Jump to content

CPU or GPU first

Thanatos_G
Go to solution Solved by Droidbot,

put it this way: 

while I don't often use passmark as a CPU benchmark, it's good for general comparisons of all-core performance. 

i7 3770: 9315

1241v3: 10036

i7 7700: 10831

 

Whereas: 

gtx 770: 6108

gtx 970: 8574

gtx 1070: 10906

gtx 1080: 11979

 

GPU > CPU in this case

 

Currently I am rocking a B85 motherboard. 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 RAM with a E3-1241v3 and a GTX 970. 

 

I am am considering upgrading to a 1080, or a DDR4 motherboard, 16GB 2133 MHz RAM (for now) and a I7-7700. Should I upgrade the GPU or the rest first for 1080p 144hz gaming. 

 

  • CPU: E3-1241v3|| MOBO: Asus B85M-G R 2.0|| RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport (4x4) 16GB || GPU: MSI Geforce GTX 970 Gaming || CASE: Corsair 100R Carbide Series || Crucial MX100 250GB SSD + WD Blue 1TB || PSU: Sentey 750W Semi-Modular 80+ Bronze || Cooling: x2 Corsair AF120 Red LED Silent Edition

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

gpu, your CPU will keep up with a 1070 or 1080 fine - you won't see much gain going from Haswell to Skylake, wait a couple generations

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, nerdslayer1 said:

cpu first, a 780ti is outdated while a 4770k is a high-end CPU still. 

How does either of those things pertain to this. 

 

  • CPU: E3-1241v3|| MOBO: Asus B85M-G R 2.0|| RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport (4x4) 16GB || GPU: MSI Geforce GTX 970 Gaming || CASE: Corsair 100R Carbide Series || Crucial MX100 250GB SSD + WD Blue 1TB || PSU: Sentey 750W Semi-Modular 80+ Bronze || Cooling: x2 Corsair AF120 Red LED Silent Edition

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Thanatos_G said:

How does either of those things pertain to this. 

Honestly I can't tell, but they're bot very similar to what you have.

M1 MacBook Air 256/8 | iPhone 13 pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nerdslayer1 said:

cpu first, a 780ti is outdated while a 4770k is a high-end CPU still, it will depend on your task. 

What?

3 minutes ago, Thanatos_G said:

Currently I am rocking a B85 motherboard. 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 RAM with a E3-1241v3 and a GTX 970. 

 

I am am considering upgrading to a 1080, or a DDR4 motherboard, 16GB 2133 MHz RAM (for now) and a I7-7700. Should I upgrade the GPU or the rest first for 1080p 144hz gaming. 

I'd stay on the current platform and move to a new GPU.

Cor Caeruleus Reborn v6

Spoiler

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700K

CPU Cooler: be quiet! - PURE ROCK 
Thermal Compound: Arctic Silver - 5 High-Density Polysynthetic Silver 3.5g Thermal Paste 
Motherboard: ASRock Z370 Extreme4
Memory: G.Skill TridentZ RGB 2x8GB 3200/14
Storage: Samsung - 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive
Storage: Western Digital - Blue 2TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive
Storage: Western Digital - BLACK SERIES 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
Video Card: EVGA - 970 SSC ACX (1080 is in RMA)
Case: Fractal Design - Define R5 w/Window (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: EVGA - SuperNOVA P2 750W with CableMod blue/black Pro Series
Optical Drive: LG - WH16NS40 Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Writer 
Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Pro OEM 64-bit and Linux Mint Serena
Keyboard: Logitech - G910 Orion Spectrum RGB Wired Gaming Keyboard
Mouse: Logitech - G502 Wired Optical Mouse
Headphones: Logitech - G430 7.1 Channel  Headset
Speakers: Logitech - Z506 155W 5.1ch Speakers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Thanatos_G said:

How does either of those things pertain to this. 

I think he miss worded that 

 

GPU First, CPU is only 2 years old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ARikozuM said:

What?

I'd stay on the current platform and move to a new GPU.

 

i would say GPU too, i was talking about a general rule of thumb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither, thats a grand rig.. leave well enough alone.. maybe a nice high hz Gsync monitor and then an upgrade in the future to take advantage of the high hz while the 970 will be good with the gsync.

I don'T PreSS caPs.. I juST Hit THe keYboARd so HarD iT CriTs :P

 

Quote or @dzzope to get my attention..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

put it this way: 

while I don't often use passmark as a CPU benchmark, it's good for general comparisons of all-core performance. 

i7 3770: 9315

1241v3: 10036

i7 7700: 10831

 

Whereas: 

gtx 770: 6108

gtx 970: 8574

gtx 1070: 10906

gtx 1080: 11979

 

GPU > CPU in this case

 

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dzzope said:

Neither, thats a grand rig.. leave well enough alone.. maybe a nice high hz Gsync monitor and then an upgrade in the future to take advantage of the high hz while the 970 will be good with the gsync.

I currently have one but in wild lands on low with my 970 I get 30 fps max. So that's why I'm even considering, as I don't want that to become a trend with other newer games 

 

  • CPU: E3-1241v3|| MOBO: Asus B85M-G R 2.0|| RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport (4x4) 16GB || GPU: MSI Geforce GTX 970 Gaming || CASE: Corsair 100R Carbide Series || Crucial MX100 250GB SSD + WD Blue 1TB || PSU: Sentey 750W Semi-Modular 80+ Bronze || Cooling: x2 Corsair AF120 Red LED Silent Edition

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thanatos_G said:

I currently have one but in wild lands on low with my 970 I get 30 fps max. So that's why I'm even considering, as I don't want that to become a trend with other newer games 

That seems like an optimization issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case deff go GPU.

But 60 fps on high should be achievable on a 960...

I don'T PreSS caPs.. I juST Hit THe keYboARd so HarD iT CriTs :P

 

Quote or @dzzope to get my attention..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dzzope said:

In that case deff go GPU.

But 60 fps on high should be achievable on a 960...

Idk it's only on that game, and well I guess playerunknown but I think that is a optimization issue. CS for instance gets pretty much capped 300 fps so idk. 

 

  • CPU: E3-1241v3|| MOBO: Asus B85M-G R 2.0|| RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport (4x4) 16GB || GPU: MSI Geforce GTX 970 Gaming || CASE: Corsair 100R Carbide Series || Crucial MX100 250GB SSD + WD Blue 1TB || PSU: Sentey 750W Semi-Modular 80+ Bronze || Cooling: x2 Corsair AF120 Red LED Silent Edition

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Brooksie359 said:

That seems like an optimization issue.

The game is very heavy on eye candy and realistic textures.

Cor Caeruleus Reborn v6

Spoiler

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700K

CPU Cooler: be quiet! - PURE ROCK 
Thermal Compound: Arctic Silver - 5 High-Density Polysynthetic Silver 3.5g Thermal Paste 
Motherboard: ASRock Z370 Extreme4
Memory: G.Skill TridentZ RGB 2x8GB 3200/14
Storage: Samsung - 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive
Storage: Western Digital - Blue 2TB 3.5" 5400RPM Internal Hard Drive
Storage: Western Digital - BLACK SERIES 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
Video Card: EVGA - 970 SSC ACX (1080 is in RMA)
Case: Fractal Design - Define R5 w/Window (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: EVGA - SuperNOVA P2 750W with CableMod blue/black Pro Series
Optical Drive: LG - WH16NS40 Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Writer 
Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Pro OEM 64-bit and Linux Mint Serena
Keyboard: Logitech - G910 Orion Spectrum RGB Wired Gaming Keyboard
Mouse: Logitech - G502 Wired Optical Mouse
Headphones: Logitech - G430 7.1 Channel  Headset
Speakers: Logitech - Z506 155W 5.1ch Speakers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ARikozuM said:

The game is very heavy on eye candy and realistic textures.

yes but it should be more playable when put to low settings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Thanatos_G said:

I currently have one but in wild lands on low with my 970 I get 30 fps max. So that's why I'm even considering, as I don't want that to become a trend with other newer games 

 

1080 users have been getting bad frames in wildlands, even on lower settings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×