Jump to content

6950xt vs 4070ti

Shabaps

Hi.

 

I'm in the market for a new GPU (my 1080ti is getting a bit long in the tooth) and I have been keeping an eye on the GPU market.

Currently the 7900 range from AMD as well as the 4080 range and up from Nvidia is out of my budget so I'm looking at the 4070ti from Nvidia at present. However, there is currently a good price on a MSI 6950xt card, and removing RT from the discussion, it looks like really good value.

I'm from New Zealand and currently the cheapest 4070ti card I can find comes in around $1600-$1700 NZD. The MSI 6950xt card is currently going for $1100 NZD. That's a substantial difference for me as I could use the extra $500/$600 I would have spent on something else.

 

I am not fussed by RT performance as most games I play are normal raster games, and I mainly stick to 1440p 144hz as that is my monitors max native resolution. DLSS is great but it's not a deal breaker for me, especially after seeing how FSR 2.0 works in some newer titles, and playing on 1440p I don't suspect I would really need it in any case.

 

So my question would be: Is the 6950xt still a valid option in todays GPU market (is it is RDNA 2 and not 3) in comparison to the 4070ti, or is it better to spend the extra money on the newer card?

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6950 XT is certainly still a relevant GPU for modern gaming, and should be relevant for 1440p gaming for several more years. 

 

The 4070 ti performs 4% better than the 6950 XT on average, according to TechPowerUp's relative rankings. (The gap will grow with ray tracing enabled but you said you don't care about that.) Since in your local market the 4070 ti is ~50% more expensive, I don't see any case to be made for that... paying 50% more for a performance uplift that's barely outside the margin of error. 

Corps aren't your friends. "Bottleneck calculators" are BS. Only suckers buy based on brand. It's your PC, do what makes you happy.  If your build meets your needs, you don't need anyone else to "rate" it for you. And talking about being part of a "master race" is cringe. Watch this space for further truths people need to hear.

 

Ryzen 7 5800X3D | ASRock X570 PG Velocita | PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT | 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix 3600mt/s CL16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello! These are both great graphics cards, but the 4070ti is definitely better, about 30% better in most things, but I would get the 6950xt, if you're only running games at 1440p at 144hz, you shouldn't need the 4070ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Middcore said:

6950 XT is certainly still a relevant GPU for modern gaming, and should be relevant for 1440p gaming for several more years. 

 

The 4070 ti performs 4% better than the 6950 XT on average, according to TechPowerUp's relative rankings. (The gap will grow with ray tracing enabled but you said you don't care about that.) Since in your local market the 4070 ti is ~50% more expensive, I don't see any case to be made for that... paying 50% more for a performance uplift that's barely outside the margin of error. 

I'm not sure how they got the 4% difference, but in reality it's closer to 30%. Check here: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-6950-XT-vs-Nvidia-RTX-4070-Ti/m1843533vs4146

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for the price difference, I'd strongly go with Nvidia. At those prices? Harder decision. Honestly though, I'd probably still go with Nvidia.

I've had far too many headaches with AMD GPUs.

CPU: Ryzen 9 5900 Cooler: EVGA CLC280 Motherboard: Gigabyte B550i Pro AX RAM: Kingston Hyper X 32GB 3200mhz

Storage: WD 750 SE 500GB, WD 730 SE 1TB GPU: EVGA RTX 3070 Ti PSU: Corsair SF750 Case: Streacom DA2

Monitor: LG 27GL83B Mouse: Razer Basilisk V2 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red Speakers: Mackie CR5BT

 

MiniPC - Sold for $100 Profit

Spoiler

CPU: Intel i3 4160 Cooler: Integrated Motherboard: Integrated

RAM: G.Skill RipJaws 16GB DDR3 Storage: Transcend MSA370 128GB GPU: Intel 4400 Graphics

PSU: Integrated Case: Shuttle XPC Slim

Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

Budget Rig 1 - Sold For $750 Profit

Spoiler

CPU: Intel i5 7600k Cooler: CryOrig H7 Motherboard: MSI Z270 M5

RAM: Crucial LPX 16GB DDR4 Storage: Intel S3510 800GB GPU: Nvidia GTX 980

PSU: Corsair CX650M Case: EVGA DG73

Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

OG Gaming Rig - Gone

Spoiler

 

CPU: Intel i5 4690k Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 Motherboard: MSI Z97i AC ITX

RAM: Crucial Ballistix 16GB DDR3 Storage: Kingston Fury 240GB GPU: Asus Strix GTX 970

PSU: Thermaltake TR2 Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX

Monitor: Dell P2214H x2 Mouse: Logitech MX Master Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FlamingPCs said:

I'm not sure how they got the 4% difference, but in reality it's closer to 30%. Check here: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-6950-XT-vs-Nvidia-RTX-4070-Ti/m1843533vs4146

 

Userbenchmark has a not-even-concealed bias against AMD products, and should generally never be trusted. 

Corps aren't your friends. "Bottleneck calculators" are BS. Only suckers buy based on brand. It's your PC, do what makes you happy.  If your build meets your needs, you don't need anyone else to "rate" it for you. And talking about being part of a "master race" is cringe. Watch this space for further truths people need to hear.

 

Ryzen 7 5800X3D | ASRock X570 PG Velocita | PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT | 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix 3600mt/s CL16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some data from reputable reviewers:

 

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-review-a-costly-70-class-gpu/5 

Based on 9 games at 1440p

4070 ti averages 115fps

6950 XT averages 111

 

https://www.techspot.com/review/2601-nvidia-geforce-rtx-4070-ti/ 

Based on 16 games at 1440p

4070 ti averages 152 fps

6950 XT averages 145

 

 

Corps aren't your friends. "Bottleneck calculators" are BS. Only suckers buy based on brand. It's your PC, do what makes you happy.  If your build meets your needs, you don't need anyone else to "rate" it for you. And talking about being part of a "master race" is cringe. Watch this space for further truths people need to hear.

 

Ryzen 7 5800X3D | ASRock X570 PG Velocita | PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT | 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix 3600mt/s CL16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FlamingPCs said:

I'm not sure how they got the 4% difference, but in reality it's closer to 30%. Check here: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-6950-XT-vs-Nvidia-RTX-4070-Ti/m1843533vs4146

Do not ever talk about tech and specs while linking user benchmark. Until you learn what is good data, bad data, reputable sites and non reputable sites, refrain from spreading bad info. UserBenchmark has been well known for being blatantly bad, they HATE AMD, and do everything to skew results against them. A 4070ti is a glorified 3090 at lower power, a 6950XT is about the same as a 3090, with some losses in the 3-6% range depending on the game. Its not 30%, that alone should make you question the validity of the data if you spent 5 minutes looking at info. Ray tracing? I could see a performance difference like that, but in general no.

 

OP how much are 6900XT there? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shimejii said:

Do not ever talk about tech and specs while linking user benchmark. Until you learn what is good data, bad data, reputable sites and non reputable sites, refrain from spreading bad info.

 

This is harshly stated but I have to agree with the general point.

 

@FlamingPCs, I can only encourage you to do more research on this. Knowledgeable PC communities will generally laugh you out of the room if you cite Userbenchmark for a performance comparison between two parts, and I think there are some sites and subreddits where linking to it is actually banned. 

Corps aren't your friends. "Bottleneck calculators" are BS. Only suckers buy based on brand. It's your PC, do what makes you happy.  If your build meets your needs, you don't need anyone else to "rate" it for you. And talking about being part of a "master race" is cringe. Watch this space for further truths people need to hear.

 

Ryzen 7 5800X3D | ASRock X570 PG Velocita | PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT | 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix 3600mt/s CL16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FlamingPCs said:

I'm not sure how they got the 4% difference, but in reality it's closer to 30%. Check here: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-6950-XT-vs-Nvidia-RTX-4070-Ti/m1843533vs4146

 

I'm not actually trying to be as grumpy as it seems.

I will find your mentions of Ikea or Gnome and I will /s post. 

Project Hot Box

CPU 13900k, Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Elite AX, RAM CORSAIR Vengeance 4x16gb 5200 MHZ, GPU Zotac RTX 4090 Trinity OC, Case Fractal Pop Air XL, Storage Sabrent Rocket Q4 2tbCORSAIR Force Series MP510 1920GB NVMe, CORSAIR FORCE Series MP510 960GB NVMe, PSU CORSAIR HX1000i, Cooling Corsair XC8 CPU block, Bykski GPU block, 360mm and 280mm radiator, Displays Odyssey G9, LG 34UC98-W 34-Inch,Keyboard Mountain Everest Max, Mouse Mountain Makalu 67, Sound AT2035, Massdrop 6xx headphones, Go XLR 

Oppbevaring

CPU i9-9900k, Motherboard, ASUS Rog Maximus Code XI, RAM, 48GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB 3200 mhz (2x16)+(2x8) GPUs Asus ROG Strix 2070 8gb, PNY 1080, Nvidia 1080, Case Mining Frame, 2x Storage Samsung 860 Evo 500 GB, PSU Corsair RM1000x and RM850x, Cooling Asus Rog Ryuo 240 with Noctua NF-12 fans

 

Why is the 5800x so hot?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the valuable input. The videos were very helpful. From what I have seen the performance is very similar and the 6950xt even pulls off a couple of wins in certain games. The one concern is that the power usage of the 6950xt is very high in comparison to the 4070ti but the Nvidia card also doesn't show me major value at this point in time for the price and performance it offers. 

I might hang on to my 1080ti a little while longer to see if prices or other specials pop up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6950XT all day. The 4070Ti is just way too overpriced for the performance to the GTX 1080Ti. It's barely twice as fast in native rendering at 1440p - a gap that closes quite easily when using FSR with the GTX 1080Ti.. Same goes for the 7900XT(non-second-X). In my opinion - hold onto that 1080Ti, use FSR and wait more. The majority of people who "upgraded" to 4070Ti or 7900XT from a 1080Ti aren't all that impressed and happy. Only really desperate people are now buying GPUs and it shows. Prices have been steadily going down a bit and they WILL go down even further to the point where they might start to make sense again. Despite what Nvidia are trying to make you think, a 70 class GPU is not worth $1000. It's not worth even $700. It should be right at $549. Idk if Nvidia or AMD for that matter see that the ship is very close to capsizing. The market is about to collapse and they have no one to blame but themselves and the shameless upsales. Another crypto bubble burst is on the horizon and this time it should be a serious one. There are still plenty of miner GPUs that just sit idle and wait for better times, which will never come. 

| Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 Rev 7| AsRock X570 Steel Legend |

| 4x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo 4000MHz CL16 | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT | Seasonic Focus GX-1000|

| 512GB A-Data XPG Spectrix S40G RGB | 2TB A-Data SX8200 Pro| Phanteks Eclipse G500A |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6950xt for 1440p. 

 

userbenchmark is a joke, and from actually using the cards the 6950xt is bit faster than what techpowerup claims.

 

nvidia is really mispricing everything except the 4090

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, FlamingPCs said:

I'm not sure how they got the 4% difference, but in reality it's closer to 30%. Check here: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-6950-XT-vs-Nvidia-RTX-4070-Ti/m1843533vs4146

You're using user benchmark as a source? Joke right?

 

Given the price differential, the 6950XT would be my choice, no question. The 4070Ti does not give you $500/$600 worth of additional performance and is just generally overpriced as a product. The 6950XT at $1100 NZD is roughly equivalent to $690 USD, so that's a pretty good price for that card. That 4070 Ti on the other hand at $1600-$1700 NZD is roughly $1000-$1100 USD. Not even close to a good price.

Zen 3 Daily Rig (2022 - Present): AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + Optimus Foundations AM4 | Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti FE + Alphacool Eisblock 3080 FE | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@3733 c14) | ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero | 2x Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB | Crucial MX500 1TB | Corsair RM1000x | Lian Li O11 Dynamic | LG 48" C1 | EK Quantum Kinetic TBE 200 w/ D5 | HWLabs GTX360 and GTS360 | Bitspower True Brass 14mm | Corsair 14mm White PMMA | ModMyMods Mod Water Clear | 9x BeQuiet Silent Wings 3 120mm PWM High Speed | Aquacomputer Highflow NEXT | Aquacomputer Octo

 

Test Bench: 

CPUs: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, Core i5-2400, Core i7-4790K, Core i9-10900K, Core i3-13100, Core i9-13900KS

Motherboards: ASUS Z97-Deluxe, EVGA Z490 Dark, EVGA Z790 Dark Kingpin

GPUs: GTX 275 (RIP), 2x GTX 560, GTX 570, 2x GTX 650 Ti Boost, GTX 980, Titan X (Maxwell), x2 HD 6850

Bench: Cooler Master Masterframe 700 (bench mode)

Cooling: Heatkiller IV Pro Pure Copper | Koolance GPU-210 | HWLabs L-Series 360 | XSPC EX360 | Aquacomputer D5 | Bitspower Water Tank Z-Multi 250 | Monsoon Free Center Compressions | Mayhems UltraClear | 9x Arctic P12 120mm PWM PST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just bought a 6950xt nitro,At 1440p gaming its still a amazing card.Some older games like gta5 i have to lock the fps at 144hz or it runs too fast and stutters some.Gta5 1440p max settings i see 180fps.I didn't see the 4070ti being worth the extra money to me plus having to spend 30 dollars for a power cable not to use the adapter.If i was going to spend that much money i would have went for a 7900xt or the 7900xtx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×