Jump to content

Is 100% usage possible?!

I've been wondering why my CPU and GPU usage never go up to 100% while gaming. Yet, my framerate doesn't reach 60FPS.

 

I have seen several YouTube videos where the usages go up to 100% constantly, so basically it should be possible to achieve that, right?

 

It's said that there might be a motherboard bottleneck if your CPU and GPU can't reach 100% usage because it can't process the power of those components. However, while benchmarking the do, in fact, go up to 100% usage in my system, so that shouldn't be the problem in my case, right?

 

So is there a software problem? Or do those games simply not use all the CPU cores or something like that?

 

I've been wondering about that for quite a while and couln't really find any solutions or great help, so I just figured I might give it a go in here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Specs ?

Temps ?

What games and at what res?

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TofuHaroto said:

Specs ?

Temps ?

What games and at what res?

I7-6700

GTX 1070

16GB DDR4 2133MHz

 

I'm going to focus on My Summer Car for now:

The temps are below 70°C. I am playing on 1920x1080 and it's running below 40FPS

 

In GTA5

my GPU temps go up to the limit of 83°C and the game runs at about 50FPS on 1920x1080 as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Run the resource monitor and play the game for a bit. It should identify your bottleneck. For instance if your disk utilization is at 100% then your storage might be slow.

 

Also you never want 100% utilization because in that case, if you even want to abort whatever is happening, your system will freeze as it’ll push it over the edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SergentWallnuss said:

The temps are below 70°C. I am playing on 1920x1080 and it's running below 40FPS

Ddu the drivers 

 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jet_ski said:

Run the resource monitor and play the game for a bit. It should identify your bottleneck. For instance if your disk utilization is at 100% then your storage might be slow.

 

Also you never want 100% utilization because in that case, if you even want to abort whatever is happening, your system will freeze as it’ll push it over the edge.

Alright thanks, will do that.

 

Oh yeah right, that sounds comprehensible haha, thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TofuHaroto said:

Ddu the drivers 

 

What does that to exactly?

I've just had a look into that and it appears that it uninstalls some drivers and does something with the system. However, it could also mess up my system if I understood that correctly....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SergentWallnuss said:

However, it could also mess up my system if I understood that correctly....

Display driver uninstaller 

Check a video on how to use it

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TofuHaroto said:

Display driver uninstaller 

Check a video on how to use it

Alright, will do, thank you very much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SergentWallnuss said:

Alright, will do, thank you very much!

Good luck 

PC: Motherboard: ASUS B550M TUF-Plus, CPU: Ryzen 3 3100, CPU Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34, GPU: GIGABYTE WindForce GTX1650S, RAM: HyperX Fury RGB 2x8GB 3200 CL16, Case, CoolerMaster MB311L ARGB, Boot Drive: 250GB MX500, Game Drive: WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM HDD.

 

Peripherals: GK61 (Optical Gateron Red) with Mistel White/Orange keycaps, Logitech G102 (Purple), BitWit Ensemble Grey Deskpad. 

 

Audio: Logitech G432, Moondrop Starfield, Mic: Razer Siren Mini (White).

 

Phone: Pixel 3a (Purple-ish).

 

Build Log: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jet_ski said:

Run the resource monitor and play the game for a bit. It should identify your bottleneck. For instance if your disk utilization is at 100% then your storage might be slow.

 

Also you never want 100% utilization because in that case, if you even want to abort whatever is happening, your system will freeze as it’ll push it over the edge.

I've been looking at my usages for a little bit now and my disks stay at 0% (or go up 2% very rarely), my CPU has an average of about 50%, GPU of 30% and RAM of 50% as well, so there shouldn't be any bottlenecks.

The individual CPU Threads stay at about 30%-50%. They don't really go above that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SergentWallnuss said:

The individual CPU Threads stay at about 30%-50%. They don't really go above that.

Can you see if a single thread benchmark/stress test shows the same thing? Windows seems to move threads between cores.

 

I suspect either your cpu or your ram speed is the problem. Your cpu is not outstanding, and your ram is slow. 

 

Double check if your ram is dual channel. You can see this with cpu-z channel #.

 

You could also try some sort of benchmark that tries to check if you are gpu bound like shadow of the tomb raider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Craftyawesome said:

Can you see if a single thread benchmark/stress test shows the same thing? Windows seems to move threads between cores.

 

I suspect either your cpu or your ram speed is the problem. Your cpu is not outstanding, and your ram is slow. 

 

Double check if your ram is dual channel. You can see this with cpu-z channel #.

 

You could also try some sort of benchmark that tries to check if you are gpu bound like shadow of the tomb raider.

When I do some benchmarks etc. the CPU does reach 100% usage.

 

I've checked MSI CPU-Z and it appears that my RAM is a single channel, so I guess that's quite bad XD.

 

I've downloaded the SOTR demo from steam and ran the benchmark. With the high preset I could average 62FPS and it tells me that I am 11% GPU-bound. Is that good or bad or what exactly does that tell me? I guess it means that my CPU is way to slow for my GPU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SergentWallnuss said:

When I do some benchmarks etc. the CPU does reach 100% usage.

 

I've checked MSI CPU-Z and it appears that my RAM is a single channel, so I guess that's quite bad XD.

 

I've downloaded the SOTR demo from steam and ran the benchmark. With the high preset I could average 62FPS and it tells me that I am 11% GPU-bound. Is that good or bad or what exactly does that tell me? I guess it means that my CPU is way to slow for my GPU?

Lets try to fix your ram first. Do you have two sticks of ram? Dual channel is typically slot 1 and 3 or 2 and 4. Check your motherboard manual, though. If you only have one stick, you will have a hard time with performance. Also, is your ram supposed to be 2133? That is typical without xmp, although if you bought cheap ram that might be its max.

 

My bench:

 

6600k @ 4.5 GHz

1060 6G with minor oc

Dual channel 2300 MHz ram

T1vdDKc.png
 

 

Gpu bound is when your gpu is why your framerate is low. So something else is holding your framerate back. Your cpu should probably beat mine, since my short google suggests SotTR works better with 4c8t. Although, my OC might lower that gap.

That basically leaves ram. With single channel 2133, I'm surprised it isn't worse. Can you send a listing of what you bought?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Craftyawesome said:

Lets try to fix your ram first. Do you have two sticks of ram? Dual channel is typically slot 1 and 3 or 2 and 4. Check your motherboard manual, though. If you only have one stick, you will have a hard time with performance. Also, is your ram supposed to be 2133? That is typical without xmp, although if you bought cheap ram that might be its max.

 

My bench:

  Hide contents

6600k @ 4.5 GHz

1060 6G with minor oc

Dual channel 2300 MHz ram

T1vdDKc.png
 

 

Gpu bound is when your gpu is why your framerate is low. So something else is holding your framerate back. Your cpu should probably beat mine, since my short google suggests SotTR works better with 4c8t. Although, my OC might lower that gap.

That basically leaves ram. With single channel 2133, I'm surprised it isn't worse. Can you send a listing of what you bought?

No I only have one stick of ram with 2133MHz and it doesn't support xmp...already checked that :(

 

I don't really have the shopping list of what I've bought but I know I've got those components:

CPU: I7-6700 @3,40GHz

GPU: GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X

RAM: Kingston DDR4-2133 1 Stick á 16GB

Motherboard: MSI Z170-A PRO

 

I'm running my games off a HDD but as there is next to no usage I don't really think that should be a problem.

 

So I guess the best thing would be to upgrade my ram instead of heading towards a better CPU?

 

Thank you very much for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SergentWallnuss said:

 

RAM: Kingston DDR4-2133 1 Stick á 16GB

there's the problem, if the ram's running in single channel it slows down the cpu by 30-40%

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SergentWallnuss said:

No I only have one stick of ram with 2133MHz and it doesn't support xmp...already checked that :(

 

I don't really have the shopping list of what I've bought but I know I've got those components:

CPU: I7-6700 @3,40GHz

GPU: GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X

RAM: Kingston DDR4-2133 1 Stick á 16GB

Motherboard: MSI Z170-A PRO

 

I'm running my games off a HDD but as there is next to no usage I don't really think that should be a problem.

 

So I guess the best thing would be to upgrade my ram instead of heading towards a better CPU?

 

Thank you very much for your help!

You could try overclocking your ram to at least help, but a relatively fast set would probably be better. Maybe this unless you can find a cheaper and still relatively fast kit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, xg32 said:

there's the problem, if the ram's running in single channel it slows down the cpu by 30-40%

ohh I see, so I will definitely upgrade that as soon as I can.

 

Thank you very much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Craftyawesome said:

You could try overclocking your ram to at least help, but a relatively fast set would probably be better. Maybe this unless you can find a cheaper and still relatively fast kit.

Thank you, I will have a look at some of those....I've been looking into those G.SKILL ones for some time.

 

What about the speeds? The faster the better or do I have to pay attention on something like the compatibility with the CPU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SergentWallnuss said:

Thank you, I will have a look at some of those....I've been looking into those G.SKILL ones for some time.

 

What about the speeds? The faster the better or do I have to pay attention on something like the compatibility with the CPU?

Hmm. I think you mainly need to pay attention to the motherboard and not the CPU. I think a z series should let you run high speed ram without a k series CPU, but I would like someone else to confirm this. Or you could see if it at least lets you manually oc your ram.

Your mobo support page says up to 3200MHz. Although, my msi mobo says 3600 max on it and will let me manually select higher, but IDK if XMP will go higher than listed.

So you might not want to bother with more than 3200?

Higher speed is better, and lower CAS latency/timings is better. Also keep in mind that a faster speed also improves actual latency. For example, 3600 CL 18 has the same latency as 3200 CL 16, but the 3600 has higher bandwidth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Craftyawesome said:

Hmm. I think you mainly need to pay attention to the motherboard and not the CPU. I think a z series should let you run high speed ram without a k series CPU, but I would like someone else to confirm this. Or you could see if it at least lets you manually oc your ram.

Your mobo support page says up to 3200MHz. Although, my msi mobo says 3600 max on it and will let me manually select higher, but IDK if XMP will go higher than listed.

So you might not want to bother with more than 3200?

Higher speed is better, and lower CAS latency/timings is better. Also keep in mind that a faster speed also improves actual latency. For example, 3600 CL 18 has the same latency as 3200 CL 16, but the 3600 has higher bandwidth.

I've been looking around online shops as well and settled with a G.SKILL Aegis 16GB kit. 3200MHz and CL16. I think I'm going for that.

 

I really hope that improves the performance of my pc.

 

Thank you very much for you help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Craftyawesome said:

Hmm. I think you mainly need to pay attention to the motherboard and not the CPU. I think a z series should let you run high speed ram without a k series CPU, but I would like someone else to confirm this. Or you could see if it at least lets you manually oc your ram.

Your mobo support page says up to 3200MHz. Although, my msi mobo says 3600 max on it and will let me manually select higher, but IDK if XMP will go higher than listed.

So you might not want to bother with more than 3200?

Higher speed is better, and lower CAS latency/timings is better. Also keep in mind that a faster speed also improves actual latency. For example, 3600 CL 18 has the same latency as 3200 CL 16, but the 3600 has higher bandwidth.

I went to a computer store today and bought a pair of G.SKILL Aegis 2x8GB DDR4 3000MHz CL16.

XMP doesn't work for me (PC bluescreens and says there is a problem). I think that's because my motherboard has a maximum voltage of 1.2V and the ram needs 1.35V....not too much of a problem for me though.

 

I ran the SotTR benchmark and averaged 81FPS instead of 62FPS, so I am really happy with the result.

 

Thanks for everyones help here! 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, SergentWallnuss said:

I went to a computer store today and bought a pair of G.SKILL Aegis 2x8GB DDR4 3000MHz CL16.

XMP doesn't work for me (PC bluescreens and says there is a problem). I think that's because my motherboard has a maximum voltage of 1.2V and the ram needs 1.35V....not too much of a problem for me though.

 

I ran the SotTR benchmark and averaged 81FPS instead of 62FPS, so I am really happy with the result.

 

Thanks for everyones help here! 😄

Will it not let you manually set any voltages or is it just reverting to 1.2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×