Jump to content

Fable Legends DirectX 12 benchmark

vitor_cut
By vitor_cut
in Tech News
 Share
Posted

Another DX12 Game with AMD doing better than nVidia. It seems GCN really like DX12, and nVidia got a problem to solve, although i think its an  architectural problem  with Maxwel, and no driver will fix it

 

 

 

 

If other analysis confirms these figures, it implies that AMD’s GCN-based cards could have real staying power in the DX12 API. For the past few months, there’s been a great deal of chatter back and forth as users debated whether or not DX12 feature levels were likely to deliver significant performance advantages or disadvantages. These types of questions are always best answered by games, and the (very) early DX12 data is looking very solid for Team Red. The fact that the R9 390, at $329, outperforms a GTX 980 with an MSRP of ~$460, is a very nice feather in AMD’s cap.

 

 

AMD-Perf2.png

 

 

 

source:

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/214834-fable-legends-amd-and-nvidia-go-head-to-head-in-latest-directx-12-benchmark

 

http://techreport.com/review/29090/fable-legends-directx-12-performance-revealed/2

 

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Fable-Legends-Benchmark-DX12-Performance-Testing-Continues/Results-1080p-Ultr

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Read the posting guidelines please.

 

Edit: That's better but you need to add your own opinion, not just repeating what the article says.

 

Edit: There, that's better.

I am conducting some polls regarding your opinion of large technology companies. I would appreciate your response. 

Microsoft Apple Valve Google Facebook Oculus HTC AMD Intel Nvidia

I'm using this data to judge this site's biases so people can post in a more objective way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

 And then there are the other million games that nVidia runs better than AMD...

Intel Core i7-6700K | Corsair H105 | Asus Z170I PRO GAMING | G.Skill TridentZ Series 16GB | 950 PRO 512GB M.2

 

Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB STRIX OC | BitFenix Prodigy (Black/Red) | XFX PRO Black Edition 850W

 

 

My Build | PCPartPicker | CoC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

off:Read the rules and expand your post please.

 

on: So we have Ashes and Fable Legends. Looks good for AMD.

 They're not winning by much, but we have what we need, competition.

MARS_PROJECT V2 --- RYZEN RIG

Spoiler

 CPU: R5 1600 @3.7GHz 1.27V | Cooler: Corsair H80i Stock Fans@900RPM | Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350 Gaming 3 | RAM: 8GB DDR4 2933MHz(Vengeance LPX) | GPU: MSI Radeon R9 380 Gaming 4G | Sound Card: Creative SB Z | HDD: 500GB WD Green + 1TB WD Blue | SSD: Samsung 860EVO 250GB  + AMD R3 120GB | PSU: Super Flower Leadex Gold 750W 80+Gold(fully modular) | Case: NZXT  H440 2015   | Display: Dell P2314H | Keyboard: Redragon Yama | Mouse: Logitech G Pro | Headphones: Sennheiser HD-569

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Also, it doesn't seem like the Fury X is overly outperforming the 980 TI. AFAIK they are the same price range, and in that game it makes them perform about equally - except for 720p low details.

CPU: I7 4790K(4.6@1.252v)                               Case: Fractal Design Define R5 Windowed(Black)           Cooler: CM 212 EVO + NF F12 iPPC

RAM: HyperX Fury 1600MHZ CL10 2x4GB      Storage: Samsung 850 EVO(250GB) + WD Red(2TB)      PSU: Corsair RM750 (and no, it hasn't blown up!)

MoBo: Asus Maximus VII Ranger                      Graphics: MSI GTX 970 TwinFrozr (1494MHZ Core)       OS: Windows 10 Enterprise

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Also, it doesn't seem like the Fury X is overly outperforming the 980 TI. AFAIK they are the same price range, and in that game it makes them perform about equally - except for 720p low details.

 

Yes, but the better part for AMD is here the R9-390 outperforms the Gtx 980

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Also, it doesn't seem like the Fury X is overly outperforming the 980 TI. AFAIK they are the same price range, and in that game it makes them perform about equally - except for 720p low details.

 

The Fiji based cards don't seem to be getting much extra out of DX12 but the Hawaii cards are getting a very nice boost. R9 390 + 390x outperforming a GTX980 at $100+ cheaper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

The Fiji based cards don't seem to be getting much extra out of DX12 but the Hawaii cards are getting very nice boost. R9 390 + 390x outperforming a GTX980?

Definitely a nice boost - but unless we see this in the majority of DX12 games, it probably wont flip the market.

CPU: I7 4790K(4.6@1.252v)                               Case: Fractal Design Define R5 Windowed(Black)           Cooler: CM 212 EVO + NF F12 iPPC

RAM: HyperX Fury 1600MHZ CL10 2x4GB      Storage: Samsung 850 EVO(250GB) + WD Red(2TB)      PSU: Corsair RM750 (and no, it hasn't blown up!)

MoBo: Asus Maximus VII Ranger                      Graphics: MSI GTX 970 TwinFrozr (1494MHZ Core)       OS: Windows 10 Enterprise

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Ouch NVidia is getting rekt in DX12. A 390 beating a 980? I wonder if my 290 would beat a 980 too. That would be pathetic. I guess NVidia's strategy of planned obsolescence works. Just a bit too soon than they thought.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Definitely a nice boost - but unless we see this in the majority of DX12 games, it probably wont flip the market.

Likely ROP bottleneck just like ashes. Fiji has 64rops just like Hawaii.

Daily Driver:

Case: Red Prodigy CPU: i5 3570K @ 4.3 GHZ GPU: Powercolor PCS+ 290x @1100 mhz MOBO: Asus P8Z77-I CPU Cooler: NZXT x40 RAM: 8GB 2133mhz AMD Gamer series Storage: A 1TB WD Blue, a 500GB WD Blue, a Samsung 840 EVO 250GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Likely ROP bottleneck just like ashes. Fiji has 64rops just like Hawaii.

If you are talking about Asyncronous shaders, then yea - most likely. Future NVidia cards (pascal to be precise) should address this issue.

CPU: I7 4790K(4.6@1.252v)                               Case: Fractal Design Define R5 Windowed(Black)           Cooler: CM 212 EVO + NF F12 iPPC

RAM: HyperX Fury 1600MHZ CL10 2x4GB      Storage: Samsung 850 EVO(250GB) + WD Red(2TB)      PSU: Corsair RM750 (and no, it hasn't blown up!)

MoBo: Asus Maximus VII Ranger                      Graphics: MSI GTX 970 TwinFrozr (1494MHZ Core)       OS: Windows 10 Enterprise

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Ouch NVidia is getting rekt in DX12. A 390 beating a 980? I wonder if my 290 would beat a 980 too. That would be pathetic. I guess NVidia's strategy of planned obsolescence works. Just a bit too soon than they thought.

Nvidia may not care too much, as pascal is only about half a year away, many people will just wait it out. 

I am conducting some polls regarding your opinion of large technology companies. I would appreciate your response. 

Microsoft Apple Valve Google Facebook Oculus HTC AMD Intel Nvidia

I'm using this data to judge this site's biases so people can post in a more objective way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

 And then there are the other million games that nVidia runs better than AMD...

barely?

 

I smell some bullshit here, that or "teh amdees is dx12 reedy!1111!!1!" is pretty much proven as bullshit here (see fury x vs 980 ti)

Check out my guide on how to scan cover art here!

Local asshole and 6th generation console enthusiast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Awesome. Seems that FuryX strugles with 4GB of memory in 4k. I wonder how it would perform with 8GB.

Laptop: Acer V3-772G  CPU: i5 4200M GPU: GT 750M SSD: Crucial MX100 256GB
Desktop: CPU: R7 1700x GPU: RTX 2080 SSD: Samsung 860 Evo 1TB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Food for though about this benches, there's more to it that performance.

this is one of the greatest thing that has happened to me recently, and it happened on this forum, those involved have my eternal gratitude http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/198850-update-alex-got-his-moto-g2-lets-get-a-moto-g-for-alexgoeshigh-unofficial/ :')

i use to have the second best link in the world here, but it died ;_; its a 404 now but it will always be here

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

 And then there are the other million games that nVidia runs better than AMD...

 

Are you daft? This is for DirectX 12.

 

AMD is in the lead right now. Clear as day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

barely?

 

I smell some bullshit here, that or "teh amdees is dx12 reedy!1111!!1!" is pretty much proven as bullshit here (see fury x vs 980 ti)

 

Did you quote the worng person, I prefer the nVidia GPU.

Intel Core i7-6700K | Corsair H105 | Asus Z170I PRO GAMING | G.Skill TridentZ Series 16GB | 950 PRO 512GB M.2

 

Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB STRIX OC | BitFenix Prodigy (Black/Red) | XFX PRO Black Edition 850W

 

 

My Build | PCPartPicker | CoC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Feeling really good about running a pair of 290's right now... :)

 

 And then there are the other million games that nVidia runs better than AMD...

 

OP said "Another DX12 game with AMD doing better than Nvidia". ;)

My Systems:

Main - Work + Gaming:

Spoiler

Woodland Raven: Ryzen 2700X // AMD Wraith RGB // Asus Prime X570-P // G.Skill 2x 8GB 3600MHz DDR4 // Radeon RX Vega 56 // Crucial P1 NVMe 1TB M.2 SSD // Deepcool DQ650-M // chassis build in progress // Windows 10 // Thrustmaster TMX + G27 pedals & shifter

F@H Rig:

Spoiler

FX-8350 // Deepcool Neptwin // MSI 970 Gaming // AData 2x 4GB 1600 DDR3 // 2x Gigabyte RX-570 4G's // Samsung 840 120GB SSD // Cooler Master V650 // Windows 10

 

HTPC:

Spoiler

SNES PC (HTPC): i3-4150 @3.5 // Gigabyte GA-H87N-Wifi // G.Skill 2x 4GB DDR3 1600 // Asus Dual GTX 1050Ti 4GB OC // AData SP600 128GB SSD // Pico 160XT PSU // Custom SNES Enclosure // 55" LG LED 1080p TV  // Logitech wireless touchpad-keyboard // Windows 10 // Build Log

Laptops:

Spoiler

MY DAILY: Lenovo ThinkPad T410 // 14" 1440x900 // i5-540M 2.5GHz Dual-Core HT // Intel HD iGPU + Quadro NVS 3100M 512MB dGPU // 2x4GB DDR3L 1066 // Mushkin Triactor 480GB SSD // Windows 10

 

WIFE'S: Dell Latitude E5450 // 14" 1366x768 // i5-5300U 2.3GHz Dual-Core HT // Intel HD5500 // 2x4GB RAM DDR3L 1600 // 500GB 7200 HDD // Linux Mint 19.3 Cinnamon

 

EXPERIMENTAL: Pinebook // 11.6" 1080p // Manjaro KDE (ARM)

NAS:

Spoiler

Home NAS: Pentium G4400 @3.3 // Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 // 2x 4GB DDR4 2400 // Intel HD Graphics // Kingston A400 120GB SSD // 3x Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200 HDDs in RAID-Z // Cooler Master Silent Pro M 1000w PSU // Antec Performance Plus 1080AMG // FreeNAS OS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Nvidia may not care too much, as pascal is only about half a year away, many people will just wait it out. 

And it's a bad strategy...what will the people that have invested a lot of money in a 980 or a 970? They were advertised as futureproof cards. Yet they start losing to "obsolete" AMD chips.

MARS_PROJECT V2 --- RYZEN RIG

Spoiler

 CPU: R5 1600 @3.7GHz 1.27V | Cooler: Corsair H80i Stock Fans@900RPM | Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350 Gaming 3 | RAM: 8GB DDR4 2933MHz(Vengeance LPX) | GPU: MSI Radeon R9 380 Gaming 4G | Sound Card: Creative SB Z | HDD: 500GB WD Green + 1TB WD Blue | SSD: Samsung 860EVO 250GB  + AMD R3 120GB | PSU: Super Flower Leadex Gold 750W 80+Gold(fully modular) | Case: NZXT  H440 2015   | Display: Dell P2314H | Keyboard: Redragon Yama | Mouse: Logitech G Pro | Headphones: Sennheiser HD-569

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Nvidia may not care too much, as pascal is only about half a year away, many people will just wait it out. 

 

Pascal is out the earliest of Q2 2016, and that might be the Quattros and Titans first. You make it sound like 100% of NVidia users will be buying a Pascal GPU next year. What about all the NVidia users who are not going to get a Pascal GPU? Is it ok, that they are just screwed over? They not only paid a price premium for their products to begin with, but now they are slower too. What a joke.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Game looks pretty, the benchmarks for everything below 980Ti/FuryX are from AMD internal tests.  Anandtech is showing much different numbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Game looks pretty, the benchmarks for everything below 980Ti/FuryX are from AMD internal tests.  Anandtech is showing much different numbers

conspiracy.jpg

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Game looks pretty, the benchmarks for everything below 980Ti/FuryX are from AMD internal tests.  Anandtech is showing much different numbers

 

 I think PCPER did their own testing which shows the same trend of the R9 380/390x beating a GTX 960/980 in both frame-rates and frame-times.

 

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Fable-Legends-Benchmark-DX12-Performance-Testing-Continues

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Tech News

×