LTT 3DMark Thread

[PCGuy_5960]

7 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

i'm pretty sure its 16 threads only for the combined test. 

For the Phsyics test, the combined is mostly single core

[Jumper118]

4 minutes ago, DXMember said:

nah, the Firestrike runs 32 threads for CPU regardless of the underlying hardware, but once you step over that there's no more threads to run on hardware so you can now stream the benchmarks without losing score

well on my dual xeon system it doesnt use both cpu's fully and buildzoid had issues with 6950x on it too. got a higher score with no ht on. 

[DXMember]

On ‎2017‎.‎06‎.‎13‎. at 11:02 PM, Jumper118 said:

well on my dual xeon system it doesnt use both cpu's fully and buildzoid had issues with 6950x on it too. got a higher score with no ht on. 

pretty sure it's 32 threads, what buildzoid was running into I believe was weird multi-GPU setup with the drivers...

On ‎2017‎.‎06‎.‎13‎. at 11:02 PM, PCGuy_5960 said:

For the Phsyics test, the combined is mostly single core

so that's why me combined es so crap...

[Jumper118]

5 minutes ago, DXMember said:

 

pretty sure it's 32 threads, what buildzoid was running into I believe was weird multi-GPU setup with the drivers...

so that's why me combined es so crap...

no i am on about the combined test. not the physics test. wait its says 32 thread in combined as well.  well its a lie cos it doesnt use them and i can prove it. 

[DXMember]

3 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

no i am on about the combined test. not the physics test. wait its says 32 thread in combined as well.  well its a lie cos it doesnt use them and i can prove it. 

report a bug, cus I hate combined too, it scores like crap for no apparent reason

[Jumper118]

Just now, DXMember said:

report a bug, cus I hate combined too, it scores like crap for no apparent reason

i dont have internet on bench drives and i wouldn't use a patch if they fixed it  the old version of firestrike which i use doesnt brick itself every 5 ins like the new one does. 

[done12many2]

33 minutes ago, DXMember said:

report a bug, cus I hate combined too, it scores like crap for no apparent reason

 

I still can't believe you're back.  You disappeared for six months!  

 

I'm guessing a short prison sentence or coma?  I'm not buying the browser story.  

[Jumper118]

3 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

I still can't believe you're back.  You disappeared for six months!  

 

I'm guessing a short prison sentence or coma?  I'm not buying the browser story.  

Starting to feel like doc dre? Watched em come and go? Some come back and then go again. 

 

Out of the original people from when I started on here I rarely see another member active. 

 

Ltt og. 

[Jumper118]

Wow I joined the forum 4 days after Slick. That how long I've been here. 

[PCGuy_5960]

16 hours ago, DXMember said:

so that's why me combined es so crap...

Yep, even if it claims that it can use 32 threads, it can't use them efficiently 

[Vellinious]

I just noticed this....not sure how it got there, whether I put up the wrong link or what, but....line 20 on the overall score, is NOT mine.  Overall score 33285, graphics score 49364 belongs to PunkSods.  I never could hit 49k graphics.

[done12many2]

Just now, Vellinious said:

I just noticed this....not sure how it got there, whether I put up the wrong link or what, but....line 20 on the overall score, is NOT mine.  Overall score 33285, graphics score 49364 belongs to PunkSods.  I never could hit 49k graphics.

 

How's that house buying/building or whatever going bud?  It's a great time in the HEDT market.  

[Vellinious]

4 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

How's that house buying/building or whatever going bud?  It's a great time in the HEDT market.  

I decided I was rushing things a bit too much, so I throttled back a bit.  Still building a new house, but am going to wait until spring next year to break ground, and be ready to move in around July / August 2018.  So, I'll be upgrading to the X299 platform when it hits.

Eyeballing the 7900.....looks like fun.

[done12many2]

7 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

I decided I was rushing things a bit too much, so I throttled back a bit.  Still building a new house, but am going to wait until spring next year to break ground, and be ready to move in around July / August 2018.  So, I'll be upgrading to the X299 platform when it hits.

 

Yeah, getting the house stuff right the first time around is far more important then any PC.  I'm lucky that my wife picks them (houses) and I just pay for them.  

 

Are you going with the 7900X from the get go, waiting for some HCC parts, or a combination of both?

 

I plan to start with the 7900X and transition to the 7980XE when they become available and depending on reviews.  

[Vellinious]

23 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

Yeah, getting the house stuff right the first time around is far more important then any PC.  I'm lucky that my wife picks them (houses) and I just pay for them.  

 

Are you going with the 7900X from the get go, waiting for some HCC parts, or a combination of both?

 

I plan to start with the 7900X and transition to the 7980XE when they become available and depending on reviews.  

Well, because I'm trying to save money at the same time, I'll probably start with a good board, get the cheapest CPU, clock the hell out of it, then move on to the 7900X.  I don't have any plans to go higher than that atm, but.....I get urges....

[VagabondWraith]

Where do you guys expect a 7820X to fall in for physics scores? For Fire Strike. I believe my 6700K did 13,500 stock iirc. Time to get my scores (hopefully) well above 21,000.

[Vellinious]

2 hours ago, VagabondWraith said:

Where do you guys expect a 7820X to fall in for physics scores? For Fire Strike. I believe my 6700K did 13,500 stock iirc. Time to get my scores (hopefully) well above 21,000.

I would guess in that neighborhood.  I was pulling high 18k physics with a 5820k.  Given their increased IPC and clock speed, I'd say that's well within range.

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, Vellinious said:

I would guess in that neighborhood.  I was pulling high 18k physics with a 5820k.  Given their increased IPC and clock speed, I'd say that's well within range.

 

Are them urges getting stronger yet?

[Vellinious]

All the time.  lol

[DXMember]

I'm still going ham for Threadripper if it's below 650 for cheapest 16 core

 

The clock for clock performance is pretty good, I just wish they sprinkle it with some more pixie dust to break that 4.0GHz barrier....

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/12596409/fs/10048415

[PCGuy_5960]

6 hours ago, DXMember said:

I'm still going ham for Threadripper if it's below 650 for cheapest 16 core

Same, but I think that the 14 or the 12 core will cost $650..... The 16 core will cost $850 AFAIK

[DildorTheDecent]

1 hour ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Same, but I think that the 14 or the 12 core will cost $650..... The 16 core will cost $850 AFAIK

the little 16 core does. i think there's two. little and big. 

[PCGuy_5960]

1 minute ago, DildorTheDecent said:

the little 16 core does. i think there's two. little and big. 

I think the non X will cost $850 and the X $1000....  

[Jumper118]

1 hour ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

I think the non X will cost $850 and the X $1000....  

yes. the bottom 16 core is $850 with the top being 1000. 

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, Jumper118 said:

yes. the bottom 16 core is $850 with the top being 1000. 

 

What do you get for an extra $150?