Jump to content

Are my clock speeds too low?

Is it normal that my ''idle'' clock speeds on a 5900x, would be in the mhz level? (see image) 

I never seen that low before...

 

 

thanks

 

 

Screenshot 2022-05-14 214815.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

what software is that so I stay away from it??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

use ryzen master

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its HWiNFO64, I think.

AMD R7 5800X3D | Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO, 1x T30

Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z @ 3733C14

Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC @ 3060/1495 | WD SN850, SN850X, SN770

Seasonic Vertex GX-1000 | Fractal Torrent Compact RGB, Many CFM's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Borgus Bohr said:

Is it normal that my ''idle'' clock speeds on a 5900x, would be in the mhz level? (see image) 

I never seen that low before...

 

 

thanks

 

 

Screenshot 2022-05-14 214815.png

That's normal.

Main: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti, 16 GB 4400 MHz DDR4 Fedora 38 x86_64

Secondary: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 16 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Fedora 38 x86_64

Server: AMD Athlon PRO 3125GE, 32 GB 2667 MHz DDR4 ECC, TrueNAS Core 13.0-U5.1

Home Laptop: Intel Core i5-L16G7, 8 GB 4267 MHz LPDDR4x, Windows 11 Home 22H2 x86_64

Work Laptop: Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA Quadro P520, 8 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Windows 10 Pro 22H2 x86_64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't worry about the idle clock, the lower the better for your electricity bill.

what you want to check is the load clock.

Ryzen 5700g @ 4.4ghz all cores | Asrock B550M Steel Legend | 3060 | 2x 16gb Micron E 2666 @ 4200mhz cl16 | 500gb WD SN750 | 12 TB HDD | Deepcool Gammax 400 w/ 2 delta 4000rpm push pull | Antec Neo Eco Zen 500w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, svmlegacy said:

That's normal.

I don't think AMD processor idle below there reference (or bus) frequency. I believe 800mhz is the lowest P-state of a 5900X processor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Borgus Bohr

With Intel CPUs, the Effective Clock data that HWiNFO reports is only meaningful when all cores of a CPU are fully 100% loaded. When not fully loaded, you might see MHz numbers reported that are well below the minimum speed that the CPU actually runs at. That appears to be what your screenshot shows.   

 

When running Windows 11 on an Intel CPU, you have to disable the new Windows 11 virtualization features so monitoring software has direct access to all of the CPU registers. Monitoring timers within the CPU might not be accessible if some of the virtualization features are enabled. I am not sure if this issue also applies to AMD CPUs. 

 

For Intel, things like Hyper-V, Virtual Machine Platform, Windows Hypervisor Platform, Windows Subsystem for Linux and Android and the Windows Core Isolation - Memory Integrity feature need to be disabled to give monitoring software full access to all of the CPU registers. When monitoring software does not have full access, some of what it reports might be completely wrong or make no sense whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Guest 5150 said:

I don't think AMD processor idle below there reference (or bus) frequency. I believe 800mhz is the lowest P-state of a 5900X processor.

This is not the "physical" frequency of the cores. They change much too fast to be reported like that. It's an average over the polling period that accounts sleep at 0 MHz.

Main: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti, 16 GB 4400 MHz DDR4 Fedora 38 x86_64

Secondary: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 16 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Fedora 38 x86_64

Server: AMD Athlon PRO 3125GE, 32 GB 2667 MHz DDR4 ECC, TrueNAS Core 13.0-U5.1

Home Laptop: Intel Core i5-L16G7, 8 GB 4267 MHz LPDDR4x, Windows 11 Home 22H2 x86_64

Work Laptop: Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA Quadro P520, 8 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Windows 10 Pro 22H2 x86_64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe i'm reading this wrong by Ryzen Master is reporting quite low clockspeeds per core on my 5800x. Most cores are actually sleeping in this screenshot.

 

image.thumb.png.ecb07c261b57a10f4002308809c1f101.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, svmlegacy said:

This is not the "physical" frequency of the cores. They change much too fast to be reported like that. It's an average over the polling period that accounts sleep at 0 MHz.

So it just displays "something"? 

The pulling rate on the software is typically 1000ms. I believe you can change that in hwinfo64?

 

So, help me out with terminology please.

 

Gated =

Parked =

Sleeping =

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Guest 5150 said:

So it just displays "something"? 

The pulling rate on the software is typically 1000ms. I believe you can change that in hwinfo64?

 

So, help me out with terminology please.

 

Gated =

Parked =

Sleeping =

?

All refer to different levels of sleep.

C0 = Awake, executing code.

C1 = Core parked, still energized

C3 through C7 involve various states of power gating to save power. The "deeper" the state, the longer and more energy is needed to "wake" the core back to C0.

Main: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti, 16 GB 4400 MHz DDR4 Fedora 38 x86_64

Secondary: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 16 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Fedora 38 x86_64

Server: AMD Athlon PRO 3125GE, 32 GB 2667 MHz DDR4 ECC, TrueNAS Core 13.0-U5.1

Home Laptop: Intel Core i5-L16G7, 8 GB 4267 MHz LPDDR4x, Windows 11 Home 22H2 x86_64

Work Laptop: Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA Quadro P520, 8 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Windows 10 Pro 22H2 x86_64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, svmlegacy said:

All refer to different levels of sleep.

C0 = Awake, executing code.

C1 = Core parked, still energized

C3 through C7 involve various states of power gating to save power. The "deeper" the state, the longer and more energy is needed to "wake" the core back to C0.

Right gotcha.

Sometimes I get a little taken off track because I often refer to C0 that utilizes the processor P-states. 

C3 and above is clocks off then. Should report 0mhz. 

 

So this software that reads temp sensors that aren't there, you just get some random number. Just it's doing it with a frequency, that isn't there. I'm saying gated cores aren't running = clocks off, cache off. 0mhz. 

 

(Am I close?)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×