Jump to content

The Witcher 3 GTX 780Ti Could Push 35-45 FPS At Max? this is a next gen game!!

TOMPPIX
By TOMPPIX
in PC Gaming
 Share
Posted

Of course it will run like that with 8xMSAA.(Try to run Crysis 3 maxed out with 8xMSAA)
I bet with 4xMSAA or 2xMSAA it will run over 60FPS on a GTX780ti.

RTX2070OC 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Nobody runs 8xMSAA. Seems like the game runs similar to crysis 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

People stop complaining about not being able to max out a game because you don't have a really high end card. Just turn down settings like people used to do 10 years ago when you had to read the system requirements on the back of the box to see if you had a good enough PC. 

Just take it as a bonus that you could play it again with a new PC and appreciate it in more detail another time round.

I think the point of spending thousands is to play on ultra...

CPU: i9 19300k////GPU: RTX 4090////RAM: 64gb DDR5 5600mhz ////MOBO: Aorus z790 Elite////MONITORS: 3 LG 38" 3840x1600 WIDESCREEN MONITORS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Soooo time for a second 290x? 

AMD Ryzen 5900x, Nvidia RTX 3080 (MSI Gaming X-trio), ASrock X570 Extreme4, 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB @ 3200mhz CL16, Corsair MP600 1TB, Intel 660P 1TB, Corsair HX1000, Corsair 680x, Corsair H100i Platinum

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I was like "ya ill swap my 760 for an 870 and be set for witcher 3" but now i might as well get a titan z. soooo pumped for this game.

 

  1. GLaDOS: i5 6600 EVGA GTX 1070 FE EVGA Z170 Stinger Cooler Master GeminS524 V2 With LTT Noctua NFF12 Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8 GB 3200 MHz Corsair SF450 850 EVO 500 Gb CableMod Widebeam White LED 60cm 2x Asus VN248H-P, Dell 12" G502 Proteus Core Logitech G610 Orion Cherry Brown Logitech Z506 Sennheiser HD 518 MSX
  2. Lenovo Z40 i5-4200U GT 820M 6 GB RAM 840 EVO 120 GB
  3. Moto X4 G.Skill 32 GB Micro SD Spigen Case Project Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

When copy-pasting text, remember to remove the formatting, beacuse it is really hard to read for dark theme users  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I guess I have no chance playing this on my 1440p monitor then  :(

You could use G-sync for beatiful results  :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I think the point of spending thousands is to play on ultra...

Yeah... you are not gonna keep that name for a long time  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Yeah... you are not gonna keep that name for a long time  :rolleyes:

Happened on 2 other forums, won't be surprised and just left when it happens.

Will enjoy my visit while it lasts.

CPU: i9 19300k////GPU: RTX 4090////RAM: 64gb DDR5 5600mhz ////MOBO: Aorus z790 Elite////MONITORS: 3 LG 38" 3840x1600 WIDESCREEN MONITORS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Happened on 2 other forums, won't be surprised and just left when it happens.

Will enjoy my visit while it lasts.

Haha, that's the spirit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Haha, that's the spirit

should see my gamer tag

CPU: i9 19300k////GPU: RTX 4090////RAM: 64gb DDR5 5600mhz ////MOBO: Aorus z790 Elite////MONITORS: 3 LG 38" 3840x1600 WIDESCREEN MONITORS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Looks like I may need crossfire.  :D

 

I'm sure performance will get better as the game comes closer to release, and better drivers are released.

My Rig:

Spoiler

Case: NZXT H210 CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700x  Motherboard:  MSI B450 AM4 Motherboard  Memory: GeIL EVO POTENZA 16GB Video Card: MSI RX480 Power Supply: Corsair TX 750w Storage: Samsung 840 120GB And a 500GB WD BLUE Monitor: Acer S231HLbid 23" and an old Dell Mouse: RAZER DeathAdder 3.5G Keyboard: Ducky DK9008G2 PRO MX Cherry Blue

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Wasn't it Ubersampling that really killed the performance on the last one, and with it turned off you got a huge boost right?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Does the game also have ubersampling like The Witcher 2 has? If it does and with every on max + ubersampling a GTX 780ti gets 35-40fps then I am quite glad. It means my card could get around 45-50 with no AA, no ubersampling.

NZXT Phantom 410 Gunmetal | Asus Z87-A (don't ask why I have a Z mobo with a non k cpu, have my reasons)| Intel Core i7 4770 | XGIMATEK Dark Knight II| 8GB Corsair Vengeance | 120GB SKHynix | 2tb WD Green | Gigabyte GTX 770 OC | OCZ 750W ZT | Logitech DiNovo Edge | Logitech G602

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I still don't even see what makes the witcher 2 so "amazing" graphics wise.

Spoiler

CPU: R5 1600 @ 4.2 GHz; GPU: Asus STRIX & Gigabyte g1 GTX 1070 SLI; RAM: 16 GB Corsair vengeance 3200 MHz ; Mobo: Asrock Taichi x470; SSD: 512 gb Samsung 950 Pro Storage: 5x Seagate 2TB drives; 1x 2TB WD PurplePSU: 700 Watt Huntkey; Peripherals: Acer S277HK 4K Monitor; Logitech G502 gaming mouse; Corsair K95 Mechanical keyboard; 5.1 Logitech x530 sound system

 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01100100 01101111 01100101 01110011 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111 00101110

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Aw thanks :D

 

Yeah I bought em in February of last year, there was no 700 series then.

 

Not to get off topic, but thinking about how old those are... Titans have aged better than any other card in my recent memory. They're hardly any newer than my 670's and the Titan is still almost at the top...


 

[spoiler = "My Computer Stuff"]

My ITX:

240 Air ; Z87I-Deluxe ; 4770K ; H100i ; G1 GTX 980TI ; Vengeance Pro 2400MHz (2x8GB) ; 3x 840 EVO (250GB) ; 2x WD Red Pro (4TB) ; RM650 ; 3x Dell U2414H ; G710+ ; G700s ; O2 + ODAC + Q701 ; Yamaha HTR-3066 + 5.1 Pioneer.

 

Things I Need To Get Off My Shelf:

250D ; 380T ; 800D ; C70 ; i7 920 ; i5 4670K ; Maximus Hero VI ; G.Skill 2133MHz (4x4GB) ; Crucial 2133MHz (2x4GB) ; Patriot 1600MHz (4x4GB) ; HX750 ; CX650M ; 2x WD Red (3TB) ; 5x 840 EVO (250GB) ; H60 ; H100i ; H100i ; H100i ; VS247H-P ; K70 Reds ; K70 Blues ; K70 RGB Browns ; HD650.


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

why are they using 8x MSAA when 4x TXAA exists ?  

Computer users fall into two groups:
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

This seems a little ridiculous. A game that current HIGH END hardware can't push effectively, isn't a good thing...

They're just going to push people away,

Games like this cause higher resolutions to not be available to most, and cause people to crank their settings way down, just to hit good FPS.

Either this game needs some optimization (probably), it needs to be reevaluated, or both.

 

They aren't forcing people to run the game at max detail settings. It's simply there for the people who have PC's that can run that sort of detail.

 

As for as pushing people away, I don't see that being an issue with such a huge title.

My Rig:

Spoiler

Case: NZXT H210 CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700x  Motherboard:  MSI B450 AM4 Motherboard  Memory: GeIL EVO POTENZA 16GB Video Card: MSI RX480 Power Supply: Corsair TX 750w Storage: Samsung 840 120GB And a 500GB WD BLUE Monitor: Acer S231HLbid 23" and an old Dell Mouse: RAZER DeathAdder 3.5G Keyboard: Ducky DK9008G2 PRO MX Cherry Blue

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

They aren't forcing people to run the game at max detail settings. It's simply there for the people who have PC's that can run that sort of detail.

 

As for as pushing people away, I don't see that being an issue with such a huge title.

This is exactly how I see it.  The guys at CD Projekt Red have publicly said, many times, that PC is the ideal gaming platform, and they know what there are a ton of enthusiasts out there.  They don't want to water anything down for the sake of letting everyone run it on Ultra, they want to allow for maximum visual quality that can be created right now, and that requires power.  Crysis 3 still destroys graphics cards on Ultra settings, especially at higher than 1080p resolutions, but not many people call it poorly optimized.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I still don't even see what makes the witcher 2 so "amazing" graphics wise.

It was amazing for the time it came out. It was released in 2011 and still looks better than some games today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

This seems a little ridiculous. A game that current HIGH END hardware can't push effectively, isn't a good thing...

They're just going to push people away,

Games like this cause higher resolutions to not be available to most, and cause people to crank their settings way down, just to hit good FPS.

Either this game needs some optimization (probably), it needs to be reevaluated, or both.

 

You are aware that you don't have to run the game on the highest setting order to enjoy it, right?

•  i7 4770k @ 4.5ghz • Noctua NHL12 •  Asrock Z87 Extreme 4 •  ASUS GTX 780 DCII 1156/6300 •

•  Kingston HyperX 16GB  •  Samsung 840 SSD 120GB [boot] + 2x Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200RPM •

•  Fractal Design Define R4  •  Corsair AX860 80+ Platinum •  Logitech Wireless Y-RK49  •  Logitech X-530  •

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Why is this news?

If I run with 8xMSAA on any modern, good looking game it'll kill my FPS... what a redundant article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
Posted

ubersampling too?

8X MSAA is very close the rendering equivalent of Ubersampling but without the ENB(Skyrim Mods) like effects, I assume there will be a separate setting for the ENB like effect of Ubersampling if they are using 8X MSAA as a replacement for Ubersampling.

I run my browser through NSA ports to make their illegal jobs easier. :P
If it's not broken, take it apart and fix it.
http://pcpartpicker.com/b/fGM8TW

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

why are they using 8x MSAA when 4x TXAA exists ?  

4X or 8X MSAA looks better, but I would hope that they include many AA options, Crysis 3 had MSAA, FXAA, TXAA, and SMAA options and I think one more.

I run my browser through NSA ports to make their illegal jobs easier. :P
If it's not broken, take it apart and fix it.
http://pcpartpicker.com/b/fGM8TW

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing PC Gaming

×