Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[Jumper118]

I thought this was interesting…

CPU: Q6600

GPU: gt730… 1253mem, 902core

Average FPS: 6

Score: 250

Setting: Extreme HD

 

Time to overclock that sucker!

that is not the extreme HD setting, its says custom although the settings are correct

[Kaarlis_]

I hope this is correct

 

CPU: i5-4690K

GPU: ASUS Strix gtx 970 2003 memory, 1470 core

Average FPS: 68.9

Score: 2881

Setting: Extreme HD

[Jumper118]

 

I hope this is correct

 

CPU: i5-4690K

GPU: ASUS Strix gtx 970 2003 memory, 1470 core

Average FPS: 68.9

Score: 2881

Setting: Extreme HD

 

 

that is fine

[cooperb21]

Is this normal because for some reason i think my min fps seems bad compared to people with similar specs.

 

 

[Lays]

I have a few Custom BIOS's set up for Air/H2o and LN2 for the 970 G1 cards.

 

 

Where'd you get them?  If you didn't make them yourself with your own BIOS, I wouldn't recommend flashing them.

 

There's like 9 different BIOS for 970 G1's already, and different revisions as well, (I think 3 right now, may be 4)

I flashed a G1 bios the other day that was a different revision than my card, that was not fun at all trying to fix it >.<

[Lord Pantaloons]

Ok so this is cool, I went back to try to beat my GTS 250 with a single OC'd GT 545 and instead of MSI afterburner I just opened EVGA PX and I saw that PX allowed me to increase the voltage. I had the setting enabled in AB but it still wouldn't let me and I wasn't surprised so I didn't check to see if PX would let me. PX let me go from 950mv to 1162mv which increased the OC from 880/1100 to 950/1190 on the primary card and from 880/1100 to 920/1120 on the secondary card so I ran the SLI basic preset again too and I beat my GTS 250 and my SLI GT 545 run. yay

 

Single GPU run Basic preset

i5-3570k@4.2Ghz

GT 545 950/1190

33.1

1385

 

SLI Basic preset

i5-3570k@4.2Ghz

SLI GT 545 920/1120

49.1

2056

 

 

I think that the score increase for my primary GT 545 from the extra OC was pretty dammed impressive, it went from 1061 points at stock clocks to 1385 points OC'd not too bad for a GT card eh?

[duratothemax]

that is not the extreme HD setting, its says custom although the settings are correct

oops, i did the benchmark a few more times, but kept getting "custom" even though I selected Extreme HD....  Turn out I accidentally checked Vsync..

[duratothemax]

7! FPS... man you are die hard to make a benchmark with 7FPS haha. Didn´t your eye balls hurt ? Thumbs up for that!

yeah it was rough to watch.  But that ASUS 144hz monitor sure didn't struggle at all...

[Analog]

Processor: Intel Core i7 5960X at 4.5GHz

Graphics Card: Asus MARS GTX 760x2 1162MHz/6000MHz

Preset: Extreme HD

FPS: 73.5

Score 3076

 

PS: The GT210 is there just to power the second monitor. 

 

[WaitForMeImOnDialUp]

280x crossfire at stock

fx8350 at 4.5 ghz

preset is extreme hd

 

 

 

[johnnysasaki]

My second attempt. This time higher (than factory oc values) gpu overclock and @KingCry performance tips. Actually a nice benchmark score bump (imo).

Image link (since it only posted a large thumbnail): http://imgur.com/l1BzqfU

Edited January 11, 2015 by johnnysasaki

[JamGorby]

New Year, New Tweaks, New Score, Same ol' system

Processor: AMD Phenom x6 1100t@4.0

Graphics Card: EVGA GTX780 ACX/SC 1190 core 1749 mem (6996 effective)
Preset: Extreme HD
FPS: 66.0
Score: 2760

[Raudi_]

Where'd you get them?  If you didn't make them yourself with your own BIOS, I wouldn't recommend flashing them.

 

There's like 9 different BIOS for 970 G1's already, and different revisions as well, (I think 3 right now, may be 4)

I flashed a G1 bios the other day that was a different revision than my card, that was not fun at all trying to fix it >.<

They are made using a BIOS from my friends 970 G1 card the h20 and air bios are fine so far I won't dare test the ln2 bios on it. But I am still waiting for funds for my own 970/980's

[Raudi_]

I was gone all weekend so gt630 bench marks basic/extreme HD/1440pl/4k all coming this week. Good thing it's a 4GB pos synergy card from zotac

[Lays]

They are made using a BIOS from my friends 970 G1 card the h20 and air bios are fine so far I won't dare test the ln2 bios on it. But I am still waiting for funds for my own 970/980's

Keep in mind it's voltage locked at 1.312v no matter what you tell it to do in the bios

Some guys on OCN were messing around with DMM and 1.4v in the bios but the DMM still reads 1.312

[Raudi_]

Keep in mind it's voltage locked at 1.312v no matter what you tell it to do in the bios

Some guys on OCN were messing around with DMM and 1.4v in the bios but the DMM still reads 1.312

Thanks for the info, I haven't been on OCN for a few months now so I had no idea it was hard locked at 1.312

[Lays]

Thanks for the info, I haven't been on OCN for a few months now so I had no idea it was hard locked at 1.312

 

 

Yeah I think the stock BIOS on the G1 goes up to ~1.27, so you'll only really be looking at a small boost for any higher end clocks. (Neither of my cards will pull the max @ the highest stable clocks, although I haven't tested in firestrike extreme yet, which will probably pull more.

[Raudi_]

Yeah I think the stock BIOS on the G1 goes up to ~1.27, so you'll only really be looking at a small boost for any higher end clocks. (Neither of my cards will pull the max @ the highest stable clocks, although I haven't tested in firestrike extreme yet, which will probably pull more.

I think its a bit odd though that a card designed and binned for overclocking is still hard locked, I'm hoping someone will find a way to do a voltage edit like with 7xx series cards for the 970/980

[Lays]

I think its a bit odd though that a card designed and binned for overclocking is still hard locked, I'm hoping someone will find a way to do a voltage edit like with 7xx series cards for the 970/980

 I agree for sure.

 

I think it may have to do somehow with how the vrms are designed, because I think every 970 right now has the exact same VRM power design, but some have "better" quality components.

 

I think all of them are 6+2 or something like that.    I was hoping EVGA or someone would make a 970 that's binned + has a overbuilt VRM, but nobody's done it yet which makes me sad.

[Raudi_]

GT 630 Benched for Valley 
CPU: 4770k 4.5GHz
GPU: Zotac GT 630 Synergy Edition 4GB 
Core: 958.5MHz
Memory 533MHz(Won't overclock AT ALL)

 

 

 

 

 

 
1440p

[pdv789]

Wow ... you even did 1440p on that card ... I would have to leave the room while that was running.

[Raudi_]

Wow ... you even did 1440p on that card ... I would have to leave the room while that was running.

Yeah I was gonna do 4k but it doesn't support it at all even with DSR on HDMI or DVI oh well it was fun gonna be doing 3DMark stuff next, then HWBot submissions.

[pdv789]

I am a little confused when it comes to ASIC quality though. Would you be able to explain it to me? It just seems to be more of a market gimick than anything with all the explanations floating around on various websites. I was told that high quality is better. However my card can overclock 1592 on the core and (I think 8.332ghz on memory??? 0.o ?) That sounds really off, I get a score of 2083 on afterburner, am I supposed to multiply that by 4 or 3 or something else? But going by the 65% quality that is a pretty high overclock and other cards can't do that even with a higher asic quality.

[Lord Pantaloons]

Wow ... you even did 1440p on that card ... I would have to leave the room while that was running.

Is that the kepler version of the 630? if it is I'm disappointed, I thought that would beat my 545.

[Briggsy]

I am a little confused when it comes to ASIC quality though. Would you be able to explain it to me? It just seems to be more of a market gimick than anything with all the explanations floating around on various websites. I was told that high quality is better. However my card can overclock 1592 on the core and (I think 8.332ghz on memory??? 0.o ?) That sounds really off, I get a score of 2083 on afterburner, am I supposed to multiply that by 4 or 3 or something else? But going by the 65% quality that is a pretty high overclock and other cards can't do that even with a higher asic quality.

 

With electricity, every material has a certain level of resistance, and that resistance needs to be overcome by adding more force (or voltage) behind the charge of electrons (amps). the ASIC quality tells the bios of the graphic card how much voltage the card needs compared to the theoretical design. the VRM's regulate the voltage so that the gpu gets the voltage it needs based on its ASIC score, instead of every card getting the same voltage indiscriminately. In theory a higher ASIC score means better for air cooling, because there is less resistance, and less heat generated as a result (resistance causes heat.. electric heaters work in this manner). Temperatures also effect the resistance, so switching to water cooling automatically lowers the resistance of the gpu, and less voltage is needed to maintain stability. 

 

It's more complicated than this but on a base level it makes sense. ASIC% should not effect overclockability.