People are a little like spoilt brats but they use their own money, but put expectations way too high.

[aezakmi]

6 hours ago, IronMidHeaven said:

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-480-vs-AMD-HD-6970/3157vsm7712

 

I am sure we can add some memes for the toasting

 

HD 6K OC poorly, Fermi OC'd great and had big performance gains.

gpu.memebenchmark.com

[Tristerin]

Godking Linus has spoken - terribad buy.

[Suika]

1 hour ago, pas008 said:

do you realize 780ti wasnt relased six months after 780 and titan was first

6xx series had no ti or titan

but now naming tiers matter?

Naming tier matters in the sense that the 2080 Ti likely isn't the last Turing product, there's a good possibility that a Titan is looming on the horizons.

 

That is why naming tier matters here, the suspicion that Titan hasn't been shifted out of NVIDIA's "flagship but not quite flagship because 'it's not for consumers'" spot yet.

1 hour ago, pas008 said:

but wait there is also new features to improve

I will count the number of features that if I were to drop an RTX 2080 in my system, I can use them right now, at this moment:

 

0

 

You're hyping up features that simply don't exist yet and may very well be disappointing or not worth it, just like Turing in its current condition. The NVENC upgrade is the only notable one so far and even then, it's only an upgrade, as a feature it's existed for awhile and it's just not a feature that's used as often as raw performance.

[pas008]

51 minutes ago, Suika said:

Naming tier matters in the sense that the 2080 Ti likely isn't the last Turing product, there's a good possibility that a Titan is looming on the horizons.

 

That is why naming tier matters here, the suspicion that Titan hasn't been shifted out of NVIDIA's "flagship but not quite flagship because 'it's not for consumers'" spot yet.

I will count the number of features that if I were to drop an RTX 2080 in my system, I can use them right now, at this moment:

 

0

 

You're hyping up features that simply don't exist yet and may very well be disappointing or not worth it, just like Turing in its current condition. The NVENC upgrade is the only notable one so far and even then, it's only an upgrade, as a feature it's existed for awhile and it's just not a feature that's used as often as raw performance.

hdr/gsync boost video showed it lol

and rt is coming, otherwise they would have huge lawsuit lol

I think you dont understand how long many(developers and yes gamers) have been sitting around waiting for it in real time

and if you havent been living under a rock you would know many products are released with features and performance to be coming later, from phones/stereos/tvs/cars/operation systems/games/software/ etc

 

tiers dont matter with its naming

dealing with completely different gen

if you saying they do then 680 should been compared to titan

670 to 780ti, 660ti to 780 660 to 770

tiers dont matter hence random ti counter competition products and what can be produced by chip with or without cut downs also

where was 1060ti or 970ti or 1050ti boost or 960ti or 950ti?

 

customers dont get to make the naming scheme or product models

their cards have never had consistent naming on tiers random ti cards every gen almost

 

 

[Majinhoju]

I'm fine with the performance increase, but not fine with the price increase.