

from 1080ti to 2080ti you're basically moving from 60FPS to 90FPS at 4k on average for 1299$...where's the hype?

i mean, it's great but a 1080ti can be yours for 550 to 600$ if you shop wisely or buy slightly used...2/3 of the performance for less than 1/2 the cost.

The top card in a perfect world would never be as efficient in terms of price: performance, with the 1080 ti it's basically paying 600 for 60fps while the 2080 ti is 1150 for 90 fps, a ~30% increase, + the fact that it's a newer gen and we are not getting much increase even from the 1080 ti to 2080. I get that. But what the 2080 ti does is allow for the possibility to do 4k/98/120 (I'd actually be hyped if i knew the benchmarks earlier, instead they focused on RT, understandably), with a heavy first adapter cost, but it's acceptable for the top single card. I'd argue the cost increase was always gonna happen after the mining boom of 2017.

 

There is however a limit even for the 2080 ti, the fact that the custom pcb ftw3, nor most of the 2080s hasn't sold out speaks volume, overall they really pushed the envelop on pricing (, and i do expect it to eventually fall, even for the 2080.

[Princess Luna]

3 hours ago, PrimeSonic said:

So while, yes, you're making a good point about price now, remember that the 1080Ti sold for $1000 or more during a good chunk of its lifespan.

What a glorious time, it was when my brother actually managed to sell his older two TITAN X Pascal and get a TITAN V directly from nVidia.

[xg32]

Just now, Princess Cadence said:

What a glorious time, it was when my brother actually managed to sell his older two TITAN X Pascal and get a TITAN V directly from nVidia.

i sold my 1080 ti during the mining boom (self-justifying a 2080 ti buy lol), been stuck on a 1060, i don't expect this gen to last long though, maybe 12months til 7nm, just really jumping the gun to switch to hdr/120hz 

[Princess Luna]

1 minute ago, xg32 said:

i sold my 1080 ti during the mining boom (self-justifying a 2080 ti buy lol), been stuck on a 1060, i don't expect this gen to last long though, maybe 12months til 7nm, just really jumping the gun to switch to hdr/120hz 

Every thing does point out to this 20 series being a lot shorter lived than Pascal was by every mean, Ray Tracing will become truly appealing on the second generation of hardware for it, when all is matured enough to justify the $.