Jump to content

I undervolted my GTX 1080 to 0.7V - Results

Tech Wizard

Posted it on overclocking subreddit originally - 

 

 

Undervolt.thumb.png.297bcae6c9ebe263c4eb38ae08a84ce9.png

 

TL;DR: Making Pascal super efficient :P

 

Undervolted my Gigabyte Windforce 1080 to static 700mV, which resulted in a maximum stable frequency of 1506MHz (also static). This undervolt halfed power consumption from most aftermarket 1080's 200W, down to 100W (20W less than a 1060). Not bad full load temps for an air-cooled card after a 20 minute Fire Strike loop.

Also did a normal Fire Strike run for a GPU score of 18 685, with underclocked core (1506MHz / stock mem).

 

Also quickly checked what the highest frequencies I could achieve with 750mV & 875mV out of curiosity, and the card could achieve 1633MHz & 1898MHz with those voltages.

 

https://imgur.com/a/2SO8UEe

 

Main:  1650 v2   @ 4,6GHz   -   X79 Deluxe                -   GTX 1080 @ 2000MHz   -   24GB DDR3 @ 2400MHz / CL10

Side:   i7-4790K @ 4,5GHz   -   Maximus 7 Hero        -   GTX 1070 @ 2114MHz    -  16GB DDR3 @ 2666MHz / CL12

 

HWBOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I get home i'll use my 1080ti and undervolt it and post my results for you. Though mine is watercooled and probably sitting at 16c atm.

My Rig: CPU: i9-9900k (5Ghz), Ram: 32gigs 3600mhz DDR4 CL16, MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus z390 Ultra, HDD: Samsung 970 Evo 500gig x2, Samsung 850 evo 250 gig, 2 TB Baracuda 7200 rpm,6tb WD Black 7200rpm, 4TB NAS, GPU: Gigabyte Aorus 3090 Master

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I don't have picture or the watts because I was using my phone to screen shot while using it remotely you can't see it at all...but on MSI I put the slider down to 50% it used average 725mV at 25c running 1047mhz core and 5500mhz memory for a score of 21432 on graphics score..that just doesn't seem right lol.

 

Ok suppose it is correct. Normal speed no OC score of 28450 with temp max at 38c. drawing 1025mV

My Rig: CPU: i9-9900k (5Ghz), Ram: 32gigs 3600mhz DDR4 CL16, MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus z390 Ultra, HDD: Samsung 970 Evo 500gig x2, Samsung 850 evo 250 gig, 2 TB Baracuda 7200 rpm,6tb WD Black 7200rpm, 4TB NAS, GPU: Gigabyte Aorus 3090 Master

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stock with a reference board. 

 

Lowering voltage would heavily limit the card if it were to run at 1500 compared to 1900 or so. No gain if the fans are still at 100. Can do the same thing with an fe card and boost higher. 

D0485774-1056-46DB-8026-6883F5B5BFB1.jpeg

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tech Wizard said:

.

nice one, i personally just adjust with the power limit, at its lowest it can do 1350mhz with the fans off, 1750mhz 200w is pretty good too

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Tech Wizard Curious, if trying to save power then why the fixed voltage and clock, why not let them drop down when idle?

 

FWIW my 1050Ti does 1400 GPU clock at 0.7V (0.84V using multimeter) and crashes at 1500 so your doing a whole lot better than me :D

 

At 1400 Heaven shows 68W using GPU-z but 50W using nvsmi and Hwinfo. I think GPU-z is calculating it using the TDP % and default power which leads to incorrect results when default power is changed - bug. Not sure it really matters in this case as nvidia has said 1050Ti power readings are crap, so much so that they removed them from the latest drivers.

 

1.jpg.1a022fe18ac1441143cf95af178d4fb2.jpg

 

AWOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, X_X said:

@Tech Wizard Curious, if trying to save power then why the fixed voltage and clock, why not let them drop down when idle?

 

FWIW my 1050Ti does 1400 GPU clock at 0.7V (0.84V using multimeter) and crashes at 1500 so your doing a whole lot better than me :D

That undervolt was under load. When idling it's sitting at 139MHz / 0.6V :P

Main:  1650 v2   @ 4,6GHz   -   X79 Deluxe                -   GTX 1080 @ 2000MHz   -   24GB DDR3 @ 2400MHz / CL10

Side:   i7-4790K @ 4,5GHz   -   Maximus 7 Hero        -   GTX 1070 @ 2114MHz    -  16GB DDR3 @ 2666MHz / CL12

 

HWBOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×