Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[Raudi_]

i'm not excited at all. they will be boring till amd catch up.

Its ok intel are high as fuck now anyways 

http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/cpu_mainboard/intel_kaby_lake_to_replace_skylake_next_year/1

[Jumper118]

You wanna make a Sandy Bridge Owners Club Together?

not really. i dont know why, but i dont really like clubs for things. i did bid on and x79 board and cpu the other day, but i was outbid, so that was a shame.

 

Its ok intel are high as fuck now anyways 

http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/cpu_mainboard/intel_kaby_lake_to_replace_skylake_next_year/1

i know. i hope zen will be good, but i expect it to be another piledriver. it just a shame they don't come out with the new athlon 64 which was miles faster than the p4, but that isn't going to happen.

[ungreedy]

well now that fury x is out looks like my 780ti will be good for me at least another 18 months , nothing worth while to upgrade to yet IMO. 980ti is like the only thing really worth while and it costs a pretty penny.

[Swindless]

So I was able to make my own bios for my 980 Ti thanks to @Lays for the help now I just need to get the funds to put this dang thing under some water and mess with the voltages until then ill enjoy the 121% power target for now

[Cheddle]

i'm still on 347.09

 

any reviews of the fury x in valley? as valley likes memory bandwidth. 

 

whats the oldest driver I can get away with running with a 980ti?

[Jumper118]

whats the oldest driver I can get away with running with a 980ti?

352.9 i think

[Cheddle]

352.9 i think

 

did some testing, no performance difference in Valley between 353.06 and 353.30 

 

I flashed a different BIOS and was getting slightly different clocks. 

[Nizzel]

 

i7 2600k 4.5Ghz

980ti - 1251mhz core clock (boost up to 1490mhz) - memory clock 2053mhz 

avg fps - 102.6

score 4291

Setting = ExtremeHD

 

 

[VagabondWraith]

No Fury yet?

[Jumper118]

No Fury yet?

not yet

[Raudi_]

not yet

"Yet" I have some things in the works 

I might also have something being worked out with NZXT as well 

[VagabondWraith]

"Yet" I have some things in the works

I might also have something being worked out with NZXT as well

Good stuff man. Can't wait to see the results!

[VagabondWraith]

Btw, I'll be watercooling my 980 Ti tomorrow. I'll post my new results tomorrow.

[Jumper118]

00006.png

i7 2600k 4.5Ghz

980ti - 1251mhz core clock (boost up to 1490mhz) - memory clock 2053mhz 

avg fps - 102.6

score 4291

Setting = ExtremeHD

you need a gpuz screen shot and also if you overclock your cpu you will get a much higher score. 

[Nizzel]

you need a gpuz screen shot and also if you overclock your cpu you will get a much higher score. 

edited it now so it has the gpu-z screenshot. also my 2600k overclocks really badly however i have had it run a suicide run on 4.8Ghz but i need like 1.5V to do so ^^'

[Raudi_]

So from all the reviews I've seen about the Fury X, I will be defiantly putting it under a block the Pump on them is noisy as hell, but some of them have HORRIBLE coil whine to the point were it sounds like an electric shaver

[Jumper118]

edited it now so it has the gpu-z screenshot. also my 2600k overclocks really badly however i have had it run a suicide run on 4.8Ghz but i need like 1.5V to do so ^^'

thanks. some people used to run 1.5v 24/7 under water on sandy, so that voltage is fair safe tbh. 

[Nizzel]

thanks. some people used to run 1.5v 24/7 under water on sandy, so that voltage is fair safe tbh. 

most people that ran it at such voltages had it degrade though. atleast from my research. i have mine at 1.376V just for 4.5Ghz and i want it to last quite some year atleast from what i can see with how cpu have made no improvement really. 

 

Not saying its 100% true what im saying here actualy its just from my limited research

[Jumper118]

most people that ran it at such voltages had it degrade though. atleast from my research. i have mine at 1.376V just for 4.5Ghz and i want it to last quite some year atleast from what i can see with how cpu have made no improvement really. 

yeah they took 18-24 months to die at that voltage running it a few times through valley won't make much difference. i run my 2550K and 2600K at 1.4v 24/7 and both of them have been over 1.6v for benching and they have only degraded a bit. 

[Nizzel]

yeah they took 18-24 months to die at that voltage running it a few times through valley won't make much difference. i run my 2550K and 2600K at 1.4v 24/7 and both of them have been over 1.6v for benching and they have only degraded a bit. 

ye i might redo my run at somepoint with higher cpu clock and a tad higher clocks on the gpu ya know have it be valley "stable" if you get my drift. i do realise its safe for just a few runs as i have done cinebench runs with like 1.55V. thanks for the advice anyways! 

[Lays]

CPU: 4770k @ 4.4 ghz

GPU: 980 Classified @ 1529/2165  (8660 effective)

Average FPS: 86.9

Score: 3638

Setting: ExtremeHD

 

I will do another run later when it's not fucking 85f in my room.  The air cooler on this thing is fucking nuts, 52c under load at 100% fan speed.

 

I'm not even remotely pushing it,

 

I couldn't take a GPU-Z screenshot because for some reason when I clicked "default" on EVGA Precision X, it cut display to my ROG Swift and I had to restart, still no display.

 

Luckily I fixed it, thought something shit the bed for a second there.

 

[Cheddle]

you need a gpuz screen shot and also if you overclock your cpu you will get a much higher score. 

 

GPUz is useless when a card is BIOS modded... MSI AB seems to be the only thing that reports the clock correctly.

 

I assume GPUz uses a default cards boost table to calculate the "boost" clock 

 

see screenshot, im boosting at 1496mhz but gpuz reports 1370mhz

 

[Lays]

GPUz is useless when a card is BIOS modded... MSI AB seems to be the only thing that reports the clock correctly.

 

I assume GPUz uses a default cards boost table to calculate the "boost" clock 

 

see screenshot, im boosting at 1496mhz but gpuz reports 1370mhz

 

gpuzplz.png

 

 

GPU-Z always does that, use the sensors tab for accurate readings.

 

GPU-Z does that because it only reports the boost clock BEFORE GPU Boost 2.0 kicks in.

[DildorTheDecent]

GPUz is useless when a card is BIOS modded... MSI AB seems to be the only thing that reports the clock correctly.

 

I assume GPUz uses a default cards boost table to calculate the "boost" clock 

 

see screenshot, im boosting at 1496mhz but gpuz reports 1370mhz

nvidia inspector can give a rough estimate for a max boost clock.

[Lays]

nvidia inspector can give a rough estimate for a max boost clock.

 

hi friend