GTX 1080 benchmarks leak: not much faster than a 980 Ti

[Lays]

3 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

dat clockspeed tho...1860mhz and it barely match my 1450mhz GTX 980ti...pfff...they can KEEP IT!! LOL

Keep in mind that's apparently stock clock, comparing architectures mean nothing really.  Remember when Kepler was out? 1200 mhz on a card was a pretty good OC, now we see maxwell cards doing 1600.

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, Lays said:

Keep in mind that's apparently stock clock, comparing architectures mean nothing really.  Remember when Kepler was out? 1200 mhz on a card was a pretty good OC, now we see maxwell cards doing 1600.

yes but still...the raw performance aint that much greater than that of a 980ti...i was expecting a bit more humff from the 1080...the 1070 will likely not be able to match a 980ti do you think?

[Lays]

1 minute ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

yes but still...the raw performance aint that much greater than that of a 980ti...i was expecting a bit more humff from the 1080...the 1070 will likely not be able to match a 980ti do you think?

Well considering the only benchmarks I've seen so far are only comparing OVERALL score, and not graphics score (the shit that actually matters) I have no actual idea what's going on.

 

I'm going to run FS Extreme right now at stock clocks, and see what my graphics score is compared to that 10,100 the 1080 gets at stock.

 

My stock clock on my 980 ti is a lot higher than a reference model though, I boost to 1430 out of the box, and I believe most reference are like 1250-1300?

[PlayStation 2]

So Nvidia's taking the piss for making a what's probably gonna be a $500 card outperform OC'd 980 Tis by a reasonable amount?

 

God damn the brainwashing is strong as fuck. I don't like Nvidia as much as the next guy but I'm not ignorant on a reasonable performance increase.

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, Lays said:

Well considering the only benchmarks I've seen so far are only comparing OVERALL score, and not graphics score (the shit that actually matters) I have no actual idea what's going on.

 

I'm going to run FS Extreme right now at stock clocks, and see what my graphics score is compared to that 10,100 the 1080 gets at stock.

 

My stock clock on my 980 ti is a lot higher than a reference model though, I boost to 1430 out of the box, and I believe most reference are like 1250-1300?

yeah around 1300 is a normal boost...mine is also around 1400mhz out of the box maybe even a bit more than that the asus strix has an aggressive overclock...i can't wait for the stream to begin though i think it will be EPIC!

[Lays]

7 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

yeah around 1300 is a normal boost...mine is also around 1400mhz out of the box maybe even a bit more than that the asus strix has an aggressive overclock...i can't wait for the stream to begin though i think it will be EPIC!

 

 

Ok so 1430/7200 gets 9,084 gpu score, so the 1080 is roughly 11% faster than a factory overclocked 980 ti, and probably closer to 20% faster than a reference model.

 

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, Lays said:

 

 

Ok so 1430/7200 gets 9,084 gpu score, so the 1080 is roughly 11% faster than a factory overclocked 980 ti, and probably closer to 20% faster than a reference model.

you think 1860mhz is stock? i mean...1600mhz stock maybe? 1860mhz seems like a lot for a stock clocked card...i don't know...

[Lays]

Just now, i_build_nanosuits said:

you think 1860mhz is stock? i mean...1600mhz stock maybe? 1860mhz seems like a lot for a stock clocked card...i don't know...

Like I said before... We can't compare architectures like that, so we have no idea if it's stock or what not

 

I know it may seem insane but we won't know til more stuff comes out

[i_build_nanosuits]

5 minutes ago, Lays said:

Like I said before... We can't compare architectures like that, so we have no idea if it's stock or what not

 

I know it may seem insane but we won't know til more stuff comes out

i really wonder what AMD's response could be to a card like that...i mean if that thing is 10 or 15% faster than a 980ti...that would put it a good 30% faster than a FuryX...AMD would have to rebrand the Fury and FuryX as the R9 490/490X and sell those for like 380$ or something?!

[79wjd]

41 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

yes but still...the raw performance aint that much greater than that of a 980ti...i was expecting a bit more humff from the 1080...the 1070 will likely not be able to match a 980ti do you think?

Keep in mind, the 970 didn't even outperform a 780 at launch let alone a 780ti. Actual release drivers will change things quite a bit. Also keep in mind that the 1080 is at stock. So it's still possible an overclocked 1070 can match a 980ti.

[i_build_nanosuits]

2 minutes ago, djdwosk97 said:

Keep in mind, the 970 didn't even outperform a 780 at launch let alone a 780ti. Actual release drivers will change things quite a bit. Also keep in mind that the 1080 is at stock. So it's still possible an overclocked 1070 can match a 980ti.

the GTX 970 at launch was faster than the 780...i know cause at the time i had an overclocked 780 in my system and i was not able to match the GTX 970 scores....but yeah the 780ti was faster tho...and now we know it's no longer the case in games...pretty close in benchmarks still tho but not in gaming.

Are you gonna watch the stream?

[Kinda Bottlenecked]

6 minutes ago, djdwosk97 said:

Keep in mind, the 970 didn't even outperform a 780 at launch let alone a 780ti. Actual release drivers will change things quite a bit. Also keep in mind that the 1080 is at stock. So it's still possible an overclocked 1070 can match a 980ti.

 

Woah much faster than that. 

 

Spoiler

 

stock 970 is nearly as fast as stock 780 Ti. Quite abit faster than the 290x as well. How things changed dramatically 

[79wjd]

6 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

the GTX 970 at launch was faster than the 780...i know cause at the time i had an overclocked 780 in my system and i was not able to match the GTX 970 scores....but yeah the 780ti was faster tho...and now we know it's no longer the case in games...pretty close in benchmarks still tho but not in gaming.

Are you gonna watch the stream?

Wasn't the 780 still ahead of the 970 on day 1? Didn't the stream already start?

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, djdwosk97 said:

Wasn't the 780 still ahead of the 970 on day 1? Didn't the stream already start?

-no i don't think so.,..

-yes i missed the beginning because twitch i had to refresh...&!"?/!"/!

[Phase]

So according to the livestream, the 1080 is faster than both 980 SLI and the Titan X.  Pretty impressive.. wondering what the price tag will look like.

[NumLock21]

49 minutes ago, Phase said:

So according to the livestream, the 1080 is faster than both 980 SLI and the Titan X.  Pretty impressive.. wondering what the price tag will look like.

It's $599 and $799 for Founder's Edition

This thread needs to be closed. A single GTX 1080 is faster than GTX 980 in SLI and a Titan X

[Seireitou]

Time to upgrade from my GTX 960 muwhahahaha. Such a perfect time to be alive hahahah

 

I knew my waiting would pay off. I so wanted to buy a GTX 970.

[uytm1]

OCed clock speed shown on stream was 2,1k mhz which is a lot faster than 980ti

[Garfieldus]

For me it's going to be like an order of magnitude upgrade from GTX 560Ti. I bought that card when I was a poor student and never really needed to upgrade until recently as it performed really well.

[Misanthrope]

1 hour ago, NumLock21 said:

It's $599 and $799 for Founder's Edition

This thread needs to be closed. A single GTX 1080 is faster than GTX 980 in SLI and a Titan X

Why? This is an actual test, Nvidia just showed power point slides about their claims. I seriously doubt they will double and triple performance just with a driver upgrade.

 

The truth will probably and somewhere in the middle between this benches and Nvidia's claims today if you ask me.

[Citadelen]

On ‎05‎/‎05‎/‎2016 at 11:02 PM, DeadEyePsycho said:

You mean 480X?

Ah yes my bad.

[mrchow19910319]

On 5/5/2016 at 1:04 AM, VagabondWraith said:

Those core clocks are insane. Definite 2+ GHz OC coming with AIB partners. And GDDR5X which nobody thought it would have. Wonder if AMD will have X or be stuck with regular GDDR5.

 

This is cool for people with 970/980 cards, but not much sense for Ti/TX owners.

 

Hoping there'll be 120Hz 4K G-Sync by the time GP100 rolls around. If not, I'll go with 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + Pascal Titan or Ti.

W8 for 1080Ti then.

*Wink

[handymanshandle]

6 minutes ago, mrchow19910319 said:

W8 for 1080Ti then.

*Wink

It's possible Nvidia might not do a 1080ti. The Pascal Titan will probably be the card for 4k gamers.

I don't see AMD being able to pull that off with either the 490X or a Fury/Fury X replacement.

Vega should probably be able to do that.

Though Navi and Volta will certainly be two different things from Polaris/Vega and Pascal.

[mrchow19910319]

3 minutes ago, wcreek said:

It's possible Nvidia might not do a 1080ti. The Pascal Titan will probably be the card for 4k gamers.

I don't see AMD being able to pull that off with either the 490X or a Fury/Fury X replacement.

Vega should probably be able to do that.

Though Navi and Volta will certainly be two different things from Polaris/Vega and Pascal.

Rumor says the new 1080Ti is coming next year Q1? Like January or sth?

[handymanshandle]

6 minutes ago, mrchow19910319 said:

Rumor says the new 1080Ti is coming next year Q1? Like January or sth?

I suppose that it's possible, though Nvidia might not feel there's an incentive to do a 1080ti. I wouldn't hold my breath for it. Though I'd be willing to hold my breath on the 480X being about a 390X equivalent but I'm not sure if it'll be part of the initial launch of Ellesmere/Polaris 10.  Even if the 480X is slower than the 390X, and the 490 is the 390X equivalent, it'll still probably be cheaper than what the 390X costs right now.