Jump to content

Should I buy FX-8370?

So is it worth it for light gaming (League of Legends and something like Overwatch) and video editing and 3D modeling?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

depends on your budget... and the rest of your machine

GUITAR BUILD LOG FROM SCRATCH OUT OF APPLEWOOD

 

- Ryzen Build -

R5 3600 | MSI X470 Gaming Plus MAX | 16GB CL16 3200MHz Corsair LPX | Dark Rock 4

MSI 2060 Super Gaming X

1TB Intel 660p | 250GB Kingston A2000 | 1TB Seagate Barracuda | 2TB WD Blue

be quiet! Silent Base 601 | be quiet! Straight Power 550W CM

2x Dell UP2516D

 

- First System (Retired) -

Intel Xeon 1231v3 | 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Dual Channel | Gigabyte H97 D3H | Gigabyte GTX 970 Gaming G1 | 525 GB Crucial MX 300 | 1 TB + 2 TB Seagate HDD
be quiet! 500W Straight Power E10 CM | be quiet! Silent Base 800 with stock fans | be quiet! Dark Rock Advanced C1 | 2x Dell UP2516D

Reviews: be quiet! Silent Base 800 | MSI GTX 950 OC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its good for video editing, not that great for gaming but will work and not sure about 3D modelling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HydraGaming said:

Its good for video editing, not that great for gaming but will work and not sure about 3D modelling

How does the 8350/70 compare to a 6600k now? Its been years since its launched and Intel had so many new lines of processors released during that time. Can those 4 cores beat a 8350 in video editing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tp95112 said:

How does the 8350/70 compare to a 6600k now? Its been years since its launched and Intel had so many new lines of processors released during that time. Can those 4 cores beat a 8350 in video editing?

You have to remember that the 8 cores are not fully seperated. Each 2 cores share some of the computing units. But a 6600k will be the better choice because way better single core performance, draws less power and creates less heat

GUITAR BUILD LOG FROM SCRATCH OUT OF APPLEWOOD

 

- Ryzen Build -

R5 3600 | MSI X470 Gaming Plus MAX | 16GB CL16 3200MHz Corsair LPX | Dark Rock 4

MSI 2060 Super Gaming X

1TB Intel 660p | 250GB Kingston A2000 | 1TB Seagate Barracuda | 2TB WD Blue

be quiet! Silent Base 601 | be quiet! Straight Power 550W CM

2x Dell UP2516D

 

- First System (Retired) -

Intel Xeon 1231v3 | 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Dual Channel | Gigabyte H97 D3H | Gigabyte GTX 970 Gaming G1 | 525 GB Crucial MX 300 | 1 TB + 2 TB Seagate HDD
be quiet! 500W Straight Power E10 CM | be quiet! Silent Base 800 with stock fans | be quiet! Dark Rock Advanced C1 | 2x Dell UP2516D

Reviews: be quiet! Silent Base 800 | MSI GTX 950 OC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GUITAR BUILD LOG FROM SCRATCH OUT OF APPLEWOOD

 

- Ryzen Build -

R5 3600 | MSI X470 Gaming Plus MAX | 16GB CL16 3200MHz Corsair LPX | Dark Rock 4

MSI 2060 Super Gaming X

1TB Intel 660p | 250GB Kingston A2000 | 1TB Seagate Barracuda | 2TB WD Blue

be quiet! Silent Base 601 | be quiet! Straight Power 550W CM

2x Dell UP2516D

 

- First System (Retired) -

Intel Xeon 1231v3 | 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Dual Channel | Gigabyte H97 D3H | Gigabyte GTX 970 Gaming G1 | 525 GB Crucial MX 300 | 1 TB + 2 TB Seagate HDD
be quiet! 500W Straight Power E10 CM | be quiet! Silent Base 800 with stock fans | be quiet! Dark Rock Advanced C1 | 2x Dell UP2516D

Reviews: be quiet! Silent Base 800 | MSI GTX 950 OC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 19_blackie_73 said:

You have to remember that the 8 cores are not fully seperated. Each 2 cores share some of the computing units. But a 6600k will be the better choice because way better single core performance, draws less power and creates less heat

I mean in terms of video editing. Do those cores pass some threshold that a 4 core intel can perform better then those 8.And yes I know they are not real cores its just easier to say 8 then 4 with 2 modules etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tp95112 said:

I mean in terms of video editing. Do those cores pass some threshold that a 4 core intel can perform better then those 8.And yes I know they are not real cores its just easier to say 8 then 4 with 2 modules etc

I don't think you'll see that much difference between the two while video editing

GUITAR BUILD LOG FROM SCRATCH OUT OF APPLEWOOD

 

- Ryzen Build -

R5 3600 | MSI X470 Gaming Plus MAX | 16GB CL16 3200MHz Corsair LPX | Dark Rock 4

MSI 2060 Super Gaming X

1TB Intel 660p | 250GB Kingston A2000 | 1TB Seagate Barracuda | 2TB WD Blue

be quiet! Silent Base 601 | be quiet! Straight Power 550W CM

2x Dell UP2516D

 

- First System (Retired) -

Intel Xeon 1231v3 | 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Dual Channel | Gigabyte H97 D3H | Gigabyte GTX 970 Gaming G1 | 525 GB Crucial MX 300 | 1 TB + 2 TB Seagate HDD
be quiet! 500W Straight Power E10 CM | be quiet! Silent Base 800 with stock fans | be quiet! Dark Rock Advanced C1 | 2x Dell UP2516D

Reviews: be quiet! Silent Base 800 | MSI GTX 950 OC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there how much difference between FX-8350 and FX-8370?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

all depends on what would be an intel equvelent in price, if its like a I3 6xxx then go AMD if its an I5 3xxx, 4xxx or 6xxx then i would go with Intel

I spent $2500 on building my PC and all i do with it is play no games atm & watch anime at 1080p(finally) watch YT and write essays...  nothing, it just sits there collecting dust...

Builds:

The Toaster Project! Northern Bee!

 

The original LAN PC build log! (Old, dead and replaced by The Toaster Project & 5.0)

Spoiler

"Here is some advice that might have gotten lost somewhere along the way in your life. 

 

#1. Treat others as you would like to be treated.

#2. It's best to keep your mouth shut; and appear to be stupid, rather than open it and remove all doubt.

#3. There is nothing "wrong" with being wrong. Learning from a mistake can be more valuable than not making one in the first place.

 

Follow these simple rules in life, and I promise you, things magically get easier. " - MageTank 31-10-2016

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, N4vySc4n said:

So is it worth it for light gaming (League of Legends and something like Overwatch) and video editing and 3D modeling?

 

get the FX 8350 instead. It comes with the Wraith cooler which is pretty damn good and should be plenty of LOL, Overwatch and casual video editing/3D modeling. 

 

Get a decent board like the ASUS 970 GAMING/AURA or GIGABYTE 970 GAMING. Or if you want to go "all out" the GIGABYTE 990FX GAMING. The ASRock 970A-G/3.1 is also a ood option,  but not as good as the aforementioned ones.

 

DO NOT EVER buy MSI boards for AMD FX. EVER!!!!

 

A FX 8350 at around 4GHz will be pretty damn okay at Video Editing/3D modeling on the cheap. The only "better" thing you can get is a old XEON V3 1231. However, older XEONs cannot be OC'd.

 

52 minutes ago, Bananasplit_00 said:

all depends on what would be an intel equvelent in price, if its like a I3 6xxx then go AMD if its an I5 3xxx, 4xxx or 6xxx then i would go with Intel

there is no Intel equivalent in the same price bracket. For 3D modeling and Video editing, a FX 8350 destroys even a slightly overclocked i5 4690k. The 8350 is also unlocked and DAMN easy to OC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Prysin said:

get the FX 8350 instead. It comes with the Wraith cooler which is pretty damn good and should be plenty of LOL, Overwatch and casual video editing/3D modeling. 

 

Get a decent board like the ASUS 970 GAMING/AURA or GIGABYTE 970 GAMING. Or if you want to go "all out" the GIGABYTE 990FX GAMING. The ASRock 970A-G/3.1 is also a ood option,  but not as good as the aforementioned ones.

 

DO NOT EVER buy MSI boards for AMD FX. EVER!!!!

 

A FX 8350 at around 4GHz will be pretty damn okay at Video Editing/3D modeling on the cheap. The only "better" thing you can get is a old XEON V3 1231. However, older XEONs cannot be OC'd.

 

there is no Intel equivalent in the same price bracket. For 3D modeling and Video editing, a FX 8350 destroys even a slightly overclocked i5 4690k. The 8350 is also unlocked and DAMN easy to OC.

ok just making sure, wasent sure how good it would be at 3D modeling but i guess the multiple cores help there

I spent $2500 on building my PC and all i do with it is play no games atm & watch anime at 1080p(finally) watch YT and write essays...  nothing, it just sits there collecting dust...

Builds:

The Toaster Project! Northern Bee!

 

The original LAN PC build log! (Old, dead and replaced by The Toaster Project & 5.0)

Spoiler

"Here is some advice that might have gotten lost somewhere along the way in your life. 

 

#1. Treat others as you would like to be treated.

#2. It's best to keep your mouth shut; and appear to be stupid, rather than open it and remove all doubt.

#3. There is nothing "wrong" with being wrong. Learning from a mistake can be more valuable than not making one in the first place.

 

Follow these simple rules in life, and I promise you, things magically get easier. " - MageTank 31-10-2016

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bananasplit_00 said:

ok just making sure, wasent sure how good it would be at 3D modeling but i guess the multiple cores help there

see my post above. 4460 is just barely slower then a stock 4690k and still loses by a WIDE margin (4 min+). So you would need to OC the 4690k to around 4GHz or more to match a 4GHz FX. But then you can just OC the FX 8350 to 4.7-5GHz and it will just destroy every i5 out there, bar maybe 5GHz 6600ks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, N4vySc4n said:

Is there how much difference between FX-8350 and FX-8370?

not much difference. The 8350 will easily hit 4.7-5GHz if you got a good motherboard and good cooling. The FX 8370 is marginally faster, but cost WAY more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stconquest said:

yeah, he would have to go for a Xeon E3 1231 or 1241 with a LGA1150 board. That will beat a 8350. Still gonna cost a bit. but it would be better.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Prysin said:

yeah, he would have to go for a Xeon E3 1231 or 1241 with a LGA1150 board. That will beat a 8350. Still gonna cost a bit. but it would be better.

 

I think it would be worth it, to not have to deal with overclocking and heat:

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1231 V3 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor  ($239.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: ASRock H97 Anniversary ATX LGA1150 Motherboard  ($61.98 @ Newegg)
Total: $301.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-31 05:20 EDT-0400

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stconquest said:

I think it would be worth it, to not have to deal with overclocking and heat:

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1231 V3 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor  ($239.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: ASRock H97 Anniversary ATX LGA1150 Motherboard  ($61.98 @ Newegg)
Total: $301.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-31 05:20 EDT-0400

FX 8350 comes with the Wraith cooler, which is equivalent to a single fan Hyper 212 Evo.

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz 8-Core Processor  ($149.99 @ SuperBiiz) 
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-Gaming ATX AM3+ Motherboard  ($112.98 @ Newegg) 
Total: $262.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-31 06:28 EDT-0400

 

that Gigabyte board has VERY good features. and with the 990FX chipset it has 42 PCIe Gen2 lanes, so that equals 21 PCIe Gen3 lanes in bandwith.

I urge you to read through the feature list.

www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128886&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-PCPartPicker,%20LLC-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=10446076&PID=3938566&SID=

 

For a equally feature rich board (USB type C 3.1 10GB/s, ASMedia controller) but fewer PCIe Gen2 lanes and not as good overclocking you can go with this ASRock board. It is a 2x 4+1 phase setup. So "8+2". It is still enough to hit 4.7-4.8GHz at around 1.4750v without the board being at risk of taking damage. However as it is not a true 8 phase digi+ design, i wouldnt try to push for 5GHz or frequencies requiring more then 1.4750v....

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz 8-Core Processor  ($149.99 @ SuperBiiz) 
Motherboard: ASRock 970A-G/3.1 ATX AM3+/AM3 Motherboard  ($79.99 @ SuperBiiz) 
Total: $229.98
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-31 06:30 EDT-0400

 

Please note the price disparity. The XEON is a good purchase, but even with a modestly priced board, as you picked out, it still comes in at a noticeable premium over the FX. Due to lower clock speeds, it may not be faster then the FX 8350 once you get it over 4GHz.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×