Jump to content

Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

Jumper118
By Jumper118
in Graphics Cards
 Share
Posted
2 hours ago, mattias1172 said:

No overclocks, just straight up. 

 

-snip-

Get that CPU to 4.5 or higher, you'll see a huge performance boost in Valley since it craves CPU speed.

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboard: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
On 3/6/2016 at 0:55 AM, done12many2 said:

done12many2

i7 5960x @ 4.95 GHz
(2) EVGA GTX 980 Ti SLI --- 1549 GPU / 2033 Memory
184.8 Avg FPS
7731
Extreme HD setting

-snip-

I'm mad at you...

LTT Unigine SUPERPOSITION scoreboard: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

Intel i7 8700k || ASUS Z370-I ITX || AMD Radeon VII || 16GB 4266mhz DDR4 || Silverstone 800W SFX-L || 512GB 950 PRO M.2 + 3.5TB of storage SSD's

SCHIIT Lyr 3 Multibit || HiFiMAN HE-1000 V2 || MrSpeakers Ether C

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
34 minutes ago, Masada02 said:

I'm mad at you...

Straight and to the point.  I like it!  Now get to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 hours ago, mattias1172 said:

No overclocks, just straight up. 

 

Screenshot (2).png

You've got plenty of overhead even if you're on air.  Turn that 5820k and those 980 Ti cards up a bit.   I'm a big fan of the 5820k!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

bought an old lappy for some gaming while on a work trip.

 

has an external gpu. neat.

valley basic.png

Sim Rig:  Valve Index - Acer XV273KP - 5950x - GTX 2080ti - B550 Master - 32 GB ddr4 @ 3800c14 - DG-85 - HX1200 - 360mm AIO

Quote

Long Live VR. Pancake gaming is dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 hour ago, done12many2 said:

You've got plenty of overhead even if you're on air.  Turn that 5820k and those 980 Ti cards up a bit.   I'm a big fan of the 5820k!

Quote

Get that CPU to 4.5 or higher, you'll see a huge performance boost in Valley since it craves CPU speed.

I was planning on doing some over clocking with the cpu. Nothing yet on the gpu, might get to that later. In the meantime, two benchmarks, 1st @ 4.3ghz 2nd @ 4.5ghz. V at 1.325v

 

Screenshot (10).png

Screenshot (12).png

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
8 minutes ago, bmuskett9920 said:

https://gyazo.com/fb16be82630c36f0ab70b515c2bdef00

 

i5 4690k

Gigabyte 970 Mini Core Clock-1647mhz Memory-3500ish

Avg-98.6

Score 4136

That's like 1000 points higher than the fastest GTX 970. 

8d9520009159590cbd43636cb6fcd311.png

Like seriously what did you do? 

Our Grace. The Feathered One. He shows us the way. His bob is majestic and shows us the path. Follow unto his guidance and His example. He knows the one true path. Our Saviour. Our Grace. Our Father Birb has taught us with His humble heart and gentle wing the way of the bob. Let us show Him our reverence and follow in His example. The True Path of the Feathered One. ~ Dimboble-dubabob III

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, mattias1172 said:

I was planning on doing some over clocking with the cpu. Nothing yet on the gpu, might get to that later. In the meantime, two benchmarks, 1st @ 4.3ghz 2nd @ 4.5ghz. V at 1.325v

 

Screenshot (10).png

Screenshot (12).png

Nice work.  Huge improvements!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, done12many2 said:

Nice work.  Huge improvements!

Probably could have kept pushing but its just not worth the slight extra improvements.  Second pick shows 1.35v in cpu-z, i have gotten it down to 1.325v stable so far.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
58 minutes ago, mattias1172 said:

Probably could have kept pushing but its just not worth the slight extra improvements.  Second pick shows 1.35v in cpu-z, i have gotten it down to 1.325v stable so far.  

More than likely you'll be able to drop that a bit lower.  I personally love pushing it.  I don't worry about voltage much as long as it's within reason.  Voltage at 5.0GHz gets fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 hours ago, bmuskett9920 said:

https://gyazo.com/fb16be82630c36f0ab70b515c2bdef00

 

i5 4690k

Gigabyte 970 Mini Core Clock-1647mhz Memory-3500ish

Avg-98.6

Score 4136

2016-03-10.png

1 hour ago, DildorTheDecent said:

That's like 1000 points higher than the fastest GTX 970. 

8d9520009159590cbd43636cb6fcd311.png

Like seriously what did you do? 

Yeah, for a start there's no GPU-Z. But my guess would be AA forced in the control panel to something low or some other settings tweaked to pull the fidelity down. That score isn't possible for a single 970 on probably even LN2

 

LTT's fastest Valley 970, slowest Valley Basic and Extreme HD scores

 

Desktop || CPU - i5 4690k || Motherboard - ASUS Gryphon Z97 || RAM - 16GB Kingston HyperX 1866MHz || GPU - Gigabyte G1 GTX 970 *Cough* 3.5GB || Case - Fractal Design Define R5 || HDD - Seagate Barracuda 160GB || PSU - Corsair AX760
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
9 minutes ago, TheElt said:

Yeah, for a start there's no GPU-Z. But my guess would be AA forced in the control panel to something low or some other settings tweaked to pull the fidelity down. That score isn't possible for a single 970 on probably even LN2

 

Its probably timer bug on win 8/10/8.1 because he's on haswell.  It's the reason why hwbot doesn't accept loads of benchmark submissions if they're on certain platforms with Windows 8/8.1/10. 

 

Basically it tricks the bench into thinking it's running faster than it is. 

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
5 minutes ago, Lays said:

Its probably timer bug on win 8/10/8.1 because he's on haswell.  It's the reason why hwbot doesn't accept loads of benchmark submissions if they're on certain platforms with Windows 8/8.1/10. 

 

Basically it tricks the bench into thinking it's running faster than it is. 

Build number shows he's on 10. Odd bug, never heard of it before but then again I'm not a massive bencher

 

LTT's fastest Valley 970, slowest Valley Basic and Extreme HD scores

 

Desktop || CPU - i5 4690k || Motherboard - ASUS Gryphon Z97 || RAM - 16GB Kingston HyperX 1866MHz || GPU - Gigabyte G1 GTX 970 *Cough* 3.5GB || Case - Fractal Design Define R5 || HDD - Seagate Barracuda 160GB || PSU - Corsair AX760
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
19 minutes ago, TheElt said:

Yeah, for a start there's no GPU-Z. But my guess would be AA forced in the control panel to something low or some other settings tweaked to pull the fidelity down. That score isn't possible for a single 970 on probably even LN2

 

 

2 hours ago, bmuskett9920 said:

https://gyazo.com/fb16be82630c36f0ab70b515c2bdef00

 

i5 4690k

Gigabyte 970 Mini Core Clock-1647mhz Memory-3500ish

Avg-98.6

Score 4136

2016-03-10.png

He included a link showing his GPU-Z shot.  

 

That's a fantastic run bmuskett9920!  Can you tell us more about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
18 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

 

  Can you tell us more about it?

It's bugged.  A quick look at the spreadsheet can tell ya that one. 

 

23 minutes ago, TheElt said:

Build number shows he's on 10. Odd bug, never heard of it before but then again I'm not a massive bencher

 

It has to do with the bios timer and how windows reads it or some shit.  Apparently it can be easily tweaked by messing with BCLK. 

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
12 hours ago, TheElt said:

1.4 feels pretty high to me but you are on water. I found it best to start at 1.3v, increase the multiplier until instability, then more voltage. You'll know when you hit the wall, for me before I killed my chip the wall was 4.8GHz at a bit over 1.35v IIRC

 

Urm, well...

Spoiler

4670k-high-4.9ghz.PNG.404039b7b5d103ff33

 

10 hours ago, Peter Hammond said:

Quiet down the front there :P        I'm on 3132

I have to wait till winter to try anything again. It's still way to warm here to give anything ago.
But I will try & see what happens. Need a day less than 20c to try anything. And that won't be for at least a few months.
I can get my 4690k stable at 4.9Ghz quiet easily with temps around 70c under 100% stress. Can't remember the voltage though.
Have to look into my saved profile in my bios to check. But I think it is around 1.330 - 1.350v.

 

Close, but those extra few points are bloody hard to get.
Good luck though :)  Also what card are you using? Can't say I have seen anywhere in a post what it is.

Damn my 4.9ghz needs 1.47v :( 

Spoiler

Chernobyl

AMD FX8350 @ 5GHz | Asus Sabretooth 990FX R2 | 16GB HyperX Savage @1950mhz CL9 | 120GB Kingston SSDNow

EK AMD LTX CSQ | XSPC D5 Dual Bay | Alphacool NexXxoS XT45 240mm & Coolgate Triple HD360

 

Spoiler

Kraken

Intel i5 4670K Bare Die 4.9GHz | ASUS Maximus VII Ranger Z97 | 16GB HyperX Savage 2400MHz | Samsung EVO 250GB

EK Supremecy EVO & EK-MOSFET M7G  | Dual 360mm Rads | Primochill CTR Phase II w/D5 | MSI GTX970 1670MHz/8000MHz

 

Graphic Design Student & Overall Nerd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
51 minutes ago, TheElt said:

Yeah, for a start there's no GPU-Z. But my guess would be AA forced in the control panel to something low or some other settings tweaked to pull the fidelity down. That score isn't possible for a single 970 on probably even LN2

 

I can't see how that is possible as well. Maybe if it was like 50 -100 over "maybe"

I'm calling bluff as well. He has listed his core clock for that run was 1647Mhz with his CPU-Z only showing boost clock of 1441Mhz ?????
I know to get my clock up to 1649Mhz CPU-Z was showing my boost clock of 1574Mhz. Difference of 133Mhz. Can't see GPU Boost 2.0 jumping it that much.
I have included the CPU-Z he claims was from that run....   I'm NOT saying it is his fault or that he is lying. Must be a glitch somewhere........
WhatThe.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
15 hours ago, Cheddle said:

bought an old lappy for some gaming while on a work trip.

 

has an external gpu. neat.

valley basic.png

 

should add I clocked the core to 810 and the ram to 1170 - will re run later

Sim Rig:  Valve Index - Acer XV273KP - 5950x - GTX 2080ti - B550 Master - 32 GB ddr4 @ 3800c14 - DG-85 - HX1200 - 360mm AIO

Quote

Long Live VR. Pancake gaming is dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
14 hours ago, Benji_w said:

 

Urm, well...

  Reveal hidden contents

4670k-high-4.9ghz.PNG.404039b7b5d103ff33

 

Damn my 4.9ghz needs 1.47v :( 

Oh man, that's some beefy volts for 4.9. What's 4.8 or 4.7 like on volts?

 

14 hours ago, Peter Hammond said:

I can't see how that is possible as well. Maybe if it was like 50 -100 over "maybe"

I'm calling bluff as well. He has listed his core clock for that run was 1647Mhz with his CPU-Z only showing boost clock of 1441Mhz ?????
I know to get my clock up to 1649Mhz CPU-Z was showing my boost clock of 1574Mhz. Difference of 133Mhz. Can't see GPU Boost 2.0 jumping it that much.
I have included the CPU-Z he claims was from that run....   I'm NOT saying it is his fault or that he is lying. Must be a glitch somewhere........
WhatThe.jpg

GPU-Z is always a bit too low, and Valley is always a bit too high, so his clocks are probably in the middle. The sensor tab always gives the right reading, which is why most submit using that set to the max clocks.

 

With my 970 at 1590MHz, Valley reports 1700+ and GPU-Z reports around the high 1400's

LTT's fastest Valley 970, slowest Valley Basic and Extreme HD scores

 

Desktop || CPU - i5 4690k || Motherboard - ASUS Gryphon Z97 || RAM - 16GB Kingston HyperX 1866MHz || GPU - Gigabyte G1 GTX 970 *Cough* 3.5GB || Case - Fractal Design Define R5 || HDD - Seagate Barracuda 160GB || PSU - Corsair AX760
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Might run some valley later, board is prepped for some funs.

 

I want to insulate my 980 TI and DICE it as well, but I haven't quite worked up the nerve yet.  Also insulating GPU's is a fuckin pain in the ass...

 

nCIBK.jpg

 

nCIAQ.jpg

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

CPU: Intel 2600k 5.8Ghz
GPU: nVidia 980ti (EVGA SC)
Average FPS: 60.3
Score: 2522
Setting:Extreme HD

valley.thumb.png.6d33bd1dfb7433b1eddbcbb

gpuz.gif.83fb1a01efa178a012c95726e5bd03a

It's only showing 4GB VRAM instead of 6... hmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
5 hours ago, MilkTheSloth said:

CPU: Intel 2600k 5.8Ghz
GPU: nVidia 980ti (EVGA SC)
Average FPS: 60.3
Score: 2522
Setting:Extreme HD

 

 

It's only showing 4GB VRAM instead of 6... hmm

vsync on lol? also it showing it has only 4gb of ram is completely normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
6 hours ago, MilkTheSloth said:

CPU: Intel 2600k 5.8Gh

What. Do you have a CPU-Z validation? Also come here and give cinebench a run: 

 

Our Grace. The Feathered One. He shows us the way. His bob is majestic and shows us the path. Follow unto his guidance and His example. He knows the one true path. Our Saviour. Our Grace. Our Father Birb has taught us with His humble heart and gentle wing the way of the bob. Let us show Him our reverence and follow in His example. The True Path of the Feathered One. ~ Dimboble-dubabob III

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
On 3/10/2016 at 8:29 AM, mattias1172 said:

 was planning on doing some over clocking with the cpu. Nothing yet on the gpu, might get to that later. In the meantime, two benchmarks, 1st @ 4.3ghz 2nd @ 4.5ghz. V at 1.325v

 

 

with my 5820k I can run 4.5ghz @ 1.26v - thats my everyday clock - it gets real hard real quick though... even up to 1.5v I couldn't get 5.0ghz 

 

Best I managed was 4.9ghz at about 1.38v if I recall

 

the has'wall' is real

Sim Rig:  Valve Index - Acer XV273KP - 5950x - GTX 2080ti - B550 Master - 32 GB ddr4 @ 3800c14 - DG-85 - HX1200 - 360mm AIO

Quote

Long Live VR. Pancake gaming is dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Graphics Cards

×