Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[harrynowl]

As my previous 7950 score was pitiful (like 1550).

 

 

[Zolon]

I had some fun with overclocking my Laptop GPU. Standard clocks are 500MHz Core and 900MHz Memory. The only limiting factor so far seem to be my CPU temps, they reach 86°C during Valley...

 

[Jumper118]

As my previous 7950 score was pitiful (like 1550).

it was 1880

 

Intel Core i5 4460

Nvidia GTX 970 @ 1285MHz / 1853 MHz

65.6

2746

Extreme HD

thats great, but you need to add a screenshot

I had some fun with overclocking my Laptop GPU. Standard clocks are 500MHz Core and 900MHz Memory. The only limiting factor so far seem to be my CPU temps, they reach 86°C during Valley...

 

Mobile GPU OC.png

which gpu is it exactly, gpuz and valley are a bit vague.

[Raudi_]

I've got alot of benching to do still. I need to redo the HD 6950, I got my hands back on my old GTX 650ti Boost that I gave my friend, GT 630 (that 4GB Zotac POS), and my 770's. 

[harrynowl]

it was 1880

 

thats great, but you need to add a screenshot

which gpu is it exactly, gpuz and valley are a bit vague.

i5 2450m -  hd3000

[Jumper118]

i5 2450m -  hd3000

it says amd hd7500m/7600m and if it was hd3000 it would be incredibly fast compared with hd4600. 

[Zolon]

which gpu is it exactly, gpuz and valley are a bit vague.

It should be the radeon 7600M, based on the 128bit bus width instead of 64bit on the 7500m. My Card also uses GDDR3 instead of GDDR5.

[Jumper118]

It should be the radeon 7600M, based on the 128bit bus width instead of 64bit on the 7500m. My Card also uses GDDR3 instead of GDDR5.

GPUZ.gif

thanks

[Cheddle]

Was going to bench a 4870 crossfire setup in spare rig to compare the solo 4870 and a 4870/4850 crossfire...

 

Unfortunately my 550w psu was not up to the task... once loaded up it crashed and wouldn't detect the second card on reboot... hopefully no permanent damage.

 

Maybe one day with the right board / psu ill do a 4870/4870/4850 tri-fire run. Giggedy

[Opcode]

Was going to bench a 4870 crossfire setup in spare rig to compare the solo 4870 and a 4870/4850 crossfire...

 

Unfortunately my 550w psu was not up to the task... once loaded up it crashed and wouldn't detect the second card on reboot... hopefully no permanent damage.

 

Maybe one day with the right board / psu ill do a 4870/4870/4850 tri-fire run. Giggedy

Wonder how it would stack against my single HD 5870 considering Crossfire scaling. 

[Cheddle]

Wonder how it would stack against my single HD 5870 considering Crossfire scaling. 

 

If I ever find a beefier psu ill test it for the giggles... I have 8x650watt PSU's sitting here but they are all for 1U rack servers... proprietary plugs :-(

[Opcode]

If I ever find a beefier psu ill test it for the giggles... I have 8x650watt PSU's sitting here but they are all for 1U rack servers... proprietary plugs :-(

You don't have any other PSU's laying around? You could always rig up another 400-500w PSU outside of the case connected to cards 2 + 3 to power them separately. You can just do the close hanger method to turn the secondary PSU on before turning the main machine on. Then the load will be split up between two different PSU's. 

[Cheddle]

You don't have any other PSU's laying around? You could always rig up another 400-500w PSU outside of the case connected to cards 2 + 3 to power them separately. You can just do the close hanger method to turn the secondary PSU on before turning the main machine on. Then the load will be split up between two different PSU's. 

 

I do have one other but its from an OEM HP machine and its only 260watts with no molex or pcie... sold my other PSU's... 

 

I doubt it would power one card haha

[Opcode]

I do have one other but its from an OEM HP machine and its only 260watts with no molex or pcie... sold my other PSU's... 

 

I doubt it would power one card haha

 

 +  = 

[pdv789]

Really wanted to beat that cf but ran out of time. I don't know why but it does help to keep the core under 45c, doing that I can run higher core but it heats up to 46c right before the end causing it to crash. Can't get anymore out of the memory though, adding 10mhz to memory actually made it go up 3 points but causes the driver to start crashing and only work every 3rd or 4th time. Need to get a water cooling setup for this then sli.

 

I5-4690k Stock speeds

Gigabyte G1 970

+200 core = 1592 core

+660 memory = 4166 memory

 

74.7 Fps

3125 Score

35.1 Min Fps

138.0 Max Fps

[CmdrAdrian]

Cpu: AMD 245 @ 3.48

Gpu: r9 290  

         core -977

         memory - 1250

 

average: 42.1

score :1761

[Cheddle]

Cpu: AMD 245 @ 3.48

Gpu: r9 290  

         core -977

         memory - 1250

 

average: 42.1

score :1761

00000.png

Capture.PNG

 

I got 60fps out of my r9 290 - was clocked a little higher but I suspect that CPU is a bottleneck

[Cheddle]

Really wanted to beat that cf but ran out of time. I don't know why but it does help to keep the core under 45c, doing that I can run higher core but it heats up to 46c right before the end causing it to crash. Can't get anymore out of the memory though, adding 10mhz to memory actually made it go up 3 points but causes the driver to start crashing and only work every 3rd or 4th time. Need to get a water cooling setup for this then sli.

 

I5-4690k Stock speeds

Gigabyte G1 970

+200 core = 1592 core

+660 memory = 4166 memory

 

74.7 Fps

3125 Score

35.1 Min Fps

138.0 Max Fps

 

Thats an impressive result. 

 

83.2 on my 980 is the best I have managed - Are you able to do a run at 4k with those settings?

[PaPaBlista]

Ran it twice the 2030 was the first,  the screenshot was 2nd. also ran it on low settings and it was only a few fps different.

[CmdrAdrian]

I got 60fps out of my r9 290 - was clocked a little higher but I suspect that CPU is a bottleneck

im pretty sure its the cpu too, i have plans to change it but i spent all my cash  also im still on a ddr2 board i have an asus m5a99 sitting on my shelf waiting 

[pdv789]

Thats an impressive result. 

 

83.2 on my 980 is the best I have managed - Are you able to do a run at 4k with those settings?

I will give it a shot in a bit. I will do stock setting first, since I was able to dsr bf4 at 4k with 30-50fps at medium.

[pdv789]

Well didn't have time to oc but normal settings I average 30fps at 4k. I would imagine in the end being somewhere around 40ish.

 

 

*Edit*

`Nvm, didn't see we had to have AA enabled, a little weird considering it's 4k and nobody would need AA at that resolution, but whatever`

[pdv789]

Well here is a 4k bench. I understand why we need to enable AA although it was very painful to watch such choppy frames. I do believe that at 4k nobody is going to be playing with AA enabled, maybe we can get a different tab for that or something of the sorts for results without AA? I am sure some but not all of the choppiness is due to the instability in overclocking.

 

Still an I5-4690k @ stock settings

G1 970

+190 core = 1582

+600 Mem = 4104

 

19.8

829

13.5

35.8

[pdv789]

Didn't realize there was a 1440p tab. Well here's my result,

 

i5-4690

g1 970

+190

+600

(same core and mem speed as my last post)

 

44.1

1846

26.1

82.0

[Variable]

Cpu:     Intel 3570K No OC

Gpu:    2x gigabyte 670 SLI      (Core:1267 Mem:3004)

Score: 3250

AVG Fps: 77.7 

MIN Fps :25.3

MAX Fps:140.3

Preset: Extreme HD

1920x1080

(Everything is at stock settings)