AMD FX 9590 @5.1GHz runing not hot?

[cirabarnet4]

The FX 9590 is ruining at 5,1 GHz (not stable higher) at 1,62V with max temp of 78 Celsius useing a Noctua NH-D14. 

Why is it so low? Is Noctua just that good? 

 

Update: 

board is wonky as can be, and what people are saying i am asuming that the readings are wrong and/or it is thermal "throteling". going back to "safe" 4,8 GHz at 1,56V 

thanks for the info

Edited March 9, 2017 by cirabarnet4

[JohnnyCorporalTech]

Are you doing anything with your computer?

 

If you are not doing much the CPU isn't being pushed as hard, so it doesn't get as hot. 

 

Once you start running a game or other CPU intensive program, the CPU will throttle down it speed as the temperatures rise. 

[mikat]

1,62V? that doesn't sound very safe? have you run a stress test like aida64?

[Firebirdss]

How did you boot into that that's insane.

[GirlFromYonder]

Just now, cirabarnet4 said:

The FX 9590 is ruining at 5,1 GHz (not stable higher) at 1.62V* with max temp of 78 Celsius using* a Noctua NH-D14. 

Why is it so low? Is Noctua just that good? 

yes it most definitely is.....

 

Spoiler

*lol sorry for correcting the rest. I feel like a bitch ebcuase i even never correct me speeling. becuase i just live the bad speelings  

 

[Jumper118]

They are supposed to shut down at 75c so rip, that is way too hot. I suspect it's not 78c or using 1.62v or it would be thermal throttling like crazy unless you have turned everything off in the bios and you are killing your cpu pretty quick. 

[WereCat]

FX9590 has lower temperature ceiling compared to Intel CPUs so yes, it is running hot as hell.

[TheRandomness]

31 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

They are supposed to shut down at 75c so rip, that is way too hot. I suspect it's not 78c or using 1.62v or it would be thermal throttling like crazy unless you have turned everything off in the bios and you are killing your cpu pretty quick. 

Or you know, AMD temp monitoring is awful and it could be running cooler

47 minutes ago, mikat said:

1,62V? that doesn't sound very safe? have you run a stress test like aida64?

See what I said below. 

42 minutes ago, Firebirdss said:

How did you boot into that that's insane.

1.62V for FX CPUs is normal. 

[Jumper118]

1 minute ago, TheRandomness said:

Or you know, AMD temp monitoring is awful and it could be running cooler

See what I said below. 

1.62V for FX CPUs is normal. 

1.62v is not normal for an fx cpu!!! Unless you mean athlon 64 fx

[Megah3rtz]

2 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

1.62V for FX CPUs is normal

can confirm, FX line runs at crazy fucking high voltage. I managed to undervolt my CPU and still get a decent overclock. 

[Jumper118]

5 minutes ago, Jorgen297 said:

how did you get ur ryzen to 4.5 ghz?

Idk yet. My board bricked itself.

[Jumper118]

6 minutes ago, Jorgen297 said:

i hope you get RMA on it, regardless 4.5GHz is a really nice overclock, reviewers barely managed to get 4.1

Yeah well I got to 4.09ghz on air. I am sending the board back today. 

[TheRandomness]

36 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

1.62v is not normal for an fx cpu!!! Unless you mean athlon 64 fx

Stock volts were 1.5V. 

[Space Reptile]

1 hour ago, cirabarnet4 said:

The FX 9590 is ruining at 5,1 GHz (not stable higher) at 1,62V with max temp of 78 Celsius

this is SERIUSLY hot for FX , Tjmax is 72 , recommended max is 62 (for daily)

 

also 1.62v .... the max it allows you normally is 1.55

 

I ran my 6100 at 1.4625 and was like "this is a lot"  

[Jumper118]

18 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

Stock volts were 1.5V. 

That's the auto voltage given by a crap board.  the absolute max vid is 1.55v so it's definitely not recommended to run it at that voltage never mind higher

[TheRandomness]

10 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

That's the auto voltage given by a crap board.  the absolute max vid is 1.55v so it's definitely not recommended to run it at that voltage never mind higher

From what I've been reading elsewhere, 1.6V is apparently alright when cooled properly. 

[Jumper118]

7 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

From what I've been reading elsewhere, 1.6V is apparently alright when cooled properly. 

What have you been reading  you can run 2v on Ln2 with no issues, but he's running an air cooler. 1.6v 24/7 is insane even if the cpu was under a massive water loop at 40c max. 

[cirabarnet4]

2 hours ago, mikat said:

1,62V? that doesn't sound very safe? have you run a stress test like aida64?

I have. That is what i got under aoda64. But based on what people are saying and the board is as wonky as can be. The readings are wrong somehow. 

 

[SpaceGhostC2C]

2 hours ago, cirabarnet4 said:

The FX 9590 is ruining at 5,1 GHz (not stable higher) at 1,62V with max temp of 78 Celsius useing a Noctua NH-D14. 

Why is it so low? Is Noctua just that good? 

If that's the socket temp, you are 6C above the stated limit. If that's the package temp, you are 10-12C above safe temps.

Still, at 1.64v I would be more worried about VRM temps.

[i_build_nanosuits]

3 hours ago, cirabarnet4 said:

The FX 9590 is ruining at 5,1 GHz (not stable higher) at 1,62V with max temp of 78 Celsius useing a Noctua NH-D14. 

Why is it so low? Is Noctua just that good? 

 

Update: 

board is wonky as can be, and what people are saying i am asuming that the readings are wrong and/or it is thermal "throteling". going back to "safe" 4,8 GHz at 1,56V 

thanks for the info

it's because the TJmax of that CPU is 62c...it's running VERY VERY hot right now man.

Also, 1.5v is the max recommened voltage...just saying.

you're torturing that poor little chip right now.

 

[i_build_nanosuits]

2 hours ago, TheRandomness said:

Stock volts were 1.5V. 

no no no...stock voltage for FX-9590 is 1.5v...yes...but this is a stupidly overclocked out of the box CPU...standard voltage for an FX-8350 for example is more around 1.35 to 1.375V.

[TheRandomness]

1 hour ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

no no no...stock voltage for FX-9590 is 1.5v...yes...but this is a stupidly overclocked out of the box CPU...standard voltage for an FX-8350 for example is more around 1.35 to 1.375V.

But the OP is using a 9590. 

[Guest]

post HWMonitor or something.

 

Too much assuming and not enough information. 

[LeStringMan]

22 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

But the OP is using a 9590. 

That doesn't change the max safe voltages lol, 1.55v is AMD's absolute max recommendation, 1.5v or lower for aircooling or AIO. Also AMD has the FX series overvolted out of the box just like the RX 470/480, the FX cpus operate at pre-defined voltages (to ensure stability for all chips.) and they have a strict maximum tdp (once it hits its rated tdp it will throttle to idle speed (1.4ghz)), this is enforced by APM. Max temperature goes by TDP, 70.5c for 95w parts, 61c for 125w, and 57c for 220w.

[TheRandomness]

6 minutes ago, LeStringMan said:

That doesn't change the max safe voltages lol, 1.55v is AMD's absolute max recommendation, 1.5v or lower for aircooling or AIO. Also AMD has the FX series overvolted out of the box just like the RX 470/480, the FX cpus operate at pre-defined voltages (to ensure stability for all chips.) and they have a strict maximum tdp (once it hits its rated tdp it will throttle to idle speed (1.4ghz)), this is enforced by APM. Max temperature goes by TDP, 70.5c for 95w parts, 61c for 125w, and 57c for 220w.

Hmmm... I must be mixing up with LN2 chips I've seen (that were pathetic at overclocking) them... Lower max temps at higher TDPs? Well done AMD.