gpu for gta v What 200-250 GPU for GTA V on high settings with good fos

[Grasson123]

Help me choosing the right GPU!

I have thought about the msi gtx 960 gaming 4g with 4gb of vram?

But do you have any suggestions...

Otherwise is the msi a good gpu

Sorry for bad english... I am danish

 

 

[User347943598]

200-250 is the current € i think? The price you want to get along?

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, Grasson123 said:

Help me choosing the right GPU!

I have thought about the msi gtx 960 gaming 4g with 4gb of vram?

But do you have any suggestions...

Otherwise is the msi a good gpu

Sorry for bad english... I am danish

 

 

Don't buy a 960 - it's a waste of money

RX480 or R9 380X. Both MUCH better options.

@App4that

[manikyath]

200-250 dollar, pound, euro, pesos, danish crowns, vietnamese dong?

[User347943598]

Just now, don_svetlio said:

RX480 or R9 380X. Both MUCH better options.

@App4that

For Nvidia guys, you might get the 970 or the 1060

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Grasson123 said:

Help me choosing the right GPU!

I have thought about the msi gtx 960 gaming 4g with 4gb of vram?

But do you have any suggestions...

Otherwise is the msi a good gpu

Sorry for bad english... I am danish

 

 

Don't buy a last gen gpu. Its a waste of money, buy something future proof like the RX 480 8gb.

[don_svetlio]

Just now, User347943598 said:

For Nvidia guys, you might get the 970 or the 1060

1060 is too expensive, 970 is shit in DX12/Vulkan and the 3.5GB of VRAM is NOT enough for 1080p anymore

[App4that]

The 960 is a horrible buy, even when relevant it was choked by it's small memory bus size. As Don said get a 380, 380X, or even better yet a RX 480.

[samcool55]

rx 480 or gtx 1060, whatever you can get for a good price where you live.

Because both are mostly out of stock it's just a matter of luck getting one

[App4that]

Just now, User347943598 said:

For Nvidia guys, you might get the 970 or the 1060

The 970 is a mistake to buy, but if the 1060 is cheaper then the RX 480 it's a consideration.

[don_svetlio]

Just now, ONOTech said:

4GB is definitely enough for 1080p. Who told you otherwise?

 

Every sane individual? Ask @Prysin @Dackzy 
@Notional
@App4That or anyone else. 3,5GB is DEAD

[david cassar]

Gtx 1060 is much better than the 480 in gta v so I'd go with that if you can find it for a similar price.

[Nacho Marco Segui]

1 minute ago, ONOTech said:

4GB is definitely enough for 1080p. Who told you otherwise?

 

 

He said that 3,5 is not enough, 4 is okay. Those 500 MB make a huge difference, at least in GTA V.

[Dackzy]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

Every sane individual? Ask @Prysin @Dackzy 
@Notional
@App4That or anyone else. 3,5GB is DEAD

I know that you love me, but give me some space

[Nacho Marco Segui]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

Every sane individual? Ask @Prysin @Dackzy 
@Notional
@App4That or anyone else. 3,5GB is DEAD

 

I have just switched to a 980ti from my old 970 and the extra Vram is reaaaally helpful.

[App4that]

3 minutes ago, ONOTech said:

4GB is definitely enough for 1080p. Who told you otherwise?

 

4g is enough as long as you don't want high textures in a lot of newer titles. Problem is the 970 doesn't have 4g, it has enough memory controllers for 3.5g, which is what a lot of games see. No reason to buy a 970.

[Dackzy]

Look here: https://linustechtips.com/main/profile/184449-dackzy/?status=138072&type=status 

 

[don_svetlio]

Just now, ONOTech said:

According to Gamer's Nexus & Hardware Unboxed videos of the RX 480 4GB vs 8GB, there's no noticeable difference at all between the two at 1080p & 1440p.

 

The only game that shows pretty obvious differences is AC Syndicate which is a badly optimized game & ME Catalyst using the Hyper settings, which is completely pointless compared to the Ultra settings.

So your logic dictates that any game which shows 8GB being better is badly optimized or the settings are useless? Well, that's very narrow-minded of you. Now stop giving bad advice.

[App4that]

1 minute ago, ONOTech said:

According to Gamer's Nexus & Hardware Unboxed videos of the RX 480 4GB vs 8GB, there's no noticeable difference at all between the two at 1080p & 1440p.

 

The only game that shows pretty obvious differences is AC Syndicate which is a badly optimized game & ME Catalyst using the Hyper settings, which is completely pointless compared to the Ultra settings.

Again that's 4g not 3.5g.

[Dackzy]

Just now, Dackzy said:

SNIP

Quote

4g is enough as long as you don't want high textures in a lot of newer titles. Problem is the 970 doesn't have 4g, it has enough memory controllers for 3.5g, which is what a lot of games see. No reason to buy a 970.

He said it fine so, I am not going to say it again

[manikyath]

6 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

1060 is too expensive, 970 is shit in DX12/Vulkan and the 3.5GB of VRAM is NOT enough for 1080p anymore

depends on what you play in terms of vram, but my vote is for the RX480 here.

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, ONOTech said:

Yet the 970 beats the RX 480 8GB in GTA V..? The only time the slower 500 mb comes affects performance is with live texture updates, like when it rains.

 

Other than that, it's perfectly fine.

No, not really. Look at DigitalFoundry - 480/1060 are above the 970 by a decent bit

[Guest]

7 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

1060 is too expensive, 970 is shit in DX12/Vulkan and the 3.5GB of VRAM is NOT enough for 1080p anymore

i has all 4 gb of ram and ive yet to go over 3.5gb on any game at 1080p

[Techicolors]

1 minute ago, Dackzy said:

Look here: https://linustechtips.com/main/profile/184449-dackzy/?status=138072&type=status 

 

for some reason catalyst has texture streaming issues, at least for me. when i turn off memory restriction it kinda helps, but that results in maxing my 8gb VRAM buffer

[App4that]

1 minute ago, ONOTech said:

Oh my goodness, I knew starting this was a bad idea.

 

I'm done.

glad we could help clear that up for you.