Jump to content

LeapFrogMasterRace

Member
  • Posts

    1,811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from jagdtigger in White House urges developers to avoid C and C++, use 'memory-safe' programming languages   
    Hey hey hey chill with the Java hate it is python that deserves the fire. 
  2. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from BiG StroOnZ in White House urges developers to avoid C and C++, use 'memory-safe' programming languages   
    Hey hey hey chill with the Java hate it is python that deserves the fire. 
  3. Informative
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from NobleGamer in internet on wifi slow, but using a VPN or cable makes it fast again   
    Are you doing things on the laptop that you are not doing on other devices? 
  4. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Brando212 in I’ve gotta get out of this contract   
    Can we get an update on the moss?
  5. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from GoStormPlays in I’ve gotta get out of this contract   
    Can we get an update on the moss?
  6. Informative
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Iggzy in my pc won’t boot ( windows logo freeze )   
    Been seeing this kind of a lot lately. I think it has something to do with update to windows 11 screen that pops up after every update.
     
    The fix for me has been to crate a windows 10 installation media on a USB. Boot to it then you can go to repair the OS. You don't need to actually reinstall windows or delete your data. 
  7. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Cyberspirit in Trying 9 "AI" Tech Products at CES 2024   
    Ai monitor this Ai bed that. Where is my damn Ai cat girl holographic waifu in a box. You let me down CES! 
  8. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from CoolHotdog76 in Possible ssd or malware issue, not sure.   
    Open task manager when it is running slow and see if there are any processes using a lot of CPU or RAM or disk. If it is a rogue program you should be able to see it. Try updating your motherboard chipset drivers too early AM4 chipset versions are very unreliable. 
     
     
     
  9. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Lurick in Trying 9 "AI" Tech Products at CES 2024   
    Ai monitor this Ai bed that. Where is my damn Ai cat girl holographic waifu in a box. You let me down CES! 
  10. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Anfros in AMD Booth at CES 2024   
    I want to see someone test one of these APUs with a DX12 multi GPU compatible game like ashes of singularity to see how much fps it can add to a dedicated GPU. 
  11. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace reacted to Will7 in Windows 10 problem after recent update   
    Display scaling 125%, cables are good too (tested them with another monitor/pc), I did ddu and reinstall my gpu drivers
    I just completely reinstall windows and it fixed it, so def the windows update was the issue.
  12. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Octagoncow in CNET deletes thousands of old articles for better SEO   
    Oh cnet is still around? Thats neat! 
  13. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from ItTakes2ToMango in Project Farm's LTT Stubby Screwdriver Review   
    That sata one looks like a total steal 
  14. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from SorryBella in Making sure my next build doesn't immediately incinerate itself (Ryzen 7000 + ASUS MOBO)   
    If you did not know intel 14th gen is right around the corner for October. I know no one wants to wait to build their PC but it is still worth mentioning. From the looks of it intel 14th gen will be a refresh of 13th but they are upping the core count at least on the i7. As far as your current builds. This is my personal note which others may disagree with: New Ryzen sockets are a bit sketchy as it often takes AMD a tad longer to get stable than Intel and you stated you want something for a long time if that is the case I will lead to Intel 14th gen (if it launches well). This leads a bit in to the explosive issue you mentioned haha. Yes BIOS fixes are a thing now but there seems to be other issues with EXPO.
     
    I highly doubt the CPU will fry in the time it takes to update the bios but if you get a board that allows bios flashing without a CPU to eliminate the risk. 
     
     
  15. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Techstorm970 in CNET deletes thousands of old articles for better SEO   
    Oh cnet is still around? Thats neat! 
  16. Informative
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from nashi_7 in Making sure my next build doesn't immediately incinerate itself (Ryzen 7000 + ASUS MOBO)   
    If you did not know intel 14th gen is right around the corner for October. I know no one wants to wait to build their PC but it is still worth mentioning. From the looks of it intel 14th gen will be a refresh of 13th but they are upping the core count at least on the i7. As far as your current builds. This is my personal note which others may disagree with: New Ryzen sockets are a bit sketchy as it often takes AMD a tad longer to get stable than Intel and you stated you want something for a long time if that is the case I will lead to Intel 14th gen (if it launches well). This leads a bit in to the explosive issue you mentioned haha. Yes BIOS fixes are a thing now but there seems to be other issues with EXPO.
     
    I highly doubt the CPU will fry in the time it takes to update the bios but if you get a board that allows bios flashing without a CPU to eliminate the risk. 
     
     
  17. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace reacted to Senzelian in Dywue Technology stole LMG video for advertisement (Ragnok 2 Mouse, ShortCircuit, David)   
    Why would this be a troll post? What OP claims is true.
  18. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Boojakascha in Dywue Technology stole LMG video for advertisement (Ragnok 2 Mouse, ShortCircuit, David)   
    Thanks I will have the team make a tweet about this asap
  19. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace reacted to LMGcommunity in Dywue Technology stole LMG video for advertisement (Ragnok 2 Mouse, ShortCircuit, David)   
    I've passed this along. Thanks for posting this here.
  20. Funny
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from WolframaticAlpha in CNET deletes thousands of old articles for better SEO   
    Oh cnet is still around? Thats neat! 
  21. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from cjbtlr in Gamers Nexus alleges LMG has insufficient ethics and integrity   
    Nothing Steve said was new we just ignored it but the response Linus made is just offensive what does he take us for?
     
    "Rome wasn't built in a day" sorry but how long has LTT been benchmarking GPUs, like over a decade now? The whole new team thing is not a proper excuse. A 13 year old can extract benchmark data and put it in excel to make graphs (I know because I have done it with fraps as a wee lad, plenty of DX12 open source tools today too) and Linus practically head hunted his staff. Now that GN threw it back to back in 1 video I can't fathom how common the issues are. The stuff gamers nexus pointed out is legit and it's part of the reason we rely on other sources for reviews (yeah obviously) but it seems to be a especially reoccurring issue with LTT benchmarks. 
     
    My comment on this is I have seen flaws and low testing standards from day one everything GN mentioned was basically in the back of my mind for a decade and many others I am sure.   I have been watching LTT/NCIX actively for ~9+ years now and was always shocked how LTT was always late to the game despite them then and now being one of the biggest. For example 1% lows and .1% lows included in graphs took almost a decade to finally be included vs other smaller channels! Just stating that to further say I've not been impressed with testing details and that GN is not dropping any bombshells. Seriously it seems like every single damn video has a comment under it correcting some obvious mistake which should be just embarrassing to LMG.
     
    For starters every single comment that was made by Steve should be addressed. No sugar coating or excuses or finger pointing if LTT has to flat out take a few Ls so be it. After all many of us already knew the things Steve mentioned we just don't care because as enthusiasts we already know what articles to read and to watch 3 minimum other channels and the noobs obviously don't know enough to call it out.
     
    Oh and I literally have been unsubbed from GN for like 6 years at this point as I started finding Steve annoying a while ago so it's not like I'm even one of his fanboys. 
     
     
     
  22. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from arcanition in Gamers Nexus alleges LMG has insufficient ethics and integrity   
    Nothing Steve said was new we just ignored it but the response Linus made is just offensive what does he take us for?
     
    "Rome wasn't built in a day" sorry but how long has LTT been benchmarking GPUs, like over a decade now? The whole new team thing is not a proper excuse. A 13 year old can extract benchmark data and put it in excel to make graphs (I know because I have done it with fraps as a wee lad, plenty of DX12 open source tools today too) and Linus practically head hunted his staff. Now that GN threw it back to back in 1 video I can't fathom how common the issues are. The stuff gamers nexus pointed out is legit and it's part of the reason we rely on other sources for reviews (yeah obviously) but it seems to be a especially reoccurring issue with LTT benchmarks. 
     
    My comment on this is I have seen flaws and low testing standards from day one everything GN mentioned was basically in the back of my mind for a decade and many others I am sure.   I have been watching LTT/NCIX actively for ~9+ years now and was always shocked how LTT was always late to the game despite them then and now being one of the biggest. For example 1% lows and .1% lows included in graphs took almost a decade to finally be included vs other smaller channels! Just stating that to further say I've not been impressed with testing details and that GN is not dropping any bombshells. Seriously it seems like every single damn video has a comment under it correcting some obvious mistake which should be just embarrassing to LMG.
     
    For starters every single comment that was made by Steve should be addressed. No sugar coating or excuses or finger pointing if LTT has to flat out take a few Ls so be it. After all many of us already knew the things Steve mentioned we just don't care because as enthusiasts we already know what articles to read and to watch 3 minimum other channels and the noobs obviously don't know enough to call it out.
     
    Oh and I literally have been unsubbed from GN for like 6 years at this point as I started finding Steve annoying a while ago so it's not like I'm even one of his fanboys. 
     
     
     
  23. Like
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from OneGuy83 in Gamers Nexus alleges LMG has insufficient ethics and integrity   
    Nothing Steve said was new we just ignored it but the response Linus made is just offensive what does he take us for?
     
    "Rome wasn't built in a day" sorry but how long has LTT been benchmarking GPUs, like over a decade now? The whole new team thing is not a proper excuse. A 13 year old can extract benchmark data and put it in excel to make graphs (I know because I have done it with fraps as a wee lad, plenty of DX12 open source tools today too) and Linus practically head hunted his staff. Now that GN threw it back to back in 1 video I can't fathom how common the issues are. The stuff gamers nexus pointed out is legit and it's part of the reason we rely on other sources for reviews (yeah obviously) but it seems to be a especially reoccurring issue with LTT benchmarks. 
     
    My comment on this is I have seen flaws and low testing standards from day one everything GN mentioned was basically in the back of my mind for a decade and many others I am sure.   I have been watching LTT/NCIX actively for ~9+ years now and was always shocked how LTT was always late to the game despite them then and now being one of the biggest. For example 1% lows and .1% lows included in graphs took almost a decade to finally be included vs other smaller channels! Just stating that to further say I've not been impressed with testing details and that GN is not dropping any bombshells. Seriously it seems like every single damn video has a comment under it correcting some obvious mistake which should be just embarrassing to LMG.
     
    For starters every single comment that was made by Steve should be addressed. No sugar coating or excuses or finger pointing if LTT has to flat out take a few Ls so be it. After all many of us already knew the things Steve mentioned we just don't care because as enthusiasts we already know what articles to read and to watch 3 minimum other channels and the noobs obviously don't know enough to call it out.
     
    Oh and I literally have been unsubbed from GN for like 6 years at this point as I started finding Steve annoying a while ago so it's not like I'm even one of his fanboys. 
     
     
     
  24. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from Lurking in Gamers Nexus alleges LMG has insufficient ethics and integrity   
    Nothing Steve said was new we just ignored it but the response Linus made is just offensive what does he take us for?
     
    "Rome wasn't built in a day" sorry but how long has LTT been benchmarking GPUs, like over a decade now? The whole new team thing is not a proper excuse. A 13 year old can extract benchmark data and put it in excel to make graphs (I know because I have done it with fraps as a wee lad, plenty of DX12 open source tools today too) and Linus practically head hunted his staff. Now that GN threw it back to back in 1 video I can't fathom how common the issues are. The stuff gamers nexus pointed out is legit and it's part of the reason we rely on other sources for reviews (yeah obviously) but it seems to be a especially reoccurring issue with LTT benchmarks. 
     
    My comment on this is I have seen flaws and low testing standards from day one everything GN mentioned was basically in the back of my mind for a decade and many others I am sure.   I have been watching LTT/NCIX actively for ~9+ years now and was always shocked how LTT was always late to the game despite them then and now being one of the biggest. For example 1% lows and .1% lows included in graphs took almost a decade to finally be included vs other smaller channels! Just stating that to further say I've not been impressed with testing details and that GN is not dropping any bombshells. Seriously it seems like every single damn video has a comment under it correcting some obvious mistake which should be just embarrassing to LMG.
     
    For starters every single comment that was made by Steve should be addressed. No sugar coating or excuses or finger pointing if LTT has to flat out take a few Ls so be it. After all many of us already knew the things Steve mentioned we just don't care because as enthusiasts we already know what articles to read and to watch 3 minimum other channels and the noobs obviously don't know enough to call it out.
     
    Oh and I literally have been unsubbed from GN for like 6 years at this point as I started finding Steve annoying a while ago so it's not like I'm even one of his fanboys. 
     
     
     
  25. Agree
    LeapFrogMasterRace got a reaction from LittleGreenMan in Gamers Nexus alleges LMG has insufficient ethics and integrity   
    Nothing Steve said was new we just ignored it but the response Linus made is just offensive what does he take us for?
     
    "Rome wasn't built in a day" sorry but how long has LTT been benchmarking GPUs, like over a decade now? The whole new team thing is not a proper excuse. A 13 year old can extract benchmark data and put it in excel to make graphs (I know because I have done it with fraps as a wee lad, plenty of DX12 open source tools today too) and Linus practically head hunted his staff. Now that GN threw it back to back in 1 video I can't fathom how common the issues are. The stuff gamers nexus pointed out is legit and it's part of the reason we rely on other sources for reviews (yeah obviously) but it seems to be a especially reoccurring issue with LTT benchmarks. 
     
    My comment on this is I have seen flaws and low testing standards from day one everything GN mentioned was basically in the back of my mind for a decade and many others I am sure.   I have been watching LTT/NCIX actively for ~9+ years now and was always shocked how LTT was always late to the game despite them then and now being one of the biggest. For example 1% lows and .1% lows included in graphs took almost a decade to finally be included vs other smaller channels! Just stating that to further say I've not been impressed with testing details and that GN is not dropping any bombshells. Seriously it seems like every single damn video has a comment under it correcting some obvious mistake which should be just embarrassing to LMG.
     
    For starters every single comment that was made by Steve should be addressed. No sugar coating or excuses or finger pointing if LTT has to flat out take a few Ls so be it. After all many of us already knew the things Steve mentioned we just don't care because as enthusiasts we already know what articles to read and to watch 3 minimum other channels and the noobs obviously don't know enough to call it out.
     
    Oh and I literally have been unsubbed from GN for like 6 years at this point as I started finding Steve annoying a while ago so it's not like I'm even one of his fanboys. 
     
     
     
×