So I was looking at a 6700K

[NumLock21]

Then I decided to scroll down the bottom of the page and saw this

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117559

 

 

[asim1999]

30 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

Then I decided to scroll down the bottom of the page and saw this

 

 

 

Integrated graphics

Nobody who buys a 6700K is gonna use it though 

[Praesi]

1 hour ago, NumLock21 said:

Then I decided to scroll down the bottom of the page and saw this

 

 

 

Its a typo. They meant over 9000x better Graphics.

[ThinkWithPortals]

1 hour ago, NumLock21 said:

 

Who even buys a 6700K to use Intel HD Graphics

[NumLock21]

It's not Intel graphics, it's what they're comparing it to.

30X better graphics than a 5 year old computer.

[SpaceGhostC2C]

8 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

It's not Intel graphics, it's what they're comparing it to.

30X better graphics than a 5 year old computer.

They could just have left it at  "<insert good stuff>"

[Space Reptile]

so if i replace my 2600 w/ a 6th gen I7 , my 290 will suddenly get a 30times increase of power? sign me the F up ! 

[Bananasplit_00]

what they are comparing to is probably like a pentium machine on the IGPU VS the 6700K with a 1070 lol

[NumLock21]

 

 

[Jake Dalay]

Really, I can't blame them for trying. There are people who aren't going to look into things, who don't really know much more than (or may not even know) how to put the pieces together into a PC. Those people may not be thinking, wait, what about this processor would possibly make my graphics run 30x better? It clearly isn't meant for enthusiasts who wouldn't dream of running without discrete graphics. My parents would say, oh good, it runs games (thinking facebook games etc.) and put it in the cart.

 

At least, I really hope their (Intel's) marketing people are involved enough to know that such claims wouldn't hold up/sway the enthusiast crowd.