Google Glass? How do you feel about it.

[Builder]

or what about something like galaxy gear you could record with that as discretly as you could with glass actually probally even more descretly 

I don't like the Galaxy Gear either.

[sperkowsky]

I understand it's purpose. Honestly, your view that half paying attention to someone is acceptable and not rude is a huge part of the problem.

It's socially unacceptable and quite rude.

Sadly I'm not surprised someone your age finds it an all right practice.

well what do you think is better being fully indulged in your phone or half paying attention to your device and half attention to a person. Obviously neither is the best but its an improvement I guess. To the last statement your probally somewhat right we are in a generation where you talk to your friends on facetime more than actually face to face

[sperkowsky]

I don't like the Galaxy Gear either.

respectable

[Builder]

well what do you think is better being fully indulged in your phone or half paying attention to your device and half attention to a person. Obviously neither is the best but its an improvement I guess. To the last statement your probally somewhat right we are in a generation where you talk to your friends on facetime more than actually face to face

If you're looking at your phone nobody expects you to be paying attention. Looking at your face, they do. That's why Glass is obnoxious.

[sperkowsky]

If you're looking at your phone nobody expects you to be paying attention. Looking at your face, they do. That's why Glass is obnoxious.

yeah thats a good point 

[dizmo]

well what do you think is better being fully indulged in your phone or half paying attention to your device and half attention to a person. Obviously neither is the best but its an improvement I guess. To the last statement your probally somewhat right we are in a generation where you talk to your friends on facetime more than actually face to face

Haha, no. It's really not an improvement at all. It shouldn't even be an issue to be honest.

Not really, but I've fired quite a few people who just can't seem to keep off their phones at work.

Going home everyone's staring at a screen.

It's pretty sad, really.

[sperkowsky]

Haha, no. It's really not an improvement at all. It shouldn't even be an issue to be honest.

Not really, but I've fired quite a few people who just can't seem to keep off their phones at work.

Going home everyone's staring at a screen.

It's pretty sad, really.

is it too much to ask what kind of business you own I am interested now. But yeah its weird actually I am one of those people who is on their phone constantly. I went to sleep away camp for 2 weeks and was able to live fine without even missing it but as soon as I got it back I returned to being on it constantly. 

[Totally-A-Hero]

Ya carry a camera on ur head at all times, gg NSA

[Builder]

Ya carry a camera on ur head at all times, gg NSA

My point.

[Totally-A-Hero]

NSA: Hey apple get finger prints for us

Apple: No prob *5s! Fingerprint feature!*

NSA:Google help us track people and see there every move

Google: Google Glass is great!Built in camera!

[Builder]

NSA: Hey apple get finger prints for us

Apple: No prob *5s! Fingerprint feature!*

Not physically possible...do you understand the secure enclave?

[Totally-A-Hero]

Not physically possible...do you understand the secure enclave?

do you understand that Police can make you open the phone if you use the fingerprint feature? But if its memory they cant?

[sperkowsky]

do you understand that Police can make you open the phone if you use the fingerprint feature? But if its memory they cant?

well thats only with a search warrant and if you have a warrant its a good thing the police can access your phone to the safety of public

[Builder]

do you understand that Police can make you open the phone if you use the fingerprint feature? But if its memory they cant?

They can arrest you if you don't give them the password and plus it's very easily hacked.

 

However you did dodge my point and switch to the police.

[Totally-A-Hero]

They can arrest you if you don't give them the password and plus it's very easily hacked.

 

However you did dodge my point and switch to the police.

Your point is valid, but i wouldnt be surprised if they looked anyway, they already break lots of laws.

[Totally-A-Hero]

Were getting off topic, point is that its basically a kinect that follows you around.

[Akolyte]

I see where that wouldnt be too comforting but the same could be said if someone walked in to bathroom holding up their phone if someone is wierd enough to tape people in a bathroom they are wierd enough to do it right with their phone imo

yeah, but then if they are wearing google glass, its a wearable.  Its always on your face and so it could be recording at any time, people who walk into bathrooms dont take out their phones really.  However Google glass is glasses, esspecially if Google makes prescription Google glass then it will be impossible for people to take them off or they cant see properly. 

[Builder]

Your point is valid, but i wouldnt be surprised if they looked anyway, they already break lots of laws.

No, as in the way secure enclave is implemented makes it impossible.

[sperkowsky]

yeah, but then if they are wearing google glass, its a wearable.  Its always on your face and so it could be recording at any time, people who walk into bathrooms dont take out their phones really.  However Google glass is glasses, esspecially if Google makes prescription Google glass then it will be impossible for people to take them off or they cant see properly. 

there are already perscription google glasses so yes point taken

[Caincard]

The HUD idea is okay, but I am not to enthused about it. plus the unit looks kind of crappy. I know im knocking it without trying it, but then again with the way some people would use it. I only see the invasive point of the topic. Now if they could set up something that would basically say "SCREW YOU GLASSHOLE" and negate their signal or the use of photographic optics in reference to someone who has said accessory then fine. But seeing as that would require a range greater than the optics on the glass. Seems a bit out of the way.

[Totally-A-Hero]

No, as in the way secure enclave is implemented makes it impossible.

It makes it impossible for people to acsess it?

[sperkowsky]

Your point is valid, but i wouldnt be surprised if they looked anyway, they already break lots of laws.

the ignorance in that statement is to the point of ridiculousness

[Builder]

It makes it impossible for people to acsess it?

No, only the specific hardware can, and it's not wirelessly connected.

[Builder]

the ignorance in that statement is to the point of ridiculousness

But it's the truth...

[sperkowsky]

But it's the truth...

the whole point of their job is enforcing the laws......I know there are the corrupt cops out there but majority of them play by the rules