Jump to content

bad video quality

mr.hughmungus

i've had this problem since i upgraded my monitor to the benq xl2411p, using the dual port cable, my youtube videos look like this https://pasteboard.co/HKeA325.jpg

playing games it's fine but videos look terrible, could it be the dual port cable? or some setting i need to adjust?

 

cpu 4690k

gpu gtx 1070ti

ram 8GB (2x2Gb + 1x4Gb)

motherboard h97m-e

psu 750W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

the cable or the monitor having problems, because that's what we can see from a screenshot.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks fine to me

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jurrunio said:

the cable or the monitor having problems, because that's what we can see from a screenshot.

this is a print screen, so it's not the monitor's fault right? so i need to buy a new dual port cable preferebly high quality one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, mr.hughmungus said:

this is a print screen, so it's not the monitor's fault right? so i need to buy a new dual port cable preferebly high quality one?

if you took a screenshot and the image turns out fine, that means it's the monitor's fault probably. Do you mean display port cable? Or dual link DVI?

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fasauceome said:

if you took a screenshot and the image turns out fine, that means it's the monitor's fault probably. Do you mean display port cable? Or dual link DVI?

yes i mean displayport, can you not see the pixels in the image? because i just looked in my phone so it's not the monitor's fault.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure your output is set to Full RGB or YCbCr 4:4:4  and not on YCbcr 4:2:0

It's DisplayPort not dual port .... hopefully that's what you're using.

 

Maybe try to set refresh rate to 120Hz and see if you still get image that's not good. In some situations, going to 144 Hz makes the card switch to the lower YCbCr 4:2:0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you take a screenshot of what's on the monitor, that shows us the direct image that the graphics card has just rendered and pasted on your screen. You need to take a picture of the screen with a camera for us to see any imperfections.

USEFUL LINKS:

PSU Tier List F@H stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mr.hughmungus said:

yes i mean displayport, can you not see the pixels in the image? because i just looked in my phone so it's not the monitor's fault.

 

The text is really crisp and the objects like the loading bar are very well defined, if you mean the black artifacts that's normal

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 10 and Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

How many watts do I needATX 3.0 & PCIe 5.0 spec, PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mr.hughmungus said:

this is a print screen, so it's not the monitor's fault right? so i need to buy a new dual port cable preferebly high quality one?

why would we know? Print Screen only captures what the PC outputs, not what the monitor shows. 

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, fasauceome said:

The text is really crisp and the objects like the loading bar are very well defined, if you mean the black artifacts that's normal

the pixels in the black background are very bad, another image https://www.imageupload.co.uk/image/TPzG

the image quality is terrible especially on dark colors, it's really wierd.

 

compare it to the actual video colors 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude, when you use Print Screen , you get a picture of what the video card outputs, not what the monitor is displaying. So you can keep giving us screenshots and they would look good to us.

 

You would have to take an actual photo with your phone or a digital camera of the image on the screen, for us to see that bad image quality.

 

I already suggested your video card may output in YCbCr 4:2:0 which could lower quality , you never answered confirming or denying... check that first

 

And then , it's a monitor with a TN panel , which means that if you look at the image from the sides or from above the panel , basically if the panel is not straight in front of your eyes, the colors on the screen will shift a bit.

Even worse, it's a TN monitor aimed for gaming, for high refresh rate , not for good color reproduction.

The original XL2411 used a panel from AU Optronics and was designed to do 6bit + FRC , not 8 bit. That means the panel can only display around 260k colors, not 16 million, but there's circuitry inside which quickly flips between a bunch of those colors tricking your eyes to think one color is actually darker or brighter basically different... so in the end it makes it possible to show up to let's say 12-15 million colors... though how accurate colors they are I don't know.

Your s is XL2411P - i don't know if the tech is still 6bit + FRC or not ... it probably is.

 

If you mean the problem is ugly gradients... that can be caused by this 6bit + FRC deal...this faking of colors doesn't always work well with gradients and fade ins , fade outs etc

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mariushm said:

Dude, when you use Print Screen , you get a picture of what the video card outputs, not what the monitor is displaying. So you can keep giving us screenshots and they would look good to us.

 

You would have to take an actual photo with your phone or a digital camera of the image on the screen, for us to see that bad image quality.

 

I already suggested your video card may output in YCbCr 4:2:0 which could lower quality , you never answered confirming or denying... check that first

 

And then , it's a monitor with a TN panel , which means that if you look at the image from the sides or from above the panel , basically if the panel is not straight in front of your eyes, the colors on the screen will shift a bit.

Even worse, it's a TN monitor aimed for gaming, for high refresh rate , not for good color reproduction.

The original XL2411 used a panel from AU Optronics and was designed to do 6bit + FRC , not 8 bit. That means the panel can only display around 260k colors, not 16 million, but there's circuitry inside which turns pixels on and off tricking your eyes to think one color is actually darker or brighter... so in the end it makes it possible to show up to let's say 12-15 million colors... though how accurate colors they are I don't know.

Your s is XL2411P - i don't know if the tech is still 6bit + FRC or not ... it probably is.

 

If you mean the problem is ugly gradients... that can be caused by this 6bit + FRC deal...this faking of colors doesn't always work well with gradients and fade ins , fade outs etc

 

 

alright, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×