Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[bamerx98]

i7 4790k @4.4

2133Mhz Memory

7970 - 1200 Core 6000 Memory

Same CPU and Ram 

GTX 570 

900Mhz core 

2002Mhz memory(4004Mhz)

1800 Shaderclock 

[Ober1kenobi]

Considering that your GPU core clock is quite a bit lower than most other 970's here I would say that is the main reason why your score is lower, first gen i7's are still fine and Valley doesn't need much in the way of CPU power.

The screenshot is showing 1689Mhz if im not mistaken, My card does this as well, I can get it to run 1540Mhz Boost clock in Afterburner, but it will show 1650Mhz in the benchmark, If i OC to 1590Mhz Boost clock it will show nearly 1689-1694Mhz in the benchmark.

The card may have its base clock at 1328Mhz but its boost clock will be much higher

However my card doesn't always boost correctly, or if it is then othertimes it may be over boosting, or just an incorrect reading.

[Cheddle]

Ive got an 8400gs, hd5450, hd4870, gtx260(busted), gtx650 (in the post), gtx570 (in the post) & gtx980

 

I can pump up the basic and extremeHD results if you want ^.^

 

ill run all of them but the dead 260 and my 980 in the spare i5-750 system - when I find a spare few hours lol

 

^.^

[Priller]

Alittle bit of testing.

 

My top card wont run at 1185 even with 1.3V but I still need to play around with the voltage to see if that might be too high.

 

My bottom card needs additional voltage between 1150 and 1175 because at 1175 the score fell off my 3 points compared to the 1150 run.

 

Overclocking does pick up score by a good bit as I picked up 58 points just by going from 4.2 to 4.4Ghz.

 

280X CF 1150/1500. Still on 14.7 driver.

 

It also makes me the highest scoring all AMD rig on the list.

[Lord Pantaloons]

The screenshot is showing 1689Mhz if im not mistaken, My card does this as well, I can get it to run 1540Mhz Boost clock in Afterburner, but it will show 1650Mhz in the benchmark, If i OC to 1590Mhz Boost clock it will show nearly 1689-1694Mhz in the benchmark.

The card may have its base clock at 1328Mhz but its boost clock will be much higher

However my card doesn't always boost correctly, or if it is then othertimes it may be over boosting, or just an incorrect reading.

They listed their clock as 1328 and valley never displays the correct clocks. I'm going on what they post not what valley is most likely misreporting.

[Cheddle]

snip

 

Updated score:

 

[Mattriz]

They listed their clock as 1328 and valley never displays the correct clocks. I'm going on what they post not what valley is most likely misreporting.

correct, my clock speeds was 1328 in gpu-z.

 

Got some better scores when i took out one of the old ram sticks.

 

http://imgur.com/piNWMJf,aN4pHTj,9ErTUkq#0

http://imgur.com/a/QQsmM/all 

[Real_PhillBert]

Updated score:

 

valley78.9.jpg

Now I know what I will be doing this evening...  :angry:

[Mattriz]

So i found out that for some reason my cpu/ram overclock was reverted back to standard settings. So after overclocking it back too 4ghz, i got much better results. So here is my new submission:

 

i7-930 @ 4.0ghz
Gigabyte 970 g1 - 1328/1828
63,4
2652
Extreme HD

 

[Jumper118]

Gigabyte G1 970, Actual boost clock I seen with my OC aswell was 1540Mhz in Afterburners sensor thing. Benchmark was showing 1600+, and sometimes nearly 1700Mhz.. not sure if legit or... the benchmark.. I dunno

afterburner is correct. what was the memory clock?

 

Well shit turns out my 84000gs is dead and apparently setting the basic preset to run in fullscreen changes it from the preset. I didn't know that and didn't pay attention till I finished. I'm not running them again though so I'll only submit the extreme ones unless it's ok to submit the basic ones.

 

3570k 4.5Ghz

GTS 250 777/1100

FPS: 9.3

391

Extreme HD

 

 

3570k @4.5Ghz

GT 610 969/550

FPS: 2.1

89

Extreme HD

 

its a same about the 8400gs . i'll let you off on the basic benchmarks just this once as long as all the other settings were the same. I see my gt610 is faster than yours even though it clocked lower! it must be that mine has a massive 2gb of vram

 

i7 4790k @4.4

2133Mhz Memory

7970 - 1200 Core 6000 Memory

 

Same CPU and Ram 

GTX 570 

900Mhz core 

2002Mhz memory(4004Mhz)

1800 Shaderclock 

 

try a bit less core and more memory speed on that 7970 if you can, it should do 6400-6600 if its half decent and that should get you over 2K.

 

 

All updated!

[Lord Pantaloons]

 

 

its a same about the 8400gs . i'll let you off on the basic benchmarks just this once as long as all the other settings were the same. I see my gt610 is faster than yours even though it clocked lower! it must be that mine has a massive 2gb of vram

Must be lol here are the shots for basic, all the settings are the same I just made it run in fullscreen.

 

 

 

[Cheddle]

Did a few basic benches - had to full screen.

 

CPU: i5-4690
 

 

 

CPU: i5-750
 

[Opcode]

Yeah! Shitty Linux drivers baby!

 

 

Seriously tho, my card's back from when support on Linux sucked. Would score 3x higher and see 4x higher frame rates on Windows.

 

P.S. This is why I suggested to add platform to the sheet.

[Jumper118]

Did a few basic benches - had to full screen.

 

CPU: i5-4690

 

valley_gtx980_basic9.png

 

 

CPU: i5-750

 

IMG_20141106_174708.jpg

IMG_20141106_181312.jpg

which 48?? is the card and also what are the clocks for the 7600GS. 

 

Yeah! Shitty Linux drivers baby!

 

 

 

Seriously tho, my card's back from when support on Linux sucked. Would score 3x higher and see 4x higher frame rates on Windows.

 

P.S. This is why I suggested to add platform to the sheet.

i will put that in the notes column at the end because so far you are the only person using Linux and its uses open gl rather than dx which will change the score as well. also which 58 series is the card?

[Opcode]

which 48?? is the card and also what are the clocks for the 7600GS. 

 

i will put that in the notes column at the end because so far you are the only person using Linux and its uses open gl rather than dx which will change the score as well. also which 58 series is the card?

HD 5870, as you can see by Jumper118's post his 4800 series card squashes mine at the same preset.  I don't game much or play anything heavy anymore, else I would have no choice but to go back to Windows.

[Cheddle]

which 48?? is the card and also what are the clocks for the 7600GS. 

 

i will put that in the notes column at the end because so far you are the only person using Linux and its uses open gl rather than dx which will change the score as well. also which 58 series is the card?

 

Sorry

HD4870 1gb edition

 

clocks on the 8400gs are stock? so 450mhz core?

[bamerx98]

I really like the basic preset over the ultra HD higer score 

i7 4790k 4.4Ghz

7970 1200 Core 6000mhz memory 

[Jumper118]

Sorry

HD4870 1gb edition

 

clocks on the 8400gs are stock? so 450mhz core?

it says 7600GS on the screenshot? 

[bamerx98]

Base run.

I get 2000 more points then you

[Jumper118]

I get 2000 more points then you

because you have an intel cpu. valley prefers them for some reason 

[Cheddle]

it says 7600GS on the screenshot? 

 

hermerferkengerd - sorry... im actually not awake... its definitely a 7600gs but GPUz wouldn't give me its clock speeds :-(

[bamerx98]

because you have an intel cpu. valley prefers them for some reason 

Yes I knoww Really its like one of the few things I noticed a good upgrade in, my score is really werid for the basic run because I looked at the charts and its beating a 780ti on the basic 

[Jumper118]

hermerferkengerd - sorry... im actually not awake... its definitely a 7600gs but GPUz wouldn't give me its clock speeds :-(

ok. if you know what make it is then it should 

 

Yes I knoww Really its like one of the few things I noticed a good upgrade in, my score is really werid for the basic run because I looked at the charts and its beating a 780ti on the basic 

basic is lower res so it might be a difference between architectures. you see the same kind of thing older benchmarks like 3d mark 03 and 06.

[bamerx98]

ok. if you know what make it is then it should 

 

basic is lower res so it might be a difference between architectures. you see the same kind of thing older benchmarks like 3d mark 03 and 06.

probably, I wanted to run it because i've got other cards like a gt7800 I am trying to get running just to see what the score is 

[bamerx98]

I don't think that I am going to be able to run my 7800 GT because windows 8.1 doesn't seem to want to let me install teh older driver