Amd and Intel president on the wann show

[Ryanwake]

1 minute ago, lewdicrous said:

We answered the poll and added to it/explained in a pos

did everyone say they didn't want it because they didn't think it was going to happen or does everyone just not want to see this happen?

 

I mean it would be interesting and very entertaining, plus I have a dozen questions I'd like to ask them, everything from why they did what they did since Ryzen, what is Intel going to do if ryzen release is a 16 core processor at gigahertz in the consumer Line of CPUs.

 

If the progression of computer power over time is slowing then what cinebench scores do you think you could achieve in the next five generations of CPUs or 10 generations.

 

I mean come on you want to know the answer to these questions don't you?

 

 

[Guest]

No love for Gregory M. Bryant general manager

[Drak3]

16 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

am I the only one interested in them justifying their decisions?

Yes, because:

• We know that it won't happen.
• We know that at the end of the day, we won't get anything substancial from it.
• The CEO/President of the company doesn't make all that many decisions that we'd be interested in. That would fall between the board of directors and the heads of each department/division/child company.

[Ryanwake]

17 minutes ago, lewdicrous said:

Because we're realistic?

I don't get it you don't want something to happen because you don't think it's possible?

 

So you're saying you'd be happy with it if Linus nag them until they paid someone else to do it?

[Ryanwake]

2 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

We know that at the end of the day, we won't get anything substancial from it.

We could get substantial information on old Topic, and what about General speculation of the future?

 

Problems with 7 nanometers

 

Both Intel and AMD have been dealing with this for years and it looks like they both already solved it

[Drak3]

Just now, Ryanwake said:

General speculation of the future?

We have WCCFTech for that.

 

1 minute ago, Ryanwake said:

We could get substantial information on old Topic

That'd be meaningless to 99% of us, and again, those people are not likely to know.

 

2 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

Problems with 7 nanometers

That's a question for the engineers.

[lewdicrous]

2 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

did everyone say they didn't want it because they didn't think it was going to happen or does everyone just not want to see this happen?

Hence why I said what I said; " We answered the poll and added to it/explained in a post"

3 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

I mean it would be interesting and very entertaining, plus I have a dozen questions I'd like to ask them, everything from why they did what they did since Ryzen, what is Intel going to do if ryzen release is a 16 core processor at gigahertz in the consumer Line of CPUs.

 

If the progression of computer power over time is slowing then what cinebench scores do you think you could achieve in the next five generations of CPUs or 10 generations.

I wouldn't be surprised if they inflated their numbers instead of giving actual information just to satisfy their shareholders.

5 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

I mean come on you want to know the answer to these questions don't you?

Just cause they're the CEO of a company doesn't mean they hold all the answers.

3 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

I don't get it you don't want something to happen because you don't think it's possible?

I don't get my hopes up about things that have a very low chance of happening.

4 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

So you're saying you'd be happy with it if Linus nag them until they paid someone else to do it?

They don't have to nag, they can just ask.

[Ryanwake]

5 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

Yes, because:

• We know that it won't happen.
• We know that at the end of the day, we won't get anything substancial from it.
• The CEO/President of the company doesn't make all that many decisions that we'd be interested in. That would fall between the board of directors and the heads of each department/division/child company.

That's a depressing outlook, even if we don't get anything substantial it will be entertaining.

 

On top of that communicating with there consumers will only help the brand.

 

I think it is realistic

[lewdicrous]

Just now, Drak3 said:

We have WCCFTech for that.

[Drak3]

Just now, Ryanwake said:

even if we don't get anything substantial it will be entertaining.

It'd be like watching politicians who know nothing about the outcomes of the policy they stand for, but instead of Bernie Sanders talking about socialism, it's Lisa Su talking about the Ryzen architecture.

 

2 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

On top of that communicating with there consumers will only help the brand.

Not really, again, they have nothing to say that is worth listening to, that they haven't said at events like CES.

[Ryanwake]

3 minutes ago, lewdicrous said:

Hence why I said what I said; " We answered the poll and added to it/explained in a post"

I wouldn't be surprised if they inflated their numbers instead of giving actual information just to satisfy their shareholders.

Just cause they're the CEO of a company doesn't mean they hold all the answers.

I don't get my hopes up about things that have a very low chance of happening.

They don't have to nag, they can just ask.

I didn't ask u to get your hopes up, I don't know why you are attacking an idea that probably wouldn't happen anyway.

[lewdicrous]

1 minute ago, Ryanwake said:

I didn't ask u to get your hopes up, I don't know why you are attacking an idea that probably wouldn't happen anyway.

You said:

Quote

Explain your choice

We are not attacking the idea, we're explaining why we chose what we chose.

[Ryanwake]

1 minute ago, Drak3 said:

It'd be like watching politicians who know nothing about the outcomes of the policy they stand for, but instead of Bernie Sanders talking about socialism, it's Lisa Su talking about the Ryzen architecture.

 

Not really, again, they have nothing to say that is worth listening to, that they haven't said at events like CES.

Do u don't want healthy communication between the companies making computers, that's like handing over your future to people who don't understand your needs.

 

That's giving the more power they could turn into apple and sense u saip politics a good reputation would be Trump/ Ajit pie.

 

Do u want them making your computers?

[Ryanwake]

1 minute ago, lewdicrous said:

You said:

We are not attacking the idea, we're explaining why we chose what we chose.

You explained your chioce 15 minutes ago now we're arguing

[lewdicrous]

Just now, Ryanwake said:

You explained your chioce 15 minutes ago now we're arguing

Yes, I explained my choice, but then you asked me more questions, so I answered them.. I'm answering your questions, not arguing with you.

[Ryanwake]

5 minutes ago, lewdicrous said:

Yes, I explained my choice, but then you asked me more questions, so I answered them.. I'm answering your questions, not arguing with you.

Lmgtfu

Argument

 

     an exchange of diverging or opposite views, "typically" a heated or angry one.

[lewdicrous]

Just now, Ryanwake said:

Lmgtfu

Argument

 

     an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.

Ok buddy.

[Guest]

Still no love for Gregory M. Bryant general manager

[Drak3]

13 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

Do u don't want healthy communication between the companies making computers,

We have that.

[Ryanwake]

6 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

We have that.

What I was referring to was what Intel did in a world before Ryzen.

 

We already know that AMD cares more about money than they do there own consumers, I mean just look at Vega it's crazy expensive and designed for cryptocurrency first and gaming second.

 

Other than crypto server chips are there main concern, in quarter two we are going to see how much they improve theedripper 4x the amount is the minimum we could see.

[Canada EH]

On 1/15/2019 at 9:09 AM, Ryanwake said:

Amd and Intel president on the wann show

The prez of those 2 co's do not have the time, nor do they want to come on the WAN show for Linus.

[Ryanwake]

23 minutes ago, Canada EH said:

The prez of those 2 co's do not have the time, nor do they want to come on the WAN show for Linus.

I asked who u wanted but if they can't show, they could pay an engineer or something.

 

Plus it the ceo's think it's a good product move they could make time, or schedule it in the summer

[Canada EH]

Just now, Ryanwake said:

I asked who u wanted but if they can't show, they could pay an engineer or something.

  

Plus it the ceo's think it's a good product move they could make time, or schedule it in the summer

Naaaa it would never happen unless they have complete control over everything, then there is a slight chance.

[Ryanwake]

Just now, Canada EH said:

Naaaa it would never happen unless they have complete control over everything, then there is a slight chance.

I bet Linus and Luke would fly to the on the side of the world pay for their plane tickets and hotel for a chance at an hour interview

[Canada EH]

5 minutes ago, Ryanwake said:

I bet Linus and Luke would fly to the on the side of the world pay for their plane tickets and hotel for a chance at an hour interview

Yes, they probably would not hesitate, but there would have to be strict rules in place for no silly facial expressions for the thumbnail picture for the video, and a good title for the video. That is why its highly unlikely the CEO's would ever do it because Linus' stock is not up to snuff for their standards.