Jump to content

Good graphics card for a Q6600 CPU at 2.4ghz?

Shd0w2

Something that won't bottleneck budget isn't really limited

Diamond 5 in League :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GTX 760, but I would seriously overclock it to 3GHz if your motherboard supports it

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

GTX 760

 

hah

Something up to r7 250x from amd.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 
 

hah

Something up to r7 250x from amd.

 

Do you even have any experience with this CPU? Trust me, a GTX 760 will pair nicely with it

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you even have any experience with this CPU? Trust me, a GTX 760 will pair nicely with it

I had an e8400 and it struggled to keep up with 7750. q6600 is soooooooooo old.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an e8400 and it struggled to keep up with 7750. q6600 is soooooooooo old

I paired my E8500 with a GTX 770 for a little while and it performed admirably in every game aside from BF4 64 person. The Q6600 is a quad core so it will perform even better.

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paired my E8500 with a GTX 770 and it performed admirably in every game aside from BF4 64 person.

Like 30-50% below what it should be? It's just not worth it to pair 8 year old cpu with a mid-high end gpu.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like 30-50% below what it should be? It's just not worth it to pair 8 year old cpu with a mid-high end gpu.

A proper overclocked Q9550 like 4.5GHz could nearly match a 2500k's stock performance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the 760, and overclocking to 3GHz would be nice

Specs are on my profile page

 

 Teach a man to fish and he ends up sticking a screw driver in a turned on power supply seeing if it still works.        #KilledMyWifeWithABomb            Resolution is just a number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like 30-50% below what it should be? It's just not worth it to pair 8 year old cpu with a mid-high end gpu.

 

A proper overclocked Q9550 like 4.5GHz could nearly match a 2500k's stock performance

The E8500 was nearly maxed out in most of the games I ran, and the 770 was maxed out at least 90% of the time. Like I said, BF4 MP was the only thing that it started to lag behind in and that's because the E8500 only has two cores. The frame rates were very stable.

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on what games you wanna play. A Q6600 will not bottleneck a 780 on Far Cry 2, but it will bottleneck even a GTX 650 on newer games like Watch Dogs or Assassin's Creed IV. 
 

 

Like 30-50% below what it should be? It's just not worth it to pair 8 year old cpu with a mid-high end gpu.

My Q8200 @2.80GHz is working at 95% on Watch Dogs while my 6870 is running at around 30-35% utilization. Here's a hard example of a bottleneck for all of you.

My PC: CPU: Intel Core i3 3220, MB: ASUS P8P67 LE, GPU: Palit Jetstream GTX 670, RAM: 4GB 1333mhz DDR3, Storage: 750GB Hitachi, PSU: CoolerMaster G650M 80+ Bronze, Cooling: Coolermaster Hyper 212 Plus, Case: Multirama, Display: Acer x229w 22" 1680x1050, Keyboard: Logitech K120, Mouse: Steelseries Kinzu v2, Sound: Logitech 2.1 system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

a Q6600 is great on optimized games like BF4  (Not watch dogs)

i would really recommend overclocking it

get with a 760 or amd 270

If your grave doesn't say "rest in peace" on it You are automatically drafted into the skeleton war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My Q8200 @2.80GHz is working at 95% on Watch Dogs while my 6870 is running at around 30-35% utilization. Here's a hard example of a bottleneck for all of you.

watch dogs is a horribly unoptimized pos

its always cpu bound

 

i guess a person with such a CPU will have watch out for certain games

If your grave doesn't say "rest in peace" on it You are automatically drafted into the skeleton war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on what games you wanna play. A Q6600 will not bottleneck a 780 on Far Cry 2, but it will bottleneck even a GTX 650 on newer games like Watch Dogs or Assassin's Creed IV. 

 

 
 

My Q8200 @2.80GHz is working at 95% on Watch Dogs while my 6870 is running at around 30-35% utilization. Here's a hard example of a bottleneck for all of you.

Crank the settings

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

watch dogs is a horribly unoptimized pos

its always cpu bound

 

i guess a person with such a CPU will have watch out for certain games

No it's not. Watch Dogs is buggy and glitchy, but it's well coded and performs decently on mid range GPUs provided you have enough CPU horsepower. + It takes advantage of all cores.

But this bottleneck happens in every modern game. Assassin's Creed 4 (55%), Wolfenstein: The New Order (55%), Battlefield 3 (60%), Far Cry 3 (75%). The list goes on and on. But guess what? Older games are not troubled by the CPU. GPU utilization on Far Cry 2 and Crysis 1 is 98-100%. 

Anything below a Q9550 is just not capable of running new games smoothly enough. In other words anything below 4000 points on this list http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php Sorry to break it to you, but the Q8400 minimum requirements for Watch Dogs is complete bull. This game is absolutely raping my CPU. 

My PC: CPU: Intel Core i3 3220, MB: ASUS P8P67 LE, GPU: Palit Jetstream GTX 670, RAM: 4GB 1333mhz DDR3, Storage: 750GB Hitachi, PSU: CoolerMaster G650M 80+ Bronze, Cooling: Coolermaster Hyper 212 Plus, Case: Multirama, Display: Acer x229w 22" 1680x1050, Keyboard: Logitech K120, Mouse: Steelseries Kinzu v2, Sound: Logitech 2.1 system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

GTX 750/650ti boost is your max before you would hit a bottleneck. Overclocking could alleviate some of that stress. By going Nvidia, you can use GPU accelerated physics with PHYSX, perfect for your weak CPU config.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 760 with my Q6700 @ 3.2GHz and it's always around 90% utilisation.

Get a 760 if you can

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - CPU Cooler: Deepcool Castle 240EX - Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC

RAM: 2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RBG 3200MHz - GPU: MSI RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best bet is that you get a cooler and overclock it to 3 ghz.

I wouldn't go higher than a 760/r9 270x. If I was you I would get a card with a good price/performance ratio like a gtx 750 ti or a r7 265.

 

No it's not. Watch Dogs is buggy and glitchy, but it's well coded and performs decently on mid range GPUs provided you have enough CPU horsepower. + It takes advantage of all cores.

But this bottleneck happens in every modern game. Assassin's Creed 4 (55%), Wolfenstein: The New Order (55%), Battlefield 3 (60%), Far Cry 3 (75%). The list goes on and on. But guess what? Older games are not troubled by the CPU. GPU utilization on Far Cry 2 and Crysis 1 is 98-100%. 

Anything below a Q9550 is just not capable of running new games smoothly enough. In other words anything below 4000 points on this list http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php Sorry to break it to you, but the Q8400 minimum requirements for Watch Dogs is complete bull. This game is absolutely raping my CPU. 

Overclocking helps. http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=24950945500

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on what games you wanna play. A Q6600 will not bottleneck a 780 on Far Cry 2, but it will bottleneck even a GTX 650 on newer games like Watch Dogs or Assassin's Creed IV. 

 

 
 

My Q8200 @2.80GHz is working at 95% on Watch Dogs while my 6870 is running at around 30-35% utilization. Here's a hard example of a bottleneck for all of you.

This. It's all game dependent. A hypothetical example would be a program that bottlenecks a 4770k while a GT 420 is at 30%. Kind of different vice versa, but same effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Titan Z

Le Bastardo+ 

i7 4770k + OCUK Fathom HW labs Black Ice 240 rad + Mayhem's Gigachew orange + 16GB Avexir Core Orange 2133 + Gigachew GA-Z87X-OC + 2x Gigachew WF 780Ti SLi + SoundBlaster Z + 1TB Crucial M550 + 2TB Seagate Barracude 7200rpm + LG BDR/DVDR + Superflower Leadex 1KW Platinum + NZXT Switch 810 Gun Metal + Dell U2713H + Logitech G602 + Ducky DK-9008 Shine 3 MX Brown

Red Alert

FX 8320 AMD = Noctua NHU12P = 8GB Avexir Blitz 2000 = ASUS M5A99X EVO R2.0 = Sapphire Radeon R9 290 TRI-X = 1TB Hitachi Deskstar & 500GB Hitachi Deskstar = Samsung DVDR/CDR = SuperFlower Golden Green HX 550W 80 Plus Gold = Xigmatek Utguard = AOC 22" LED 1920x1080 = Logitech G110 = SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get an R7 260X and use Mantle where you can.

FANBOY OF: PowerColor, be quiet!, Transcend, G.Skill, Phanteks

FORMERLY FANBOY OF: A-Data, Corsair, Nvidia

DEVELOPING FANBOY OF: AMD (GPUS), Intel (CPUs), ASRock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×