Jump to content

Lurick

Silver Contributor
  • Posts

    15,718
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Lurick reacted to jaslion in I bought my cheap gaming router question   
    Its literally jist marketing to make you pay more.
     
    Its not like a regular router is suddenly gonna suck for gaming.
     
    20 devices is easy enough for almost anything.
     
     
     
  2. Funny
    Lurick got a reaction from soldier_ph in Moderators Anniversary On The Forum   
    2019 was NOT 5 years ago ;-;
  3. Informative
    Lurick got a reaction from Needfuldoer in Malicious devs falsely banning users on Steam   
    Ah yes, touching grass is the solution to all life's problems.
    Wrongly banned in a game that causes issues on the main platform outside just that game? Just touch grass!!
    Run out of milk? Go outside and touch grass!! Milk appears
    Car broken down and girlfriend left you? Touch grass and all is well 😛
     
    This isn't limited to just the game(s) in question, devs (from what I'm reading) are giving out beta keys and then auto banning people right away causing issues elsewhere on Steam since they're now flagged as "cheaters" in one game from a ban where they have no playtime.
  4. Like
    Lurick reacted to Levent in I bought my cheap gaming router question   
    I can guarantee you pretty much any router is capable of handling more than 20 devices and works for gaming.
  5. Agree
    Lurick reacted to LIGISTX in Best Windows 11 home settings for using 1st gigabit lan for internet and using 2nd gigabit lan for file sharing and tranferring files only (details )   
    Just use one router. There is 0 reason to separate this into two subnets. 
     
    Only use 1 router, plug everything into it, and use switches where required if you need more ports for more devices. 
  6. Like
    Lurick got a reaction from Lightwreather in Moderators Anniversary On The Forum   
    2019 was NOT 5 years ago ;-;
  7. Informative
    Lurick reacted to Revadike in Malicious devs falsely banning users on Steam   
    Steam provides developers tools to lend Valve's anticheat service in their games, called Game Bans. They appear on user's profiles. Once enabled for the publisher API key, you can ban any user that owns the game with a simple HTTP request.
     
    While Valve disallows the use of this API for any non-cheating purposes, it hasn't stopped malicious devs from abusing this to attack, suppress, or potentially even racially discriminate their own customerbase. These Game Bans are shown on Steam profiles and will permanently mark users as cheaters, destroying their reputations, which is their nefarious goal. They know they can get away with it, as they have been able to do this unpunished, for years now.
     
    The victims can't retaliate, as Valve has a policy to simply not help and ignore banned users. They redirect victims to their abusers, which is obviously not going to do anything. There have been many attempts to make Valve aware of this problem and have them do something about it, but they do not seem to care.
     
    What do you think of this?
     
    Related:
    Developer System Ban Abuse Tracer Interactive Task Force Avoid Future Purchases
    Task Force Game Developer Mass-Banning Abuse for Negative Review Players
    Developer System Ban Abuse For Multiplayer Games If Game Gets Bad Review?
    Steam Developer Game Ban Abusers
    Remove Game Bans on Profiles
    Reports of "game ban" abuse
    Task Force devs are abusing Game Bans (Steam)*
    Task Force devs are abusing Game Bans (r/pcgaming)*
    Task Force devs are abusing Game Bans (r/Steam)*
    Multi-platform ban abuse by certain companies
    False game ban issued from game developer after negative review
    Developer Ban Abuse scram
    We Draw A Red Line To Socom Successors and Take Out The "Trash" Force (aka Task Force) TFPEP1
    This Developer BANNED me on Steam...
    Dirty Devs: Task Force Developer Redline Game Ban Abuse
    This Developer has banned me TWICE from their game LOL
    Task Force Steam Reviews
    * My story
  8. Like
    Lurick got a reaction from Skyesgaming in Moderators Anniversary On The Forum   
    2019 was NOT 5 years ago ;-;
  9. Like
    Lurick got a reaction from Kilrah in Moderators Anniversary On The Forum   
    2019 was NOT 5 years ago ;-;
  10. Like
    Lurick reacted to TVwazhere in Moderators Anniversary On The Forum   
    Happy 5 year anniversary to me
  11. Like
  12. Like
    Lurick reacted to Needfuldoer in What does 60 percent cpu usage mean in task manager?   
    It means 60% of your processor's total processing capacity is in use. The workload isn't necessarily on one core/thread, or evenly distributed across all the cores/threads.
  13. Like
    Lurick reacted to Needfuldoer in Best Windows 11 home settings for using 1st gigabit lan for internet and using 2nd gigabit lan for file sharing and tranferring files only (details )   
    There's no reason to overcomplicate the setup like that unless you're running 10 gig Ethernet between your PCs and the file server. Just run everything on one subnet.
     
    If you really insist, set up a completely separate network just for file sharing and use a different address space. (For example, 192.168.2.x/24 instead of 192.168.1.x/24.) Then connect to the file shares by those addresses instead of the "regular" ones.
  14. Agree
    Lurick reacted to Levent in What do I need to do in software to prepare for upgrade?   
    Backup your irreplaceable data and just send it and see what happens. Thats what I do anyway.
  15. Agree
    Lurick reacted to Levent in Best free tool for motherboard diagnostics?   
    why are you downloading hwinfo from shitty leech websites like that?
    https://www.hwinfo.com/download/
     
    hwinfo is a monitoring tool. It wont tell you if your board has any issues, it will display sensor data. Finding issues is the technicians (in this instance, you) job.
  16. Agree
    Lurick reacted to Kilrah in WhatNot Email Spam   
    The question is indeed did you click the unsubscribe link and still receive them? Because it's all standard, only if they don't respect your requests to shut up would it become shady.
  17. Agree
    Lurick reacted to DoctorNick in Bottleneck   
    Yes bottleneck calculators are useless. Its a fine setup
  18. Agree
    Lurick reacted to Average Nerd in Bottleneck   
    Don't use those, they're absolutely useless.
    Bottlenecks are always present, and they change from one application to another (also, they are way less of a problem than you might think)
  19. Like
    Lurick reacted to da na in so YT has pay to watch yt uploads IDK how feel about.   
    Paywalling is entirely the choice of the content creator, as others have said. Some creators require a paid subscription to their channel to access certain videos, just like how this one video requires Premium.
  20. Agree
    Lurick got a reaction from ARandomPerson in LTTStore - Cookies   
    OP is saying there needs to be a Decline button/option to say I don't want cookies though.
  21. Agree
    Lurick got a reaction from LAwLz in LTTStore - Cookies   
    OP is saying there needs to be a Decline button/option to say I don't want cookies though.
  22. Agree
    Lurick got a reaction from AbydosOne in LTTStore - Cookies   
    OP is saying there needs to be a Decline button/option to say I don't want cookies though.
  23. Like
    Lurick reacted to Average Nerd in Intel CPU install   
    LGA sockets put a ton of force on the CPU to ensure proper contact. If the CPU is properly installed, which yours appears to be, it's fine.
    (It made me very uncomfortable the first time too)
  24. Agree
    Lurick reacted to Blasty Blosty in so YT has pay to watch yt uploads IDK how feel about.   
    I don't see an issue with this, just another incentive for buying the subscription. Not missing out on much
  25. Like
    Lurick reacted to Poinkachu in so YT has pay to watch yt uploads IDK how feel about.   
    Simple, feel nothing.
    Not the only "Members Only" thing in the world, that's for sure.
    Plus... not like it's something crucial to livelihood.
×