Jump to content

can Intel's Iris PRO inside Broadwell be a low-end discrete video card killer?

Mmmm, not yet. If AMD brings out higher clocked Carrizo SKUs before Zen, it could close that gap pretty easily, especially since Carrizo gets GCN 1.2 with Delta Color Compression, and the Excavator core IPC is higher than Steamroller by a 5-15% margin depending on the workload.

lets hope so. I realy hate seeing amd fall so far behind. I want the real gpu and cpu wars to come back. That would be awesome.

Case: Phanteks Evolve X with ITX mount  cpu: Ryzen 3900X 4.35ghz all cores Motherboard: MSI X570 Unify gpu: EVGA 1070 SC  psu: Phanteks revolt x 1200W Memory: 64GB Kingston Hyper X oc'd to 3600mhz ssd: Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB ITX System CPU: 4670k  Motherboard: some cheap asus h87 Ram: 16gb corsair vengeance 1600mhz

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Though a scripted course never covers it all either, and I'd argue it can even cover less in a lot of cases.

 

Depends on if the devs know what they are doing.

 

I'm certainly not trying to say that every ingame benchmark tool is proper, just that doing a human piloted one instead of a perfectly good canned benchmark is ridiculous.

4K // R5 3600 // RTX2080Ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on if the devs know what they are doing.

 

I'm certainly not trying to say that every ingame benchmark tool is proper, just that doing a human piloted one instead of a perfectly good canned benchmark is ridiculous.

It isn't ridiculous, but you have to know exactly what it is you're looking at. That's why I actually prefer JayzTwoCents live benchmarking through gameplay which I can watch.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets hope so. I realy hate seeing amd fall so far behind. I want the real gpu and cpu wars to come back. That would be awesome.

You should pay very careful attention to how IBM and Nvidia fair against Skylake E5/E7 and Knight's Landing. If they slip, Nvidia will be on the road to collapse, as their low and some of their mid-range sales will be eaten by Iris Pro 7200 and likely the Zen/Zen+ APUs (especially if they come with HBM onboard, at which point Intel will do the same thing). If Nvidia gets knocked out of the HPC space, it will be out of direct competition with Intel (technically they only compete in accelerators since Intel doesn't make dGPUs), leaving it open to a buyout by Intel, something the Nvidia shareholders would love. At that point Intel will have everything it wants and needs to just crush AMD outright and not give a damn who gets the x86 license and AMD's IP. Intel will snatch up Papermaster, Keller, and Koduri, and the competition will be stranded for years enough that Intel can just plod along with microscopic improvements and then make quantum leaps when the competition gets close, permanently keeping the competition crippled.

 

The next 5-6 years will determine the course of semiconductor history, and it all comes down to whether or not IBM and Nvidia can remain competitive. If they can and AMD can stay financially afloat and keep hold of Keller & Koduri, they have a chance to reignite Intel's competitive spirit in the consumer space. If Nvidia and IBM slip out of HPC, it's all over, because ARM isn't going to break in (at least not in time to offset the eradication of PowerPC) now that Avoton and Xeon D are scooping up all the dense microserver and low power server markets that were starting to emerge.

 

If AMD falls apart too early, the other scenario that might reignite the competition is IBM, Nvidia, Apple, or Samsung gets it and retains Papermaster, Keller, and Koduri. In that case, suddenly Intel's dealing with the only engineers that have managed to threaten it backed by a war chest large enough to rival its own. If Nvidia makes the purchase, then Intel will buy up the ATI IP by FTC antitrust rulings, and you'll see Intel take off with dGPUs pretty much immediately, probably a bit shaky at the start. Intel can't afford to crush AMD too early and make it go bankrupt until Nvidia's out of the picture. That said, Nvidia's not pulling punches since it knows AMD's on the financial ropes. The next few years decide if Intel will have competition long-term or not. In the worst case, Samsung, Apple, or IBM take over a bloodied and beaten AMD minus its best engineers with Intel in possession of Nvidia. If that happens Intel will exist as a legitimate monopoly with no one in the industry able to keep pace and secure strong competition. In the best case scenario, Intel gets ATI, Nvidia gets AMD, and competition in the consumer space is reignited.

 

AMD is not going to last as AMD for more than another decade. I just don't see it.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow these things kill AMD APUs, one more market AMD has lost.. 

N64 HTPC: [Completed]

 

Main PC: i7 4770k @ 4.2 Ghz | Be Quiet! Dark Rock TF | Asus Z87 Maximus VI Formula | G Skill Ripjaws X 16GB | Zotac GTX 1070 | Samsung 850 EVO 500GB | Seagate 1TB Hybrid | Samsung 840 EVO 128GB | Corsair 1200i | Thermaltake Core P5

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow these things kill AMD APUs, one more market AMD has lost.. 

 

How is a 350$ part killing a 150$ market? I don't get it.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is a 350$ part killing a 150$ market? I don't get it.

 

...You got me there. I guess I didn't really think that through. Here is this better:

 

One more market where AMD has been pushed to the budget option.

N64 HTPC: [Completed]

 

Main PC: i7 4770k @ 4.2 Ghz | Be Quiet! Dark Rock TF | Asus Z87 Maximus VI Formula | G Skill Ripjaws X 16GB | Zotac GTX 1070 | Samsung 850 EVO 500GB | Seagate 1TB Hybrid | Samsung 840 EVO 128GB | Corsair 1200i | Thermaltake Core P5

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

...You got me there. I guess I didn't really think that through. Here is this better:

 

One more market where AMD has been pushed to the budget option.

 

Indeed. I assume this will return to status quo, when ZEN apu's hit the market. 14 nm finfet makes room for a lot of apu. But who knows.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could have included a direct price comparison between the cheap CPU + cheap GPU solution and the Iris Pro solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. I assume this will return to status quo, when ZEN apu's hit the market. 14 nm finfet makes room for a lot of apu. But who knows.

That will depend on whether or not AMD invests in some eDRAM or HBM onboard.  If it doesn't, Intel will pull ahead without a doubt and maintain an unnecessarily wide lead despite having a weaker architecture. AMD is bandwidth-choked, and so is Intel, though Intel definitely doesn't have the same amount of power under the hood.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's heaps good to see Intel putting out some good iGPU's BUT.... guys pls

 

The 5775c and 5675c are like $366 and $276 respectively vs. the 7870K at $137 (Anandtech)..

 

I don't think AMD will be worrying about their budget market being hampered that much. I mean for $360 you can get the 7870K or an i3 + still have more than $200 to spend on a GPU. For $270 you can get the 7870K or even drop it down and get the 860K or something + a 270X or maybe something even slightly better. There's no doubt though that these Iris chips would make a lot of sense for many situations though, I am definitely not disputing that.

THE BEAST Motherboard: MSI B350 Tomahawk   CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1700   GPU: Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC  RAM: 16GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4   

 

PSU: Corsair CX650M     Case: Corsair 200R    SSD: Kingston 240GB SSD Plus   HDD: 1TB WD Green Drive and Seagate Barracuda 2TB Media Drive

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't CPUs that are stagnating. It's consumer software design. Intel's flops numbers have multiplied by a factor of 6 in as many years. We have wide vector instructions. Code just has to be allowed to optimize for them. Most consumer software is still compiled as to support all the way back to the minimum of windows XP: the Pentium 3. -O0 vs -Ofast on any C++ compiler is a huge difference. Go take a look at my HPC for Dummies blog here on LTT. I demonstrate very clearly what the differences are.

 

Most CPU stagnation complaints come out of gamers, a large population here, and it's sad but understandable.  Game developers work their asses off, but adding on top of that efficient multi-threading... nope.  It's 2015 and barely any games are multi-threaded.  How long have we had multi-core processors for in the consumer space?  It's so long I don't even remember, and I've had an 8 threaded CPU since 2009 personally.  Thus, gamers bitch about 10% improvements when 40-90% of their CPU isn't being used at all.  The only recent examples that come to mind are BF4 and Cities: Skylines.

ExMachina (2016-Present) i7-6700k/GTX970/32GB RAM/250GB SSD

Picard II (2015-Present) Surface Pro 4 i5-6300U/8GB RAM/256GB SSD

LlamaBox (2014-Present) i7-4790k/GTX 980Ti/16GB RAM/500GB SSD/Asus ROG Swift

Kronos (2009-2014) i7-920/GTX680/12GB RAM/120GB SSD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will depend on whether or not AMD invests in some eDRAM or HBM onboard.  If it doesn't, Intel will pull ahead without a doubt and maintain an unnecessarily wide lead despite having a weaker architecture. AMD is bandwidth-choked, and so is Intel, though Intel definitely doesn't have the same amount of power under the hood.

 

This ^^ 

 

APU's performance is choked by system memory.

R9 3900XT | Tomahawk B550 | Ventus OC RTX 3090 | Photon 1050W | 32GB DDR4 | TUF GT501 Case | Vizio 4K 50'' HDR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will depend on whether or not AMD invests in some eDRAM or HBM onboard.  If it doesn't, Intel will pull ahead without a doubt and maintain an unnecessarily wide lead despite having a weaker architecture. AMD is bandwidth-choked, and so is Intel, though Intel definitely doesn't have the same amount of power under the hood.

 

With the investment in HBM, I think AMD will implement it into whatever makes economical sense. I definitely think 2016 will be a very interesting year for AMD's portfolio of products.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most CPU stagnation complaints come out of gamers, a large population here, and it's sad but understandable.  Game developers work their asses off, but adding on top of that efficient multi-threading... nope.  It's 2015 and barely any games are multi-threaded.  How long have we had multi-core processors for in the consumer space?  It's so long I don't even remember, and I've had an 8 threaded CPU since 2009 personally.  Thus, gamers bitch about 10% improvements when 40-90% of their CPU isn't being used at all.  The only recent examples that come to mind are BF4 and Cities: Skylines.

 

It's just economics, dual core CPUs are still being sold, so you hit the biggest market if you focus on playable performance on dual cores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the investment in HBM, I think AMD will implement it into whatever makes economical sense. I definitely think 2016 will be a very interesting year for AMD's portfolio of products.

depending on the operational temps for HBM, it may be impossible to put it on the same die as the APU and air-cool it

might be the reason Fiji is not air-cooled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

depending on the operational temps for HBM, it may be impossible to put it on the same die as the APU and air-cool it

might be the reason Fiji is not air-cooled

 

Nah HBM has lower voltage and tdp than GDDR5, so that cannot be it. Fiji is a huge die with 4096 stream processors, so it has about 300w tdp. But it does not need water cooling, as 290x didn't either at 300 w tdp. But water cooling makes it possible for Fiji to be a really small itx size card.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are a lot of pages here are there any comments mentioning that anandtech has the i5-5765c at a little under 300 bucks?

74938.png

 

As impressive as the performance is i'd hardly call a system with a 300 dollar CPU a "budget build" and the 7870k may be behind performance wise but the i5 is costing you double for that 12 fps

 

I'm sure somebody has pointed this out somewhere in here and been appropriately smashed though..

CPU: Intel i5 4690k W/Noctua nh-d15 GPU: Gigabyte G1 980 TI MOBO: MSI Z97 Gaming 5 RAM: 16Gig Corsair Vengance Boot-Drive: 500gb Samsung Evo Storage: 2x 500g WD Blue, 1x 2tb WD Black 1x4tb WD Red

 

 

 

 

"Whatever AMD is losing in suddenly becomes the most important thing ever." - Glenwing, 1/13/2015

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah HBM has lower voltage and tdp than GDDR5, so that cannot be it. Fiji is a huge die with 4096 stream processors, so it has about 300w tdp. But it does not need water cooling, as 290x didn't either at 300 w tdp. But water cooling makes it possible for Fiji to be a really small itx size card.

that's exactly the problem

Fiji dissipates a lot of heat and the HBM chips are very close to the GPU die itself, making thermal contact via the heatsink - that's a very big problem is HBM operational temps must not reach hi values

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's exactly the problem

Fiji dissipates a lot of heat and the HBM chips are very close to the GPU die itself, making thermal contact via the heatsink - that's a very big problem is HBM operational temps must not reach hi values

 

AMD would never put HBM on an interposer that close, if they could not handle the temps. Remember that Fiji will also come in an air cooled version.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD would never put HBM on an interposer that close, if they could not handle the temps. Remember that Fiji will also come in an air cooled version.

 

I would guess at separate heatpipes for the HBM chips on an air cooled card, either that or Fiji is going to have a really low temperature throttling point.

 

*edit* for their cpu's/apu's its not an issue because those already have a low throttling point, so HBM on an APU would be just fine for temps.

R9 3900XT | Tomahawk B550 | Ventus OC RTX 3090 | Photon 1050W | 32GB DDR4 | TUF GT501 Case | Vizio 4K 50'' HDR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember that Fiji will also come in an air cooled version.

still to be confirmed; and those 2x8 power connectors make me wonder if ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

still to be confirmed; and those 2x8 power connectors make me wonder if ever

 

Well...

 

EVGA-GeForce-GTX-780-Ti-Classified-Kingp

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...

no, that card is beyond the point; the GTX 780Ti air-cooled cannot use that much power

that card is most likely built for LN2

 

yes:

GTX-780-Ti-Classified-1900-MHz-842x620.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...

EVGA-GeForce-GTX-780-Ti-Classified-Kingp

Yea, cherry pick a Kingpin card that is specifically designed (over designed) for additional power for water/LN2 cooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×