Jump to content

Weird font issue but only on this site

Go to solution Solved by Biohazard777,

@Master Disaster@Nayr438

Yep that is it, installed helvetica-neu and numbers look normal in FF.
image.png.40ae2de51f8356c0ba1cb09ccd97403d.png

Which means Brave comes with this font.


Went to AUR, found one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/helvetica-neue

image.png.ea86fdfa67ecc887f295d9abebc03527.png
K... better check PKGBUILD for this one:

image.png.f5e25bfd236bcb22de81a3faebafd95e.png

Seriously... impostersussy , amogus.sussy@fedora.mail

Git looks fine: https://github.com/impostersussy/HelveticaNeue

But still, I am not comfortable with having this updating with the rest of my aur packages, so right after testing if FF will work with it I uninstalled.
Then as @Master Disasteralready found out, it is not a free font... Which explains that strange aur package a little, but does that mean Brave payed for license and ships the browser bundled with the font and FF doesn't? But @RockSolid1106confirmed it works with FF on Windows... This whole things just keeps getting weirder haha.

Browser, version and OS: 

Firefox, Arch Linux

 

Steps to reproduce/what were you doing before it happened?

N/A

 

What happened?

Number fonts appear smaller compared to others

 

What did you expect to happen?

Not that

 

Link to a page where it happened, if applicable: 

All

 

Screenshots of the issue, if applicable: 

 

1TB, 2TB, 3TB, 4TB, 5TB, 6TB, 7TB

 

Any other relevant details:

Cannot replicate on any other websites or in local apps (PyCharm, VSCode etc are all fine), not exactly sure if it is an issue on this site or a screwy something on my install

 

If it's a cloudflare error, what was the ray ID from the bottom of the error page?

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Master Disaster said:

Screenshots of the issue, if applicable: 

 

1TB, 2TB, 3TB, 4TB, 5TB, 6TB, 7TB

That's not a screenshot...

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Untitled.png.7c88e6d866ebce21c0eba5c5168b0a26.png

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't replicate this on FF 97 on Windows. Pretty sure this is a Linux thing

 

image.png.42d3353027913d5c6039a1a6d3352004.png

On 4/5/2024 at 10:13 PM, LAwLz said:

I am getting pretty fucking sick and tired of the "watch something else" responses. It's such a cop out answer because you could say that about basically anything, and it doesn't address the actual complaints. People use it as some kind of card they pull when they can't actually respond to the criticism raised but they still feel like they need to defend some company/person. If you don't like this thread then stop reading it. See how stupid it is? It's basically like telling someone "shut the fuck up". It's not a clever responsive, it doesn't address anything said, and it is rude. 

 ^

 

bruh switch to dark mode its at the bottom of this page

VPN Server Guide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RockSolid1106 said:

Can't replicate this on FF 97 on Windows. Pretty sure this is a Linux thing

 

image.png.42d3353027913d5c6039a1a6d3352004.png

So then why only on this site?

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably has something to do with the font packages you have installed and how the CSS is calling them. (This site may be using a different sans-serif font than the Google search box.)

 

font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, Roboto, "Liberation Sans", sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol";

 

I sold my soul for ProSupport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scaling is off (100%),
Looks like FF (97.0.1 (64-bit)) issue:
image.png.6f45effa8859dc59e160cbc0c122a622.png

 

Brave:

image.png.5113f0d4ff62d417c96c6bb177d8ab1f.png


Both browsers are on the same OS:
image.png.0b1517d20bd746ac39a104e0b27a521d.png


Though I have no clue when the issue started, as I rarely use FF.

VGhlIHF1aWV0ZXIgeW91IGJlY29tZSwgdGhlIG1vcmUgeW91IGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIGhlYXIu

^ not a crypto wallet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

CSS font family rule is the same in both browsers when inspecting.
FF:
image.png.9c9267e5559b2936095a69820c3e8c3d.png

Brave:
image.png.2949875783c69429e130d62a8bbeacd1.png


Also font-size and line-height are the same.
FF:

image.png.f46f2d8f515890a2f2da13605a08d072.png

Brave:
image.png.9a94e7c3add524dd55c1f5dbfab17743.png

 

100% scale, no zoom used inside the browsers.

Side by side (Brave left, FF right):
image.thumb.png.49da6072b319e06398d8a53c0cf4a1c3.png

Weird.

VGhlIHF1aWV0ZXIgeW91IGJlY29tZSwgdGhlIG1vcmUgeW91IGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIGhlYXIu

^ not a crypto wallet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Biohazard777 said:

Both browsers are on the same OS:

image.png.0b1517d20bd746ac39a104e0b27a521d.png

 

This agrees it is a browser issue since I'm on Kernel 5.16.11 and Gnome 41/GTK/Wayland

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's how the Helvetica Font substitution font is handling that specific scaling factor, in my instance it appears to be "Nimbus Sans". 14px / 10.5 pt

image.png.4bef3f9852aa89f15f3328243416f3d3.png

 

image.thumb.png.3e387661f22ef9b9360ce27ce80e7f0a.png

 

image.thumb.png.3a2dd08c086a378b99140873bf1c3a59.png

Edited by Nayr438
Wasn;t paying attention to the fact that Libre-Office was substituting missing fonts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nayr438 said:

It's how the Helvetica Font is handling that specific scaling factor. 14px / 10.5 pt

image.png.4bef3f9852aa89f15f3328243416f3d3.png

Interesting, when I tried to replicate this it turns out I don't have Helvetica installed at all...

 

Gonna pull it from the AUR RN.

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Master Disaster said:

Interesting, when I tried to replicate this it turns out I don't have Helvetica installed at all...

 

Gonna pull it from the AUR RN.

Oops I may have been wrong, it's being substituted. I believe with "Nimbus Sans" on my machine from "gsfonts".

 

image.png.4faea70add7085f9c8923acb0759b558.png

 

Figured something was up when you said "AUR" as the only font packages I have from the AUR are "aur/all-repository-fonts" and "aur/ttf-meslo-nerd-font-powerlevel10k"
 

Edited by Nayr438
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nayr438 said:

Oops I may have been wrong, it's being substituted. I believe with "Nimbus Sans" on my machine from "gsfonts".

 

image.png.4faea70add7085f9c8923acb0759b558.png

 

Figured something was up when you said "AUR" as the only font packages I have from the AUR are "aur/all-repository-fonts" and "aur/ttf-meslo-nerd-font-powerlevel10k"
 

I did some digging, looks like Helvetica is an Adobe font (I was sure it was MS) and is provided by x11-fonts-100dpi however only in bitmap format, afaict the TTF Helvetica doesn't exist on Linux.

 

Anyhow, thanks for at least confirming its a weird font issue. I'm not sure exactly where it came from though as I'm sure it didn't exist yesterday (or maybe it did but I didn't see it) and now it showing on both my Laptop & Desktop.

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Master Disaster@Nayr438

Yep that is it, installed helvetica-neu and numbers look normal in FF.
image.png.40ae2de51f8356c0ba1cb09ccd97403d.png

Which means Brave comes with this font.


Went to AUR, found one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/helvetica-neue

image.png.ea86fdfa67ecc887f295d9abebc03527.png
K... better check PKGBUILD for this one:

image.png.f5e25bfd236bcb22de81a3faebafd95e.png

Seriously... impostersussy , amogus.sussy@fedora.mail

Git looks fine: https://github.com/impostersussy/HelveticaNeue

But still, I am not comfortable with having this updating with the rest of my aur packages, so right after testing if FF will work with it I uninstalled.
Then as @Master Disasteralready found out, it is not a free font... Which explains that strange aur package a little, but does that mean Brave payed for license and ships the browser bundled with the font and FF doesn't? But @RockSolid1106confirmed it works with FF on Windows... This whole things just keeps getting weirder haha.

VGhlIHF1aWV0ZXIgeW91IGJlY29tZSwgdGhlIG1vcmUgeW91IGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIGhlYXIu

^ not a crypto wallet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Biohazard777 said:

@Master Disaster@Nayr438

Yep that is it, installed helvetica-neu and numbers look normal in FF.
image.png.40ae2de51f8356c0ba1cb09ccd97403d.png

Which means Brave comes with this font

 

If I had to take a guess, brave is probably ignoring the systems substitution, either providing its own or continuing onto the next generic font in the list. Meanwhile Firefox is probably grabbing "Nimbus Sans", at least on my machine, because the system had a substitution defined for that font as available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Biohazard777 said:

it works with FF on Windows... This whole things just keeps getting weirder haha.

Works on FF nightly too on macOS,

tho Helvetica ships as a system font in macOS, so…

"A high ideal missed by a little, is far better than low ideal that is achievable, yet far less effective"

 

If you think I'm wrong, correct me. If I've offended you in some way tell me what it is and how I can correct it. I want to learn, and along the way one can make mistakes; Being wrong helps you learn what's right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, J-from-Nucleon said:

tho Helvetica ships as a system font in macOS, so…

Yeah I just checked myself, it is included (haven't installed any additional fonts on my Mac):

Spoiler

ss-mac.png.0569f9f58dddcf99e96084753fb900f7.png


 

1 hour ago, Nayr438 said:

If I had to take a guess, brave is probably ignoring the systems substitution, either providing its own or continuing onto the next generic font in the list. Meanwhile Firefox is probably grabbing "Nimbus Sans", at least on my machine, because the system had a substitution defined for that font as available.

But on Windows 11 it isn't included.

Spoiler

ss-fonts.thumb.png.65008a1ccf62be86c5ac977dac4d689f.png

And yet it looks fine...
image.png.1dc184637eabb09950f7ce6b65f07b7b.png

I checked the network request, only Font Awesome and Material Icons are dynamically loaded, so it isn't that (unless I missed it).

Spoiler

image.png.a6c679523599a05dc33ca7c7789b8584.png

So yeah, I guess either FF excluded the that font in their Linux build or FF chooses a different substitute font on Windows.

VGhlIHF1aWV0ZXIgeW91IGJlY29tZSwgdGhlIG1vcmUgeW91IGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIGhlYXIu

^ not a crypto wallet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Biohazard777 said:

@Master Disaster@Nayr438

Yep that is it, installed helvetica-neu and numbers look normal in FF.
image.png.40ae2de51f8356c0ba1cb09ccd97403d.png

Which means Brave comes with this font.


Went to AUR, found one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/helvetica-neue

image.png.ea86fdfa67ecc887f295d9abebc03527.png
K... better check PKGBUILD for this one:

image.png.f5e25bfd236bcb22de81a3faebafd95e.png

Seriously... impostersussy , amogus.sussy@fedora.mail

Git looks fine: https://github.com/impostersussy/HelveticaNeue

But still, I am not comfortable with having this updating with the rest of my aur packages, so right after testing if FF will work with it I uninstalled.
Then as @Master Disasteralready found out, it is not a free font... Which explains that strange aur package a little, but does that mean Brave payed for license and ships the browser bundled with the font and FF doesn't? But @RockSolid1106confirmed it works with FF on Windows... This whole things just keeps getting weirder haha.

Installing this font clears the issue. I was a tad reluctant to pull it myself, had bad luck with AUR fonts in the past but it works so....

 

Just to be safe though, I'll add it to the update ignore list 😄

 

Edit - Now I'm just waiting for Mortis to come in, laugh and tell us he knew what the issue was and how to fix it already

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Biohazard777 said:

Yeah I just checked myself, it is included (haven't installed any additional fonts on my Mac):

  Reveal hidden contents

ss-mac.png.0569f9f58dddcf99e96084753fb900f7.png


 

But on Windows 11 it isn't included.

  Hide contents

ss-fonts.thumb.png.65008a1ccf62be86c5ac977dac4d689f.png

And yet it looks fine...
image.png.1dc184637eabb09950f7ce6b65f07b7b.png

I checked the network request, only Font Awesome and Material Icons are dynamically loaded, so it isn't that (unless I missed it).

  Reveal hidden contents

image.png.a6c679523599a05dc33ca7c7789b8584.png

So yeah, I guess either FF excluded the that font in their Linux build or FF chooses a different substitute font on Windows.

Windows may not have a substitute defined, or has one that better matches the original, but the next generic font is "Arial" which is a Windows font as far as I'm aware.

 

5 hours ago, Needfuldoer said:

 

 

font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, Roboto, "Liberation Sans", sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol";

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RockSolid1106 said:

Can't replicate this on FF 97 on Windows. Pretty sure this is a Linux thing

 

image.png.42d3353027913d5c6039a1a6d3352004.png

On a different, unrelated tangent, a large number of my websites render improperly and now i have to use a uniform font everywhere. It breaks sites like google news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Master Disaster said:

Installing this font clears the issue. I was a tad reluctant to pull it myself, had bad luck with AUR fonts in the past but it works so....

 

Just to be safe though, I'll add it to the update ignore list 😄

 

Edit - Now I'm just waiting for Mortis to come in, laugh and tell us he knew what the issue was and how to fix it already

 

An alternative would be to swap out the substitution.

For Example.

 

~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'>
<fontconfig>
  <match>
    <test name="family"><string>Helvetica</string></test>
    <edit name="family" mode="assign" binding="strong">
      <string>Liberation Sans</string>
    </edit>
  </match>
</fontconfig>


Which substitutes "Helvetica" with "Liberation Sans".

 

You can check it with

fc-match Helvetica
Edited by Nayr438
Swapped Alias for Match.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Master Disaster said:

Edit - Now I'm just waiting for Mortis to come in, laugh and tell us he knew what the issue was and how to fix it already

Not sure what you're expecting to be fixed here? Different devices use different fonts, that's ok and why we have a list of fallback fonts defined. The font that your browser is falling back to looks slightly weird to you, but that's not a forum bug, just that you don't like that font.

HTTP/2 203

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, colonel_mortis said:

Not sure what you're expecting to be fixed here? Different devices use different fonts, that's ok and why we have a list of fallback fonts defined. The font that your browser is falling back to looks slightly weird to you, but that's not a forum bug, just that you don't like that font.

The only real issue is that fontconfig just so happens to have a default substitution for "Helvetica", so instead of continuing to the next font in the list, it just loads "Nimbus Sans", which just happens to look off at the set font size, but that is a issue with how fontconfig is setup and could vary between Distro's and Browsers. Not something a site can really control.


 

❯ for family in "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, Roboto, "Liberation Sans", sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; do
  echo -n "$family: "
  fc-match "$family"
done
<!-- Helvetica Neue,: NotoSans-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans" "Regular" --> Wildcard Substitution ignored by FireFox
Helvetica,: NimbusSans-Regular.otf: "Nimbus Sans" "Regular"
Arial,: Arimo-Regular.ttf: "Arimo" "Regular"
Roboto,: Roboto-Regular.ttf: "Roboto" "Regular"
Liberation Sans,: LiberationSans-Regular.ttf: "Liberation Sans" "Regular"
sans-serif,: NotoSans-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans" "Regular"
Apple Color Emoji,: NotoColorEmoji.ttf: "Noto Color Emoji" "Regular"
Segoe UI Emoji,: NotoColorEmoji.ttf: "Noto Color Emoji" "Regular"
Segoe UI Symbol: Cantarell-VF.otf: "Cantarell" "Regular"

 

Anyways a solution to swap out these substitutions is posted above.

Edited by Nayr438
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, colonel_mortis said:

Not sure what you're expecting to be fixed here? Different devices use different fonts, that's ok and why we have a list of fallback fonts defined. The font that your browser is falling back to looks slightly weird to you, but that's not a forum bug, just that you don't like that font.

Oh no. nothing at all. I just thought you'd already know exactly why it was happening without the detective work we all put in 🙂

Main Rig:-

Ryzen 7 3800X | Asus ROG Strix X570-F Gaming | 16GB Team Group Dark Pro 3600Mhz | Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe Gen 4 | Sapphire 5700 XT Pulse | Corsair H115i Platinum | WD Black 1TB | WD Green 4TB | EVGA SuperNOVA G3 650W | Asus TUF GT501 | Samsung C27HG70 1440p 144hz HDR FreeSync 2 | Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS |

 

Server:-

Intel NUC running Server 2019 + Synology DSM218+ with 2 x 4TB Toshiba NAS Ready HDDs (RAID0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×