ASUS Killing AREZ brand? ROG is Back? *UPDATED ARTICLE*

[pas008]

3 minutes ago, leadeater said:

To be fair I did wind @mr moose up a bit before you came in, there isn't really a good excuse for it but I know I've been rather terse and a bit dickish in discussing the topic (life stuff, tired, cranky blah blah). Not that there is a way that we can actually wipe the slate clean and start again just remember we're all probably more pissy about this than we should be.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

cant wipe a garden of weeds and parasites if you planting them

[leadeater]

8 minutes ago, pas008 said:

cant wipe a garden of weeds and parasites if you planting them

Just remember to also not be throwing rocks in the same glass house  If we're all throwing rocks and the house falls down we're all just as much to blame for the house falling down.

[laminutederire]

24 minutes ago, pas008 said:

@bolded no on has given proof

 

 

and yes please input evidence

 

I link evidence you knock it down so wheres your counter evidence?

 

 

like i said guilty til proven innocent hahahaha

ty come again

What evidence?

You mean your link to a definition from a questionable dictionary? Did you read through my own link explaining deductive reasoning and stating what is the place of hypothesis in that? Here it is linked again: Link .

[pas008]

Just now, laminutederire said:

What evidence?

You mean your link to a definition from a questionable dictionary? Did you read through my own link explaining deductive reasoning and stating what is the place of hypothesis in that? Here it is linked again: Link .

 

i provide links you provide what?\

deductible reasoning means there aliens

deductible reasoning is just an assumption right?

@leadeater

ty for understanding

[laminutederire]

6 minutes ago, pas008 said:

 

i provide links you provide what?\

deductible reasoning means there aliens

deductible reasoning is just an assumption right?

@leadeater

ty for understanding

I provided you twice with the same f***ing link. 

By the way deductible had a very different meaning than deductive.

[pas008]

5 minutes ago, laminutederire said:

I provided you twice with the same f***ing link. 

By the way deductible had a very different meaning than deductive.

ok i'm open minded show your proof

 

if you have some master equation why are we still trying ti configure women?

plz share if you can  deductible way isnt for a changing variant

 

[pas008]

just remember if you change 1 variant you change the whole outcome thats why lmg and others keep a variant constant to the best of what they can do

drivers might be xxx.xx to yyy.yy

 

they do their best given the situation even if new cards released 2 yrs later

[laminutederire]

1 hour ago, pas008 said:

ok i'm open minded show your proof

 

if you have some master equation why are we still trying ti configure women?

plz share if you can  deductible way isnt for a changing variant

 

Are you blind? I gave you two times the same link...

What do have women do to do with anything discussed here?..

[pas008]

So a case study on pseudo science that hasn't been adopted or proved but that's your source?

And my woman reference is a joke because of your assumptions

[laminutederire]

1 hour ago, pas008 said:

So a case study on pseudo science that hasn't been adopted or proved but that's your source?

And my woman reference is a joke because of your assumptions

Its an epistemology course from Stanford...

What are you talking about?

[mr moose]

@leadeater I feel I understand something so I am reading your posts in a none aggressive way.  that's why I keep discussing.  I will not continue the discussion with iamimature,  because my stance is pretty simply and when the same response keep being posted with no attempt to explain the reasoning you know it is futile.

[pas008]

5 hours ago, laminutederire said:

Its an epistemology course from Stanford...

What are you talking about?

So  with that reasoning where does gameŵorks fall?