Jump to content

Asus X470 Dual or Quad channel?

I recently upgraded my motherboard to 32GB of DDR4 ram and filled all 4 of my ram slots. But I was wondering, does anyone know if the Asus ROG Strix X470-F is a dual or Quad channel motherboard? How do I tell, I read the manual but I am still confused. Sorry I know this sounds like a simple question but I wanted to know what I had. :)

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 1kv said:

It's a dual channel board.

Ouch, Ok. Am I losing any performance by having a dual channel board? Even with all the ram slots filled?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, _Grid21 said:

Ouch, Ok. Am I losing any performance by having a dual channel board? Even with all the ram slots filled?

You'd probably lose a few FPS (about 2-5) but it shouldn't have a major impact on performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 1kv said:

You'd probably lose a few FPS (about 2-5) but it shouldn't have a major impact on performance.

What about rendering videos and streaming?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

What about rendering videos and streaming?

You'd probably lose a little bit of performance, but it wouldn't be too bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

Ouch, Ok. Am I losing any performance by having a dual channel board? Even with all the ram slots filled?

All AM4 boards are dual channel max because that's the max for the CPUs on this socket.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, 1kv said:

You'd probably lose a little bit of performance, but it wouldn't be too bad. 

 

28 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

All AM4 boards are dual channel max because that's the max for the CPUs on this socket.

What was the reason for AMD going for dual channel only and not quad? Are more newer Intel boards quad channel as oppose to AMD?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, _Grid21 said:

Ouch, Ok. Am I losing any performance by having a dual channel board?

There are no quad channel boards for AM4, only LGA20xx and AMD TR4 are Quad Channel.

1 hour ago, _Grid21 said:

Even with all the ram slots filled?

Yes, as max. possible frequency is reduced a bit.

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

 

What was the reason for AMD going for dual channel only and not quad? Are more newer Intel boards quad channel as oppose to AMD?

AMD does quad, but only for threadripper. Same for Intel, only does quad on the high end big boys like X299.

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

What was the reason for AMD going for dual channel only and not quad?

You need about 64pins (rather a bit more) per Channel, so that would increase the complexety and with that price dramatically.

And to be fair, most people don't really need it - or are willing to pay the price for it.

15 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

Are more newer Intel boards quad channel as oppose to AMD?

 No, they are not as we are talking about really expensive High end desktop Boards.

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, fasauceome said:

AMD does quad, but only for threadripper. Same for Intel, only does quad on the high end big boys like X299.

 

8 minutes ago, Stefan Payne said:

You need about 64pins (rather a bit more) per Channel, so that would increase the complexety and with that price dramatically.

And to be fair, most people don't really need it - or are willing to pay the price for it.

 No, they are not as we are talking about really expensive High end desktop Boards.

Ok so other than just gaining more system ram which was a blessing for streaming and now rendering videos. I haven't gained anything else? I also noticed that while D.O.C.P. is still enabled, I noticed clock timings are ever so slightly higher. Would it be possible to safely reduce the timings and boost the speed on Corsair vengeance RGB ram?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

 

Ok so other than just gaining more system ram which was a blessing for streaming and now rendering videos. I haven't gained anything else? I also noticed that while D.O.C.P. is still enabled, I noticed clock timings are ever so slightly higher. Would it be possible to safely reduce the timings and boost the speed on Corsair vengeance RGB ram?

What exact ram do you have? Set in the bios to rated speed + enable XMP.

 

MSI B450 Pro Gaming Pro Carbon AC | AMD Ryzen 2700x  | NZXT  Kraken X52  MSI GeForce RTX2070 Armour | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (4*8) 3200MhZ | Samsung 970 evo M.2nvme 500GB Boot  / Samsung 860 evo 500GB SSD | Corsair RM550X (2018) | Fractal Design Meshify C white | Logitech G pro WirelessGigabyte Aurus AD27QD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

I haven't gained anything else?

Compared to two sticks with the same frequency and timings, no you havent.

 

10 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

I noticed clock timings are ever so slightly higher.

that's normal, because higher frequency is harsh on the memory and memory controller, so the timings are a bit worse to compensate.

 

10 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

Would it be possible to safely reduce the timings and boost the speed on Corsair vengeance RGB ram?

yes it's safe

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Compared to two sticks with the same frequency and timings, no you havent.

 

that's normal, because higher frequency is harsh on the memory and memory controller, so the timings are a bit worse to compensate.

 

yes it's safe

I am not familiar with lowing timings. My current timings are this. http://prntscr.com/mpi1ew So what timings and voltage could I go to?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, _Grid21 said:

I am not familiar with lowing timings. My current timings are this. http://prntscr.com/mpi1ew So what timings and voltage could I go to?

Timings are a trial and error process. Start with the first one and work your way through.

 

Voltage: 1.5V max for daily systems, 1.8V for short benchmarks

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ReggieGRS said:

Also high end old boys like the x99

I am kinda surprised that this being an "X" board it's not quad considering the video Linus did about what the different letters and numbers mean.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it really doesn't rest on the motherboard manufacturer of the RAM specs, but the CPU and their instructions capabilities.

whether dual channel can function in a performance sector, the topology of the motherboard manufacturer can affect this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

IIRC the jump in performance from single channel to dual channel is much more pronounced than from dual to quad.

 

Between my two Titan RTX rigs the only perceptible gaming difference I can tell is that the 9900k is clocked a lot higher than the 7960x - they have the same RAM, just the 9900k has 2 sticks in dual channel, 7960x has 4 sticks in quad channel, same graphics cards (9900k has 1, 7960x has 2 - but some games I play only use 1).

 

short version is I wouldn't worry about it. Just get dual and be happy.

HEDT: i9 10980XE @ 4.9 gHz, 64GB @ 3600mHz CL14 G.Skill Trident-Z DDR4, 2x Nvidia Titan RTX NVLink SLI, Corsair AX1600i, Samsung 960 Pro 2TB OS/apps, Samsung 850 EVO 4TB media, LG 38GL950G-B monitor, Drop CTRL keyboard, Decus Respec mouse

Laptop: Razer Blade Pro 2019 9750H model, 32GB @ 3200mHz CL18 G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4, 2x Samsung 960 Pro 1TB RAID0, repasted with Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Gaming Rig: i9 9900ks @ 5.2ghz, 32GB @ 4000mHz CL17 G.Skill Trident-Z DDR4, EVGA RTX 2080 Ti Kingpin, Corsair HX1200, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB, Asus PG348Q monitor, Corsair K70 LUX RGB keyboard, Corsair Ironclaw mouse
HTPC: i7 7700 (delidded + LM), 16GB @ 2666mHz CL15 Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4, MSI Geforce GTX 1070 Gaming X, Corsair SFX 600, Samsung 850 Pro 512gb, Samsung Q55R TV, Filco Majestouch Convertible 2 TKL keyboard, Logitech G403 wireless mouse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kalm_Traveler1 said:

IIRC the jump in performance from single channel to dual channel is much more pronounced than from dual to quad.

 

Between my two Titan RTX rigs the only perceptible gaming difference I can tell is that the 9900k is clocked a lot higher than the 7960x - they have the same RAM, just the 9900k has 2 sticks in dual channel, 7960x has 4 sticks in quad channel, same graphics cards (9900k has 1, 7960x has 2 - but some games I play only use 1).

 

short version is I wouldn't worry about it. Just get dual and be happy.

I'm totally happy! I love my board for the nice PCIe advantages too, for example, the 2 16x Slots aren't shared. I was just curious how it was laid out and why.

2 hours ago, airdeano said:

it really doesn't rest on the motherboard manufacturer of the RAM specs, but the CPU and their instructions capabilities.

whether dual channel can function in a performance sector, the topology of the motherboard manufacturer can affect this.

So since my board is "dual channel" does that mean it's Daisy Chained because of not only the color coding but also the way A DIMM and *A DIMM with the " * " symbol?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

I am kinda surprised that this being an "X" board it's not quad considering the video Linus did about what the different letters and numbers mean.

Well, AMD uses X differently from Intel. They should have used a different letter for simplicity though.

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So dual channel is daisy chain? Givin the video information I watched?

Edit: Does that also mean my motherboard is daisy chain Dual channel?

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

So dual channel is daisy chain? Givin the video information I watched?

No, Dual Channel means 2 independant Memory Channels.

Back in the day you'd call that 128bit Memory interface, while Single Channel is only 64bit.

 

Because its independant, you can put anything inside and don't have to put the 2x the same in each socket.


For example, back in the day, the newer boards had "quad channel" Interface wich required 4 of the same memory Sticks.

In that case it was 30pin SIMMs with just 8bit 

 

9 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

Edit: Does that also mean my motherboard is daisy chain Dual channel?

There is no daisy chain here, its in parallel. Daisy Chain is something more seen in the RAMBUS Serial bus. That's the only "Daisy Chain" Example I have for the Memory Bus.

 

 You just have two Sticks in the bus, both connected in Parallel. And that causes Problems because of the high frequencys, the interferences that causes (the PCBs are actually antennas) and the driving power needed to drive them...

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2019 at 2:01 PM, Stefan Payne said:

No, Dual Channel means 2 independant Memory Channels.

Back in the day you'd call that 128bit Memory interface, while Single Channel is only 64bit.

 

Because its independant, you can put anything inside and don't have to put the 2x the same in each socket.


For example, back in the day, the newer boards had "quad channel" Interface wich required 4 of the same memory Sticks.

In that case it was 30pin SIMMs with just 8bit 

 

There is no daisy chain here, its in parallel. Daisy Chain is something more seen in the RAMBUS Serial bus. That's the only "Daisy Chain" Example I have for the Memory Bus.

 

 You just have two Sticks in the bus, both connected in Parallel. And that causes Problems because of the high frequencys, the interferences that causes (the PCBs are actually antennas) and the driving power needed to drive them...

So even though DOCP is enabled and running around the same speed as before, it's harder to overclock the ram further because of the Parallel? 

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2Ghz Pinnacle Ridge | Asus Prime X570-Pro | Corsair Vengeances RGB PRO 64GB 3200Mhz | EVGA Nvidia Geforce 3060 XC | EVGA G2 SuperNova 750 Watt PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, _Grid21 said:

So even though DOCP is enabled and running around the same speed as before, it's harder to overclock the ram further because of the Parallel? 

Because of the higher load and the interferences caused by the second stick on the bus.

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×