Jump to content

HOLY CRAP! THE CORE CLOCK FOR THE TEMP IS OUTRAGEOUS

TubsAlwaysWins
 Share
Posted

So I'm doing some overclocking on my FX-8320 and Open Hardware Monitor says my core is at 10566Mhz at a maximum of 56.3 degrees on a AIO watercooler!

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

If this bothers you, use other software.

 

If your posting it for the funny side of things....

Succeeded.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

How does it run crysis?

Lol. No idea since I don't own Crysis

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Also it's at 4.3Ghz not 10. But I think I would win the Silicon lottery of I could get it there with a AIO

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

crap software monitoring.. amd platform has no reliable software to monitor temps,

activity, loads, and voltages. and this has been a problem since wayback.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

crap software monitoring.. amd platform has no reliable software to monitor temps,

activity, loads, and voltages. and this has been a problem since wayback.. 

CPU-Z is pretty spot on on voltages and core clock

Edit: And open hardware monitor does fine with loads

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

crap software monitoring.. amd platform has no reliable software to monitor temps,

activity, loads, and voltages. and this has been a problem since wayback.. 

There is AMD overdrive which does a pretty good job of doing all of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

CPU-Z is pretty spot on on voltages and core clock

Edit: And open hardware monitor does fine with loads

 

Yea, not to mention HWmonitor is made by the same developers as CPU-Z- CPUID

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Lol. No idea since I don't own Crysis

Can download demo.

Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 @ 3.5GHz 6C:12T / CM212 Evo / Asus X99 Deluxe / 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 3000 Trident-Z / Samsung 850 Pro 256GB / Intel 335 240GB / WD Red 2 & 3TB / Antec 850w / RTX 2070 / Win10 Pro x64

HP Envy X360 15: Intel Core i5 8250U @ 1.6GHz 4C:8T / 8GB DDR4 / Intel UHD620 + Nvidia GeForce MX150 4GB / Intel 120GB SSD / Win10 Pro x64

 

HP Envy x360 BP series Intel 8th gen

AMD ThreadRipper 2!

5820K & 6800K 3-way SLI mobo support list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

 

 

Polling error, ignore it.

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Polling error, ignore it.

I know. It was as a joke

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

crap software monitoring.. amd platform has no reliable software to monitor temps,

activity, loads, and voltages. and this has been a problem since wayback.. 

 

I have no issues with HWinfo 64, the odd error every blue moon.

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

I have no issues with HWinfo 64, the odd error every blue moon.

So wich is more accurate for idle temps.... Open Hardware Monitor or Overdrive? OHM: 18.8-28.8 Degrees (below room temp i believe) or OD: 43.5-51.5 degrees

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

So wich is more accurate for idle temps.... Open Hardware Monitor or Overdrive? OHM: 18.8-28.8 Degrees (below room temp i believe) or OD: 43.5-51.5 degrees

 

None, Idle temps will always jump around, read your socket temp when your system is at idle.

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

None, Idle temps will always jump around, read your socket temp when your system is at idle.

AAAANNNNDDD using Intel Burn Test which is more accurate: OHM:42.8 degrees VS OD: 26.5 degrees

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

AAAANNNNDDD using Intel Burn Test which is more accurate: OHM:42.8 degrees VS OD: 26.5 degrees

OHM OD? What do you mean?

 

Ah OD is TJ Max/headroom, OHM is telling you the actual temp.

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

OHM OD? What do you mean?

Open Hardware Monitor and Overdrive. Sorry

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Open Hardware Monitor and Overdrive. Sorry

 

See my edit.

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Saw it.

 

They're both accurate, one tells you how many more degrees c you can hit before hitting max safe temp, the other is the actual temp.

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

They're both accurate, one tells you how many more degrees c you can hit before hitting max safe temp, the other is the actual temp.

So if im not trying to go past 60 degrees i should pay attention to OHM

 

Breaking things 1 day at a time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory

×