Post your Cinebench R20+15+R11.5+2003 Scores **Don't Read The OP PLZ**

[Nagasaki]

Just upgraded to a 3600 from a 1600. This is what I have managed to squeeze out of it.

[nick name]

1 hour ago, Nagasaki said:

Just upgraded to a 3600 from a 1600. This is what I have managed to squeeze out of it.

Oooh.  You got one of them new, good 3600s.  That's pretty damn good.  You tune your RAM yet?

[Nagasaki]

14 minutes ago, nick name said:

Oooh.  You got one of them new, good 3600s.  That's pretty damn good.  You tune your RAM yet?

I have just set my bios "Memory Try It!" to run my ram as follows:

 

My ram is Corsair Vengeance RGB 3000Mhz CL15 16Gb kit

 

[nick name]

2 minutes ago, Nagasaki said:

I have just set my bios "Memory Try It!" to run my ram as follows:

 

My ram is Corsair Vengeance RGB 3000Mhz CL15 16Gb kit

 

That's not too shabby.  

[Alkocicero]

Best I could get on a 3600

[Sebedees]

I got 4,55 Ghz score on a Ryzen 3600. LLC mode 3 on a Mortar Max. Pretty happy with it. Now running 24/7 on 4,2 ghz on 1,125v. What do you think?

[Jumper118]

15 hours ago, Sebedees said:

I got 4,55 Ghz score on a Ryzen 3600. LLC mode 3 on a Mortar Max. Pretty happy with it. Now running 24/7 on 4,2 ghz on 1,125v. What do you think?

 

 

seems like a good cpu. 

[Mondas42]

My Cinibench R20 score, Ryzen 9 3900X with all core overclock to 4.3 Ghz. 

 

 

[RHCPeppers92]

[BigDamn]

4.4ghz all core on my Ryzen 3700x. This is fully stable and stays under 70c on my custom loop with an extremely liberal fan profile. Considering that PBO gave me random spikes over 80c, performed worse, and ran at higher voltages I'd say I'm pleased with these results. Also got RAM OC'd to 3600mhz CL16. Board is MSI X470 Gaming Pro Carbon

 

[djd3]

Ryzen 5 3600 OC to 4.75Ghz

[Shogunluffy_1982]

Latest one i made this morning..!

[SiegeWulf]

Feedback please - First manual clock of the Ryzen 9 3900x

Aorus Master with a Castle 360EX water cooler.

 

Got 3 passes of R20 at 4.2Ghz @1.34V  with a temp of 71C Max Multicore and 51C Max Single Core.

I think this sits right where I want it - just need to know if this sounds like a good stable setting please!?

7378 Best Multi-Core Score 

486 Best Single Core Score

Images...

Edited July 15, 2020 by SiegeWulf
Corrections

[AliceShadowRose]

Lets see what 8 Gen Prozessor beat here

[Jumper118]

13 hours ago, SiegeWulf said:

Feedback please - First manual clock of the Ryzen 9 3900x

Aorus Master with a Castle 360EX water cooler.

 

Got 3 passes of R20 at 4.2Ghz @1.34V  with a temp of 71C Max Multicore and 51C Max Single Core.

I think this sits right where I want it - just need to know if this sounds like a good stable setting please!?

7378 Best Multi-Core Score 

486 Best Single Core Score

Images...

 

sounds a bit slow, doesnt it boost higher than 4.2ghz by itself? i would expect a 3900x to do 4.3-4.4ghz all core at least.

[SiegeWulf]

5 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

sounds a bit slow, doesnt it boost higher than 4.2ghz by itself? i would expect a 3900x to do 4.3-4.4ghz all core at least.

No, Ryzen 2 don't really like going past approx 4.2 - they do get to UP TO 4.7Ghz with the Precision boost setting (PBO) for a few microseconds here and there - but they usually gain a LOT of heat and use absurdly more power after 4.2 all core from what I understand.  For my uses - 4.2Ghz is plenty and the voltage is much better.

Using 1.34V instead of 1.45V is a gooood thing as there are reports starting that running Ryzen 2 chips above ~1.4V is causing early deaths - and at the moment - PBO is allowing the chips to get way over that (as per my 1.45V max I have seen - gets to 1.43 regularly).

I would rather play it safe, and seen as the best performance seems to be at around 4.2Ghz - I will stay close to that.

PBO WITH its extra voltage and boosting gave me a score 300 points lower approximately than my manual clocking too - I thinks that says enough...

Anyone who has played with the 3900x enough to know if I am on the right track with this please guys???

[Coachdude]

13 hours ago, SiegeWulf said:

No, Ryzen 2 don't really like going past approx 4.2 - they do get to UP TO 4.7Ghz with the Precision boost setting (PBO) for a few microseconds here and there - but they usually gain a LOT of heat and use absurdly more power after 4.2 all core from what I understand.  For my uses - 4.2Ghz is plenty and the voltage is much better.

Using 1.34V instead of 1.45V is a gooood thing as there are reports starting that running Ryzen 2 chips above ~1.4V is causing early deaths - and at the moment - PBO is allowing the chips to get way over that (as per my 1.45V max I have seen - gets to 1.43 regularly).

I would rather play it safe, and seen as the best performance seems to be at around 4.2Ghz - I will stay close to that.

PBO WITH its extra voltage and boosting gave me a score 300 points lower approximately than my manual clocking too - I thinks that says enough...

Anyone who has played with the 3900x enough to know if I am on the right track with this please guys???

According to what AMD has stated numerous times on the matter, voltages of up to 1.5 volts are completely safe when run at stock settings, as it boosts a couple of cores at a time during low current loads. If you run something like Prime95 on the cpu for instance, and monitor via HWinfo, you'll see all core workloads around ~4.0GHz and voltages around the 1.3 range, or lower, depending on what the chip deems safe at that particular moment. 

[DildorTheDecent]

Quote

there are reports starting that running Ryzen 2 chips above ~1.4V is causing early deaths

Source pls.

If you bothered to read anything about Zen 2 you would know that there's nothing wrong with PBO behaviour. It's entirely normal for LOW CURRENT loads to have a working voltage of 1.45V+.

 

Edited July 17, 2020 by LogicalDrm

[zevans]

On 3/21/2020 at 5:40 PM, Hendrics said:

Figured I'd throw my scores in too, all overclocking done via Ryzen Master, didn't mess with LLC or anything in BIOS, but here are my scores. 

 

Ryzen 7 3700x @ 4.4ghz - 1.337v

 

 

Same Overclock and same processor, but running R20

 

 

How did you get it to nearly 4.4GHz on all-core? what cooler do you have?

 

I just bought my 3700X and I am still learning about it.

[SiegeWulf]

11 hours ago, DildorTheDecent said:

Source pls.

If you bothered to read anything about Zen 2 you would know that there's nothing wrong with PBO behaviour. It's entirely normal for LOW CURRENT loads to have a working voltage of 1.45V+. Or just don't read and spew nonsense.

 

I read plenty and listen to what lots of people are saying about this PBO/Voltage situation - some people are reporting their chips sit around 1.2/1.3v drop to 0.9 and spike to 1.4 to 1.47V irregularly, then there are cases more like mine where under just a gaming load I am seeing it SAT at around 1.42 to 1.45V and occasional DIPS to below 1.4 - which is said NOT to be good for the chips at all - PBO seems to be unreliable at this stage and I am not sure whether I trust it or not...  (Unless gaming is using a Low current draw on cores - which I suspect Not!?).

Yes - from what I understand - the chance of a Burn-Out of my Ryzen chip is very low - but has not been disproved where people are seeing higher voltages reported at this point...  Should I really risk an ~$850 NZD chip???  (YES - that's how much they are over here!)

 

That being said, my scores went UP ~300 points when I manual clocked instead of using PBO, so I think that it's working better for me anyway, considering temps sit ~ same or better than before...

Whether I am right about the PBO causing an issue or not is beside the point at this time - If I choose to play it safe and limit for both Temps and performance being improved - that doesn't make this a silly idea...

As it turns out after an hour of searching for further info - this issue with the power reporting and 'Burn out' is probably being over-hyped by media -  but when I could not find any reports to the contrary without going very in-depth you can surely see why someone could believe this may be a real problem!? 

As it stands I watched a half hour long GN speel on youtube about it to get an answer and see that it looks to be a non-event.  With a decent cooler in particular it sounds like it should never be an issue - even IF it originally could have been! 

 

As for your source - I cannot find the original story I read not long ago - but it had not been updated like this one has been since https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ryzen-burnout-amd-board-power-cheats-may-shorten-cpu-lifespan

And this is the youtube vid I watched that explained the whole situation by GN https://youtu.be/10b8CS7wQcM

 

I get that 'random spew' can be misleading - but don't call someone out on not reading/listening to info before talking to them - I may not know a heap about overclocking, but that does NOT make me ignorant - please remember that...  

 

Anyway - I'm done here. Enjoy your sarcasm people!  Thanks for nothing!!!!!!!

Edited July 17, 2020 by LogicalDrm
Cleaned

[Abnormalia]

R20 7356 -   3900X@4200 all cores while vcore fixed 1.22v

 

[Atheris]

9900K in tweaked stock (PL1 is 150W, voltage control via SVID with 75 mV negative offset).

[Tido_III]

Ryzen 5 3600 OC to 4200 All cores with fixed vcore at 1.2

16Gb Corsair LPX 3000C16 OC to 3200 (FCLK at 1600)

X570A-Pro

XFX RX570 8GB (stock)

 

This is my 24/7 setup. Going to try pushing it a bit further, especially on GPU. What would you suggest on cpu and ram?

[DildorTheDecent]

46 minutes ago, Tido_III said:

What would you suggest on cpu and ram?

CPU: push for 4.3GHz. What may pass in Cinebench may not pass other benchmarks so watch out for that. Also use per CCX OC if either the temperatures with all 6 cores running at 4.3GHz aren't to your liking or if the other CCXs just can't do that clock. You could have CCX 0 at 4.3GHz and CCX 1 at 4.2GHz for example.

 

RAM: Depends on the IC. I'd go for as much speed as possible and then try and tune them to more respectable timings. I've not a clue about any other IC (or really any clue about RAM OC). DRAM calculator for Ryzen and its accompanying thread on OCN is where the knowledge regarding that is: https://www.overclock.net/forum/13-amd-general/1640919-new-dram-calculator-ryzena-1-7-3-overclocking-dram-am4-membench-0-8-dram-bench.html

 

Or you can try and tune your kit at 3200MHz to be as low as the memory controller or motherboard or IC allows. Might be optimal for gaming, idk.

[Tido_III]

3 minutes ago, DildorTheDecent said:

CPU: push for 4.3GHz. What may pass in Cinebench may not pass other benchmarks so watch out for that. Also use per CCX OC if either the temperatures with all 6 cores running at 4.3GHz aren't to your liking or if the other CCXs just can't do that clock. You could have CCX 0 at 4.3GHz and CCX 1 at 4.2GHz for example.

 

RAM: Depends on the IC. I'd go for as much speed as possible and then try and tune them to more respectable timings. I've not a clue about any other IC (or really any clue about RAM OC). DRAM calculator for Ryzen and its accompanying thread on OCN is where the knowledge regarding that is: https://www.overclock.net/forum/13-amd-general/1640919-new-dram-calculator-ryzena-1-7-3-overclocking-dram-am4-membench-0-8-dram-bench.html

 

Or you can try and tune your kit at 3200MHz to be as low as the memory controller or motherboard or IC allows. Might be optimal for gaming, idk.

Thanks for suggestions. Appreciated.

 

CPU

I did have it at 4.3 all cores briefly a while back, no issues, but only to see if it posts and boots. I put it straight back.

If i go to 4.3 (and i take you point on doing it by CCX) should i reduce volts further? 1.2 > 1.15?

 

RAM

I used the DRAM calc for Ryzen to get the initial set of all the timing to get that 3200 and tweaked a little further.

I want to push closer to 3600 but not sure on volts here too. Don't know if advisable to go above 1.35v just for a bench and then put it straight back

 

Score

Any chance you think i can get to 4000 on cine R20 (just for the milestone) or is that completely unrealistic?